Evaluation of soil analytical methods for the characterization of alkaline Technosols: II. Amorphous constituents and carbonates
- 313 Downloads
The aims of this study were to identify potential sources of error in common methods for determination of amorphous oxide concentrations and carbonate concentrations, as applied to a Technosolic material (bauxite residue), and where possible, suggest improvements to the methods.
Materials and methods
An acid ammonium oxalate (AAO) extraction was applied to fresh and weathered bauxite residues, at soil to solution ratios varying from 1:100 to 1:800. Two methods for carbonate concentration were compared: the ‘weight loss’ method, and the ‘difference in total C’ method. These were applied to six weathered bauxite residue samples, with CaCO3 concentrations ranging from 0.1–2 % weight.
Results and discussion
Chemically extractable amorphous content was underreported in bauxite residue at the standard 1:100 extraction ratio, likely due to Al and Si saturation of the oxalate complex. A 1:400 soil: AAO ratio extracted the highest amount of amorphous material. Some crystalline minerals such as sodalite, inherited from the Technosolic parent material, were soluble in the acid ammonium oxalate extractant. The difference in total C method was more precise than the weight loss method for the determination of carbonate concentration in bauxite residues.
The high amorphous content of bauxite residues requires a wider soil to solution ratio (1:400) for acid ammonium oxalate extraction than is used for typical soil materials (1:100). The difference in total C method is recommended for the routine analysis of field samples where small variations in carbonate concentration need to be detected.
KeywordsAcid ammonium oxalate extraction Analytical methods Inorganic carbon Pedogenesis Tailings Technosols
acid ammonium oxalate
The authors wish to thank Stephen Leavy and Kim-Louise Burke of Alcoa of Australia Limited. for assistance with ICPOES analyses; David Cooling, Patrick Keogh, and Keith Schmidt of Alcoa, Hezio Oliviera of Alumar, and Dianne McDonald of the Guyana Geology and Mines Commission for assisting with collection of bauxite residue samples; and Justin Kimpton, Helen Brand, and Qinfen Gu of the Australian Synchrotron for assistance with XRD analyses. Part of this research was undertaken on the Powder Diffraction (10BM1) beamline at the Australian Synchrotron, Victoria, Australia. Financial support for this work was provided by Alcoa of Australia Limited. and BHP Billiton Worsley Alumina, and a Minerals and Energy Research Institute of Western Australia scholarship to the senior author.
- Allison LE, Bollen WB, Moodie CD (1965) Total carbon. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 2—chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Wisconsin, pp 1346–1366Google Scholar
- Allison LE, Moodie CD (1965) Carbonate. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 2—chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Wisconsin, pp 1379–1396Google Scholar
- IUSS Working Group WRB (2006) World reference base for soil resources—world soil resources reports no. 103, 2nd edition. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
- King P, Kennedy H, Newton PP, Jickells TD, Brand T, Calvert S, Cauwet G, Etcheber H, Head B, Khripounoff A, Manighetti B, Miquel JC (1998) Analysis of total and organic carbon and total nitrogen in settling oceanic particles and a marine sediment: an interlaboratory comparison. Mar Chem 60:203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Loeppert RH, Inskeep WP (1996) Iron. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 3—chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Wisconsin, pp 639–664Google Scholar
- Loeppert RH, Suarez DL (1996) Carbonate and gypsum. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 3—chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Wisconsin, pp 437–474Google Scholar
- Rayment GE, Higginson FR (1992) Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods. Inkata Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- Richards LA (ed) (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkaline soils - United States Department of Agriculture Handbook No. 60. United States Government Printing Office, Washington DC Google Scholar
- Ross GJ, Wang C (1993) Extractable Al, Fe, Mn, and Si. In: Carter MR (ed) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 239–246Google Scholar
- Schumacher BA (2002) Methods for the determination of total organic carbon (TOC) in soils and sediments. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Las VegasGoogle Scholar
- Snars KE, Gilkes RJ (2009) Evaluation of bauxite residues (red muds) of different origins for environmental applications. Appl Clay Sci 46:13–20Google Scholar
- VSN International (2009) Genstat Release 12.1. VSN International, Helensburgh, AustraliaGoogle Scholar