Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 921–932 | Cite as

Sublethal effects of contaminated sediment on Arenicola marina

  • Kenneth Macrae
  • Silje Kile
  • Merete Grung
  • Ketil Hylland
SEDIMENTS, SEC 1 • SEDIMENT QUALITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT • RESEARCH ARTICLE
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 166 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The highest concentrations of environmental contaminants are generally found in marine sediments, and there is a need for knowledge concerning how and whether they affect sediment-dwelling organisms. This study aimed to assess sublethal effects in Arenicola marina exposed to two sediments from a contaminated fjord and two reference locations with different sediment characteristics.

Materials and methods

Duplicate contaminated sediments were used to investigate the robustness of current protocols for sediment testing. The two reference sediments, with different grain sizes and total organic carbon, were collected from the outer Oslofjord and the two contaminated sediments from Frierfjord. Polychaetes were exposed in quadruplicate sediment microcosms and sampled after 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks of exposure. Oxidative stress resistance (total oxyradical scavenging capacity, TOSC) and components comprising the energy budget (cellular energy allocation, CEA) were determined for individual polychaetes.

Results and discussion

Arenicola maintained and increased body weights over the initial 4 weeks of exposure in all groups, except in one reference sediment (Elle). There were no differences between treatments in the scavenging capacity (TOSC). The most striking difference in how polychaetes partitioned energy resources was a difference in lipid and carbohydrate allocations for Arenicola held in the contaminated sediments over the initial weeks. Cellular respiration appeared to increase in polychaetes held in the Elle sediment and decreased for polychaetes held in the two Frierfjord sediments by weeks 4 and 8. In the overall CEA, this was offset by increased energy per weight stored in the Elle group, which resulted in an overall positive CEA for polychaetes held in that sediment, whereas polychaetes in the other treatments were close to neutral. Although CEA would thus indicate that Elle polychaetes had good health status, their body weight also decreased significantly over the experimental period compared to other treatments, indicating an overall negative effect.

Conclusions

This study has shown the importance of sediment characteristics when evaluating toxicity and how resource allocation can differ dramatically over a short time span in polychaetes held in similarly contaminated sediments. There were no clear effects of sediment contamination on CEA or TOSC in the polychaete A. marina. The findings are relevant for the design of both short- and long-term sediment studies.

Keywords

Arenicola marina Cellular energy allocation Oxidative stress Sediment Time trend 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was partly funded by the Norwegian Research Council to the Sedrisk (project no. 172531). Thanks are due to two anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved the manuscript.

References

  1. Abele-Oeschger D (1996) A comparative study of superoxide dismutase activity in marine benthic invertebrates with respect to environmental sulphide exposure. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 197:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abele-Oeschger D, Oeschger R, Theede H (1994) Biochemical adaptations of Nereis diversicolor (Polychaeta) to temporarily increased hydrogen peroxide levels in intertidal sandflats. Mar Ecol prog ser Oldendorf 106:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakke T, Kallqvist T, Ruus A, Breedveld GD, Hylland K (2010) Development of sediment quality criteria in Norway. J Soils Sediments 10:172–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bat L, Raffaelli D (1998) Sediment toxicity testing: a bioassay approach using the amphipod Corophium volutator and the polychaete Arenicola marina. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 226:217–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beiras R, Vazquez E, Bellas J, Lorenzo JI, Fernandez N, Macho G, Mariño JC, Casas L (2001) Sea-urchin embryo bioassay for in situ evaluation of the biological quality of coastal seawater. Estuar Coastal Shelf Sci 52:29–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benedetti M, Ciaprini F, Piva F, Onorati F, Fattorini D, Notti A, Ausili A, Regoli F (2012) A multidisciplinary weight of evidence approach for classifying polluted sediments: integrating sediment chemistry, bioavailability, biomarkers responses and bioassays. Environ Internat 38:17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bligh E, Dyer W (1959) A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 37:911–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bocchetti R, Lamberti CV, Pisanelli B, Razzetti EM, Maggi C, Catalano B, Sesta G, Martuccio G, Gabellini M, Regoli F (2008) Seasonal variations of exposure biomarkers, oxidative stress responses and cell damage in the clams, Tapes philippinarum, and mussels, Mytilus galloprovincialis, from Adriatic Sea. Mar Environ Res 66:24–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byrne PA, O’Halloran J (2001) The role of bivalve molluscs as tools in estuarine sediment toxicity testing: a review. Hydrobiologia 465:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Camus L, Pampanin DM, Volpato E, Delaney E, Sanni S, Nasci C (2004) Total oxyradical scavenging capacity responses in Mytilus galloprovincialis transplanted into the Venice lagoon (Italy) to measure the biological impact of anthropogenic activities. Mar Pollut Bull 49:801–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carr RS, Chapman DC (1992) Comparison of solid-phase and pore-water approaches for assessing the quality of marine and estuarine sediments. Chemistry and Ecology 7:19–30Google Scholar
  12. Cesar A, Choueri RB, Riba I, Morales-Caselles C, Pereira CDS, Santos AR, Abessa DMS, DelValls TA (2007) Comparative sediment quality assessment in different littoral ecosystems from Spain (Gulf of Cadiz) and Brazil (Santos and São Vicente estuarine system). Environ Internat 33:429–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christensen M, Banta GT, Andersen O (2002) Effects of the polychaetes Nereis diversicolor and Arenicola marina on the fate and distribution of pyrene in sediments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 237:159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cornelissen G, Breedveld GD, Næs K, Oen AMP, Ruus A (2006) Bioaccumulation of native polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from sediment by a polychaete and a gastropod: freely dissolved concentrations and activated carbon amendment. Environ Tox Chem 25:2349–2355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Croteau M-N, Luoma SN, Stewart AR (2005) Trophic transfer of metals along freshwater food webs: evidence of cadmium biomagnification in nature. Limnol Oceanogr 50:1511–1519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Coen W (1999) Study of the energy metabolism and DNA-damage of the water flea Daphnia magna Straus under toxic stress and the relation with population dynamics. PhD thesis, University of Ghent, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  17. de Coen W, Janssen CR (1997) The use of biomarkers in Daphnia magna toxicity testing. II. Digestive enzyme activity in Daphnia magna exposed to sublethal concentrations of cadmium, chromium and mercury. Chemosphere 35:1053–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galloway T, Lewis C, Dolciotti I, Johnston BD, Moger J, Regoli F (2010) Sublethal toxicity of nano-titanium dioxide and carbon nanotubes in a sediment dwelling marine polychaete. Environ Poll 158:1748–1755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. García-Alonso J, Hoeger U, Rebscher N (2006) Regulation of vitellogenesis in Nereis virens (Annelida: Polychaeta): effect of estradiol-17beta on eleocytes. Comp Biochem Physiol, Part A Mol Integr Physiol 143:55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gnaiger E (1983) Appendix C. Calculation of energetic and biochemical equivalents of respiratory oxygen consumption. In: Gnaiger E, Forstner G (eds) Polarogr oxygen sens. Springer, Berlin, pp 337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Griscom SB, Fisher NS (2002) Uptake of dissolved Ag, Cd, and Co by the clam, Macoma balthica: relative importance of overlying water, oxic pore water, and burrow water. Environ Sci Technol 36:2471–2478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grung M, Ruus A, Holth TF, Sidhu RS, Eriksen DØ, Hylland K (2009) Bioaccumulation and lack of oxidative stress response in the ragworm H. diversicolor following exposure to 226Ra in sediment. J Environ Radioact 100:429–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grung M, Næs K, Fogelberg O, Nilsen AJ, Brack W, Lubcke-von Varel U, Thomas K (2011) Effects-directed analysis of sediments from polluted marine sites in Norway. J Tox Environ Health 74:439–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gunnarsson JS, Rosenberg R (1996) Eutrophication increases the association of PCB to dissolved organic matter in marine microcosms. Mar Poll Bull 33:100–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hatlen K, Camus L, Berge J, Olsen GH, Baussant T (2009) Biological effects of water soluble fraction of crude oil on the Arctic sea ice amphipod Gammarus wilkitzkii. Chem Ecol 25:151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hylland K, Sköld M, Gunnarsson JS, Skei J (1996) Interactions between eutrophication and contaminants. IV. Effects on sediment-dwelling organisms. Mar Poll Bull 33:90–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hylland K, Aspholm O, Knutsen JA, Ruus A (2006) Biomarkers in fish from dioxin-contaminated fjords. Biomarkers 11:97–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaag NHBM, Scholten MCT, Van Straalen NM (1998) Factors affecting PAH residues in the lugworm Arenicola marina, a sediment feeding polychaete. J Sea Res 40:251–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keay J, Thornton JW (2009) Hormone-activated estrogen receptors in annelid invertebrates: implications for evolution and endocrine disruption. Endocrinol 150:1731–1738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. King FD, Packard TT (1975) Respiration and the activity of the respiratory electron transport system in marine zooplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 20:849–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Klamer HJC, Leonards PEG, Lamoree MH, Villerius LA, Åkerman JE, Bakker JF (2005) A chemical and toxicological profile of Dutch North Sea surface sediments. Chemosphere 58:1579–1587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kocan RM, Sabo KM, Landolt ML (1985) Cytotoxicity/genotoxicity: the application of cell culture techniques to the measurement of marine sediment pollution. Aquat Toxicol 6:165–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Landrum PF (1989) Bioavailability and toxicokinetics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons sorbed to sediments for the amphipod Pontoporeia hoyi. Environ Sci Technol 23:588–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Law FCP, Meng JX, He YT, Chui YC, Lehner AF, Horn J, Flesher JW, Lemieux H, Blier PU, Dufresne F, Desrosiers G, Lin ELC, Cormier SM, Racine RN, Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1994) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275Google Scholar
  35. Lee W-Y, Wang W-X (2001) Metal accumulation in the green macroalga Ulva fasciata: effects of nitrate, ammonium and phosphate. Sci Total Environ 278:11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Livingstone DR, Martinez PG, Michel X, Narbonne JF, O’Hara S, Ribera D, Winston GW (1990) Oxyradical production as a pollution-mediated mechanism of toxicity in the common Mussel, Mytilus edulis L., and other molluscs. Funct Ecol 4:415–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lowry O, Rosebrough N, Farr A, Randall R (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275Google Scholar
  38. Mearns AJ, Swartz RC, Cummins JM, Dinnel PA, Plesha P, Chapman PM (1986) Inter-laboratory comparison of a sediment toxicity test using the marine amphipod, Rhepoxynius abronius. Mar Environ Res 19:13–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Næs K, Hylland K, Oug E, Förlin L, Ericson G (1999) Accumulation and effects of aluminum smelter—generated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on soft—bottom invertebrates and fish. Environ Tox Chem 18:2205–2216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Connor TP, Daskalakis KD, Hyland JL, Paul JF, Summers JK (1998) Comparisons of sediment toxicity with predictions based on chemical guidelines. Environ Tox Chem 17:468–471Google Scholar
  41. Olsen GH, Sva E, Carroll J, Camus L, de Coen W, Smolders R, Øveraas H, Hylland K (2007) Alterations in the energy budget of Arctic benthic species exposed to oil-related compounds. Aquat Toxicol 83:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Penry DL, Weston DP (1998) Digestive determinants of benzo[a]pyrene and phenanthrene bioaccumulation by a deposit-feeding polychaete. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:2254–2265Google Scholar
  43. Perez E, Blasco J, Sole M (2004) Biomarker responses to pollution in two invertebrate species: Scrobicularia plana and Nereis diversicolor from the Cadiz Bay (SW Spain). Mar Environ Res 58:275–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Persson NJ, Gustafsson Ö, Bucheli TD, Ishaq R, Broman D (2002) Soot-carbon influenced distribution of PCDD/Fs in the marine environment of the Grenlandsfjords, Norway. Environ Sci Technol 36:4968–4974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Piva F, Ciaprini F, Onorati F, Benedetti M, Fattorini D, Ausili A, Regoli F (2011) Assessing sediment hazard through a weight of evidence approach with bioindicator organisms: a practical model to elaborate data from sediment chemistry, bioavailability, biomarkers and ecotoxicological bioassays. Chemosphere 83:475–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Regoli F (2000) Total oxyradical scavenging capacity (TOSC) in polluted and translocated mussels: a predictive biomarker of oxidative stress. Aquat Toxicol 50:351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Regoli F, Winston GW (1998) Applications of a new method for measuring the total oxyradical scavenging capacity in marine invertebrates. Mar Environ Res 46:439–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reinfelder JR, Wang W-X, Luoma SN, Fisher NS (1997) Assimilation efficiencies and turnover rates of trace elements in marine bivalves: a comparison of oysters, clams and mussels. Mar Biol 129:443–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Riba I, Forja JM, Gómez-Parra A, DelValls TÁ (2004) Sediment quality in littoral regions of the Gulf of Cádiz: a triad approach to address the influence of mining activities. Environ Poll 132:341–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roddie BD, Thain JE (2002) Biological effects of contaminants: Corophium sp. sediment bioassay and toxicity test. ICES Techniques in Marine Environmental Sciences, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  51. Ruus A, Schaanning M, Oxnevad S, Hylland K (2005) Experimental results on bioaccumulation of metals and organic contaminants from marine sediments. Aquat Toxicol 72:273–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scarlett A, Rowland SJ, Canty M, Smith EL, Galloway TS (2007) Method for assessing the chronic toxicity of marine and estuarine sediment-associated contaminants using the amphipod Corophium volutator. Mar Environ Res 63:457–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schaanning MT, Hylland K, Eriksen DØ, Bergan TD, Gunnarson JS, Skei J (1996) Interactions between eutrophication and contaminants. II. Mobilization and bioaccumulation of Hg and Cd from marine sediments. Mar Poll Bull 33:71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Selck H, Granberg ME, Forbes VE (2005) Impact of sediment organic matter quality on the fate and effects of fluoranthene in the infaunal brittle star Amphiura filiformis. Mar Environ Res 59:19–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Skei J, Hylland K, Schaanning MT, Berge JA, Gunnarsson JS, Sköld M, Eriksen DØ (1996) Interactions between eutrophication and contaminants. I. Principles, experimental design and synthesis. Mar Poll Bull 33:64–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 2nd edn. W.H. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Stomperudhaugen ES, Overas NHH, Langford K, de Coen W, Smolders R, Hylland K (2009) Cellular energy allocation in Hediste diversicolor exposed to sediment contaminants. J Toxicol Environ Health 72:244–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Widdows J, Burns KA, Menon NR, Page DS, Soria S (1990) Measurement of physiological energetics (scope for growth) and chemical contaminants in mussels (Arca zebra) transplanted along a contamination gradient in Bermuda. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 138:99–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Widdows J, Donkin P, Staff FJ, Matthiessen P, Law RJ, Allen YT, Thain JE, Allchin CR, Jones BR (2002) Measurement of stress effects (scope for growth) and contaminant levels in mussels (Mytilus edulis) collected from the Irish Sea. Mar Environ Res 53:327–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Winston GW, Regoli F, Dugas AJ, Fong JH, Blanchard KA (1998) A rapid gas chromatographic assay for determining oxyradical scavenging capacity of antioxidants and biological fluids. Free Radical Biol Med 24:480–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zebe E, Schiedek D (1996) The lugworm Arenicola marina: a model of physiological adaptation to life in intertidal sediments. Helgol Meeres Hamburg 50:37–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth Macrae
    • 1
    • 2
  • Silje Kile
    • 2
  • Merete Grung
    • 1
  • Ketil Hylland
    • 2
  1. 1.Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA)OsloNorway
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations