Advertisement

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

, Volume 24, Issue 9, pp 1553–1572 | Cite as

A bottom-up approach for implementation of Environmental Product Declarations in Mexico’s housing sector

  • Victor Alberto Arvizu-PiñaEmail author
  • Albert Cuchí-Burgos
  • Juan Pablo Chargoy Amador
BUILDING COMPONENTS AND BUILDINGS

Abstract

Purpose

After analyzing in previous papers the potential of Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) as a sustainability tool in Mexico’s building sector and studying its implementation mainly from government housing programs and normative instruments (a top-down approach), this work seeks to complement a holistic approach about its implementation in an emerging country like Mexico. So, the main objective of this paper is to analyze the possibilities of EPDs implementation in Mexico’s housing sector from the business sector (a bottom-up approach), determining the possible challenges this approach would have.

Methods

The experience, vision, and perspective about EPDs from the main potential users of this ecolabel in Mexico have been considered. For this, a questionnaire to housing developers and Mexican companies implementing EPDs has been applied. Similar studies from developed countries have been used as a reference to establish a possible path for the EPD development in a business sector of a country like Mexico. Based on this analysis, an outlook and challenges for a bottom-up EPD implementation in Mexico’s housing sector has been made.

Results and discussion

Reduce the environmental impact and increase the commercial competitiveness are two of the main reasons for companies to implement sustainability strategies. Although EPDs serve these objectives, and there are Mexican standards, normative instruments, and housing design guides recommending the use of this ecolabel, there are few housing developers knowing EPDs, and there are also few Mexican companies implementing this ecolabel. Moreover, there is limited knowledge about EPDs in Mexico, both by final consumers and professional buyers. On the other hand, the European benchmark has served to detect common aspects about the EPD implementation, as well as to establish a possible development path that can be used to accelerate its implementation by Mexican companies.

Conclusions

In Mexico, there is a solid legislative and regulatory framework that can be used as a starting point to promote the EPDs in housing sector. There is also a widespread interest from companies in using ecolabels as part of its sustainability strategies. However, there is still not enough supply–demand for this kind of information, nor the technical and personnel capacity supporting the EPD implementation. Consolidate the human resources formation in life cycle assessment (LCA), inform about the EPD’s usefulness, and facilitate the understanding of such information to consumers and professional buyers would be the main challenges to promote this ecolabel in Mexico.

Keywords

Building environmental assessment Emerging economy countries EPD Housing sector LCA Mexico SMEs 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their widest and sincere gratitude to all persons and companies that have collaborated in various phases of this research, mainly to the following organizations: to the Center for Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainable Design (CADIS), to the National Housing and Sustainable Communities Laboratory, to the INFONAVIT Evaluation and Analysis area, and finally to the housing companies and the companies implementing EPDs, for their support responding the questionnaires. We also thank the National Council of Science and Technology (CONACyT) for funding this research.

Supplementary material

11367_2019_1587_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (107 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 107 kb)
11367_2019_1587_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (106 kb)
ESM 2 (PDF 106 kb)

References

  1. Arvizu-Piña VA, Cuchí Burgos A (2017) Promoting sustainability in Mexico’s building sector via environmental product declarations. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:1744–1759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. CADIS, ADDERE (2015) EPD Latin America. In: Hub Lat. Am. Int. EPD® Syst. http://www.epd-americalatina.com. Accessed 30 Jul 2016
  3. CCA (2008) Edificación Sustentable en América del Norte. Oportunidades y Retos. Quebec, CanadáGoogle Scholar
  4. CIDOC, SHF (2015) Estado Actual de la Vivienda en México 2015Google Scholar
  5. CONAVI (2014) El mercado de vivienda en MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  6. Del Borghi A (2013) LCA and communication: environmental product declaration. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:293–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernández-Viñé MB, Gómez-Navarro T, Capuz-Rizo SF (2013) Assessment of the public administration tools for the improvement of the eco-efficiency of small and medium sized enterprises. J Clean Prod 47:265–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fundación IDEA (2013) Estrategia Nacional para la Vivienda Sustentable. British Embassy in Mexico, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  9. Gazulla C (2012) Declaraciones Ambientales de Producto: instrumento para la mejora de productos. Dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  10. Ibáñez-Forés V, Pacheco-Blanco B, Capuz-Rizo SF, Bovea MD (2015) Environmental product declarations: exploring their evolution and the factors affecting their demand in Europe. J Clean Prod 116:157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. INFONAVIT (2015) Hipoteca Verde. 3er Foro de Calentamiento Solar de Agua. México, D.FGoogle Scholar
  12. INFONAVIT (2016a) Desarrollos habitacionales que cuentan con viviendas sustentables. http://portal.infonavit.org.mx/wps/wcm/connect/7d1462f9-4374-4630-b07d-29cbdefcd8d5/Lista_de_desarrollos_sustentables.pdf?MOD=AJPERES. Accessed 10 Mar 2016
  13. INFONAVIT (2016c) RUV Materiales. http://materiales.ruv.org.mx/BuscarProductos.aspx?fam=5. Accessed 29 Sep 2016
  14. INFONAVIT, FOVISSSTE, SHF (2016) RUV Materiales | RUV—Registro Único de Vivienda. http://portalruvprod.azurewebsites.net/ruv-materiales/. Accessed 29 Sep 2016
  15. ISO (2006) ISO 14025: Environmental labels and declarations—type III environmental declarations—principles and proceduresGoogle Scholar
  16. Jönsson K (2000) Communicating the environmental characteristics of products. The use of environmental product declarations in the building, energy and automotive industries. Lund UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaineg R, Kraft G, Neuhauss W et al (2013) NAMA Apoyada para la Vivienda Sustentable en México—Acciones de Mitigación y Paquetes FinancierosGoogle Scholar
  18. Minkov N, Schneider L, Lehmann A, Finkbeiner M (2015) Type III environmental declaration programmes and harmonization of product category rules: status quo and practical challenges. J Clean Prod 94:235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. OECD (2007) Small businesses and environmental compliance: review and possible application of international experience in GeorgiaGoogle Scholar
  20. Passer A, Lasvaux S, Allacker K, de Lathauwer D, Spirinckx C, Wittstock B, Kellenberger D, Gschösser F, Wall J, Wallbaum H (2015) Environmental product declarations entering the building sector: critical reflections based on 5 to 10 years experience in different European countries. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1199–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Arquitectura, Urbanismo e Ingeniería CivilUniversidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de MéxicoMexico CityMexico
  2. 2.Barcelona School of Architecture, Department of Architectural TechnologyUniversitat Politècnica de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Centro de Análisis de Ciclo de Vida y Diseño SustentableCuautitlán IzcalliMexico

Personalised recommendations