Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 215–222 | Cite as

Carbon and trace element mobility in an urban soil amended with green waste compost

SOILS, SEC 1 * SOIL ORGANIC MATTER DYNAMICS AND NUTRIENT CYCLING * RESEARCH ARTICLE

Abstract

Background, aim and scope

The amendment of degraded urban soils using recycled organic wastes offers potential improvements to physicochemical status and functionality, but there is a paucity of knowledge on the potential impact on residual contaminants in soil. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mobility of trace metals and arsenic (As) through an urban soil following amendment with green waste compost over an annual cycle.

Materials and methods

Rhizon soil pore water samplers were inserted into the sides of a soil pit located in a relatively undisturbed urban lawn, which was amended with a surface mulch of green waste compost. Regular sampling and analysis of pore water from the compost and at varying soil depths was carried out, in comparison to an adjacent profile, which had not been amended.

Results and discussion

Rapid dissociation of As from compost was found following its surface deposition as a mulch. Periods of high rainfall enhanced As mobility through upper soil horizons to deeper technogenic layers with higher pH. Copper (Cu) concentrations in soil beneath compost were substantially elevated and strongly correlated with dissolved organic carbon (DOC) released from compost into pore water. Seasonal biological activity, rather than soluble carbon, determined the patterns of mobility and release of zinc (Zn) in both compost-amended and control soil. Location of more stable concentrations of lead (Pb) at lower depths reflected reduced atmospheric fallout or the composition of the lower strata. Flushes of DOC from compost also enhanced mobility of residual cadmium (Cd) in soil.

Conclusions, recommendations and perspectives

Amendment of urban soils with green waste compost mulches impacts on residual trace element contaminants and may enhance mobilisation of harmful elements to the wider environment, meaning that caution is needed when applying compost to soils with elevated levels of trace metals.

Keywords

Compost Dissolved organic carbon Soluble arsenic Trace metal mobility Urban soils 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Keith Hatton, of The University of Liverpool, for kindly providing rainfall and soil temperature data and reviewers for their helpful comments.

References

  1. Bernal MP, Clemente R, Walker DJ (2006) The role of organic amendment in the bioremediation of heavy metal polluted soils. In: Gore RW (ed) Environmental research at the Leading Edge. Nova Science, Hauppauge, pp 1–60Google Scholar
  2. Borken W, Xu Y, Beese F (2004) Leaching of dissolved organic carbon and carbon dioxide emission after compost application to six nutrient-depleted forest soils. J Environ Qual 33:89–98Google Scholar
  3. Buckingham S, Tipping E, Hamilton-Taylor J (2008) Dissolved organic matter in soil solutions: a comparison of collection methods. Soil Use Manage 24:29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bundt M, Widmer F, Pesaro M, Zeyer J, Blaser P (2001) Preferential flow paths: biological ‘hot spots’ in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 33:729–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao J, Tao S, Li BG (1999) Leaching kinetics of water soluble organic carbon (WSOC) from upland soil. Chemosphere 39:1771–1780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. CL:AIRE (2008) Guidance on comparing soil contamination data with a critical concentration. The Chartered Institute of Environmental Science (CIEH), LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Clemente R, Dickinson NM, Lepp NW (2008) Mobility of metals and metalloids in a multi-element contaminated soil 20 years after cessation of the pollution source activity. Environ Pollut 155:254–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Craul PJ (1999) Urban soils: applications and practices. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Curtis MJ, Claassen VP (2009) Regenerating topsoil functionality in four drastically disturbed soil types by compost incorporation. Restor Ecol 17(1):24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davies BE (1995) Lead. In: Alloway BJ (ed) Heavy metals in soils. Blackie, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. DEFRA (2002) Soil guideline values for arsenic contamination. Available from the R&D Dissemination Centre, WRc plc, Swindon, Wilts, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Dickinson NM, Pulford ID (2005) Cadmium phytoextraction using short rotation coppice Salix: the evidence trail. Environ Int 31:609–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fitz WJ, Wenzel WW (2002) Arsenic transformations in the soil-rhizosphere-plant system: fundamentals and potential application to phytoremediation. J Biotechnol 99:259–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fontaine S, Bardoux LA, Mariotti A (2004) Carbon input to soil may decrease soil carbon content. Ecol Lett 7:314–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fontaine S, Barot S, Barre P, Bdioui N, Mary B, Rumpel C (2007) Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply. Nature 450:277–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ge Y, Murray P, Hendershot WH (2000) Trace metal speciation and bioavailability in urban soils. Environ Pollut 107:137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geibe CE, Danielsson R, van Hees PAW, Lundstrom US (2006) Comparison of soil solution chemistry sampled by centrifugion, two types of suction lysimeters and zero-tension lysimeters. Appl Geochem 21:2096–2111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guggenberger G, Kaiser K (2003) Dissolved organic matter in soil: challenging the paradigm of sorptive preservation. Geoderma 113:293–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hartley W, Uffindell L, Plumb A, Rawlinson HA, Putwain P, Dickinson NM (2008) Assessing biological indicators for remediated anthropogenic urban soils. Sci Total Environ 405:358–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kiekens L (1995) Zinc. In: Alloway BJ (ed) Heavy metals in soils. Blackie, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Lehmann A, Stahr K (2007) Nature and significance of anthropogenic urban soils. J Soils Sediments 7:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marschner B, Kalbitz K (2003) Controls of bioavailability and biodegradability of dissolved organic matter in soils. Geoderma 113:211–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Neff JC, Asner GP (2001) Dissolved organic carbon in terrestrial ecosystems: synthesis and a model. Ecosystems 4:29–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nolan AL, McLaughlin MJ, Mason SD (2003) Chemical speciation of Zn, Cd, Cu and Pb in pore waters of agricultural and contaminated soils using Donnan dialysis. Environ Sci Technol 37:97–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. O'Neill P (1990) Arsenic. In: Alloway BJ (ed) Heavy metals in soils. Blackie, London, pp 83–99Google Scholar
  26. Pouyat RV, Yesilonis ID, Nowak DJ (2006) Carbon storage by urban soils in the United States. J Environ Qual 35:1566–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Song QJ, Greenway GM (2004) A study of the elemental leachability and retention capability of compost. J Environ Monit 6:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stewart CE, Paustian K, Conant RT, Plante AF, Six J (2008) Soil carbon saturation: Evaluation and corroboration by long-term incubations. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1741–1750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thums CR, Farago ME, Thornton I (2008) Bioavailability of trace metals in brownfield soils in an urban area in the UK. Environ Geochem Health 30:549–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Whalen JK, Hu Q, Liu A (2003) Compost applications increase water-stable aggregates in conventional and no-tillage systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:1142–1847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wong CSC, Li X, Thornton I (2006) Urban environmental geochemistry of trace metals. Environ Pollut 142:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ScienceLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations