Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 810–818 | Cite as

A methodological approach to estimate the geogenic contribution in soils potentially polluted by trace elements. Application to a case study

  • Emilio Galán
  • Isabel González
  • Antonio Romero
  • Patricia Aparicio
POTENTIALLY HARMFUL ELEMENTS IN SOIL-PLANT INTERACTIONS
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Purpose

The determination of the contribution of background values in a potentially polluted soil is very important in defining the contamination extension, in particular in areas of geological complexity and long-term economic development, where mining and industry have been traditional activities and soils are showing both geogenic and anthropogenic contributions. Some approaches have been proposed for the estimation of the anthropogenic input vs. the background; in this paper we present a more robust approach.

Materials and methods

The proposed methodological approach includes the following steps. The first step consists of the comparison among the trace element contents in potentially polluted soils (PPS) and the reference and threshold values calculated both for the same geotectonic unit. A second stage is the calculation of the reference and threshold values for the surrounding area (LTV), natural setting, of the PPS with similar lithological characteristics. The final step is based on the analysis of the results by comparison of the PPS with LTV. On the other hand, the definition of a new pollution factor allows to grade the pollution and to classify the pollution importance.

Results and discussion

The protocol proposed was applied to PPS from a potentially polluted area of SW Spain. The anthropogenic vs. geogenic anomalies and the pollution grade of the three PPS were assessed, which is important to establish the priority to further actions. In addition, this study makes clear that the use of the enrichment factors to estimate the pollution of soils is not advisable. On the other hand, in this study, new areas close to the PPS were defined as potentially polluted because of the high trace element concentration.

Conclusions

The methodological approach proposed can be considered as a good indicator for evaluating the geogenic vs. anthropogenic contribution in polluted soils and for classifying the pollution importance in a more robust way than the use of other previous indexes. The proposal methodology could be used also by the administration to detect other PPS in a study area, which a priori were not considered as contaminated.

Keywords

Evaluation geogenic contribution Geochemical background Methodological approach Soil pollution 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baize D, Sterckeman T (2001) Of the necessity of knowledge of the natural pedogeochemical background content in the evaluation of the contamination of soils by trace elements. Sci Total Environ 264:127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhuiyan MAH, Parvezb L, Islamc MA, Dampared SB, Suzukia S (2010) Heavy metal pollution of coal mine-affected agricultural soils in the northern part of Bangladesh. J Hazard Mater 173:384–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buat-Menard P, Chesselet R (1979) Variable influence of the atmospheric flux on the trace-metal chemistry of oceanic suspended matter. Earth Planet Sci Lett 42:399–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castillo S, de la Rosa JD, Sánchez de la Campa AM, González-Castanedo Y, Fernández-Caliani JC, Gonzalez I, Romero A (2013) Contribution of mine wastes to atmospheric metal deposition in the surrounding area of an abandoned heavily polluted mining district (Rio Tinto mines, Spain). Sci Total Environ 449:363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chopin EIB, Alloway BJ (2007) Trace element partitioning and soil particle characterisation around mining and smelting areas at Tharsis, Ríotinto and Huelva, SW Spain. Sci Total Environ 373:488–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fernández-Caliani JC, Barba-Brioso C, González I, Galán E (2009) Heavy metal pollution in soils around the abandoned mine sites of the Iberian Pyrite Belt (Southwest Spain). Water Air Soil Pollut 200:211–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Galán E, Fernández-Caliani JC, González I, Aparicio P, Romero A (2008) Influence of geological setting on geochemical baselines of trace elements in soils. Application to soils of South-West Spain. J Geochem Explor 98:89–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. González I, López M, Romero A (2008) Problemática de los suelos afectados por la explotación de sulfuros. Macla 10:61–75Google Scholar
  9. González I, Galán E, Romero A (2011) Assessing soil quality in areas affected by sulphide mining. Application to soils in the Iberian Pyrite Belt (SW SPAIN). Minerals 1:73–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hakanson L (1980) An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control, a sediment logical approach. Water Res 14:975–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. López M, González I, Romero A (2008) Trace elements contamination of agricultural soils affected by sulphide exploitation (Iberian Pyrite Belt, SW Spain). Environ Geol 54:805–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Loska K, Cebula J, Pelczar J, Wiechula D, Kwapuliński J (1997) Use of enrichment, and contamination factors together with geoaccumulation indices to evaluate the content of Cd, Cu, and Ni in the Rybnik Water Reservoir in Poland. Water Air Soil Pollut 93:347–365Google Scholar
  13. Loska K, Wiechuła D, Korus I (2004) Metal contamination of farming soils affected by industry. Environ Int 30:159–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Müller G (1969) Index of geoaccumulation in sediments of the Rhine River. GeoJournal 2:108–118Google Scholar
  15. Plumlee G (1994) Environmental geology models of mineral deposits. SE Newslett 16:5–6, JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  16. Reimann C, de Caritat P (2005) Distinguishing between natural and anthropogenic sources for elements in the environment: regional geochemical surveys versus enrichment factors. Sci Total Environ 337:91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Salminen R, Tarvainen T (1997) The problem of defining geochemical baselines. A case study of selected elements and geological materials in Finland. J Geochem Explor 60:91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sánchez de la Campa AM, de la Rosa J, Fernández-Caliani JC, González-Castanedo Y (2011) Impact of abandoned mine waste on atmospheric respirable particulate matter in the historic mining district of Rio Tinto (Iberian Pyrite Belt). Environ Res 111:1018–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schermerhörn LJG (1971) An outline stratigraphy of the Iberian Pyrite Belt. Bol Geol Min 86:239–268Google Scholar
  20. Sterckeman T, Douay F, Baize D, Fourrier H, Proix N, Schvartz C (2006) Trace elements in soils developed in sedimentary materials from Northern France. Geoderma 136:912–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sutherland RA (2000) Bed sediment-associated trace metals in an urban stream, Oahu, Hawaii. Environ Geol 39:611–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tarvainen T, Kallio E (2002) Baselines of certain bioavailable and total heavy metal concentrations in Finland. Appl Geochem 17:975–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emilio Galán
    • 1
  • Isabel González
    • 1
  • Antonio Romero
    • 1
  • Patricia Aparicio
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Cristalografía, Mineralogía y Química Agrícola, Facultad de QuímicaUniversidad de SevillaSevillaSpain

Personalised recommendations