Advertisement

Towards bioremediation of toxic unresolved complex mixtures of hydrocarbons: identification of bacteria capable of rapid degradation of alkyltetralins

  • Max Frenzel
  • Philip James
  • Sara K. Burton
  • Steven J. Rowland
  • Hilary M. Lappin-Scott
SOILS, SEC 3 • REMEDIATION AND MANAGEMENT OF CONTAMINATED OR DEGRADED LANDS • RESEARCH ARTICLE

Abstract

Background, aim and scope

Unresolved complex mixtures (UCMs) of aromatic hydrocarbons are widespread, but often overlooked, environmental contaminants. Since UCMs are generally rather resistant to bacterial degradation, bioremediation of UCM-contaminated sites by bacteria is a challenging goal. Branched chain alkyltetralins are amongst the individual classes of components of aromatic UCMs which have been identified in hydrocarbon-contaminated sediments and a number of synthetic alkyltetralins have proved toxic in laboratory studies. Thus, alkyltetralins should perhaps be amongst the targets for UCM bioremediation strategies. The slow degradation of several alkyltetralins by a microbial consortium has been reported previously; however, the bacteria involved remain unidentified and no single strain capable of alkyltetralin biodegradation has been isolated. The present project therefore aimed to enrich and identify bacterial consortia and single strains of bacteria from a naturally hydrocarbon-contaminated site (Whitley Bay, UK), which were capable of the degradation of two synthetic alkyltetralins (6-cyclohexyltetralin (CHT) and 1-(3’-methylbutyl)-7-cyclohexyltetralin (MBCHT)).

Materials and methods

Bacteria were enriched from sediment collected from Whitley Bay, UK by culturing with CHT and MBCHT for a period of 4 months. Biodegradation experiments were then established and degradation of model compounds monitored by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Internal standards allowed the generation of quantitative data. 16S rRNA gene clone libraries were constructed from individual enrichments to allow assessment of microbial community structure. Selective media containing MBCHT were used to isolate single bacterial strains. These strains were then tested in liquid culture for their ability to degrade MBCHT.

Results

The consortia obtained through enrichment culture were able to degrade 87% of CHT and 76% of MBCHT after only 46 days compared with abiotic controls. The 16S ribosomal RNA gene clone libraries of these bacteria were dominated by sequences of Rhodococcus spp. Using selective media, a strain of Rhodococcus was then isolated that was also able to biodegrade 63% of MBCHT in only 21 days.

Discussion

The present report describes the isolation of a single bacterial strain able to degrade the resistant MBCHT. Although significant losses of MBCHT were observed, putative metabolites were not detectable. Rhodococcus sp. have been reported previously to be able to biodegrade a range of hydrocarbon compounds.

Recommendations and perspectives

Due to their environmental persistence and toxicity, aromatic UCMs require bioremediation. The culturing and identification of such bacteria capable of rapid degradation of alkyltetralins may be an important step toward the development of bioremediation strategies for sites contaminated with toxic UCMs.

Keywords

Alkyltetralins Aromatic hydrocarbons Biodegradation Rhodococcus Unresolved complex mixtures 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to R. Srodzinski and P. A. Sutton (University of Plymouth) for technical assistance with GC–MS. We would also like to thank A. Booth and O. G. Brakstad for their helpful comments. Research described in this paper was supported in part by awards from the UK Natural Environment Research Council (award no. NER/S/C/2004/129821) and Schlumberger Limited.

References

  1. Andújar E, Hernáez MJ, Kaschabek SR, Reineke W, Santero E (2000) Identification of an extradiol dioxygenase involved in tetralin biodegradation: gene sequence analysis and purification and characterization of the gene product. J Bacteriol 182(3):789–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Annweiler E, Michaelis W, Meckenstock RU (2002) Identical ring cleavage products during anaerobic degradation of naphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and tetralin indicate a new metabolic pathway. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:852–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashelford KE, Chuzhanova NA, Fry JC, Jones AJ, Weightman AJ (2006) New screening software shows that most recent large 16 S rRNA gene clone libraries contain chimeras. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(9):5734–5741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Askari K, Pollard S (2005) The UK approach for evaluating human health risks from petroleum hydrocarbon in soils environment agency, Science Report.Google Scholar
  5. Atlas RM (1995) Petroleum biodegradation and oil spill bioremediation. Mar Pollut Bull 31(4–12):178–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Booth AM, Aitken C, Jones DM, Lewis CA, Rowland SJ (2007a) Resistance of toxic alkylcyclohexyltetralins to biodegradation by aerobic bacteria. Org Geochem 38(4):540–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Booth AM, Sutton PA, Lewis CA, Lewis AC, Scarlett A, Chau W, Widdows J, Rowland SJ (2007b) Unresolved complex mixtures of aromatic hydrocarbons: thousands of overlooked persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic contaminants in mussels. Environ Sci Technol 41(2):457–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Booth AM, Scarlett AG, Lewis CA, Belt ST, Rowland SJ (2008) Unresolved complex mixtures (UCMs) of aromatic hydrocarbons: branched alkyl indanes and branched alkyl tetralins are present in UCMs and accumulated by and toxic to, the mussel Mytilus edulis. Environ Sci Technol 42:8122–8126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cappello S, Caruso G, Zampino D, Monticelli LS, Maimone G, Denaro R, Tripodo B, Troussellier M, Yakimov M, Giuliano L (2007) Microbial community dynamics during assays of harbour oil spill bioremediation: a microscale simulation study. J Appl Microbiol 102(1):184–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donkin P, Smith EL, Rowland SJ (2003) Toxic effects of unresolved complex mixtures of aromatic hydrocarbons accumulated by mussels, Mytilus edulis, from contaminated field sites. Environ Sci Technol 37(21):4825–4830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards U, Rogall T, Blocker H, Emde M, Bottger EC (1989) Isolation and direct complete nucleotide determination of entire genes. Characterization of a gene coding for 16S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res 17(19):7843–7853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eickhoff CV, He S-X, Gobas FAPC, Law FCP (2003) Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in dungeness crabs (Cancer magister) near an aluminum smelter in Kitimat Arm, British Columbia, Canada. Environ Toxicol Chem 22(1):50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Felsenstein J (2005) Phylip (phylogeny inference package) distributed by the author department of genome sciences. University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  14. Frenzel M (2008) Persistence, bioremediation and fate of unresolved complex mixtures (UCMs) of hydrocarbons in the environment. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Exeter, Exeter, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. Frysinger GS, Gaines RB, Xu L, Reddy CM (2003) Resolving the unresolved complex mixture in petroleum-contaminated sediments. Environ Sci Technol 37(8):1653–1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gough MA, Rowland SJ (1990) Characterization of unresolved complex mixtures of hydrocarbons in petroleum. Nature 344(6267):648–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gough MA, Rhead MM, Rowland SJ (1992) Biodegradation studies of unresolved complex mixtures of hydrocarbons: model UCM hydrocarbons and the aliphatic UCM. Org Geochem 18(1):17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grayson DA, Tewari YB, Mayhew MP, Vilker VL, Goldberg RN (1996) Tetralin as a substrate for camphor (cytochrome P450) 5-monooxygenase. Arch Biochem Biophys 332(2):239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52(5):696–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heald SC, Brandão PFB, Hardicre R, Bull AT (2001) Physiology, biochemistry and taxonomy of deep-sea nitrile metabolising Rhodococcus strains. Antonie vanLeeuwenhoek 80:169–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hernáez MJ, Reineke W, Santero E (1999) Genetic analysis of biodegradation of tetralin by a Sphingomonas strain. Appl Environ Microbiol 65(4):1806–1810Google Scholar
  22. Hernandez-Raquet G, Budzinski H, Caumette P, Dabert P, Le Ménach K, Muyzer G, Duran R (2006) Molecular diversity studies of bacterial communities of oil polluted microbial mats from the Etang De Berre (France). FEMS Microbiol Ecol 58(3):550–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ilker U, Duan YP, Ogram A (2000) Characterization of the naphthalene-degrading bacterium, Rhodococcus opacus M213. FEMS Microbiol Lett 185(2):231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (ed) Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Keane T, Creevey C, Pentony M, Naughton T, McLnerney J (2006) Assessment of methods for amino acid matrix selection and their use on empirical data shows that Ad Hoc assumptions for choice of matrix are not justified. BMC Evol Biol 6(1):29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Landrum PF, Lotufo GR, Gossiaux DC, Gedeon ML, Lee J-H (2003) Bioaccumulation and critical body residue of PAHs in the amphipod, Diporeia spp: additional evidence to support toxicity additivity for PAH mixtures. Chemosphere 51(6):481–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Larkin MJ, Kulakov LA, Allen CCR (2005) Biodegradation and Rhodococcus—masters of catabolic versatility. Curr Opin Biotechnol 16(3):282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23(21):2947–2948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Margesin R, Fonteyne P-A, Redl B (2005) Low-temperature biodegradation of high amounts of phenol by Rhodococcus spp. and basidiomycetous yeasts. Res Microbiol 156(1):68–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McKew BA, Coulon F, Osborn MA, Timmis KN, McGenity TJ (2007a) Determining the identity and roles of oil-metabolizing marine bacteria from the Thames estuary, UK. Environ Microbiol 9(1):165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McKew MA, Coulon F, Yakimov M, Denaro R, Genovese M, Smith CJ, Osborn MA, Timmis KN, McGenity TJ (2007b) Efficacy of intervention strategies for bioremediation of crude oil in marine systems and effects on indigenous hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria. Environ Microbiol 9(6):1562–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McLeod MP, Warren RL, Hsiao WWL, Araki N, Myhre M, Fernandes C, Miyazawa D, Wong W, Lillquist AL, Wang D, Dosanjh M, Hara H, Petrescu A, Morin RD, Yang G, Stott JM, Schein JE, Shin H, Smailus D, Siddiqui AS, Marra MA, Jones SJM, Holt R, Brinkman FSL, Miyauchi K, Fukuda M, Davies JE, Mohn WW, Eltis LD (2006) The complete genome of Rhodococcus sp. Rha1 provides insights into a catabolic powerhouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(42):15582–15587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. National Research Council (2003) Oil in the sea Iii: inputs, fates and effects. National Academy Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  34. Reddy CM, Eglinton TI, Hounshell A, White HK, Xu L, Gaines RB, Frysinger GS (2002) The west falmouth oil spill after thirty years: the persistence of petroleum hydrocarbons in marsh sediments. Environ Sci Technol 36(22):4754–4760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Revill AT (1992) Characterisation of unresolved complex mixtures of hydrocarbons by degradative methods. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UKGoogle Scholar
  36. Röling WFM, Milner MG, Jones DM, Lee K, Daniel F, Swannell RJP, Head IM (2002) Robust hydrocarbon degradation and dynamics of bacterial communities during nutrient-enhanced oil spill bioremediation. Appl Environ Microbiol 68(11):5537–5548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rowland S, Donkin P, Smith E, Wraige E (2001) Aromatic hydrocarbon "humps" in the marine environment: unrecognized toxins? Environ Sci Technol 35(13):2640–2644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Scarlett A, Galloway T, Rowland S (2007) Chronic toxicity of unresolved complex mixtures (UCM) of hydrocarbons in marine sediments. J Soils Sediments 7(4):200–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schloss PD, Handelsman J (2005) Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(3):1501–1506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schreiber AF, Winkler UK (1983) Transformation of tetralin by whole cells of Pseudomonas stutzeri As39. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 18(1):6–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sikkema J, Bont JAM (1991) Isolation and initial characterization of bacteria growing on tetralin. Biodegradation 2(1):15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sikkema J, de Bont JA (1993) Metabolism of tetralin (1, 2, 3, 4-tetrahydronaphthalene) in Corynebacterium sp. strain C125. Appl Environ Microbiol 59(2):567–572Google Scholar
  43. Smith E, Wraige E, Donkin P, Rowland S (2001) Hydrocarbon humps in the marine environment: synthesis, toxicity, and aqueous solubility of monoaromatic compounds. Environ Toxicol Chem 20(11):2428–2432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Soli G, Bens EM (1972) Bacteria which attack petroleum hydrocarbons in a saline medium. Biotechnol Bioeng 14:319–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stephen JR, McCaig AE, Smith Z, Prosser JI, Embley TM (1996) Molecular diversity of soil and marine 16 s rRNA gene sequences related to beta-subgroup ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 62(11):4147–4154Google Scholar
  46. Strawinski RJ, Stone RW (1940) The utilization of hydrocarbons by bacteria. J Bacteriol 40(3):461Google Scholar
  47. Sturt HF (2000) Molecular characterisation of fluid catalytic cracker feedstocks using ruthenium tetroxide oxidation: a study of model hydrocarbons. University of Plymouth, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  48. Tett VA, Willetts AJ, Lappin-Scott HM (1994) Enantioselective degradation of the herbicide mecoprop [2-(2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxy) propionic acid] by mixed and pure bacterial cultures. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 14(3):191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thomas KV (1995) Characterisation and environmental effects of unresolved complex mixtures of hydrocarbons. University of Plymouth, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  50. Thomas KV, Donkin P, Rowland SJ (1995) Toxicity enhancement of an aliphatic petrogenic unresolved complex mixture (Ucm) by chemical oxidation. Water Res 29(1):379–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Verrhiest G, ClÉment B, Blake G (2001) Single and combined effects of sediment-associated PAHs on three species of freshwater macroinvertebrates. Ecotoxicology 10(6):363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Watson JS, Jones DM, Swannell RPJ, van Duin ACT (2002) Formation of carboxylic acids during aerobic biodegradation of crude oil and evidence of microbial oxidation of hopanes. Org Geochem 33(10):1153–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Widdows J, Donkin P, Brinsley MD, Evans SV, Salkeld PN, Franklin A, Law RJ, Waldock MJ (1995) Scope for growth and contaminant levels in North Sea mussels Mytilus edulis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 127:131–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zakaria D, Lappin-Scott H, Burton S, Whitby C (2007) Bacterial diversity in soil enrichment cultures amended with 2 (2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxy) propionic acid (Mecoprop). Environ Microbiol 9(10):2575–2587CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Max Frenzel
    • 1
  • Philip James
    • 1
  • Sara K. Burton
    • 1
  • Steven J. Rowland
    • 2
  • Hilary M. Lappin-Scott
    • 1
  1. 1.School of BiosciencesUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
  2. 2.Petroleum and Environmental Geochemistry Group, School of Earth Ocean and Environmental SciencesUniversity of PlymouthDrake CircusUK

Personalised recommendations