Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 930–939

Reducing CH4 and CO2 emissions from waterlogged paddy soil with biochar

  • Yuxue Liu
  • Min Yang
  • Yimin Wu
  • Hailong Wang
  • Yingxu Chen
  • Weixiang Wu
SOILS, SEC 2 • GLOBAL CHANGE, ENVIRON RISK ASSESS, SUSTAINABLE LAND USE • RESEARCH ARTICLE

Abstract

Purpose

A potential means to diminish increasing levels of CO2 in the atmosphere is the use of pyrolysis to convert biomass into biochar, which stabilizes the carbon (C) that is then applied to soil. Before biochar can be used on a large scale, especially in agricultural soils, its effects on the soil system need to be assessed. This is especially important in rice paddy soils that release large amounts of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere.

Materials and methods

In this study, the effects of biochar on CH4 and CO2 emissions from paddy soil with and without rice straw added as an additional C source were investigated. The biochars tested were prepared from bamboo chips or rice straw which yielded bamboo char (BC) and straw char (SC), respectively. BC and SC were applied to paddy soil to achieve low, medium, and high rates, based on C contents of the biochars. The biochar-amended soils were incubated under waterlogged conditions in the laboratory.

Results and discussion

Adding rice straw significantly increased CH4 and CO2 emissions from the paddy soil. However, when soils were amended with biochar, CH4 emissions were reduced. CH4 emissions from the paddy soil amended with BC and SC at high rate were reduced by 51.1% and 91.2%, respectively, compared with those without biochar. Methanogenic activity in the paddy soil decreased with increasing rates of biochar, whereas no differences in denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis patterns were observed. CO2 emission from the waterlogged paddy soil was also reduced in the biochar treatments.

Conclusions

Our results showed that SC was more effective than BC in reducing CH4 and CO2 emissions from paddy soils. The reduction of CH4 emissions from paddy soil with biochar amendment may result from the inhibition of methanogenic activity or a stimulation of methylotrophic activity during the incubation period.

Keywords

Bamboo char Greenhouse gas emission Methane Methanogenic activity Paddy field Straw char 

References

  1. Abdullah EC, Geldart D (1999) The use of bulk density measurements as flowability indicators. Powder Technol 102:151–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cai ZC, Xing GX, Yan XY, Xu H, Tsuruta H, Yagi K, Minami K (1997) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddy fields as affected by nitrogen fertilizers and water management. Plant Soil 196:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen G, Zheng Z, Yang S, Fang C, Zou X, Zhang J (2010) Improving conversion of Spartina alterniflora into biogas by co-digestion with cow feces. Fuel Process Technol 91:1416–1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P et al (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M et al (eds) Climate Change 2007: the Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York, pp 129–234Google Scholar
  5. Fowles M (2007) Black carbon sequestration as an alternative to bioenergy. Biomass Bioenergy 31:426–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glaser B, Balashov E, Haumaier L, Guggenberger G, Zech W (2000) Black carbon in density fractions of anthropogenic soils of the Brazilian Amazon region. Org Geochem 31:669–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hanson RS (1998) Ecology of methylotrophic bacteria. In: Burlage RS, Atlas R, Stahl D, Geesey G, Sayler G (eds) Techniques in Microbial Ecology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 137–162Google Scholar
  8. Hua L, Wu W, Liu Y, McBride MB, Chen Y (2009) Reduction of nitrogen loss and Cu and Zn mobility during sludge composting with bamboo charcoal amendment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 16:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Agriculture. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR et al (eds) Climate Change 2007: Mitigation, Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panelon Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York, pp 498–540Google Scholar
  10. Khalil MAK, Shearer MJ (2006) Decreasing emissions of methane from rice agriculture. Intern Congress Series 1293:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Knoblauch C, Marifaat AA, Haefele MS (2008) Biochar in rice-based system: Impact on carbon mineralization and trace gas emissions. http://www.biocharinternational.org/2008/conference/posters
  12. Lehmann J (2007) Bio-energy in the black. Front Ecol Environ 5:381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M (2006) Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems–a review. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 11:403–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, Kinyangi J, Grossman J, O'Neill B, Skjemstad JO, Thies J, Luizao FJ, Petersen J, Neves EG (2006) Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1719–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu CW, Wu CY (2004) Evaluation of methane emissions from Taiwanese paddies. Sci Total Environ 333:195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu W, Lu HH, Wu WX, Wei QK, Chen YX, Thies JE (2008) Transgenic Bt rice does not affect enzyme activities and microbial composition in the rhizosphere during crop development. Soil Biol Biochem 40:475–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Major J, Steiner C, DiTommaso A, Falcǎo NPS, Lenmann J (2005) Weed composition and cover after three years of soil fertility management in the central Brazilian Amazon: compost, fertilizer, manure and charcoal applications. Weed Biol Manage 5:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McHenry MP (2009) Agricultural bio-char production, renewable energy generation and farm carbon sequestration in Western Australia: Certainty, uncertainty and risk. Agric Ecosyst Environ 129:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Murray AE, Hollibaugh JT, Orrego C (1996) Phylogenetic compositions of bacterioplankton from two California estuaries compared by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of rDNA fragments. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:2676–2680Google Scholar
  20. Neue HU, Wassmann R, Lantin RS, Alberto MCR, Aduna JB, Javellana AM (1996) Factors affecting methane emission from rice fields. Atmos Environ 30:1751–1754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Renner R (2007) Rethinking biochar. Environ Sci Technol 41:5932–5933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rondon M, Ramirez JA, Lehmann J (2005) Charcoal additions reduce net emissions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. In: Proceedings of the 3 rd USDA Symposium on Greenhouse Gases and Carbon Sequestration, Baltimore, USA, March 21–24, p 208Google Scholar
  23. Rondon MA, Molina D, Hurtado M, Ramirez J, Lehmann J, Major J, Amezquita E (2006) Enhancing the productivity of crops and grasses while reducing greenhouse gas emissions through bio-char amendments to unfertile tropical soils. In: 18th World Congress of Soil Science, July 9–15, Philadelphia, PA, http://crops.confex.com/crops/wc2006/techprogram/P16849.HTM. Accessed June 2008
  24. Spokas KA, Koskinen WC, Baker JM, Reicosky DC (2009) Impacts of woodchip biochar additions on greenhouse gas production and sorption/degradation of two herbicides in a Minnesota soil. Chemosphere 77:574–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Steiner C, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Nehls T, de Macêdo JLV, Blum WEH, Zech W (2007) Long term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil. Plant Soil 291:275–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang ZP, DeLaune RD, Masscheleyn PH, Patrick WH Jr (1993) Soil redox and pH effects on methane production in a flooded rice soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:382–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang Y, Wu W, Ding Y, Liu W, Anton P, Chen Y, Medha D (2008) Methane oxidation activity and bacteria community composition in a simulated landfill cover soil is influenced by the growth of Chenopodium album L. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2452–2459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang H, Lin K, Hou Z, Richardson B, Gan J (2010) Sorption of the herbicide terbuthylazine in two New Zealand forest soils amended with biosolids and biochars. J Soils Sediments 10:283–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Watanabe T, Asakawa S, Nakamura A, Nagaoka K, Kimura M (2004) DGGE method for analyzing 16S rDNA of methanogenic archaeal community in paddy field soil. FEMS Microbiol Lett 232:153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xiong ZQ, Xing GX, Zhu ZL (2007) Nitrous oxide and methane emissions as affected by water, soil and nitrogen. Pedosphere 17:146–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yagi K, Minami K (1990) Effects of organic matter application on methane emission from some Japanese paddy fields. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 36:599–610Google Scholar
  33. Yanai Y, Toyota K, Okazaki M (2007) Effects of charcoal addition on N2O emissions from soil resulting from rewetting air-dried soil in short-term laboratory experiments. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 53:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yang SS, Chang HL (1998) Effect of environmental conditions on methane production and emission from paddy soil. Agric Ecosyst Environ 69:69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang A, Cui L, Pan G, Li L, Hussain Q, Zhang X, Zheng J, Crowley D (2010a) Effect of biochar amendment on yield and methane and nitrous oxide emissions from a rice paddy from Tai Lake plain, China. Agric Ecosyst Environ. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2010.09.003 Google Scholar
  36. Zhang H, Lin K, Wang H, Gan J (2010b) Effect of Pinus radiata derived biochars on soil sorption and desorption of phenanthrene. Environ Pollut 158:2821–2825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zheng J, Zhang X, Li L, Zhang Pu, Pan G (2007) Effect of long-term fertilization on C mineralization and production of CH4 and CO2 under anaerobic incubation from bulk samples and particle size fractions of a typical paddy soil. Agric Ecosyst Environ 120:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zou JW, Huang Y, Zheng XH, Wang Y (2007) Quantifying direct N2O emissions in paddy fields during rice growing season in mainland China: dependence on water regime. Atmos Environ 41:8032–8042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zwieten VL, Singh B, Joseph S, Kimber S, Cowie A, Chan YK (2009) Biochar and emissions of non-CO2 greenhouse gases from soil. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for Environmental Management Science and Technology. Earthscan Press, UK, pp 227–249Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuxue Liu
    • 1
  • Min Yang
    • 1
  • Yimin Wu
    • 2
  • Hailong Wang
    • 3
  • Yingxu Chen
    • 1
  • Weixiang Wu
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Environmental Science and Technology, College of Environmental and Resource SciencesZhejiang UniversityHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Hangzhou No. 2 High SchoolHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.ScionRotoruaNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations