Comparison of different tomato puree production phases from an environmental point of view
- 27 Downloads
Agro-food systems are involved with considerable environmental impacts. Tomato as an important vegetable crop is processed into some products such as puree, ketchup, and paste. This study aimed to investigate the environmental impacts of tomato puree production considering its entire life cycle, including tomato cultivation, processing, packaging, and transportation, to identify the hotspots and potential improvements for each stage to reduce environmental burdens.
The primary data were collected from the processing plant located in Urmia County, Iran, and 28 tomato growers which provide tomato to processing plant using a face-to-face questionnaire. The source for secondary data was the Ecoinvent, LCA Food DK, and IDMAT 2001 databases. The functional unit was considered as 500 g tomato puree packaged in a steel can with a plastic cap. The environmental impacts were investigated using the CML 2 baseline method.
Results and discussions
Results showed that packaging is the most important contributor to all impact categories except acidification (AC) and eutrophication (EP) in which tomato cultivation was indicated as the hotspot. In the cultivation phase, electricity and N-based fertilizers were indicated as the major contributors to most impact categories. Diesel fuel and natural gas were the hotspots in the processing phase.
Based on the results, packaging and cultivation phases have enough potential to reduce environmental impacts during puree production. It can be realized through applying materials that are involved with negligible environmental burdens during their production for packaging and improving irrigation systems for reducing electricity as a major hotspot in cultivation phases. Also, soil analysis would be helpful to determine the amounts and types of required fertilizers.
KeywordsCML baseline Environmental impacts Life cycle assessment Packaging Processing Tomato puree
The authors would like to thank the company’s personnel for cooperation and giving the data.
The authors would like to thank the Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resource University of Khuzestan for financial support.
- Boguski TK, Hunt RG, Cholakis JM, Franklin WE (1996) LCA methodology. In: Curran MA (ed) environmental life-cycle assessment. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-publication Data, pp 15-33Google Scholar
- Bolliger R, Bauer C (2007) Wasserkraft. Sachbilanzen von Energiesystemen (Ecoinvent report no. 6). Swiss Centre for LCI, Dübendorf and Villigen, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- Braschkat J, Patyk A, Quirin M, Reinhardt GA (2004) Life cycle assessment of bread production-a comparison of eight different scenarios. DIAS report, 9Google Scholar
- De Klein C, Novoa RSA, Ogle S, Smith KA, Rochette P, Wirth TC, McConkey BG, Mosier A, Rypdal K, Walsh M (2006) N2O emissions from managed soils, and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), JapanGoogle Scholar
- EPA-Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Emission factor documentation for AP-42 Section 1.4-Natural gas combustion, Technical support division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. ‹http://www3.epa.gov/ttnchie1/ap42/ch01/bgdocs/b01s04.pdf ›
- European Commission (2011) Roadmap to a resource efficient EuropeGoogle Scholar
- Faist Emmenegger M, Heck T, Jungbluth N (2007) Erdgas. Sachbilanzen von Energiesystemen (Ecoinvent report no. 6). Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf and Villigen, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (1996) In: Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Lim B, Treanton K, Mamaty I, Bonduki Y, Griggs DJ, Callender BA (eds) Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. IPCC/OECD/IEA, ParisGoogle Scholar
- ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management: life cycle assessment: principles and framework. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Nemecek T, Kägi T, Blaser S (2007) Life cycle inventories of agricultural production systems. Final report Ecoinvent v2.0 no.15. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Duebendorf, Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- Nikkhah A, Emadi B, Firouzi S (2015) F sustain. Energy Technol Assess 12:10–14Google Scholar
- World Water Assessment Programme (2009) The United Nations world water development report 3: water in a changing world. UNESCO and London: Earthscan, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Zarei MJ, Kazemi N, Marzban A (2017) Life cycle environmental impacts of cucumber and tomato production in open-field and greenhouse. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2017.07.001