Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 386–395 | Cite as

Soil organic matter dynamics and nitrogen availability in response to site preparation and management during revegetation in tropical Central Queensland, Australia

  • Shahla Hosseini BaiEmail author
  • Timothy J. Blumfield
  • Zhihong Xu
  • Chengrong Chen
  • Clyde Wild
SOILS, SEC 2 • GLOBAL CHANGE, ENVIRON RISK ASSESS, SUSTAINABLE LAND USE • RESEARCH ARTICLE

Abstract

Purpose

There is considerable interest in finding a cost-effective method of site preparation that effectively controls weeds during planting and further reduces the need for recurring herbicide applications. In this study, two weed control methods, herbicide and scalping, were examined. Both methods may have implications for soil organic matter (SOM) dynamics and nitrogen (N) which could consequently affect plant survival and vegetation establishment. This study aimed to investigate the dynamics of SOM, carbon (C) and N pools under site manipulation practices and the associated early plant survival and growth in tropical Australia.

Materials and methods

A field trial was established in Central Queensland to examine the recovery of SOM, C and N pools following scalping and the alternative site preparation technique of sequential herbicide application. Both were contrasted with control plots which received neither treatment. Plant survival and growth were also monitored to improve our understanding of plant response to site preparation practices.

Results and discussion

Scalped plots showed significantly lower values for labile C and N pools compared with the herbicide treatment and control. Generally, there was no significant difference between the herbicide and control for any of the parameters tested. Our observation indicated that herbicide application was significantly less effective than scalping to control weeds. A general decline in SOM parameters was observed in all the plots, including the control during the trial. Drought conditions were considered to be a major factor in the overall decline of SOM. Despite removal of the top soil, there was no significant difference in plant survival between herbicide and scalped areas (81% and 79% survival, respectively). Plant growth was not affected by the treatments in the first 6 months when weed competition in the herbicide areas and low nutrient availability in the scalped plots would have been significant factors in controlling growth rates. However, plants in the herbicide areas, irrespective of species, showed stronger growth than those in the scalped plots at week 61 when they had outgrown the weed competition. It is likely that differences in plant growth response to treatments will become negligible over time.

Conclusions

Top soil removal was more effective than the use of herbicide in the long-term control of weeds. However, lower SOM and N availability in the scalped areas did not affect plant survival rates when compared with that of the herbicide areas. Whilst the preservation of soil organic matter is considered to be vital in short-term cropping systems, our results indicate that this is not the case for woody vegetation establishment and, in terms of cost and reduction of chemical use, removal of the organically rich top soil, with its accompanying seed burden may be both practical and desirable.

Keywords

Herbicide application Revegetation Site management Soil C and N pools Soil organic matter Top soil removal 

References

  1. Amishev DY, Fox TR (2006) The effect of weed control and fertilization on survival and growth of four pine species in the Virginia Piedmont. For Ecol Manag 236:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araújo ASF, Monteiro RTR, Abarkeli RB (2003) Effect of glyphosate on the microbial activity of two Brazilian soils. Chemosphere 52:799–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asada T, Warner B, Aravena R (2005) Effects of the early stage of decomposition on change in carbon and nitrogen isotopes in Sphagnum litter. J Plant Interact 1:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bastida F, Moreno JL, Hernandez T, Garcia C (2007) The long-term effects of the management of a forest soil on its carbon content, microbial biomass and activity under a semi-arid climate. Appl Soil Ecol 37:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benayas JMR, López-Pintor A, García C, de la Cámara N, Strasser R, Sal AG (2002) Early establishment of planted Retama sphaerocarpa seedlings under different levels of light, water and weed competition. Plant Ecol 159:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blumfield TJ, Xu ZH (2003) Impact of harvest residues on soil mineral nitrogen dynamics following clearfall harvesting of a hoop pine plantation in subtropical Australia. For Ecol Manage 179:55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blumfield TJ, Xu ZH, Prasolova NV, Mathers NJ (2006) Effect of overlying windrowed harvest residues on soil carbon and nitrogen in hoop pine plantations of subtropical Australia. J Soils Sediments 6:243–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brookes PC, Landman A, Pruden G, Jenkinson DS (1985) Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 17:837–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burton J, Chen C, Xu Z, Ghadiri H (2010) Soil microbial biomass, activity and community composition in adjacent native and plantation forests of subtropical Australia. J Soils Sediments 10:1267–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Busse MD, Beattie SE, Powers RF, Sanchez FG, Tiarks AE (2006) Microbial community responses in forest mineral soil to compaction, organic matter removal, and vegetation control. Can J Forest Res 36:577–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Busse MD, Cochran PH, Barrett JW (1996) Changes in ponderosa pine site productivity following removal of understory vegetation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:1614–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Busse MD, Ratcliff AW, Shestak CJ, Powers RF (2001) Glyphosate toxicity and the effects of long-term vegetation control on soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1777–1789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen CR, Condron LM, Davis MR, Sherlock RR (2003) Seasonal changes in soil phosphorus and associated microbial properties under adjacent grassland and forest in New Zealand. For Ecol Manage 177:539–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen CR, Xu ZH (2005) Soil carbon and nitrogen pools and microbial properties in a 6-year-old slash pine plantation of subtropical Australia: impacts of harvest residue management. For Ecol Manage 206:237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Connin SL, Feng X, Virginia RA (2001) Isotopic discrimination during long-term decomposition in an arid land ecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 33:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erskine PD, Lamb D, Bristow M (eds) (2005) Reforestation in the tropics and subtropics of Australia using rainforest tree species. Canberra, ACT: RIRDC Publication No 05/087, Rural Industries Research and Development CorporationGoogle Scholar
  17. Flint LE, Childs SW (1987) Effect of shading, mulching and vegetation control on Douglas-Fir seedling growth and soil water supply. For Ecol Manage 18:189–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. George BH, Brennan PD (2002) Herbicides are more cost-effective than alternative weed control methods for increasing early growth of Eucalyptus dunnii and Eucalyptus saligna. New For 24:147–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graham S, McGinness HM, O'Connell DA (2009) Effects of management techniques on the establishment of eucalypt seedlings on farmland: a review. Agrofor Syst 77:59–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gurlevik N, Kelting DL, Allen HL (2004) Nitrogen mineralization following vegetation control and fertilization in a 14-year-old loblolly pine plantation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:272–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harper RJ, Booth TH, Ryan PJ, Gilkes RJ, McKenzie NJ, Lewis MF. 2008. Site selection for farm forestry in Australia. Canberra: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. https://rirdc.infoservices.com.au/items/08-152
  22. He Y, Chen C, Xu Z, Williams D, Xu J (2009) Assessing management impacts on soil organic matter quality in subtropical Australian forests using physical and chemical fractionation as well as 13C NMR spectroscopy. Soil Biol Biochem 41:640–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. He Y, Xu ZH, Chen CR, Burton J, Ma Q, Ge Y, Xu JM (2008) Using light fraction and macroaggregate associated organic matters as early indicators for management-induced changes in soil chemical and biological properties in adjacent native and plantation forests of subtropical Australia. Geoderma 147:116–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hendrickson OQ, Chatarpaul L, Robinson JB (1985) Effects of 2 methods of timber harvesting on microbial processes in forest soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:739–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huang ZQ, Xu ZH, Chen C (2008a) Effect of mulching on labile soil organic matter pools, microbial community functional diversity and nitrogen transformations in two hardwood plantations of subtropical Australia. Appl Soil Ecol 40:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang ZQ, Xu ZH, Chen CR, Boyd S (2008b) Changes in soil carbon during the establishment of a hardwood plantation in subtropical Australia. For Ecol Manage 254:46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ibell PT, Xu ZH, Blumfield TJ (2010) Effects of weed control and fertilization on soil carbon and nutrient pools in an exotic pine plantation of subtropical Australia. J Soils Sediments 10:1027–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Janzen HH, Campbell CA, Brandt SA, Lafond GP, Townley-Smith L (1992) Light-fraction organic matter in soils from long-term crop rotations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1799–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lamb D, Erskine PD, Parrotta JA (2005) Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science 310:1628–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li QC, Allen HL, Wollum AG (2004) Microbial biomass and bacterial functional diversity in forest soils: effects of organic matter removal, compaction, and vegetation control. Soil Biol Biochem 36:571–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lupwayi NZ, Harker KN, Clayton GW, O'Donovan JT, Blackshaw RE (2009) Soil microbial response to herbicides applied to glyphosate-resistant canola. Agricul Ecosys Environ 129:171–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lupwayi NZ, Harker KN, Clayton GW, Turkington TK, Rice WA, O'Donovan JT (2004) Soil microbial biomass and diversity after herbicide application. Can J Plant Sci 84:677–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. MacDonald GB, Thompson DJ (2003) Responses of planted conifers and natural hardwood regeneration to harvesting, scalping, and weeding on a boreal mixedwood site. For Ecol Manage 182:213–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mallik AU, Hu D (1997) Soil respiration following site preparation treatments in boreal mixedwood forest. For Ecol Manage 97:265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moreira A, Fageria NK, Garcia Y, Garcia A (2011) Soil fertility, mineral nitrogen, and microbial biomass in upland soils of the Central Amazon under different plant covers. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 42:694–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nadelhoffer KJ, Downs MR, Fry B, Aber JD, Magill AH, Melillo JM (1994) The fate of 15N-labelled nitrate additions to a northern hardwood forest in eastern Maine. USA Oecologia 103:292–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Paul KI, Polglase PJ, Nyakuengama JG, Khanna PK (2002) Change in soil carbon following afforestation. For Ecol Manage 168:241–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Powers RF, Reynolds PE (1999) Ten-year responses of ponderosa pine plantations to repeated vegetation and nutrient control along an environmental gradient. Can J Forest Res 29:1027–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Qi G, Wang Q, Zhou W, Ding H, Wang X, Qi L, Wang Y, Li S, Dai L (2011) Moisture effect on carbon and nitrogen mineralization in topsoil of Changbai Mountain, Northeast China. J Forest Sci 57:340–348Google Scholar
  40. Rey Benayas JM, Navarro J, Espigares T, Nicolau JM, Zavala MA (2005) Effects of artificial shading and weed mowing in reforestation of Mediterranean abandoned cropland with contrasting Quercus species. For Ecol Manage 212:302–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roldan A, Garciaorenes F, Albaladejo J (1994) Microbial-populations in the rhizosphere of Brachypodium-Retusum and their relationship with stable aggregates in a semiarid soil of southeastern Spain. Arid Soil Res Rehab 8:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schoenholtz SH, Miegroet HV, Burger JA (2000) A review of chemical and physical properties as indicators of forest soil quality: challenges and opportunities. For Ecol Manage 138:335–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Secor J, Cséke C (1988) Inhibition of acetyl-CoA carboxylase activity by Haloxyfop and Tralkoxydim. Plant Physiol 86:10–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shi J, Cui LL, Tian Z (2010) Impact of site management on changes in soil carbon after afforestation: a review. Forest Stud China 12:158–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Singh KP, Mandal TN, Tripathi SK (2001) Patterns of restoration of soil physciochemical properties and microbial biomass in different landslide sites in the sal forest ecosystem of Nepal Himalaya. Ecol Eng 17:385–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smithwick E, Mack M, Turner M, Chapin F, Zhu J, Balser T (2005) Spatial heterogeneity and soil nitrogen dynamics in a burned black spruce forest stand: distinct controls at different scales. Biogeochemistry 76:517–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Spittlehouse DL, Childs SW (1990). Evaluating the seedlingmoisture environment after site preparation. In: Gessel SP, Lacate DS, Weetman GF, Powers RF (eds) Sustained productivity of forest soils. 7th North American Forest Soils Conference: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B. C., pp 80–94Google Scholar
  48. Tan X, Chang SX, Kabzems R (2005) Effects of soil compaction and forest floor removal on soil microbial properties and N transformations in a boreal forest long-term soil productivity study. For Ecol Manage 217:158–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass-C. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vitousek PM, Andariese SW, Matson PA, Morris L, Sanford RL (1992) Effects of harvest intensity, site preparation, and herbicide use on soil nitrogen transformations in a young loblolly pine plantation. For Ecol Manage 49:277–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wardle DA, Parkinson D (1991) Relative importance of the effect of 2,4-D, glyphosate, and environmental variables on the soil microbial biomass. Plant Soil 134:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Xu ZH, Chen CR (2006) Fingerprinting global climate change and forest management within rhizosphere carbon and nutrient cycling processes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 13:293–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Xu ZH, Chen CR, He JZ, Liu JX (2009) Trends and challenges in soil research 2009: linking global climate change to local long-term forest productivity. J Soils Sediments 9:83–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Xu ZH, Ward S, Chen CR, Blumfield T, Prasolova N, Liu JX (2008) Soil carbon and nutrient pools, microbial properties and gross nitrogen transformations in adjacent natural forest and hoop pine plantations of subtropical Australia. J Soils Sediments 8:99–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zabowski D, Skinner MF, Rygiewicz PT (1994) Timber harvesting and long-term productivity: weathering processes and soil disturbance. For Ecol Manage 66:55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang J, Zhu T, Cai Z, Müller C (2011) Nitrogen cycling in forest soils across climate gradients in Eastern China. Plant Soil 342:419–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zinn YL, Resck DVS, da Silva JE (2002) Soil organic carbon as affected by afforestation with Eucalyptus and Pinus in the Cerrado region of Brazil. For Ecol Manage 166:285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shahla Hosseini Bai
    • 1
    Email author
  • Timothy J. Blumfield
    • 1
  • Zhihong Xu
    • 1
  • Chengrong Chen
    • 2
  • Clyde Wild
    • 3
  1. 1.Environmental Futures Centre, School of Biomolecular and Physical SciencesGriffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Environmental Futures Centre, School of EnvironmentGriffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.Environmental Futures Centre, School of EnvironmentGriffith UniversityGold CoastAustralia

Personalised recommendations