Sediment and society: an approach for assessing management of contaminated sediments and stakeholder involvement in Norway
- 219 Downloads
Management options for large-scale contaminated sediment remediation projects can be challenging with regard to competing stakeholder interests. This has become apparent during the Oslofjord sediment remediation project (2005–2009) which caused considerable public discussion.
To learn from this project, the ‘Sediment and society’ project was initiated to develop a collaborative approach that will incorporate local and scientific knowledge in order to achieve mutual gains, win-win outcomes for the stakeholders, in the management of contaminated marine sediments.
The project focuses on two Norwegian harbours: Oslo Harbour and Bergen Harbour. The Oslo Harbour case has been analysed ex-post, using elements of risk governance: participation, communication, information/knowledge and risk perception. The Bergen Harbour case is focused on the establishment of a citizens' jury as well as a stakeholder panel in Bergen Harbour.
Preliminary results and observations
Thus far, the results suggest three important commonalities or challenges for stakeholder involvement: (1) how to include people who have important management information and local knowledge, but not much influence in the decision-making process; (2) how to secure resources to ensure participation and (3) how to engage and motivate stakeholders to participate early in the sediment remediation planning process.
KeywordsContaminated sediments Multi-criteria analysis Sediment management Stakeholder participation
We kindly acknowledge the Norwegian Research Council as project funding is provided through their ‘The Oceans and Coastal Areas (HAVKYST)’ research programme. For the Bergen Harbour case, we are particularly grateful for the assistance we have received from Per Vikse (Bergen kommune) and Haakon Kryvi (Hordaland County).
- Barton DN, Navrud S, Bjørkeslett H, Lilleby I (2009) Economic benefits of large-scale remediation of contaminated marine sediments—a literature review and an application to the Grenland Fjords in Norway. J Soils Sediments. doi: 10.1007/s11368-009-0158-x
- Bateman IJ, Carson RT, Day B, Hanemann M, Hanely N, Hett T, Jones-Lee M, Loomes G, Mourato S, Özdemiroglu E, Pearce DW, Sugden R, Swanson J (2002) Economic valuation with stated preference techniques. A manual. Department for Transport, Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
- Chambers R (1997) Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. ITP, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Edelenbos J (2005) Process in shape. Lemma, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
- Edelenbos J, Schie van N, Gerrits LM (2009) Organizing interfaces between government institutions and interactive governance. Policy Sci 1–22Google Scholar
- Ellen GJ, Gerrits L, Slob AFL (2006) Risk perception and risk communication. In: Heise S (ed) Sediment risk management and communication. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Ellen GJ, Duijn M, Sparrevik M (2009) Sediment & Society. Report on Work package 1: Oslo harbour sediment remediation project. TNO report TNO-034-DTM-2009-02922Google Scholar
- Healey P (1997) Collaborative planning. Shaping places in fragmented societies. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Heise S (2007) Sustainable management of sediment resources: sediment risk management and communication. Elsevier, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Joziasse J, Heise S, Oen A, Ellen GJ, Gerrits L (2006) Sediment management objectives and risk indicators. In: Heise S (ed) Sediment risk management and communication. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE (2005) The social contours of risk. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Laws D (2004) Building consensus on policy choices. In: Laws D, Podziba S (eds) Negotiation and mediation—workshop readerGoogle Scholar
- Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Yatsalo B, Tkachuk A, Kiker GA, Kim J, Bridges TS, Seager TP, Gardner K (2007) Comparative assessment of several multi-criteria decision analysis tools for management of contaminated sediments. In: Linkov I, Kiker G, Wenning R (eds) Environmental security in harbors and coastal areas—management using comparative risk assessment and multi-criteria decision analysis. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 195–215Google Scholar
- Magnussen K, Bergland O (1996) Valuation of contaminants in water (in Norwegian). Stiftelsen Østfoldforskning. Report OR 51–96Google Scholar
- Navrud S, Barton DN (2006) Benefit-cost analysis of ‘Project Clean Fjord’. Report to Project Clean Fjord Remediation plan for contaminated sediments in Telemark—Phase 2 (in Norwegian). Telemark County CommisionerGoogle Scholar
- NRC (1997) Contaminated sediments in ports and waterways: cleanup strategies and technologies. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Pretty J, Guijt I, Scoones I, Thompson J (1995) A trainer's guide for participatory learning and action. International Institute for Environment and Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Renn O (2008) Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Renn O, Webler T, Wiedemann P (1995) Fairness and competence in citizen participation. Evaluating models for environmental discourse. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- SFT (2000) Contaminated sediments i Norwegian fjords, levels of ambition and strategy for further work (in Norwegian). SFT report 1774/2000. Norwegian Pollution Control Authority, OsloGoogle Scholar
- Slob AFL, Eenhoorn J, Ellen GJ, Gómezc CM, Kindd J, van der Vlies J (2007) Costs and benefits of sediment management. In: Owens P (ed) Sediment management at the river basin scale. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Slob A, Gerrits L, Ellen GJ (2008) Sediment management and stakeholder involvement. In: Owens P (ed) Sediment management at the river basin scale. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Soldal O, Oen A, Kibsgaard A, Uriansrud F, Lindholm O, Godøy O, Jartun M, Ottesen RT (2005) Feasibility study for Bergen Harbour, Phase II (in Norwegian). COWI report 114863Google Scholar
- Soma K (2010) Framing participation with multicriteria evaluations to support the management of complex environmental issues. Environmental Policy and Governance (submitted)Google Scholar
- Stern PC, Fineberg HV (1996) Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Yin RK (2003) Case study research-design and methods, 3rd edn. SAGE publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar