Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 667–678 | Cite as

Exploring particle size distribution and organic carbon pools mobilized by different erosion processes at the catchment scale

  • Elisabet NadeuEmail author
  • Joris de Vente
  • María Martínez-Mena
  • Carolina Boix-Fayos
SEDIMENTS, SEC 2 • PHYSICAL AND BIOGEOCHEMICAL PROCESSES • RESEARCH ARTICLE

Abstract

Purpose

Selective water erosion of soil organic carbon (OC) has been reported to occur in small plots under field and laboratory conditions. However, little is known about how the process of OC erosion happens at larger scales. This study was conducted to assess the differences in the selectivity of OC between different erosion processes taking place within the same catchment.

Materials and methods

A geomorphological survey of the hillslope–streambed connections within a catchment in SE Spain was conducted to determine and select the dominant erosion forms to be studied. Undisturbed sediment samples were taken from deposits derived from four different erosion processes (gully, interrill, bank and tillage erosion) and from the streambed sediment bars. Soils of the three main land uses (forest, shrubland and agricultural fields) of the drainage area were also sampled to establish comparisons with the sampled sediments and determine the enrichment ratios. Different organic carbon pools (size fractions) and particle size distribution, both dispersed and non-dispersed, were studied in soils and sediments.

Results and discussion

All sediments were impoverished in OC compared to the source soils of the catchment. The largest differences were found between bank erosion and tillage erosion processes. Particle size distribution analysis indicated that soil particles were mainly being transported as aggregates. In addition, aggregates in the 250–63 μm size fraction seemed to contain primary silt and clay particles, which were positively correlated to total organic carbon. Bar sediments downstream in the streambed were impoverished in mineral-associated organic carbon, suggesting that this OC fraction can be carried further downstream by remaining in suspension longer due to its binding to smaller mineral particles.

Conclusions

In general terms, there are indications that different erosion processes can result in different organic carbon enrichment ratios. Although selectivity during detachment, transport and deposition results in a complex set of interactions that need further research and field-based data, in this study, the nature of the erosion process, the characteristics of the source material and the level of aggregation of soil particles were found to be important variables.

Keywords

Enrichment ratio Particle size distribution Soil erosion Soil organic carbon Soil aggregates 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has been financially supported by the following projects: ERCO (CGL-2007-62590/BTE), PROBASE (CGL2006-11619) of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, ESUMA (11859/PI/09) of the Seneca Foundation of the Regional Government of Murcia, a CSIC Intramural Project (200840I170) and MIRAGE (FP7-ENV-2007-1) of the European Community. Elisabet Nadeu received funding from a predoctoral fellowship of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (BES-2008-002379). Joris de Vente was contracted through the EU funded project DESIRE (037046): Desertification Mitigation and Remediation of Land—a global approach for local solutions, within the EC-DG RTD—6th Framework Research Programme (sub-priority 1.1.6.3)—Research on Desertification. We thank Loli Ruíz and Jorge López for their help in the field and laboratory work and Ellen Petticrew and two anonymous reviewers for their careful revision of the manuscript.

References

  1. Avnimelech Y, McHenry JR (1984) Enrichment of transported sediments with organic carbon, nutrients and clay. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:259–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beuselinck L, Steegen A, Govers G, Nachtergaele J, Takken I, Poesen J (2000) Characteristics of sediment deposits formed by intense rainfall events in small catchments in the Belgian loam belt. Geomorphology 32:69–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boix-Fayos C, Barberá GG, López-Bermúdez F, Castillo VM (2007) Effects of check dams, reforestation and land-use changes on river channel morphology: Case study of the Rogativa catchment (Murcia, Spain). Geomorphology 91:103–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boix-Fayos C, de Vente J, Martinez-Mena M, Barberá GG, Castillo V (2008) The impact of land use change and check-dams on catchment sediment yield. Hydrol Process 22:4922–4935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boix-Fayos C, de Vente J, Albaladejo J, Martínez-Mena M (2009) Soil carbon erosion and stock as affected by land use changes at the catchment scale in Mediterranean ecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 133:75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cambardella CA, Elliot ET (1992) Particulate soil organic-matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:777–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Vente J, Poesen J (2005) Predicting soil erosion and sediment yield at the basin scale: scale issues and semi-quantitative models. Earth Sci Rev 71:95–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Di Stefano C, Ferro V, Palazzolo E, Panno M (2000) Sediment delivery processes and agricultural non-point pollution in a Sicilian Basin. J Agric Eng Res 77:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Díaz-Hernández JL, Fernández EB, González JL (2003) Organic and inorganic carbon in soils of semiarid regions: a case study from the Guadix-Baza basin (Southeast Spain). Geoderma 114:65–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dong A, Chesters G, Simsiman GV (1983) Soil dispersibility. Soil Sci 136:208–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galy V, France-Lanord C, Lartiges B (2008) Loading and fate of particulate organic carbon from the Himalaya to the Ganga-Brahmaputra delta. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72:1767–1787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghadiri H, Rose CW (1991) Sorbed chemical transport in overland flow: II. Enrichment ratio variation with erosion processes. J Environ Qual 20:634–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gregorich EG, Greer KJ, Anderson DW, Liang BC (1998) Carbon distribution and losses: erosion and deposition effects. Soil Tillage Res 47:291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haregeweyn N, Poesen J, Deckers J, Nyssen J, Haile M, Govers G, Verstraeten G, Moeyersons J (2008) Sediment-bound nutrient export from micro-dam catchments in Northern Ethiopia. Land Degrad Dev 19:136–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hooke J (2003) Coarse sediment connectivity in river channel systems: a conceptual framework and methodology. Geomorphology 56:79–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Instituto Geológico y Minero de España (1978) Mapa geológico de España 1:50000. Nerpio 909:23–26Google Scholar
  17. Igwe CA (2000) Nutrient losses in runoff and eroded sediments from soils of central eastern Nigeria. Pol J Soil Sci 33:67–75Google Scholar
  18. Jacinthe PA, Lal R, Owens LB, Hothem DL (2004) Transport of labile carbon in runoff as affected by land use and rainfall characteristics. Soil Tillage Res 77:111–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jin K, Cornelis WM, Gabriels D, Baert M, Wu HJ, Schiettecatte W, Cai DX, De Neve S, Jin JY, Hartmann R, Hofman G (2009) Residue cover and rainfall intensity effects on runoff soil organic carbon losses. Catena 78:81–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuhn NJ (2007) Erodibility of soil and organic matter: independence of organic matter resistance to interrill erosion. Earth Surf Process Landf 32:794–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuhn NJ, Bryan RB (2004) Drying, soil surface condition and interrill erosion on two ontario soils. Catena 57:113–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuhn NJ, Hoffmann T, Schwanghart W, Dotterweich M (2009) Agricultural soil erosion and global carbon cycle: controversy over? Earth Surf Process Landf 34:1033–1038Google Scholar
  23. Martínez-Mena M, López J, Almagro M, Boix-Fayos C, Albaladejo J (2008) Effect of water erosion and cultivation on the soil carbon stock in a semiarid area of South-East Spain. Soil Tillage Res 99:119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martínez-Mena M, López J, Almagro M, Albaladejo J, Castillo V, Ortiz R, Boix-Fayos C (2011) Organic carbon enrichment in sediments: effects of rainfall characteristics under different land uses in a Mediterranean area. Catena. doi: 10.1016/J.CATENA.2011.02.005 Google Scholar
  25. Moore DC, Singer MJ (1990) Crust formation effects on soil erosion processes. Soil Sci Soc Am 54:1117–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nadeu E, Boix-Fayos C, De Vente J, López J, Martínez-Mena M (2010) Organic carbon mobilization by different erosive processes in the slope-channel connection. Movilización de carbono orgánico por distintos procesos erosivos en la conexión ladera-cauce. Pirineos 165:157–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mi N, Wang SQ, Liu JY, Yu GR, Zhang WJ, Jobbagy E (2008) Soil inorganic carbon storage pattern in China. Glob Chang Biol 14:2380–2387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Owens LB, Malone RW, Hothem DL, Starr GC, Lal R (2002) Sediment carbon concentration and transport from small watersheds under various conservation tillage practices. Soil Tillage Res 67:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Polyakov VO, Lal R (2004) Soil erosion and carbon dynamics under simulated rainfall. Soil Sci 169:590–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Quinton JN, Catt JA, Wood GA, Steer J (2006) Soil carbon losses by water erosion: experimentation and modeling at field and national scales in the UK. Agric Ecosyst Environ 112:87–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rhoton FE, Emmerich WE, Goodrich DC, Miller SN, McChesney DS (2006) Soil geomorphological characteristics of a semiarid watershed: influence on carbon distribution and transport. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1532–1540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ritchie JC, McCarty GW, Venteris ER, Kaspar TC (2007) Soil and soil organic carbon redistribution on the landscape. Geomorphology 89:163–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodriguez AR, Guerra A, Arbelo C, Mora JL, Gorrin SP, Armas C (2004) Forms of eroded soil organic carbon in andosols of the Canary Islands (Spain). Geoderma 121:205–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roose EJ, Lal R, Feller C, Barthès B, Stewart BA (2006) Soil erosion and carbon dynamics. In: Advances in soil science series. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  35. Schiettecatte W, Gabriels D, Cornelis WM, Hofman G (2008a) Enrichment of organic carbon in sediment transport by interrill and rill erosion processes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:50–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schiettecatte W, Gabriels D, Cornelis WM, Hofman G (2008b) Impact of deposition on the enrichment of organic carbon in eroded sediment. Catena 72:340–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Slattery MC, Burt TP (1997) Particle size characteristics of suspended sediment in hillslope runoff and stream flow. Earth Surf Process Landf 22:705–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Starr GC, Lal R, Malone R, Hothem D, Owens L, Kimble J (2000) Modeling soil carbon transported by water erosion processes. Land Degrad Dev 11:83–91Google Scholar
  39. Stoltenberg NL, White JL (1953) Selective loss of plant nutrients by erosion. Soil Sci Soc Am J 17:406–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Oost K, Govers G, Quine TA, Heckrath G (2004) Comment on ‘Managing soil carbon’. Science 305:1567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang Z, Govers G, Steegen A, Clymans W, Van den Putte A, Langhans C, Merckx R, Van Oost K (2010) Catchment-scale carbon redistribution and delivery by water erosion in an intensively cultivated area. Geomorphology 124:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Warrington DN, Mamedov AI, Bhardwaj AK, Levy GJ (2009) Primary particle size distribution of eroded material affected by degree of aggregate slaking and seal development. Eur J Soil Sci 60:84–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yeomans JC, Bremner JM (1988) A rapid and precise method for routine determination of organic carbon in soil. Comm Soil Sci Plan 19:1467–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang JH, Quine TA, Ni SJ, Ge FL (2006) Stocks and dynamics of SOC in relation to soil redistribution by water and tillage erosion. Glob Chang Biol 12:1834–1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zheng F, He X, Gao X, C-e Z, Tang K (2005) Effects of erosion patterns on nutrient loss following deforestation on the Loess Plateau of China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 108:85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisabet Nadeu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joris de Vente
    • 2
    • 3
  • María Martínez-Mena
    • 1
  • Carolina Boix-Fayos
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura (CEBAS-CSIC), Spanish Council for Scientific ResearchMurciaSpain
  2. 2.Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas (EEZA-CSIC), Spanish Council for Scientific ResearchAlmeríaSpain
  3. 3.School of GeosciencesUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations