Joint toxicity of three plant protection products to Triticum aestivum (L.) and Brassica rapa (L.)
- First Online:
- 177 Downloads
Few studies have been conducted to evaluate the effects of mixtures of chemicals in terrestrial environment. Thus, it seems important to evaluate if the combined application of pesticides currently used in agricultural fields may pose a risk to terrestrial plants.
Materials and methods
The effects of binary combinations of glyphosate, dimethoate, and spirodiclofen, applied to LUFA 2.2 soil, on the growth (determined following ISO guidelines) of the two species of plants (Brassica rapa and Triticum aestivum) were evaluated by the two reference models for mixture toxicity: concentration addition and independent action.
Results and discussion
Results of single exposure to the three pesticides indicated a decrease in shoot length and fresh weight of the two plant species only at the highest concentrations tested (approximately 54 times the recommended dose of glyphosate, 37 times the recommended dose of dimethoate, and 22 times the recommended dose of spirodiclofen). Synergism was only found in the combination of glyphosate and dimethoate when the independent action model was fitted to the shoot length and fresh weight of T. aestivum.
The results obtained in the present work seem to corroborate that these pesticides have no detrimental effects when applied at recommended doses. The joint toxicity effect of the pesticides was mainly antagonistic.
KeywordsFresh biomass Higher plants Mixture toxicity Pesticides Shoot growth
- Biediger DL, Baumann PA, Weaver DN, Chandler JM, Merkle MG (1992) Interactions between primisulfuron and selected soil-applied insecticides in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 6:807–812Google Scholar
- Bielecki K, Sarapuk J, Kleszczyńska H (2004) Binary mixtures of (n-phosphonomethyl)-glycine with new aminophosphonates. Z Naturforsch 59:515–518Google Scholar
- Eurostat (2007) The use of plant protection products in the European Union. Data 1992–2003. Eurostat Statistical books, 2007 edn. European Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
- Greco W, Unkelbach HD, Pöch G, Sühnel J, Kundi M, Bodeker W (1992) Consensus on concepts and terminology for combined-action assessment: the Saariselkä agreement. Arch Complex Environ Studies 4:65–69Google Scholar
- Greco WR, Bravo G, Parsons JC (1995) The search for synergy: a critical review from a response durface perspective. Pharmacol Rev 47:332–385Google Scholar
- ISO (1995) Soil quality—Determination of the effects of pollutants on soil flora—Part 2: Effects of chemicals on the emergence and growth of higher plants. ISO/DIS 11269–2. International Organization for Standardization Geneve, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- ISO (2004) Soil quality—biological methods—chronic toxicity in higher plants., ISO/DIS 22030, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- Long SM, Reicheinberg F, Lister LJ, Hankard PM, Townsend J, Mayer P, Wright J, Holmstrup M, Svendsen C, Spurgeon DJ (2009) Combined chemical (fluoranthene) and drought effects on Lumbricus rubellus demonstrate the applicability of the independent action model for multiple stressor assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:629–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Martikainen ETP, Krogh PH (1999) Effects of soil organic matter content and temperature on toxicity of dimethoate to Folsomia fimetaria (Collembola: Isotomiidae). Environ Toxicol Chem 18:865–872Google Scholar
- Martin ML, Ronco AE (2006) Effect of mixtures of pesticides used in the direct seeding technique on nontarget plant seeds. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 77:228–236Google Scholar
- Matzke M, Stolte S, Böschen A, Filser J (2008) Mixture effects and predictability of combination effects in imidazolium based ionic liquids as well as imidazolium based ionic liquids and cadmium on terrestrial plants (Triticum aestivum) and limnic green algae (Scenedesmus vacuolatus). Green Chem 10:784–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Munkegaard M, Abbaspoor M, Cedergreen N (2008) Organophosphorous insecticides as herbicide synergists on the green algae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and the aquatic plant Lemna minor. Ecotoxicology 17:29–35Google Scholar
- Nauen R (2005) Spirodiclofen: mode of action and resistance risk assessment in Tetranychid pest mites. J Pestic Sci 30:272–274Google Scholar
- Ogg AG Jr, Young FL (1991) Effects of preplant treatment interval and tillages on herbicide toxicity to winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Tech 5:291–296Google Scholar
- Raudomis L (2006) Comparative toxicity of spirodiclofen and lambdacihalotrin to Tetranychus urticae, Tarsonemus pallidus and predatory mite Amblyseius andersoni in a strawberry site under field conditions. Agron Res 4:317–322Google Scholar
- Ribo JM (1986) “Roundup” (Glyphosate): a TRC technical review. Toxicology Research Centre, University of Saskatchewan, SaskatchewanGoogle Scholar
- Shepherd J, Arthur E (2002) Mobility Determination of BAJ2740 by Soil Thin-Layer Chromatography in Four Soils: Lab Project Number: BJ182101: 110343. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Corporation. 54 pGoogle Scholar
- Sprankel P, Meggitt WF, Penner P (1975) Adsorption, mobility, and microbial degradation of glyphosate by soils. Weed Sci 23:229–234Google Scholar
- Vieira MM (2009) Vendas de produtos fitofarmacêuticos em Portugal em 2008. Direcção Geral de Agricultura e Desenvolvimento Rural. Ministério da Agricultura e do Desenvolvimento Rural, PortugalGoogle Scholar
- Wachendorff U, Nauen R, Schnorbach HJ, Rauch N, Elbert A (2002) The biological profile of Spirodiclofen (Envidor®)—a new selective tetronic acid acaricide. Bayer Crop Sci J 73:149–176Google Scholar
- Wolf C, Schnorbach H-J (2002) Ecobiological profile of the acaricide spirodiclofen. Bayer Crop Sci J 55:177–906Google Scholar