Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 1139–1149 | Cite as

A new speciation scheme of soil polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons for risk assessment

Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article

Abstract

Purpose

The speciation of soil organic pollutants is of great importance for risk assessment and contaminant remediation, however, only few studies have attempted to develop a speciation scheme for a facilitated risk assessment. This paper postulates a pragmatic speciation scheme for the fractionation of soil polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) that could correlate with their bioavailabilities, and the aim was to develop a reliable sequential ultrasonic extraction scheme that could differentiate PAHs into four fractions with different environmental relevance. We also investigated the key factors to the fraction distribution of PAHs, as well as the relationship between bioavailability of PAHs and their fractions.

Materials and methods

Four representative PAHs were spiked into two soils and the distribution of PAH fractions was measured over a period of 90 to 210 days. The reliability of the sequential ultrasonic extraction method was cross-examined by an isotope experiment. The key factors to the fraction distribution, including aging time and properties of soil and PAH, were tested using ultrasonic extraction. The correlation between four fractionated PAHs and their bioavailabilities was assessed with a semipermeable membrane device (SPMD)-assisted desorption assay that mimics the bioconcentration of PAHs.

Results and discussion

Soil PAHs were speciated into water-soluble-, organic acid-soluble-, organically bound-, and residual fractions via sequential ultrasonic extraction. The water-soluble- and organic acid-soluble fractions, which approximated the total PAHs estimated by SPMD, corresponded to the most bioavailable portions. The latter ones decreased significantly during aging. In contrast, the residual fraction, which limits the effectiveness of remediation, increased during aging following methanolic saponification. The concentrations of water-soluble-, organic acid-soluble-, and organically bound fractions are negatively correlated with the soil organic matter content and the partition coefficient between octanol and water (Kow) of pollutants

Conclusions

The bioavailability of soil PAHs can be mimicked by a sequential chemical extraction protocol developed in this study. This speciation scheme can be readily used for studying the environmental fate and risk of PAHs, providing us with better rationales in selecting remediation strategies of soil contaminated with PAHs based bioavailability.

Keywords

Bioavailability Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Sequential ultrasonic extraction Speciation 

Supplementary material

11368_2015_1083_MOESM1_ESM.docx (178 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 178 kb)

References

  1. Abu A, Smith S (2006) Mechanistic characterization of adsorption and slow desorption of phenanthrene aged in soils. Environ Sci Technol 40:5409–5414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amdany R, Chimuka L, Cukrowska E, Kukucka P, Kohoutek J, Tolgyessy P, Vrana B (2014) Assessment of bioavailable fraction of POPs in surface water bodies in Johannesburg City, South Africa, using passive samplers: an initial assessment. Environ Monit Assess 186:5639–5653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bogan BW, Trbovic V (2003) Effect of sequestration on PAH degradability with Fenton's reagent: roles of total organic carbon, humin, and soil porosity. J Hazard Mater 100:285–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bosma TNP, Middeldorp PJM, Schraa G, Zehnder AJB (1997) Mass transfer limitation of biotransformation: quantifying bioavailability. Environ Sci Technol 31:248–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandt KK, Sjoholm OR, Krogh KA, Halling-Sorensen B, Nybroe O (2009) Increased pollution-induced bacterial community tolerance to sulfadiazine in soil hotspots amended with artificial root exudates. Environ Sci Technol 43:2963–2968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calace N, Fiorentini F, Petronio BM, Pietroletti M (2001) Effects of acid rain on soil humic compounds. Talanta 54:837–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiou CT, Peters LJ, Freed VH (1979) Physical concept of soil-water equilibria for non-ionic organic-compounds. Science 206:831–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornelissen G, van der Pal M, van Noort PCM, Govers HAJ (1999) Competitive effects on the slow desorption of organic compounds from sediments. Chemosphere 39:1971–1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cui XY, Mayer P, Gan J (2013) Methods to assess bioavailability of hydrophobic organic contaminants: principles, operations, and limitations. Environ Pollut 172:223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ehlers LJ, Luthy RG (2003) Contaminant bioavailability in soil and sediment. Environ Sci Technol 37:295a–302aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Forsberg ND, Smith BW, Sower GJ, Anderson KA (2014) Predicting polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations in resident aquatic organisms using passive samplers and partial least-squares calibration. Environ Sci Technol 48:6291–6299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gao YZ, Zeng YC, Shen Q, Ling WT, Han J (2009) Fractionation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon residues in soils. J Hazard Mater 172:897–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gao Y, Wu SC, Yu XZ, Wong MH (2010a) Dissipation gradients of phenanthrene and pyrene in the rice rhizosphere. Environ Pollut 158:2596–2603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gao YZ, Ren LL, Ling WT, Gong SS, Sun BQ, Zhang Y (2010b) Desorption of phenanthrene and pyrene in soils by root exudates. Bioresour Technol 101:1159–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Golubev SV, Bauer A, Pokrovsky OS (2006) Effect of pH and organic ligands on the kinetics of smectite dissolution at 25 degrees C. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 70:4436–4451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hartmann R (1996) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in forest soils: critical evaluation of a new analytical procedure. Int J Environ Anal Chem 62:161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hatzinger PB, Alexander M (1995) Effect of aging of chemicals in soil on their biodegradability and extractability. Environ Sci Technol 29:537–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heemken OP, Theobald N, Wenclawiak BW (1997) Comparison of ASE and SFE with Soxhlet, sonication, and methanolic saponification extractions for the determination of organic micropollutants in marine particulate matter. Anal Chem 69:2171–2180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huckins JN, Tubergen MW, Manuweera GK (1990) Semipermeable-membrane devices containing model lipid—a new approach to monitoring the bioavailability of lipophilic contaminants and estimating their bioconcentration potential. Chemosphere 20:533–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Itoh N, Numata M, Yarita T (2008) Alkaline extraction in combination with microwave-assisted extraction followed by solid-phase extraction treatment for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a sediment sample. Anal Chim Acta 615:47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Janssen CR, Heijerick DG, De Schamphelaere KAC, Allen HE (2003) Environmental risk assessment of metals: tools for incorporating bioavailability. Environ Int 28:793–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. KarimiLotfabad S, Pickard MA, Gray MR (1996) Reactions of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons on soil. Environ Sci Technol 30:1145–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kong HL, Sun R, Gao YZ, Sun BQ (2013) Elution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil columns using low-molecular-weight organic acids. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:72–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. LeFevre GH, Hozalski RM, Novak PJ (2013) Root exudate enhanced contaminant desorption: an abiotic contribution to the rhizosphere effect. Environ Sci Technol 47:11545–11553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li JY, Xu RK, Xiao SC, Ji GL (2005) Effect of low-molecular-weight organic anions on exchangeable aluminum capacity of variable charge soils. J Colloid Interface Sci 284:393–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ling WT, Ren LL, Gao YZ, Zhu XZ, Sun BQ (2009) Impact of low-molecular-weight organic acids on the availability of phenanthrene and pyrene in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 41:2187–2195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu L, Song CY, Yan ZG, Li FS (2009) Characterizing the release of different composition of dissolved organic matter in soil under acid rain leaching using three-dimensional excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy. Chemosphere 77:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luo L, Zhang SZ, Ma YB (2008) Evaluation of impacts of soil fractions on phenanthrene sorption. Chemosphere 72:891–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luo L, Lin S, Huang HL, Zhang SZ (2012) Relationships between aging of PAHs and soil properties. Environ Pollut 170:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ma LL, Zhang J, Han LS, Li WM, Xu L, Hu F, Li HX (2012) The effects of aging time on the fraction distribution and bioavailability of PAH. Chemosphere 86:1072–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mastral AM, Callen MS (2000) A review an polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) emissions from energy generation. Environ Sci Technol 34:3051–3057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mayer P, Fernqvist MM, Christensen PS, Karlson U, Trapp S (2007) Enhanced diffusion of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarhons in artificial and natural aqueous solutions. Environ Sci Technol 41:6148–6155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mccarty LS, Mackay D (1993) Enhancing ecotoxicological modeling and assessment. Environ Sci Technol 27:1719–1728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mowat FS, Bundy KJ (2001) Correlation of field-measured toxicity with chemical concentration and pollutant availability. Environ Int 27:479–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nam K, Alexander M (1998) Role of nanoporosity and hydrophobicity in sequestration and bioavailability: tests with model solids. Environ Sci Technol 32:71–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Northcott GL, Jones KC (2000) Experimental approaches and analytical techniques for determining organic compound bound residues in soil and sediment. Environ Pollut 108:19–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Northcott GL, Jones KC (2001) Partitioning, extractability, and formation of nonextractable PAH residues in soil. 1. Compound differences in aging and sequestration. Environ Sci Technol 35:1103–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Park JH, Feng YC, Cho SY, Voice TC, Boyd SA (2004) Sorbed atrazine shifts into non-desorbable sites of soil organic matter during aging. Water Res 38:3881–3892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Petty JD, Jones SB, Huckins JN, Cranor WL, Parris JT, McTague TB, Boyle TP (2000) An approach for assessment of water quality using semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) and bioindicator tests. Chemosphere 41:311–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Radian A, Mishael Y (2012) Effect of humic acid on pyrene removal from water by polycation-clay mineral composites and activated carbon. Environ Sci Technol 46:6228–6235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rey-Salgueiro L, Pontevedra-Pombal X, Alvarez-Casas M, Martinez-Carballo E, Garcia-Falcon MS, Simal-Gandara J (2009) Comparative performance of extraction strategies for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in peats. J Chromatogr A 1216:5235–5241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Richnow HH, Seifert R, Hefter J, Kastner M, Mahro B, Michaelis W (1994) Metabolites of xenobiotica and mineral-oil constituents linked to macromolecular organic-matter in polluted environments. Org Geochem 22:671–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Semple KT, Doick KJ, Jones KC, Burauel P, Craven A, Harms H (2004) Defining bioavailability and bioaccessibility of contaminated soil and sediment is complicated. Environ Sci Technol 38:228a–231aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Song YF, Jing X, Fleischmann S, Wilke BM (2002) Comparative study of extraction methods for the determination of PAHs from contaminated soils and sediments. Chemosphere 48:993–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sun H, Wang C, Huo C, Zhou Z (2008) Semipermeable membrane device-assisted desorption of pyrene from soils and its relationship to bioavailability. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sun B, Gao Y, Sun R (2011) Effect of low-molecular-weight orgniac acids and amino acids on the sorption of phenanthrene in Typic Paleudalfs. Acta Sci Circumst 31:158–163 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  47. Tao S, Xu FL, Liu WX, Cui YH, Coveney RM (2006) A chemical extraction method for mimicking bioavailability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to wheat grown in soils containing various amounts of organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 40:2219–2224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tessier A, Campbell PGC, Bisson M (1979) Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace-metals. Anal Chem 51:844–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vrana B et al (2014) Passive sampling: An effective method for monitoring seasonal and spatial variability of dissolved hydrophobic organic contaminants and metals in the Danube river. Environ Pollut 184:101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang K, Chen XX, Zhu ZQ, Huang HG, Li TQ, Yang XE (2014a) Dissipation of available benzo[a]pyrene in aging soil co-contaminated with cadmium and pyrene. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:962–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang YY, Fang L, Lin L, Luan TG, Tam NFY (2014b) Effects of low molecular-weight organic acids and dehydrogenase activity in rhizosphere sediments of mangrove plants on phytoremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Chemosphere 99:152–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weber WJ, Mcginley PM, Katz LE (1992) A distributed reactivity model for sorption by soils and sediments. 1. Conceptual basis and equilibrium assessments. Environ Sci Technol 26:1955–1962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wild SR, Jones KC (1995) Polynuclear aromatic-hydrocarbons in the United-Kingdom environment—a preliminary source inventory and budget. Environ Pollut 88:91–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yang Y, Tao S, Zhang N, Zhang DY, Li XQ (2010) The effect of soil organic matter on fate of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil: a microcosm study. Environ Pollut 158:1768–1774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhong YC, Zhu LZ (2013) Distribution, input pathway and soil-air exchange of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Banshan Industry Park, China. Sci Total Environ 444:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental ScienceZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Organic Pollution Process and ControlHangzhouChina
  3. 3.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of Houston-Clear LakeHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations