Accounting for soil organic carbon role in land use contribution to climate change in agricultural LCA: which methods? Which impacts?
- 71 Downloads
Soil organic carbon (SOC) plays a key role in soil functioning and in greenhouse gas exchange with the atmosphere. Land use and land use changes can critically affect SOC. However, despite various methodological developments, there is still no scientific consensus on the best method to assess the holistic impact of land use and land use change within LCA. The SOCLE project aimed to review how SOC contribution to climate change is accounted for in LCA and to test the feasibility and sensitivity of best methodological options.
In total, five crop products (annual/perennial, temperate/tropical) and two livestock products were investigated through 22 scenarios of land use changes (LUC) and agricultural land management changes (LMC). Three methods were applied: IPCC Tier 1-2 (2006), Müller-Wenk and Brandaõ (2010) and Levasseur et al. (2012). We also carried out a sensitivity analysis on key variables, notably carbon stocks, reference states, and regeneration times.
Results and discussion
The accounting for LUC and LMC influenced greatly the results on the climate change impact. Compared to the impact of other GHG emissions, (i) LUC impacts ranged from − 23 to + 1702% with the IPCC method and from − 5 to + 336% with the Müller-Wenk and Brandaõ method, and (ii) LMC impacts from − 130 to + 54% and from − 31 to + 11%, respectively. The sensitivity analyses stressed the critical influence of all methodological and data choices on final results.
Based on the project results, we recommend accounting systematically for the impact of LULUC on climate change by applying, a minima, the comprehensive IPCC Tier 1 approach (2006), which provides default factors for SOC accounting. Where available, case-specific data should be used (e.g., Tier 2) for SOC stocks but also C:N ratio in order to model the degressive impact over 90% of the time period needed to reach equilibrium.
KeywordsAgricultural practices Climate change Land use and land use change Soil organic carbon
We warmly thank the reviewers for their thorough reviews and constructive comments that enable to improve the paper greatly.
The SOCLE project, 2014-2017, was financed by ADEME, the French Environment & Energy Management Agency under the contract number 1360C0097.
- Benoist A, Bessou C (2018) Soil organic carbon, climate change, and soil quality: a mapping of existing methods for LCA. http://agritrop.cirad.fr/582031/Detailed project report in French: https://www.ademe.fr/sites/default/files/assets/documents/rapport_de_revue_methodo_socle_final_2018.pdf (accessed 19 Sept 2019)
- Benoist A, Cornillier C (2016) Towards a consensual method to assess climate change impacts from bio-based systems. http://agritrop.cirad.fr/580572/ (accessed 28 February 2019)
- Bos U, Horn R, Beck T (2016) LANCA - characterization factors for life cycle impact assessment - Version 2.0. Stuttgart, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- BSI (2011) PAS2050: specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services by The British Standards Institution. 45 ppGoogle Scholar
- Crowther TW, Todd-Brown KEO, Rowe CW, Wieder WR, Carey JC, Machmuller MB, Snoek BL, Fang S, Zhou G, Allison SD, Blair JM, Bridgham SD, Burton AJ, Carrillo Y, Reich PB, Clark JS, Classen AT, Dijkstra FA, Elberling B, Emmett BA, Estiarte M, Frey SD, Guo J, Harte J, Jiang L, Johnson BR, Kröel-Dulay G, Larsen KS, Laudon H, Lavallee JM, Luo Y, Lupascu M, Ma LN, Marhan S, Michelsen A, Mohan J, Niu S, Pendall E, Peñuelas J, Pfeifer-Meister L, Poll C, Reinsch S, Reynolds LL, Schmidt IK, Sistla S, Sokol NW, Templer PH, Treseder KK, Welker JM, Bradford MA (2016) Quantifying global soil carbon losses in response to warming. Nature 540(7631):104–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- de Vries W (2018) Soil carbon 4 per mille: a good initiative but let’s manage not only the soil but also the expectations: comment on Minasny et al. (2017). Geoderma 292:59–86Google Scholar
- Duparque A, Dinh JL, Mary B (2013) AMG: a simple SOC balance model used in France for decision support. International workshop SOMpatic Rauischholtzhausern (Germany), November 20-22, 2013Google Scholar
- Fujisaki K (2014) Devenir des stocks de carbone organique des sols après déforestation et mise en culture : une analyse diachronique en contexte amazonien. Centre International d’Etudes Supérieures en Sciences Agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)Google Scholar
- International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) (2011) Handbook—recommendations for life cycle impact assessment in the European context. First edition November 2011. EUR 24571 EN. Luxemburg Publications Office of the European Union. 159pGoogle Scholar
- IPBES (2018) Summary for policymakers of the assessment report on land degradation and restoration of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES secretariat, BonnGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2006) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Vol 4 Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. WMO/UNEP. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html
- IPCC (2007) Fourth Assessment Report. Climate change 2007 - synthesis report. WMO/UNEP. http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-syr.htm
- Rumpel C, Amiraslani F, Chenu C, Garcia Cardenas M, Kaonga M, Koutika LS, Ladha J, Madari B, Shirato Y, Smith P, Soudi B, Soussana JF, Whitehead D, Wollenberg E (2019) The 4p1000 initiative: Opportunities, limitations and challenges for implementing soil organic carbon sequestration as a sustainable development strategy. Ambio.:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01165-2
- Saby NPA, Brus DJ, Arrouays D (2014) Comparison of the several methods to estimate of the sampling variance from a systematic random sampling: application to the French soil monitoring network data. In: Jeannée N, Romary T (eds) GeoEnv, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Shibu ME, Leffelaar PA, Van Keulen H, Aggarwal PK (2006) Quantitative description of soil organic matter dynamics-A review of approaches with reference to rice-based cropping systemsGoogle Scholar
- Tuomisto HL, Saouter E, Pant R (2015) Default approaches for cross-cutting issues for the cattle related product environmental footprint pilots. European Commission, Joint Research Center. Italy. 21 ppGoogle Scholar