Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 89–93 | Cite as

Sediments and priority substances in river basins

New Directive 2008/105/EC; sediment issues in management plans
SCIENCE AND POLICY • COMMENTARY

References

  1. Anonymous (1993) Feasibility study on sediment remediation of the Spittelwasser in the Bitterfeld District (in German). UBS Schwerin, IGB-VT Hamburg on behalf of the Bitterfeld District Office, July 1993Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous (2000) Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council (2000/60/EC) establishing a framework of community action in the field of water policy. 23 October 2000Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous (2004a) Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Toxicity, Ecotoxicity and the Environment (CSTEE) on ‘The setting of environmental quality standards for the priority substances included in Annex X of Directive 2000/60/EC in accordance with Article 16 thereof’, 32 p. Adopted by the CSTEE during the 43rd plenary meeting of 28 May 2004Google Scholar
  4. Anonymous (2004b) Agenda item 5: Emission sources and controls for priority substances (including comments on the proposed quality standards for specific substances). Concept paper from 8 June 2004, 77 p. Expert Advisory Forum on Priority Substances and Pollution Control, 7th EAF Meeting, Brussels, 14–15 June 2004Google Scholar
  5. Anonymous (2006a) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy and amending Directive 2000/60/EC, COM(2006) 397 final, Brussels, 17.7.2006, 25 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. Anonymous (2006b) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy and amending Directive 2000/60/EC, Commission Staff Working Document ‘Impact Assessment’, SEC(2006) 947, Brussels, 17.7.2006, 77 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Anonymous (2007a) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy and amending Directive 2000/60/EC. 21 June 2007Google Scholar
  8. Anonymous (2007b) Annex to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee, on the implementation of the Community Strategy for dioxins, furans and polychlorinated biphenyls (COM(2001) 593). Second progress report, Brussels, 10.7.2007, 15 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Anonymous (2008a) Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on quality standards in the field of water policy, amending and subsequently repealing Council Directives 82/176/EEC, 83/513/EEC, 84/156/EEC, 84/491/EEC, 86/280/EEC and amending Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union, 24.12.2008, pp. L 348/84–348/97Google Scholar
  10. Anonymous (2008b) Entwurf des Bewirtschaftungsplans nach Artikel 13 der Richtlinie 2000/60/EG für den deutschen Teil der Flussgebietseinheit Elbe. Editor: River Basin Community (FGG) Elbe, Magdeburg/Germany. 26.11.2008. 192 p. http://fgg-elbe.de/joomla/index.php
  11. Anonymous (2008c) Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). Official Journal of the European Union, 25.6.2008, L 164/19–164/40Google Scholar
  12. Anonymous (2008d) Umweltbericht gemäß §14b des UVPG zum Entwurf des Maßnahmenprogramms gemäß Art. 11 der WRRL für die Flussgebietsgemeinschaft Elbe (FGG Elbe), Magdeburg/Germany 26.11.2008, 194 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Anonymous (2008e) Standardisierter Maßnahmenkatalog der Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser (LAWA) zu den WRRL-Maßnahmenprogrammen für Flussgebietseinheiten. Annex 1 to Anonymous (2008d), 6 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Anonymous (2009) Hintergrundpapier zur Ableitung der überregionalen Bewirtschaftungsziele für die Oberflächengewässer im deutschen Teil der Flussgebietseinheit Elbe für den Belastungsschwerpunkt Schadstoffe. FGG Elbe, Magdeburg/GermanyGoogle Scholar
  15. Apitz SE (2008a) Is risk-based, sustainable sediment management consistent with European policy? J Soils Sediments 8(6):461–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Apitz SE (2008b) Adaptive management principles and sediment management—a call for discussions. J Soils Sediments 8(6):359–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crane M (2003) Proposed development of sediment quality guidelines under the European Water Framework Directive: a critique. Toxicol Lett 142:195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Förstner U (2008) Differences in policy response to similar scientific findings examples from sediment contamination issues in River Basin Management Plans. J Soils Sediments 8(4):214–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Förstner U, Apitz SE (2007) Sediment remediation: U.S. focus on capping and monitored natural recovery. J Soils Sediments 7(6):351–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heise S, Förstner U, Westrich B, Jancke T, Karnahl J, Salomons W, Schönberger H (2004) Inventory of historical contaminated sediment in Rhine basin and its tributaries. Report on behalf of the Port of Rotterdam, pp 233Google Scholar
  21. Heise S, Krüger F, Baborowski M, Stachel B, Götz R, Förstner U (2008) Assessment of risks from particle bound substances in the Elbe river basin (in German). Commissioned by Hamburg Port Authority and River Basin Community (FGG) Elbe. Hamburg, May 2008, 349 pp, www.tideelbe.de
  22. Netzband A et al (2007) Sediment management—an essential element of river basin management plans. J Soils Sediments 7(2):117–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Quevauviller P (2005) Chemical monitoring activity under the common implementation strategy of the WFDGoogle Scholar
  24. Quevauviller P (2007) Water framework directive. J Soils Sediments 7(2):111–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Quevauviller Ph, Borchers U, Thompson KC, Simonart T (eds) (2008) The Water Framework Directive—Ecological and Chemical Status Monitoring. Wiley, Chichester UK, 476 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Salomons W (2008) Linking soils, sediments and catchment ecosystems. J Soils Sediments 8(2):67–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wenning RJ, Batley GE, Ingersoll CG, Moore DW (eds) (2005) Use of sediment quality guidelines and related tools for the assessment of contaminated sediments (SQG). SETAC Press, Penasacola, FL, 783 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Wölz J, Cofalla C, Hudjetz S, Roger S, Brinkmann M, Schmidt B, Schaeffer A, Kammann U, Lennartz G, Hecker M, Schuettrumpf H, Hollert H (2009) In search for the ecological and toxicological relevance of sediment re-mobilisation and transport during flood events. J Soils Sediments 9(1):1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Environmental Technology and Energy EconomicsHamburg University of TechnologyHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations