Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 15, Issue 7, pp 1644–1656 | Cite as

Sediment resuspension under variable geochemical conditions and implications for contaminant release

  • Blair D. Gibson
  • Carol J. PtacekEmail author
  • David W. Blowes
  • Shannon D. Daugherty
Sediments, Sec 2 • Physical and Biogeochemical Processes • Research Article

Abstract

Purpose

Resuspension of sediment derived from natural and anthropogenic processes in surface waters may induce the release of metals, nutrients and other undesirable constituents from sediment to the water column. Characterizing the effects of sediment resuspension under variable geochemical conditions is important for predicting and mitigating contaminant releases during potential dredging operations, as metal(loid) transport may differ under oxidizing and reducing conditions.

Materials and methods

Lake sediment core samples containing elevated concentrations of mercury, other metal(loid)s and nutrients were physically and chemically characterized. Speciation analyses using sequential extraction and synchrotron radiation-based X-ray absorption spectroscopy methods were used to investigate the chemical form and distribution of mercury and other metal(loid)s. The sediment samples were subjected to resuspension under oxic and anoxic conditions to isolate the effects of air entrainment on contaminant release.

Results and discussion

Sequential extraction analyses suggested that the mercury was present primarily in moderately to strongly bound forms, such as mercury-organo chelates and mercury sulphides, whereas only trace amounts were found as less bound forms of mercury. Synchrotron-based micro-X-ray absorption near-edge structure (μ-XANES) and micro-X-ray fluorescence (μ-XRF) spectroscopy analyses suggested the presence of mercury oxide, mercury sulphide and copper sulphide phases. Higher aqueous metal(loid) and nutrient releases were observed under oxic resuspension conditions compared to anoxic conditions.

Conclusions

Higher releases of some constituents under oxic mixing conditions potentially were due to the oxidation of organic matter and/or sulphide mineral phases. These results suggest that resuspension tests performed under variably oxygenated conditions may provide a useful analytical tool for isolating the effect of air entrainment on contaminant release.

Keywords

Copper Mercury Oxidation Resuspension Sediment Speciation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was made possible by funding through the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Synchrotron-based techniques were performed at GeoSoilEnviroCARS (Sector 13), Advanced Photon Source (APS), Argonne National Laboratory. GeoSoilEnviroCARS is supported by the National Science Foundation—Earth Sciences (EAR-0622171) and Department of Energy—Geosciences (DE-FG02-94ER14466) divisions. Use of the Advanced Photon Source was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. We thank Dr. M. Newville and Dr. Y. Choi for their assistance at the beamline, and Melissa Holingham and Alan Fan for their assistance with the experimental work.

References

  1. Beachler MM, Hill DF (2003) Stirring up trouble? Resuspension of bottom sediments by recreational watercraft. Lake Reserv Manag 19:15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bloesch J (1995) Mechanisms, measurement and importance of sediment resuspension in lakes. Mar Freshw Res 46:295–304Google Scholar
  3. Bloom NS, Preus E, Katon J, Hiltner M (2003) Selective extractions to assess the biogeochemically relevant fractionation of inorganic mercury in sediments and soils. Anal Chim Acta 479:233–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brassard P, Kramer JR, Collins PV (1997) Dissolved metal concentrations in suspended sediment in Hamilton Harbour. J Great Lakes Res 23:86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charnock JM, Moyes LN, Pattrick RAD, Mosselmans JFW, Vaughan DJ, Livens FR (2003) The structural evolution of mercury sulfide precipitate: an XAS and XRD study. Am Mineral 88:1197–1203Google Scholar
  6. Churchill JH (1989) The effect of commercial trawling on sediment resuspension and transport over the Middle Atlantic Bight continental shelf. Cont Shelf Res 9:841–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke TL, Lesht B, Young RA, Swift DJP, Freeland GL (1982) Sediment resuspension by surface-wave action: an examination of possible mechanisms. Mar Geol 49:43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corbett DR (2010) Resuspension and estuarine nutrient cycling: insights from the Neuse River Estuary. Biogeosciences 7:3289–3300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Correll DL (1998) The role of phosphorus in the eutrophication of receiving waters: a review. J Environ Qual 27:261–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis WR (1993) The role of bioturbation in sediment resuspension and its interaction with physical shearing. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 171:187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Vicente I, Cruz-Pizarro L, Rueda FJ (2010) Sediment resuspension in two adjacent shallow coastal lakes: controlling factors and consequences on phosphate dynamics. Aquat Sci 72:21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Engler RM, Patrick WH Jr (1975) Stability of sulfides of manganese, iron, zinc, copper, and mercury in flooded and nonflooded soil. Soil Sci 119:217–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flemming BW (2000) A revised textural classification of gravel-free muddy sediments on the basis of ternary diagrams. Cont Shelf Res 20:1125–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibson BD, Ptacek CJ, Lindsay MBJ, Blowes DW (2011) Examining mechanisms of groundwater Hg(II) treatment by reactive materials: an EXAFS study. Environ Sci Technol 45:10415–10421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibson BD, Blowes DW, Lindsay MBJ, Ptacek CJ (2012) Mechanistic investigations of Se(VI) treatment in anoxic groundwater using granular iron and organic carbon: an EXAFS study. J Hazard Mater 241–242:92–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hartley W, Dickinson NM (2010) Exposure of an anoxic and contaminated canal sediment: mobility of metal(loid)s. Environ Pollut 158:649–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Havens KE (1991) Fish-induced sediment resuspension: effects on phytoplankton biomass and community structure in a shallow hypereutrophic lake. J Plankton Res 13:1163–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Havens KE, Aumen NG, James RT, Smith VH (1996) Rapid ecological changes in a large subtropical lake undergoing cultural eutrophication. Ambio 25:150–155Google Scholar
  19. Hellström T (1991) The effect of resuspension on algal production in a shallow lake. Hydrobiologia 213:183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holley EA, McQuillan AJ, Craw D, Kim JP, Sander SG (2007) Mercury mobilization by oxidative dissolution of cinnabar (α-HgS) and metacinnabar (β-HgS). Chem Geol 240:313–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holmroos H, Hietanen S, Niemistö J, Horppila J (2012) Sediment resuspension and denitrification affect the nitrogen to phosphorus ratio of shallow lake waters. Fundam Appl Limnol 180(3):193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Horowitz A (1985) A primer on trace metal-sediment chemistry. U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2277. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, 67 ppGoogle Scholar
  23. Hwang K-Y, Kim H-S, Hwang I (2011) Effect of resuspension on the release of heavy metals and water chemistry in anoxic and oxic sediments. Clean Soil Water Air 39:908–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khorasanipour M, Tangestani MH, Naseh R (2012) Application of multivariate statistical methods to indicate the origin and geochemical behavior of potentially hazardous elements in sediment around the Sarcheshmeh copper mine, SE Iran. Environ Earth Sci 66:589–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim CS, Rytuba JJ, Brown GE Jr (2004a) EXAFS study of mercury(II) sorption to Fe- and Al-(hydr)oxides I. Effects of pH. J Colloid Interface Sci 271:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim CS, Rytuba JJ, Brown GE Jr (2004b) EXAFS study of mercury(II) sorption to Fe- and Al-(hydr)oxides II. Effects of chloride and sulfate. J Colloid Interface Sci 270:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kristensen P, Søndergaard M, Jeppesen E (1992) Resuspension in a shallow eutrophic lake. Hydrobiologia 228:101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kristensen E, Ahmed SI, Devol AH (1995) Aerobic and anaerobic decomposition of organic matter in marine sediment: which is fastest? Limnol Oceanogr 40:1430–1437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Legros S, Chaurand P, Rose J, Masion A, Briois V, Ferrasse J-H, Macary HS, Bottero J-Y, Doelsch E (2010) Investigation of copper speciation in pig slurry by a multitechnique approach. Environ Sci Technol 44:6926–6932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Manceau A, Nagy KL (2008) Relationships between Hg(II)-S bond distance and Hg(II) coordination in thiolates. Dalton Trans 11:1421–1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martino M, Turner A, Nimmo M, Millward GE (2002) Resuspension, reactivity and recycling of trace metals in the Mersey Estuary, UK. Mar Chem 77:171–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marvin-DiPasquale M, Cox MH (2007) Legacy mercury in Alviso slough, South San Francisco Bay, California: concentration, speciation and mobility. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007–1240, 98pGoogle Scholar
  33. Marvin-DiPasquale M, Alpers CN, Fleck JA (2009) Mercury, methylmercury, and other constituents in sediment and water from seasonal and permanent wetlands in the Cache Creek settling basin and Yolo Bypass, Yolo County, California, 2005–06. US Geological Survey Open File Report 2009–1182, 69pGoogle Scholar
  34. Marvin-DiPasquale M, Agee JL, Kakouros E, Kieu LH, Fleck JA, Alpers CN (2011) The effects of sediment and mercury mobilization in the South Yuba Rover and Humbug Creek confluence area, Nevada County, California: concentrations, speciation and environmental fate—part 2: laboratory experiments. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010–1325B, 53pGoogle Scholar
  35. Messieh SN, Rowell TW, Peer DL, Cranford PJ (1991) The effects of trawling, dredging and ocean dumping on the eastern Canadian continental shelf seabed. Cont Shelf Res 11:1237–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mucci A, Lucotte M, Montgomery S, Plourde Y, Pichet P, Van Tra H (1995) Mercury remobilization from flooded soils in a hydroelectric reservoir of northern Quebec, La Grande-2: results of a soil resuspension experiment. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52:2507–2517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nordstrom DK (1977) Thermochemical redox equilibria of ZoBell’s solution. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 41(12):1835–1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Parkman RH, Charnock JM, Bryan ND, Livens FR, Vaughan DJ (1999) Reaction of copper and cadmium ion in aqueous solution with goethite, lepidocrocite, mackinawite, and pyrite. Am Mineral 84:407–419Google Scholar
  39. Pattrick RAD, Mosselmans JFW, Charnock JM, England KER, Helz GR, Garner CD, Vaughan DJ (1997) The structure of amorphous copper sulfide precipitates: an X-ray absorption study. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 61:2023–2036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paul MC, Toia RF, von Nagy-Felsobuki EI (2003) A novel method for the determination of mercury and selenium in shark tissue using high-resolution inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Spectrochim Acta Part B 58:1687–1697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ravel B, Newville M (2005) ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J Synchrotron Radiat 12:537–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reed DC, Slomp CP, Gustafsson BG (2011) Seidmentary phosphorus dynamics and the evolution of bottom-water hypoxia: a coupled benthic-pelagic model of a coastal system. Limnol Oceanogr 56:1075–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schelske CL, Carrick HJ, Aldridge FJ (1995) Can wind-induced resuspension of meroplankton affect phytoplankton dynamics? J N Am Benthol Soc 14:616–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Simpson SL, Rosner J, Ellis J (2000) Competitive displacement reactions of cadmium, copper, and zinc added to a polluted, sulfidic estuarine sediment. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:1992–1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Skyllberg UL, Bloom PR, Qian J, Lin C-M, Bleam WF (2006) Complexation of mercury(II) in soil organic matter: EXAFS evidence for linear two-coordination with reduced sulfur groups. Environ Sci Technol 40:4174–4180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Slowey AJ (2010) Rate of formation and dissolution of mercury sulfide nanoparticles: the dual role of natural organic matter. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 74:4693–4708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Slowey AJ, Brown GE Jr (2007) Transformations of mercury, iron, and sulfur during the reductive dissolution of iron oxyhydroxide by sulfide. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:877–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. U.S. EPA (1996) Evaluation of dredged material proposed for discharge in waters of the U.S. – Testing Manual. EPA/823/B-98/004Google Scholar
  49. U.S. EPA (2002) Method 1631, Revision E. Mercury in water by oxidation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. EPA/821/R-02/019Google Scholar
  50. Vicinie A, Palermo M, Matko L (2011) A review of the applicability of various elutriate tests and refinements of these methodologies. In: Proceedings, WEDA XXXI Technical Conference & TAMU 42 Dredging Seminar, June 5-8, Nashville, TN, USAGoogle Scholar
  51. Walker WW Jr, Havens KE (1995) Relating algal bloom frequencies to phosphorus concentrations in Lake Okeechobee. Lake Reserv Manag 11:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wolfenden S, Charnock JM, Hilton J, Livens FR, Vaughan DJ (2005) Sulfide species as a sink for mercury in lake sediments. Environ Sci Technol 39:6644–6648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Xia K, Skyllberg UL, Bleam WF, Bloom PR, Nater EA, Helmke PA (1999) X-ray absorption spectroscopic evidence for the complexation of Hg(II) by reduced sulfur in soil humic substances. Environ Sci Technol 33:257–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ye S, Laws EA, Gambrell R (2013) Trace element remobilization following the resuspension of sediments under controlled redox conditions: City Park Lake, Baton Rouge, LA. Appl Geochem 28:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Blair D. Gibson
    • 1
  • Carol J. Ptacek
    • 1
    Email author
  • David W. Blowes
    • 1
  • Shannon D. Daugherty
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations