Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 10, Issue 7, pp 1289–1299 | Cite as

Is rhamnolipid biosurfactant useful in cadmium phytoextraction?

  • Jia Wen
  • Mike J. McLaughlin
  • Samuel P. Stacey
  • Jason K. Kirby
SOILS, SEC 3 • REMEDIATION AND MANAGEMENT OF CONTAMINATED OR DEGRADED LANDS • RESEARCH ARTICLE

Abstract

Purpose

Successful chelant-assisted phytoextraction requires application of an eco-friendly metal-complexing agent which enhances metal uptake but does not pose a significant risk of off-site movement of metals. Rhamnolipid biosurfactant has been used to enhance cadmium (Cd) removal from contaminated soil by washing. It has a strong affinity for Cd compared to some other hazardous metals, suggesting that rhamnolipid could be useful in Cd phytoextraction. This study investigated the potential use of rhamnolipid to enhance Cd phytoextraction.

Materials and methods

Adsorption patterns of rhamnolipid in soils were investigated by batch adsorption experiments. Hydrophobicity of rhamnolipid–metal complexes were determined by assessing partitioning in an octanol/water system. Phytotoxicity of rhamnolipid to maize (Zea mays) and chelant-assisted phytoextraction efficiency of maize and sunflower (Helianthus annuus) were determined in pot experiments.

Results and discussion

The results showed that rhamnolipid was prone to adsorb strongly to soil at low application rates (0.1–1.7 mM) possibly due to its hydrophobic interactions with soil organic matter, hence reducing its capacity to complex and transport metals to plant roots. Rhamnolipid mobility increased (i.e. decreased soil phase partitioning) at elevated concentrations (∼4.4 mM), which increased soil solution Cd concentrations possibly due to its reduced hydrophobic nature. The use of rhamnolipid at concentrations >4.4 mM severely reduced maize biomass yield, reducing the potential for chelant-assisted phytoextraction. At lower concentrations of rhamnolipid (0.02–1.4 mmol/kg), there was insignificant enhancement of Cd accumulation by plant (Z. mays and H. annuus) shoots, likely through strong retention of the chelant (or Cd-associated rhamnolipid) on soil surfaces.

Conclusions

High rates of rhamnolipid addition to soils in this study caused severe phytotoxicity to maize and sunflower. Lower rates of rhamnolpid addition to soils in this study did not improve Cd accumulation by plants. Therefore, the sorption of rhamnolipid (or Cd-associated rhamnolipid) to soils, along with the phytotoxicity and phytoextraction results, suggests that neither low nor high concentrations of rhamnolipid are likely to consistently assist Cd phytoextraction using maize or sunflower.

Keywords

Adsorption Partition coefficient Phytoextraction Phytotoxicity Rhamnolipid 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Michelle Smart and Claire Wright for technical support in ICP-OES and ICP-MS analysis and Margaret Cargill for assistance with manuscript preparation.

References

  1. Alkorta I, Hernández-Allica J, Becerril JM, Amezaga I, Albizu I, Onaindia M, Garbisu C (2004) Chelate-enhanced phytoremediation of soils polluted with heavy metals. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 3:55–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asami T, Kubota M, Orikasa K (1995) Distribution of different fractions of cadmium, zinc, lead, and copper in unpolluted and polluted soils. Water Air Soil Pollut 83:187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aşçi Y, Nurbas M, Acikel YS (2007) Sorption of Cd(II) onto kaolin as a soil component and desorption of Cd(II) from kaolin using rhamnolipid biosurfactant. J Hazard Mater 139:50–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aşçi Y, Nurbas M, Acikel YS (2008) Removal of zinc ions from a soil component Na-feldspar by a rhamnolipid biosurfactant. Desalination 223:361–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell PF, McLaughlin MJ, Cozens G, Stevens DP, Owens G, South H (2003) Plant uptake of C-14-EDTA, C-14-Citrate, and C-14-Histidine from chelator-buffered and conventional hydroponic solutions. Plant Soil 253:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruemmer G, Gerth J, Tiller KG (1988) Reaction kinetics of the adsorption and desorption of nickel, zinc and cadmium by geothite. I. Adsorption and diffusion of metals. Eur J Soil Sci 39:37–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Champion JT, Gilkey JC, Lamparski H, Retterer J, Miller RM (1995) Electron-microscopy of rhamnolipid (biosurfactant) morphology—effects of pH, cadmium, and octadecane. J Colloid Interface Sci 170:569–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chandrasekaran EV, BeMiller JN (1980) Constituent analysis of glycosaminoglycans. In: Whistler RL, Wolfrom ML (eds) Methods in carbohydrate chemistry. Academic, New York, pp 89–96Google Scholar
  9. Chaney RL, Malik M, Li YM, Brown SL, Brewer EP, Angle JS, Baker AJM (1997) Phytoremediation of soil metals. Curr Opin Biotechnol 8:279–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen YH, Li XD, Shen ZG (2004) Leaching and uptake of heavy metals by ten different species of plants during an EDTA-assisted phytoextraction process. Chemosphere 57:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins RN, Merrington G, McLaughlin MJ, Knudsen C (2002) Uptake of intact zinc–ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid from soil is dependent on plant species and complex concentration. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:1940–1945Google Scholar
  12. Elgawhary SM, Lindsay WL, Kemper WD (1970) Effect of EDTA on the self-diffusion of zinc in aqueous solution and in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 34:66–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guo YP, Hu YY, Gu RR, Lin H (2009) Characterization and micellization of rhamnolipidic fractions and crude extracts produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutant MIG-N146. J Colloid Interface Sci 331:356–363Google Scholar
  14. Hart JJ, Welch RM, Norvell WA, Sullivan LA, Kochian LV (1998) Characterization of cadmium binding, uptake, and translocation in intact seedlings of bread and durum wheat cultivars. Plant Physiol 116:1413–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Herman DC, Artiola JF, Miller RM (1995) Removal of cadmium, lead, and zinc from soil by a rhamnolipid biosurfactant. Environ Sci Technol 29:2280–2285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson A, Gunawardana B, Singhal N (2009) Amendments for enhancing copper uptake by Brassica juncea and Lolium perenne from solution. Int J Phytoremediation 11:215–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jordan FL, Robbin-Abbott M, Maier RM, Glenn EP (2002) A comparison of chelator-facilitated metal uptake by a halophyte and a glycophyte. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:2698–2704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Juwarkar AA, Nair A, Dubey KV, Singh SK, Devotta S (2007) Biosurfactant technology for remediation of cadmium and lead contaminated soils. Chemosphere 68:1996–2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kos B, Lestan D (2004) Chelator induced phytoextraction and in situ soil washing of Cu. Environ Pollut 132:333–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laurie SH, Tancock NP, McGrath SP, Sanders JR (1991a) Influence of complexation on the uptake by plants of iron, manganese, copper and zinc. 1. Effect of EDTA in a multi-metal and computer-simulation study. J Exp Bot 42:509–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laurie SH, Tancock NP, McGrath SP, Sanders JR (1991b) Influence of complexation on the uptake by plants of iron, manganese, copper and zinc. 2. Effect of DTPA in a multi-metal and computer-simulation study. J Exp Bot 42:515–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Luo CL, Shen ZG, Li XD (2005) Enhanced phytoextraction of Cu, Pb, Zn and Cd with EDTA and EDDS. Chemosphere 59:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McLaughlin MJ (2002) Bioavailability of metals to terrestrial plants. In: Allen HE (ed) Bioavailability of metals in terrestrial ecosystems. Influence of partitioning for bioavailability to invertebrates, microbes and plants. SETAC, Pensacola, pp 173–195Google Scholar
  24. McLaughlin MJ, Smolders E, Merckx R, Maes A (1997) Plant uptake of Cd and Zn in chelator-buffered nutrient solution depends on ligand type. In: Ando T (ed) Plant nutrition—for sustainable food production and environment. Kluwer, Japan, pp 113–118Google Scholar
  25. McLaughlin MJ, Andrew SJ, Smart MK, Smolders E (1998) Effects of sulfate on cadmium uptake by Swiss chard: I. Effects of complexation and calcium competition in nutrient solutions. Plant Soil 202:211–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Means JL, Kucak T, Crerar DA (1980) Relative degradation rates of NTA, EDTA and DTPA and environmental implications. Environ Pollut B Chem Phys 1:45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mulligan CN (2005) Environmental applications for biosurfactants. Environ Pollut 133:183–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mulligan CN (2009) Recent advances in the environmental applications of biosurfactants. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 14:372–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Noordman WH, Brusseau ML, Janssen DB (2000) Adsorption of a multicomponent rhamnolipid surfactant to soil. Environ Sci Technol 34:832–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nowack B, Schulin R, Robinson BH (2006) Critical assessment of chelant-enhanced metal phytoextraction. Environ Sci Technol 40:5225–5232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ochoa-Loza FJ, Artiola JF, Maier RM (2001) Stability constants for the complexation of various metals with a rhamnolipid biosurfactant. J Environ Qual 30:479–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ochoa-Loza FJ, Noordman WH, Janssen DB, Brusseau ML, Maier RM (2007) Effect of clays, metal oxides, and organic matter on rhamnolipid biosurfactant sorption by soil. Chemosphere 66:1634–1642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pritsa TS, Fotiadis EA, Lolas PC (2008) Corn tolerance to atrazine and cadmium and sunflower to cadmium in soil and hydroponic culture. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 39:1168–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rengel Z, Wheal MS (1997) Kinetic parameters of Zn uptake by wheat are affected by the herbicide chlorsulfuron. J Exp Bot 48:935–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Römkens P, Bouwman L, Japenga J, Draaisma C (2002) Potentials and drawbacks of chelate-enhanced phytoremediation of soils. Environ Pollut 116:109–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sánchez M, Aranda FJ, Espuny MJ, Marqués A, Teruel JA, Manresa Á, Ortiz A (2007) Aggregation behaviour of a dirhamnolipid biosurfactant secreted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in aqueous media. J Colloid Interface Sci 307:246–253Google Scholar
  37. Shin K, Kim K, Kim J, Lee K, Han S (2008) Rhamnolipid morphology and phenanthrene solubility at different pH values. J Environ Qual 37:509–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stacey SP, McLaughlin MJ, Cakmak I, Hetitiarachchi GM, Scheckel KG, Karkkainen M (2008) Root uptake of lipophilic zinc–rhamnolipid complexes. J Agric Food Chem 56:2112–2117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tan H, Champion JT, Artiola JF, Brusseau ML, Miller RM (1994) Complexation of cadmium by a rhamnolipid biosurfactant. Environ Sci Technol 28:2402–2406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tandy S, Schulin R, Nowack B (2006) The influence of EDDS on the uptake of heavy metals in hydroponically grown sunflowers. Chemosphere 62:1454–1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Torrens JL, Herman DC, Miller-Maier RM (1998) Biosurfactant (rhamnolipid) sorption and the impact on rhamnolipid-facilitated removal of cadmium from various soils under saturated flow conditions. Environ Sci Technol 32:776–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Trapp S (2002) Dynamic root uptake model for neutral lipophilic organics. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:203–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Turan M, Angin I (2004) Organic chelate assisted phytoextraction of B, Cd, Mo and Pb from contaminated soils using two agricultural crop species. Acta Agric Scand Sect B–Soil Plant Sci 54:221–231Google Scholar
  44. Wang SL, Mulligan CN (2004) Rhamnolipid foam enhanced remediation of cadmium and nickel contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 157:315–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wen J, Stacey S, McLaughlin M, Kriby J (2009) Biodegradation of rhamnolipid, EDTA and citric acid in cadmium and zinc contaminated soils. Soil Biol Biochem 41:2214–2221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang YM, Miller RM (1992) Enhanced octadecane dispersion and biodegradation by a pseudomonas rhamnolipid surfactant (biosurfactant). Appl Environ Microbiol 58:3276–3282Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jia Wen
    • 1
  • Mike J. McLaughlin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Samuel P. Stacey
    • 1
  • Jason K. Kirby
    • 2
  1. 1.Soil and Land Systems, School of Agriculture, Food and WineThe University of Adelaide, PMB 1Glen OsmondAustralia
  2. 2.CSIRO Land and Water, Agricultural Sustainable FlagshipEnvironmental Biogeochemistry Program, Waite CampusUrrbraeAustralia

Personalised recommendations