Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 13, Issue 10, pp 1724–1734 | Cite as

Quantification of seasonal sediment and phosphorus transport dynamics in an agricultural watershed using radiometric fingerprinting techniques

  • Natalie L. H. Huisman
  • K. G. Karthikeyan
  • Jasmeet Lamba
  • Anita M. Thompson
  • Graham Peaslee
WATERSHED SEDIMENT SOURCE IDENTIFICATION: TOOLS, APPROACHES, AND CASE STUDIES

Abstract

Purpose

Phosphorus (P) is a limiting nutrient for most US Midwestern aquatic systems and, therefore, increases of P, through point or non-point sources (NPS) of pollution such as agriculture, causes eutrophication. Identifying specific NPS contributions (e.g., upland vs. stream channels) for sediments and P is difficult due to the distributed nature of the pollution. Therefore, studies which link the spatial and temporal aspects of sediment and P transport in these systems can help better characterize the extent of NPS pollution.

Materials and methods

Our study used fingerprinting techniques to determine sources of sediments in an agricultural watershed (the North Fork of the Pheasant Branch watershed; 12.4 km2 area) in Wisconsin, USA, during the spring, summer, and fall seasons of 2009. The primary sources considered were uplands (cultivated fields), stream bank, and streambed. The model used fallout radionuclides, 137Cs, and 210Pbxs, along with total P to determine primary sediment sources. A shorter-lived fallout radioisotope, 7Be, was used to determine the sediment age and percent new sediments in streambed and suspended sediment samples (via the 7Be/210Pbxs ratio).

Results and discussion

Upland areas were the primary source of suspended sediments in the stream channels followed by stream banks. The sediment age and percent new sediment for the streambed and suspended sediments showed that the channel contained and transported newer (or more recently tagged with 7Be) sediments in the spring season (9–131 days sediment age), while relatively old sediments (165–318 days) were moving through the channel system during the fall season.

Conclusions

Upland areas are the major contributors to in-stream suspended sediments in this watershed. Sediment resuspension in stream channels could play an important role during the later part of the year. Best management practices should be targeted in the upland areas to reduce the export of sediments and sediment-bound P from agricultural watersheds.

Keywords

Fallout radionuclides Phosphorus Sediment fingerprinting Sediment sources 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the USDA NIFA Hatch Program (Project # WIS01080) and the University of Wisconsin–Madison Anna Birge Memorial Grant for funding this study. We would also like to thank the producers who allowed us to study their watershed as well as Perry Cabot and David Armstrong for their advice in setting up the project.

Supplementary material

11368_2013_769_MOESM1_ESM.docx (83 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 83 kb)

References

  1. Ballantine D, Walling DE, Leeks GJL (2009) Mobilisation and transport of sediment-associated phosphorus by surface runoff. Water Air Soil Pollut 196:311–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonniwell EC, Matisoff G, Whiting PJ (1999) Determining the times and distances of particle transit in a mountain stream using fallout radionuclides. Geomorphology 27:75–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen E, Mackay DS (2004) Effects of distribution-based parameter aggregation on a spatially distributed agricultural nonpoint source pollution model. J Hydrol 295:211–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christensen BT, Malmros PA (1982) Loss-on-ignition and carbon content in a beech forest soil-profile. Holarctic Ecol 5:376–380Google Scholar
  5. Collins AL, Walling DE (2007) Fine-grained bed sediment storage within the main channel systems of the Frome and Piddle catchments, Dorset, UK. Hydrol Process 21:1448–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins AL, Walling DE, Leeks GJL (1997) Source type ascription for fluvial suspended sediment based on a quantitative composite fingerprinting technique. Catena 29:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Rice EW, Greenberg AE (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st edn. Port City Press, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  8. Fitzgerald SA, Klump JV, Swarzenski PW, Mackenzie RA, Richards KD (2001) Beryllium-7 as a tracer of short-term sediment deposition and resuspension in the Fox River, Wisconsin. Environ Sci Technol 35:300–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. FitzHugh TW, Mackay DS (2000) Impacts of input parameter spatial aggregation on an agricultural nonpoint source pollution model. J Hydrol 236:35–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haygarth PM, Wood FL, Heathwaite AL, Butler PJ (2005) Phosphorus dynamics observed through increasing scales in a nested headwater-to-river channel study. Sci Total Environ 344:83–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Homer C, Dewitz J, Fry J, Coan M, Hossain N, Larson C, Herold N, McKerrow A, VanDriel JN, Wickham J (2007) Completion of the 2001 National Land Cover Database for the Conterminous United States. Photogramm Engineer Remote Sens 73:337–341Google Scholar
  12. Huff FA, Angel JR (1992) Rainfall frequency atlas of the Midwest. Bulletin 71. Illinois State Water Survey, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  13. Huisman NLH (2010) Sources and in-stream transport of sediment and phosphorus in an agricultural Wisconsin watershed. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Madison, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  14. Huisman NLH, Karthikeyan KG (2012) Using radiometric tools to track sediment and phosphorus movement in an agricultural watershed. J Hydrol 450:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jarvie HP, Jürgens MD, Williams RJ, Neal C, Davies JJL, Barrett C, White J (2005) Role of river bed sediments as sources and sinks of phosphorus across two major eutrophic UK river basins: the Hampshire Avon and Herefordshire Wye. J Hydrol 304:51–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lathrop RC (2007) Perspectives on the eutrophication of the Yahara lakes. Lake Reservoir Manage 23:345–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Matisoff G, Bonniwell EC, Whiting PJ (2002) Soil erosion and sediment sources in an Ohio watershed using beryllium-7, cesium-137, and lead-210. J Environ Qual 31:54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matisoff G, Wilson CG, Whiting PJ (2005) The Be-7/PB210(xs) ratio as an indicator of suspended sediment age or fraction new sediment in suspension. Earth Surf Process Landf 30:1191–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McDowell RW, Wilcock RJ (2004) Particulate phosphorus transport within stream flow of an agricultural catchment. J Environ Qual 33:2111–2121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McDowell RW, Wilcock RJ (2007) Sources of sediment and phosphorus in stream flow of a highly productive dairy farmed catchment. J Environ Qual 36:540–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Midwest Regional Climate Center (2001) Historical climate data; station: 474961 MADISON WSO AIRPORT, WI. http://mrcc.sws.uiuc.edu/climate_midwest/historical/precip/wi/474961_psum.html. Accessed 18 February 2013
  22. Mukundan R, Walling DE, Gellis AC, Slattery MC, Radcliffe DE (2012) Sediment source fingerprinting: transforming from a research tool to a management tool. J Amer Water Resour Assoc 48:1241–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Olley JM, Murray AS, Mackenzie DH, Edwards K (1993) Identifying sediment sources in a gullied catchment using natural and anthropogenic radioactivity. Water Resour Res 29:1037–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Osmond D, Meals D, Hoag D, Arabi M, Luloff A, Jennings G, McFarland M, Spooner J, Sharpley A, Line D (2012) Improving conservation practices programming to protect water quality in agricultural watersheds: lessons learned from the National Institute of Food and Agriculture-Conservation Effects Assessment Project. J Soil Water Conserv (Ankeny) 67:122A–127ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Owens PN, Walling DE (2002) The phosphorus content of fluvial sediment in rural and industrialized river basins. Water Res 36:685–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Panuska JC, Karthikeyan KG (2010) Phosphorus and organic matter enrichment in snowmelt and rainfall-runoff from three corn management systems. Geoderma 154:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Phillips JM, Russell MA, Walling DE (2000) Time-integrated sampling of fluvial suspended sediment: A simple methodology for small catchments. Hydrol Process 14:2589–2602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Russell MA, Walling DE, Hodgkinson RA (2000) Appraisal of a simple sampling device for collecting time-integrated fluvial suspended sediment samples. In: Stone M (ed) The role of erosion and sediment transport in nutrient and contaminant transfer. IAHS Publ 263, IAHS, Wallingford, pp 119–127Google Scholar
  30. Stone M, Mudroch A (1989) The effect of particle-size, chemistry and mineralogy of river sediments on phosphate adsorption. Environ Technol Lett 10:501–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Trimble SW (1999) Decreased rates of alluvial sediment storage in the Coon Creek Basin, Wisconsin, 1975–93. Science 285:1244–1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wallbrink PJ, Martin CE, Wilson CJ (2003) Quantifying the contributions of sediment, sediment-P and fertiliser-P from forested, cultivated and pasture areas at the land use and catchment scale using fallout radionuclides and geochemistry. Soil Tillage Res 69:53–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Walling DE, Collins AL (2008) The catchment sediment budget as a management tool. Environ Sci Policy 11:136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walling DE, Woodward JC (1992) Use of radiometric fingerprints to derive information on suspended sediment sources. In: Bogen J, Walling DE, Day T (eds) Erosion and sediment transport monitoring programmes in river basins. IAHS Publ 210, IAHS, Wallingford, pp 153–163Google Scholar
  35. Walling DE, Collins AL, Stroud RW (2008) Tracing suspended sediment and particulate phosphorus sources in catchments. J Hydrol 350:274–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalie L. H. Huisman
    • 1
  • K. G. Karthikeyan
    • 2
  • Jasmeet Lamba
    • 2
  • Anita M. Thompson
    • 2
  • Graham Peaslee
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUnion CollegeSchenectadyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological Systems EngineeringUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryHope CollegeHollandUSA

Personalised recommendations