Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 14, Issue 12, pp 1921–1937 | Cite as

Modelling the impact of climate change on sediment yield in a highly erodible Mediterranean catchment

  • Gianbattista Bussi
  • Félix Francés
  • Enguerrand Horel
  • José Andrés López-Tarazón
  • Ramón J. Batalla



The assessment of climate change impacts on the sediment cycle is currently a primary concern for environmental policy analysts in Mediterranean areas. Nevertheless, quantitative assessment of climate change impacts is still a complex task. The aim of this study was to implement a sediment model by taking advantage of sediment proxy information provided by reservoir bottom deposits and to use it for climate change assessment in a Mediterranean catchment.

Materials and methods

The sediment model was utilised in a catchment that drains into a large reservoir. The depositional history of the reservoir was reconstructed and used for sediment sub-model implementation. The model results were compared with gauged suspended sediment data in order to verify model robustness. Then, the model was coupled with future precipitation and temperature scenarios obtained from climate models. Climatological model outputs for two emission scenarios (A2 and B2) were simulated and the results compared with a reference scenario.

Results and discussion

Model results showed a general decrease in soil moisture and water discharge. Large floods, which are responsible for the majority of sediment mobilisation, also showed a general decrease. Sediment yield showed a clear reduction under the A2 scenario but increased under the B2 scenario. The computed specific sediment yield for the control period was 6.33 Mg ha−1 year−1, while for the A2 and B2 scenarios, it was 3.62 and 7.04 Mg ha−1 year−1, respectively. Furthermore, sediment transport showed an increase in its time compression, i.e. a stronger dependence of total sediment yield from the largest event contributions.


This study shows a methodology for implementing a distributed sediment model by exploiting reservoir sedimentation volumes. This methodology can be applied to a wide range of catchments, given the high availability of reservoir sedimentation data. Moreover, this study showed how such a model can be used in the framework of a climate change study, providing a measure of the impact of climate change on soil erosion and sediment yields.


Climate change Ésera River catchment Reservoir sedimentation Sediment modelling TETIS 



This study was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the research projects SCARCE-CONSOLIDER (ref. CSD2009-00065) and ECOTETIS (ref. CGL2011-28776-C02-01). Suspended sediment records of the Isábena river and bathymetrical surveys were carried out within the framework of the project “Sediment export from large semi-arid catchments: measurements and modelling (SESAM), funded by the German Science Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG). The authors wish to thank the Ebro Water Authorities for permission to install the measuring equipment at the Capella gauging station and or providing hydrological data. Both observed and modelled precipitation and temperature data were provided by the Spanish Meteorological Agency (AEMET). Some of the reservoir bathymetric survey reports were provided by Rafael Cobo Rayán (CEH-CEDEX, National Center for Hydrological Studies).


  1. Alatorre LC, Beguería S, García-Ruiz JM (2010) Regional scale modeling of hillslope sediment delivery: a case study in the Barasona Reservoir watershed (Spain) using WATEM/SEDEM. J Hydrol 391:109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alpert P, Ben-Gai T, Baharad A, Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D, Colacino M, Diodato L, Ramis C, Homar V, Romero R, Michaelides S, Manes A (2002) The paradoxical increase of Mediterranean extreme daily rainfall in spite of decrease in total values. Geophys Res Lett 29(11):1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrés-Doménech I, Múnera JC, Francés F, Marco JB (2010) Coupling urban event-based and catchment continuous modelling for combined sewer overflow river impact assessment. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:2057–2072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avendaño Salas C, Cobo Rayán R (1998) Seguimiento de los sólidos en suspensión durante el vaciado del embalse de Joaquín Costa. Limnética 14:113–120Google Scholar
  5. Avendaño Salas С, Sanz Montero ME, Cobo Rayán R, Gómez Montaña JL (1997) Sediment yield at Spanish reservoirs and its relationship with the drainage basin area. In: Proceedings of the 19th Symposium of Large Dams, Florence. ICOLD (International Committee on Large Dams), pp 863–874Google Scholar
  6. Baade J, Franz S, Reichel A (2012) Reservoir siltation and sediment yield in the Kruger National Park, South Africa: a first assessment. Land Degrad Dev 23:586–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bangash RF, Passuello A, Sanchez-Canales M, Terrado M, López A, Elorza FJ, Ziv G, Acuña V, Schuhmacher M (2013) Ecosystem services in Mediterranean river basin: climate change impact on water provisioning and erosion control. Sci Total Environ 458-460C:246–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beguería S, López-Moreno JI, Lorente L, Seeger M, García-Ruiz JM (2003) Assessing the effect of climate oscillations and land-use changes on streamflow in the central Spanish Pyrenees. Ambio 32:283–286Google Scholar
  9. Blöschl G (2001) Scaling in hydrology. Hydrol Process 15:709–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brune GM (1953) Trap efficiency of reservoirs. Trans AGU 34:407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bussi G, Rodríguez-Lloveras X, Francés F, Benito G, Sánchez-Moya Y, Sopeña A (2013) Sediment yield model implementation based on check dam infill stratigraphy in a semiarid Mediterranean catchment. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:3339–3354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bussi G, Francés F, Montoya JJ, Julien PY (2014), Distributed sediment yield modelling: importance of initial sediment conditions, Environ Model Softw 58:58–70Google Scholar
  13. Cerdà A (1998) Effect of climate on surface flow along a climatological gradient in Israel: a field rainfall simulation approach. J Arid Environ 38:145–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cerdà A, Brazier R, Nearing M, de Vente J (2013) Scales and erosion. Catena 102:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Christensen JH, Carter TR, Rummukainen M, Amanatidis G (2007) Evaluating the performance and utility of regional climate models: the PRUDENCE project. Clim Chang 81(S1):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coulthard TJ, Ramirez J, Fowler HJ, Glenis V (2012) Using the UKCP09 probabilistic scenarios to model the amplified impact of climate change on drainage basin sediment yield. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:4401–4416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cowpertwait P, Ocio D, Collazos G, de Cos O, Stocker C (2013) Regionalised spatiotemporal rainfall and temperature models for flood studies in the Basque Country, Spain. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:479–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cusack S, Slingo A, Edwards JM, Wild M (1998) The radiative impact of a simple aerosol climatology on the Hadley Centre atmospheric GCM. Quat J R Meteorol Soc 124:2517–2526Google Scholar
  19. De Vente J, Poesen J, Verstraeten G (2005) The application of semi-quantitative methods and reservoir sedimentation rates for the prediction of basin sediment yield in Spain. J Hydrol 305:63–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Vente J, Poesen J, Verstraeten G, Van Rompaey A, Govers G (2008) Spatially distributed modelling of soil erosion and sediment yield at regional scales in Spain. Glob Planet Chang 60:393–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Déqué M (2007) Frequency of precipitation and temperature extremes over France in an anthropogenic scenario: model results and statistical correction according to observed values. Glob Planet Chang 57:16–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Déqué M, Dreveton C, Braun A, Cariolle D (1994) The ARPEGE/IFS atmosphere model: a contribution to the French community climate modelling. Clim Dyn 10:249–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duck R, McManus J (1993) Sedimentation in natural and artificial impoundments: an indicator of evolving climate land use and dynamic conditions. In: McManus J, Duck R (eds) Geomorphology and sedimentology of lakes and reservoirs. Wiley and Sons, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  24. Engelund F, Hansen E (1967) A monograph on sediment transport in alluvial streams. Monogr Denmark Tech Univ Hydraul Lab, Teknisk Forlag, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  25. ESDB2 (2004) The European Soil Database distribution version 2.0. European Commission and the European Soil Bureau Network Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  26. European Environment Agency (2007) CLC2006 technical guidelines EEA technical report no. 17/2007. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  27. Francés F, Vélez JI, Vélez JJ (2007) Split-parameter structure for the automatic calibration of distributed hydrological models. J Hydrol 332:226–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Foster IDL, Rowntree KM, Boardman J, Mighall TM (2012) Changing sediment yield and sediment dynamics in the Karoo uplands, South Africa; post-European impacts. Land Degrad Dev 23:508–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. González-Hidalgo JC, Batalla RJ, Cerdà A, de Luis M (2010) Contribution of the largest events to suspended sediment transport across the USA. Land Degrad Dev 21:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. González-Hidalgo JC, Batalla RJ, Cerdà A (2013) Catchment size and contribution of the largest daily events to suspended sediment load on a continental scale. Catena 102:40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Herrera S, Gutiérrez JM, Ancell R, Pons MR, Frías MD, Fernández J (2010) Development and analysis of a 50-year high-resolution daily gridded precipitation dataset over Spain (Spain02). Int J Climatol 32:74–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Haregeweyn N, Poesen J, Verstraeten G, Govers G, de Vente J, Nyssen J, Deckers J, Moeyersons J (2013) Assessing the performance of a spatially distributed soil erosion and sediment delivery model (WATEM/SEDEM) in northern Ethiopia. Land Degrad Dev 24:188–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. IGME (1994) Mapa geológico de la península ibérica Baleares y Canarias. Instituto Tecnológico Geominero de España, MadridGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson B, Julien P, Molnar DK, Watson CC (2000) The two-dimensional upland erosion model CASC2D-SED. J Am Water Resour Assoc 36:31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jolly JP (1982) A proposed method for accurately calculating sediment yields from reservoir deposition volumes. In: Proceedings of the Exeter Symposium "Recent developments in the explanation and prediction of erosion and sediment yield". Ed. D. E. Walling.  IAHS Publ No 37, IAHS Press, Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
  36. Julien P (1995) Erosion and sedimentation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kilinc M, Richardson EV (1973) Mechanics of soil erosion from overland flow generated by simulated rainfall. Colorado State University Hydrology Papers, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  38. Lane EW, Koelzer VA (1943) Density of sediments deposited in reservoirs. Rep No 9 of a Study of Methods Used in Measurement and Analysis of Sediment Loads in Streams, Engineering District, St. Paul, MN, USA, District Sub-Office Univ. of Iowa, USAGoogle Scholar
  39. Lavee HA, Imeson C, Sarah P (1998) The impact of climate change on geomorphology and desertification along a Mediterranean-arid transect. Land Degrad Dev 9:407–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Le Roux JS, Roos ZN (1982) The rate of soil erosion in the Wuras Dam catchment calculated from sediments trapped in the dam. Z Geomorphol Suppl 26:315–329Google Scholar
  41. López-Moreno JI, Goyette S, Beniston M (2009) Impact of climate change on snowpack in the Pyrenees: horizontal spatial variability and vertical gradients. J Hydrol 374:384–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. López-Tarazón JA, Batalla RJ, Vericat D, Francke T (2009) Suspended sediment transport in a highly erodible catchment: the River Isábena (Southern Pyrenees). Geomorphology 109:210–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. López-Tarazón JA, Batalla RJ, Vericat D, Francke T (2012) The sediment budget of a highly dynamic mesoscale catchment: the River Isábena. Geomorphology 138:15–28. doi: 10.1016/jgeomorph201108020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. López-Vicente M, Navas A, Machín J (2008) Modelling soil detachment rates in rainfed agrosystems in the south-central Pyrenees. Agric Water Manag 95:1079–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mamede GL (2008) Reservoir sedimentation in dryland catchments: modelling and management. PhD dissertation, University of Potsdam, UniversitätsbibliothekGoogle Scholar
  46. Middelkoop H, Daamen K, Gellens D, Grabs W, Kwadijk JCJ, Lang H, Parmet BWAH, Schädler B, Schulla J, Wilke K (2001) Impact of climate change on hydrological regimes and water resources management in the Rhine Basin. Clim Chang 49:105–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miller CR (1953) Determination of the unit weight of sediment for use in sediment volume computations. Bureau of Reclamation Memorandum Denver, Colorado, USGoogle Scholar
  48. Milly PCD, Dunne KA, Vecchia AV (2005) Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature 438:347–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harme RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASAE 50:885–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mouri G, Golosov V, Chalov S, Takizawa S, Oguma K, Yoshimura K, Shiiba M, Hori T, Oki T (2013) Assessment of potential suspended sediment yield in Japan in the 21st century with reference to the general circulation model climate change scenarios. Glob Planet Chang 102:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mullan D, Favis-Mortlock D, Fealy R (2012) Addressing key limitations associated with modelling soil erosion under the impacts of future climate change. Agric For Meteorol 156:18–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Müller EN, Francke T (2008) SESAM DATA SESAM: sediment export from semi-arid catchments—measurement and modelling (2005–2008). Potsdam, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  53. Nadal-Romero E, Lasanta T, Gonzalez-Hidalgo JC, de Luis M, García-Ruiz JM (2012) The effect of intense rainstorm events on the suspended sediment response under various land uses: the Aísa valley experimental station. Cuad Investig Geogr 38:27–47Google Scholar
  54. Nakicenovic N, Swart R (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  55. Nearing MA, Pruski FF, O’Neill MR (2004) Expected climate change impacts on soil erosion rates: a review. J Soil Water Conserv (USA) 59:43–50Google Scholar
  56. Nearing MA, Jetten V, Baffaut C, Cerdan O, Couturier A, Hernandez M, Le Bissonnais Y, Nichols MH, Nunes JP, Renschler CS, Souchère V, van Oost K (2005) Modeling response of soil erosion and runoff to changes in precipitation and cover. Catena 61:131–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nunes JP, Seixas J, Pacheco NR (2008) Vulnerability of water resources vegetation productivity and soil erosion to climate change in Mediterranean watersheds. Hydrol Process 22:3115–3134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Olive LJ, Rieger WA (1988) An examination of the role of sampling strategies in the study of suspended sediment transport. In Sediment Budgets. IAHS Publ 174, IAHS Press, Wallingford, UK, pp 259–267Google Scholar
  59. Peizhen Z, Molnar P, Downs WR (2001) Increased sedimentation rates and grain sizes 2–4 Myr ago due to the influence of climate change on erosion rates. Nature 410:891–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pope VD, Gallani ML, Rowntree PR, Stratton RA (2000) The impact of new physical parametrizations in the Hadley Centre climate model: HadAM3. Clim Dyn 16:123–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pruski FF, Nearing MA (2002) Climate-induced changes in erosion during the 21st century for eight US locations. Water Resour Res 38:34–1–34–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Raclot D, Albergel J (2006) Runoff and water erosion modelling using WEPP on a Mediterranean cultivated catchment. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 31:1038–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Regüés D, Nadal-Romero E (2013) Uncertainty in the evaluation of sediment yield from badland areas: suspended sediment transport estimated in the Araguás catchment (central Spanish Pyrenees). Catena 106:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Salazar S, Francés F, Komma J, Blume T, Francke T, Bronstert A, Blöschl G (2013) A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of flood management measures based on the concept of “retaining water in the landscape” in different European hydro-climatic regions. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12(11):3287–3306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sanz Montero ME, Cobo Rayán R, Avendaño Salas C, Gómez Montaña JL (1996) Influence of the drainage basin area on the sediment yield to Spanish reservoirs. In: Proceedings of the First European Conference and Trace Exposition on Control ErosionGoogle Scholar
  66. Seibert J, McDonnell JJ (2002) On the dialog between experimentalist and modeler in catchment hydrology: use of soft data for multicriteria model calibration. Water Resour Res 38(11):23–1–23–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Serrano-Muela P, Nadal-Romero E, Lana-Renault N, González-Hidalgo JC, López-Moreno J I, Beguería S, Sanjuan Y, García-Ruiz JM (2013) An exceptional rainfall event in the Central Western Pyrenees: spatial patterns in discharge and impact. Land Degrad Dev, Online ver. doi: 10.1002/ldr.2221
  68. Srinivasan R, Ramanarayanan TS, Arnold JG, Bednarz ST (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part II: model application. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(1):91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Valero-Garcés BL, Navas A, Machı́n J, Walling D (1999) Sediment sources and siltation in mountain reservoirs: a case study from the Central Spanish Pyrenees. Geomorphology 28:23–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Van Rompaey A, Verstraeten G, Van Oost K, Govers G, Poesen J (2001) Modelling mean annual sediment yield using a distributed approach. Earth Surf Proc Land 26:1221–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Van Rompaey A, Vieillefont V, Jones RJA, Montanarella L, Verstraeten G, Bazzoffi P, Dostal T, Krasa J, de Vente J, Poesen J (2003) Validation of soil erosion estimates at European scale. European Soil Bureau Research Report No13 EUR 20827 EN Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  72. Verstraeten G, Poesen J, de Vente J, Koninckx X (2003) Sediment yield variability in Spain: a quantitative and semiqualitative analysis using reservoir sedimentation rates. Geomorphology 50:327–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Walling DE, Fang D (2003) Recent trends in the suspended sediment loads of the world’s rivers. Glob Planet Chang 39:111–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Webb BW, Foster IDL, Gurnell A (1995) Hydrology water quality and sediment behaviour. In: Foster IDL, Gurnell A, Webb BW (eds) Sediment and water quality in river catchments. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1–30Google Scholar
  75. Wilby RL, Hay LE, Leavesley GH (1999) A comparison of downscaled and raw GCM output: implications for climate change scenarios in the San Juan River basin Colorado. J Hydrol 225:67–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhao G, Mu X, Wen Z, Wang F, Gao P (2013) Soil erosion, conservation and eco-environment changes in the Loess Plateau of China. Land Degrad Dev 24:499–510Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gianbattista Bussi
    • 1
    • 7
  • Félix Francés
    • 1
  • Enguerrand Horel
    • 1
    • 2
  • José Andrés López-Tarazón
    • 3
    • 4
  • Ramón J. Batalla
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Research Institute of Water and Environmental EngineeringUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.École des Ponts Paris TechMarne-la-ValléeFrance
  3. 3.School of Natural Sciences and PsychologyLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK
  4. 4.RIUS, Fluvial Dynamics Research Group, Department of Environment and Soil SciencesUniversity of LleidaLleidaSpain
  5. 5.Catalan Institute for Water ResearchGironaSpain
  6. 6.Forest Science Centre of CataloniaSolsonaSpain
  7. 7.School of Geography and the EnvironmentUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations