Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 1104–1112 | Cite as

Acid-tolerant plant species screened for rehabilitating acid mine drainage sites

Soils, Sec 2 • Global Change, Environ Risk Assess, Sustainable Land Use • Research Article

Abstract

Purpose

Large areas of land have been impacted by acidic mine drainage. These sites could potentially be re-vegetated for growing energy plants. Conventional phytoremediation method may fail because the pH of some mine drainage and contaminated soils can reach 2.0. Thus, it is necessary to screen acid-tolerant plants as pioneers to rehabilitate those severely acidified areas.

Materials and methods

In the first phase of this study, seven levels of low pH media were used to estimate the acid-tolerant ranges of three plant species for 1 month. In the second phase, 50 commonly cultured plant species from 17 families, native in Guangdong Province of China or introduced from Australia, were evaluated for acid tolerance at three pH levels which were chosen based on results in the first phase.

Results and discussion

We found that Acacia auriculiformis could survive and nodulate at pH ≥2.0, Acacia confusa and Melaleuca armillaris could survive at pH ≥2.5 but A. confusa nodulate at pH >3.5. In the second phase, 12 plant species, in addition to A. auriculiformis, can survive in pH 2.0 media.

Conclusions

No family or genus commonality in acid tolerance was found. Two of these tolerant species, i.e., A. auriculiformis and Jatropha carcas, could potentially be planted as an economically and ecologically viable option for acid mine remediation due to their potential function as biofuel feedstock.

Keywords

Acacia auriculiformis Acid mine drainage site Bioenergy plant Jatropha carcas Phytoremediation Strong acid tolerant 

References

  1. Abad MJ, Ansuategui M, Bermejo P (2007) Active antifungal substances from natural sources. Arkivoc 2007:116–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Achten WMJ, Nielsen LR, Aerts R, Lengkeek AG, Kjær ED, Trabucco A, Hansen JK, Maes WH, Graudal L, Akinnifesi FK, Muys B (2010) Towards domestication of Jatropha curcas. Biofuels 1:91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey-Serres J, Colmer TD (2014) Plant tolerance of flooding stress—recent advances. Plant Cell Environ 37:2211–2215Google Scholar
  4. Becker K, Wulfmeyer V, Berger T, Gebel J, Münch W (2013) Carbon farming in hot, dry coastal areas: an option for climate change mitigation. Earth Syst Dyn 4:237–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brads HA (1997) Restoration of mined lands—using natural processes. Ecol Eng 8:255–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carels N (2009) Jatropha curcas: a review. Adv Bot Res 50:39–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen J, Wang WH, Liu TW, Wu FH, Zheng HL (2013) Photosynthetic and antioxidant responses of Liquidambar formosana and Schima superba seedlings to sulfuric-rich and nitric-rich simulated acid rain. Plant Physiol Biochem 64:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng Y, Long M (2007) A cytosolic NADP-malic enzyme gene from rice (Oryza sativa L.) confers salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Biotechnol Lett 29(7):1129–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheung KC, Wong JPK, Zhang ZQ, Wong JWC, Wong MH (2000) Revegetation of lagoon ash using the legume species Acacia auriculiformis and Leucaena leucocephala. Environ Pollut 109:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dai ZM, Wang YN, Muhammad N, Yu XS, Xiao KC, Meng J, Liu XM, Xu JM, Brookes PC (2014) The effects and mechanisms of soil acidity changes, following incorporation of biochars in three soils differing in initial pH. Soil Sci Soc Am J 78:1606–1614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dhir B, Srivastava S (2013) Heavy metal tolerance in metal hyperaccumulator plant, Salvinia natans. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 90:720–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Díaz-López L, Gimeno V, Lidón V, Simón I, Martínez V, García-Sánchez F (2012) The tolerance of Jatropha curcas seedlings to NaCl: an ecophysiological analysis. Plant Physiol Biochem 54:34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evangelou MWH, Ebel M, Schaeffer A (2007) Chelate assisted phytoextraction of heavy metals from soil. Effect, mechanism, toxicity, and fate of chelating agents. Chemosphere 68:989–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fan KC, Hsi HC, Chen CW, Lee HL, Hseu ZY (2011) Cadmium accumulation and tolerance of mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla) seedlings for phytoextraction applications. J Environ Manag 92:2818–2822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foy CD, Sadeghi AM, Ritchie Jerry C, Krizek DT, Davis JR, Doral KW (1999) Aluminum toxicity and high bulk density: role in limiting shoot and root growth of selected aluminum indicator plants and eastern gamagrass in an acid soil. J Plant Nutr 22:1551–1566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fu ZY, Zhang ZB, Liu ZH, Hu XJ, Xu P (2011) The effects of abiotic stresses on the NADP-dependent malic enzyme in the leaves of the hexaploid wheat. Biol Plant 55:196–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fu JY, Jiang D, Huang YH, Zhuang DF, Ji W (2014) Evaluating the marginal land resources suitable for developing bioenergy in Asia. Adv Meteorol. doi:10.1155/2014/238945 Google Scholar
  18. Grover A, Kumari M, Singh S, Rathode SS, Gupta SM, Pandey P, Gilotra S, Kumar D, Arif M, Ahmed Z (2014) Analysis of Jatropha curcas transcriptome for oil enhancement and genic markers. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 20:139–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guinto DF, Xu ZH, House APN, Saffigna PG (2000) Assessment of N2 fixation by understorey acacias in recurrently burnt eucalypt forests of subtropical Australia using 15N isotope dilution techniques. Can J For Res 30:112–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guo JH, Liu XJ, Zhang Y, Shen JL, Han WX, Zhang WF, Christie P, Goulding KWT, Vitousek PM, Zhang FS (2010) Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science 327:1008–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hai PH, Hannrup B, Harwood C, Jansson G, Ban DV (2010) Wood stiffness and strength as selection traits for sawn timber in Acacia auriculiformis. Can J For Res 40:322–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hosseini Bai S, Sun FF, Xu ZH, Blumfield TJ, Chen CR, Wild C (2012) Appraisal of 15N enrichment and 15N natural abundance methods for estimating N2 fixation by understorey Acacia leiocalyx and Acacia disparrima in a native forest of subtropical Australia. J Soils Sediments 12:653–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hosseini Bai S, Sun FF, Xu ZH, Blumfield TJ (2013) Ecophysiological status of different growth stage of understorey Acacia leiocalyx and Acacia disparrima in an Australian dry sclerophyll forest subjected to prescribed burning. J Soils Sediments 13:1378–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones DL, Darrah PR (1995) Influx and efflux of organic acids across the soil-root interface of Zea mays L. and its implications in rhizosphere C flow. Plant Soil 173:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koricheva J, Roy S, Vranjic JA, Haukioja E, Hughes PR, Hanninen O (1997) Antioxidant responses to simulated acid rain and heavy metal deposition in birch seedlings. Environ Pollut 95:249–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumar GRK, Eswaran N, Johnson TS (2011) Isolation of high-quality RNA from various tissues of Jatropha curcas for downstream applications. Anal Biochem 413:63–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Laporte MM, Shen B, Tarczynski MC (2002) Engineering for drought avoidance: expression of maize NADP-malic enzyme in tobacco results in altered stomatal function. J Exp Bot 53:699–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liang Y, Chen H, Tang MJ, Yang PF, Shen SH (2008) Responses of Jatropha curcas seedlings to cold stress: photosynthesis-related proteins and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics. Physiol Plant 131:508–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liang CY, Pineros MA, Tian J, Yao ZF, Sun LL, Liu JP, Shaff J, Coluccio A, Kochian LV, Liao H (2013) Low pH, aluminum, and phosphorus coordinately regulate malate exudation through GmALMT1 to improve soybean adaptation to acid soils. Plant Physiol 161:1347–1361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lin Q, Shen KL, Zhao HM, Li WH (2008) Growth response of Zea mays L. in pyrene-copper co-contaminated soil and the fate of pollutants. J Hazard Mater 150:515–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu SK, Cheng YX, Zhang XX, Guan QJ, Nishiuchi S, Hase K, Takano T (2007) Expression of an NADP-malic enzyme gene in rice (Oryza sativa. L) is induced by environmental stresses; over-expression of the gene in Arabidopsis confers salt and osmotic stress tolerance. Plant Mol Biol 64:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Luo LJ (2010) Breeding for water-saving and drought-resistance rice (WDR) in China. J Exp Bot 61:3509–3517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ma L, Rao XQ, Lu P, Hosseini Bai S, Xu ZH, Chen XY, Blumfield T, Xie J (2015) Ecophysiological and foliar nitrogen concentration responses of understorey Acacia spp. and Eucalyptus sp. to prescribed burning. Environ Sci Pollut R. doi:10.1007/s11356-015-4223-2
  34. Mao SY, Jiang CD, Zhang WH, Shi L, Zhang JZ, Chow WS, Yang JC (2009) Water translocation between ramets of strawberry during soil drying and its effects on photosynthetic performance. Physiol Plant 137:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mastan SG, Rathore MS, Bhatt VD, Yadav P, Chikara J (2012) Assessment of changes in DNA methylation by methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism in Jatropha curcas L. subjected to salinity stress. Gene 508:125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Neves NR, Oliva MA, Centeno DC, Costa AC, Ribas RF, Pereira EG (2009) Photosynthesis and oxidative stress in the restinga plant species Eugenia uniflora L. exposed to simulated acid rain and iron ore dust deposition: potential use in environmental risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 407:3740–3745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nguyen NT, Moghaieb REA, Saneoka H, Fujita K (2004) RAPD markers associated with salt tolerance in Acacia auriculiformis and Acacia mangium. Plant Sci 167:797–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pidlisnyuk V, Stefanovska T, Lewis E, Erickson LE, Davis LC (2014) Miscanthus as a productive biofuel crop for phytoremediation. Crit Rev Plant Sci 33:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reverchon F, Xu ZH, Blumfield TJ, Chen CR, Abdullah KM (2012) Impact of global climate change and fire on the occurrence and function of understorey legumes in forest ecosystems. J Soils Sediments 12:150–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schroeder JI, Kwak JM, Allen GJ (2001) Guard cell abscisic acid signalling and engineering drought hardiness in plants. Nature 410:327–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Silva EN, Ferreira-Silva SL, Vie′gas RA, Silveira JA (2010) The role of organic and inorganic solutes in the osmotic adjustment of drought-stressed Jatropha curcas plants. Environ Exp Bot 69:279–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Singh K, Gautam NN, Singh B, Goel VL, Patra DD (2014) Screening of environmentally less-hazardous fuelwood species. Ecol Eng 64:424–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sun LL, Liang CY, Chen ZJ, Liu PD, Tian J, Liu GD, Liao H (2014) Superior aluminium (Al) tolerance of Stylosanthes is achieved mainly by malate synthesis through an Al-enhanced malic enzyme, SgME1. New Phytol 202:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Suresh B, Ravishankar GA (2004) Phytoremediation: a novel and promising approach for environmental clean-up. Crit Rev Biotechnol 24:97–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tang GY, Li K (2014) Soil amelioration through afforestation and self-repair in a degraded valley-type savanna. For Ecol Manag 320:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tang GY, Li K, Sun Y, Zhang C (2013) Dynamics and stabilization of soil organic carbon after nineteen years of afforestation in valley-type savannah in southwest China. Soil Use Manag 29:48–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vangronsveld J, Herzig R, Weyens N, Boulet J, Adriaensen K, Ruttens A, Thewys T, Vassilev A, Meers E, Nehnevajova E, van der Lelie D, Mench M (2009) Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: lessons from the fields. Environ Sci Pollut Res 16:765–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Verlinden M, Kerkhove A, Nijs I (2013) Effects of experimental climate warming and associated soil drought on the competition between three highly invasive West European alien plant species and native counterparts. Plant Ecol 214:243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Voeller PJ, Zamora BA, Harsh J (1998) Growth response of native shrubs to acid mine spoil and to proposed soil amendments. Plant Soil 198:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang FX, Wang ZY, Lee JHW (2007) Acceleration of vegetation succession on eroded land by reforestation in a subtropical zone. Ecol Eng 31:232–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu QH, Wang SZ, Thangavel P, Li QF, Zheng H, Bai J, Qiu RL (2011) Phytostabilization potential of Jatropha curcas L. in polymetallic acid mine tailings. Int J Phytoremediat 13:788–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yang JL, Zheng SJ, He YF, Matsumoto H (2005) Aluminium resistance requires resistance to acid stress: a case study with spinach that exudes oxalate rapidly when exposed to Al stress. J Exp Bot 56(414):1197–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yang WH, Zhang TX, Li SL, Ni WZ (2014) Metal removal from and microbial property improvement of a multiple heavy metals contaminated soil by phytoextraction with a cadmium hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii H. J Soils Sediments 14:1385–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zheng YL, Feng YL, Lei YB, Yang CY (2009) Different photosynthetic responses to night chilling among twelve populations of Jatropha curcas. Photosynthetica 47:559–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Land Use and Consolidation, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Innovative Development and Utilization of Forest Plant GermplasmSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Energy Plants Resource and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Biomass Energy of Guangdong Regular Higher Education Institutions, Institute of New Energy and New MaterialsSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.South China Botanical Garden of Chinese Academy of SciencesGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Energy Resources of Australia LtdDarwinAustralia
  5. 5.Environmental Futures Research Institute, School of Natural SciencesGriffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations