Linking soil bacterial diversity to ecosystem multifunctionality using backward-elimination boosted trees analysis
- 610 Downloads
Background, aim, and scope
There is increasing evidence of linkages between biodiversity and ecosystem functions. Recent interests on this topic have expanded from an individual-function perspective to a multifunction perspective. This study aims to explore the soil bacterial diversity–multifunctionality relationship.
Materials and methods
Soil bacterial diversity was determined using culture-independent molecular techniques. Bacterial taxa groups with positive effects on certain ecosystem functions were identified by aggregated boosted tree analysis with a prediction-error-based backward-elimination criterion. Soil bacterial diversity–multifunctionality relationship was examined by exploring the relationship between the number of ecosystem functions and the number of soil bacterial taxa.
More ecosystem functions would require greater numbers of bacterial taxa, which can be explained potentially using the multifunctional complementarity mechanism. Furthermore, a power law equation, OTU N = OTU1(N) T , was firstly proposed to describe the observed positive relationship between the soil bacterial diversity and the ecosystem multifunctionality, where OTU N is the number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) required by N functions, while OTU1 is the average number of species required for one function, and T is the average turnover rate of OTU across functions.
The number of ecosystem functions would decrease with the loss of soil bacterial diversity. This biodiversity–multifunctionality relationship has an important implication for comprehensively understanding the risk of bacterial diversity loss in relation to the ecosystem functions.
KeywordsBacterial diversity Belowground ecosystem Boosted tree analysis Ecosystem multifunctionality Microorganisms Soils
This research was jointly supported by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZCX2-YW-408, KZCX1-YW-0603), the Natural Science Foundation of China (40871129), and the Australian Research Council. The assistances of the staff at the Australian and Chinese sites for soil sampling and data collecting are sincerely appreciated.
- Chen CR, Xu ZH, Mathers NJ (2004) Soil carbon pools in adjacent natural and plantation forests of subtropical Australia. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:282–291Google Scholar
- He J-Z, Shen J-P, Zhang L-M, Zhu Y-G, Zheng Y-M, Xu M-G, Di H-J (2007) Quantitative analyses of the abundance and composition of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and ammonia-oxidizing archaea of a Chinese upland red soil under long-term fertilization practices. Environ Microbiol 9:2364–2374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muyzer G, de Waal E, Uitterlinden A (1993) Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:695–700Google Scholar
- Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar