Soil pollution by nonylphenol and nonylphenol ethoxylates and their effects to plants and invertebrates
- 392 Downloads
Background, aim, and scope
Nonylphenol polyethoxylates (NPEOs) are a widely used class of nonionic surfactants known to be toxic and endocrine-disrupting contaminants. Their use and production have been banned in the European Union and substituted by other surfactants considered as environmentally safer. However, their use continues in many countries without any legal control. Discharges of effluents from wastewater treatment plants and the application of sewage sludge application, landfilling, and accidental spillage to soils are the major sources of NPEOs in the environment. The biodegradation of these surfactants is relatively easy, leading to the accumulation of the simplest chemical forms of nonylphenol ethoxylates (NP, NP1EO, and NP2EO) and nonylphenol carboxy acids (NP2EC or NP1EC). However, these are also the most toxic end-products and have a higher environmental persistence. Compared to aquatic ecosystems, not much is known about the effects of NPEOs in terrestrial organisms, with few studies mainly centered on the effects on plants and soil microorganisms. The main aim of this study is to provide the range of concentrations of NPEOs with ecotoxicological effects on different plants and soil invertebrate species. In addition, we aim to identify the main soil properties influencing their toxicity.
Materials and methods
Two natural soils collected and OECD artificial soil were used in toxicity bioassays. Two different NPEO formulations were tested. On the one hand, a technical mixture of NPEOs containing chain isomers and oligomers with an average of eight ethoxy units was used for the experiments and is referred to herein as NP8EO. On the other hand, technical-grade 4-nonylphenol 95% purity was also used and called NP in this study. The chemicals were applied and mixed with soil as an acetone solution. The toxicity of NP8EO and NP was assessed in different taxonomical groups (plants, earthworms, enchytraeids, and collembolans) according to their respective standardized methods. The effect on lethal and sublethal endpoints was assessed and, by means of linear and non-linear regression models, the NPEO concentration causing 10% and 50% inhibition was estimated. The influence of soil properties on the toxicity was assessed using generalized linear models (GLM).
The chemicals tested showed contrasting toxicities, NP being clearly more toxic than NP8EO. There were also substantial differences in the sensitivity of the species and endpoints, together with clearly different toxicities in different soils. Plants were the least affected group compared to soil invertebrates, since plant endpoints were unaffected or only slightly inhibited. In soil invertebrates, reproduction was the most affected endpoint compared to growth or survival. Toxicity was the lowest in OECD artificial soil in comparison to natural soils, with a lower organic matter content.
The higher toxicity of NP, both in plant and soil invertebrate bioassays, is consistent with previously published studies and its relatively high persistence in soil. The low phytotoxicity of NP8EO and NP, unaffected at concentrations over 1 g NP kg−1, also accords with the known low uptake in plants. The effects on soil invertebrates appeared at lower concentrations than observed in plants, enchytraeids being less affected by NP8EO than earthworms and collembolans. Drastic inhibition in the invertebrate’s endpoints generally appeared over 1 g kg−1 for NP8EO and below 1 g kg−1 for NP. The range of concentrations with effects is in agreement with the few similar studies published to date. Generally, the lowest toxicity values were obtained in OECD soil, with the highest organic matter content, while the highest toxicity was found in the PRA soil, with the lowest content. However, few of the models developed by GLM identified organic carbon as a significant factor in decreasing the bioavailability and toxicity of NPEO. The probable explanation for this is the simultaneous contribution of other soil properties and in particular the limited number of soils used in the bioassays.
A low ecotoxicological risk of NPEOs might be expected for plants and soil invertebrates, since the usual concentrations in soils (below 2.6 mg kg−1) are clearly less than the lowest concentrations reported to be toxic in our study.
Recommendations and perspectives
Although the apparent risk of NPEOs for soil ecosystems is limited, such risks should not be neglected since significant concentrations in soil could be reached with elevated application rates or when highly polluted sludges are used. More importantly, NPEO concentrations in soils should be maintained low given the extremely high toxicity for aquatic organisms. Despite the reduced leaching of NPEOs, runoff events might transport NP attached to soil particles and affect adjacent aquatic ecosystems.
KeywordsCollembolans Earthworms Enchytraeids Nonylphenol ethoxylates Plants Soil toxicity
This study has been supported by the TOXIFENOL project (CTM2006-14163-C02-01/TECNO), funded by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (MEC).
- Campbell P (2002) Alternatives to nonylphenol ethoxylates. Review of toxicity, biodegradation and technical-economic aspects. ToxEcology Report for Environment Canada. Environmental Consulting, VancouverGoogle Scholar
- Chapman HD (1965) Cation-exchange capacity. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part 1. Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 891–901Google Scholar
- Directive 2003/53/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 18 June 2003 amending for the 26th time Council Directive 76/769/EEC relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (nonylphenol, nonylphenol ethoxylate and cement). Official Journal of the European Union, Brussels, Belgium, L 178, pp 24–27Google Scholar
- ISO (1996) Water quality—determination of 33 elements by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy. Guideline no. 11885. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, pp 1–22Google Scholar
- ISO (1998) Soil quality—effects of pollutants on earthworms. Part 2: Determination of effects on reproduction. Guideline no. 11268-2. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, pp 1–38Google Scholar
- ISO (1999) Soil quality—inhibition of reproduction of Collembola (Folsomia candida) by soil pollutants. Guideline no. 11267. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, pp 1–16Google Scholar
- ISO (2003) Soil quality—effects of pollutants on Enchytraeidae (Enchytraeus sp.)—determination of effects on survival and reproduction. Guideline no. 16387. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, pp 1–22Google Scholar
- Jacobsen AM, Mortensen GK, Hansen HCB (2004) Degradation and mobility of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate and nonylphenol in sludge-amended soil. J Environ Qual 33:232–240Google Scholar
- John DM, White GF (1998) Mechanism for biotransformation of nonylphenol polyethoxylates to xenoestrogens in Pseudomonas putida. J Bacteriol 180:4332–4338Google Scholar
- Kirchmann H, Tengsved A (1991) Organic pollutants in sewage sludge. 2. Analysis of barley grains grown on sludge-fertilized soil. Swedish J Agric Res 21:115–119Google Scholar
- Krogh PH, Holmstrup M, Jensen J, Petersen SO (1996) Økologisk vurdering af spildevandsslam i landbrugsjord [Ecological assessment of sewage sludge on farm land]. Arbejdsrapport Nr. 43. Miljø- og Energiministeriet, Miljøstyrelsen [Danish EPA]Google Scholar
- Langford KH, Lester JN (2002) Fate and behaviour of endocrine disrupters in wastewater treatment processes. In: Birkett JW, Lester JN (eds) Endocrine disrupters in wastewater and sludge treatment processes. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 103–144Google Scholar
- Madsen T, Winther-Nielsen M, Samsøe-Petersen L (1998) Effects of organic chemicals in sludge applied to soil: degradation and toxicity to organisms living in soil. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Ministry of Environment and Energy, København, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
- Ney RE (1990) Where did that chemical go: a practical guide to chemical fate and transport in the environment. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- OECD (1984) OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals/Section 2: Effects on Biotic Systems, Test No. 207: Earthworm, Acute Toxicity Tests. Guideline no. 207. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, pp 1–9Google Scholar
- OECD (2006) OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals/Section 2: Effects on Biotic Systems, Test No. 208: Terrestrial Plant Test: Seedling Emergence and Seedling Growth Test. Guideline no. 208. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, pp 1–17Google Scholar
- Peters RJB, Beeltje H, van Delft RJ (2008) Xeno-estrogenic compounds in precipitation. J Environ Qual 10:760–769Google Scholar
- Sjöström ǺE (2004) Uptake of nonylphenols by crops following agricultural use of sewage sludge. PhD thesis. Imperial College London, UKGoogle Scholar
- Vogel D, Gehring M, Tennhardt L, Weltin D, Bilitewski B (2003) Mobility and fate of endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) in soil after application of sewage sludge to agricultural land. In: Pullammanappallil Pr, McComb A, Diaz LF, Bidlingmaier W (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Biological Processing of Organics: Advances for a Sustainable Society—ORBIT 2003, 30 April–2 May, Perth, Australia, vol 1, pp 241–250Google Scholar