Reply to Kim et al. (2019): Commentary on “Correction to: On the Calculation of fuel savings through lightweight design in automotive life cycle Assessments” by Koffler and Rohde-Brandenburger (2018)
- 120 Downloads
In addition, the reply contains several arguments that speak against the allocation of engine friction losses in the context of automotive lightweighting. In conclusion, the authors cannot follow Kim et al's proposed solution and maintain their recommendation to follow the approach published in their 2010 methodology paper to assess the fuel savings due to automotive lightweighting for internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles.
- Kim, H. C., Wallington, T. J., Sullivan, J. L., & Keoleian, G. A. (2015). Life cycle assessment of vehicle lightweighting: novel mathematical methods to estimate use-phase fuel consumption. Environ Sci Technol doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01655
- Kim HC, Wallington TJ, Sullivan JL, Keoleian GA (2019) Commentary on “Correction to: On the calculation of fuel savings through lightweight design in automotive life cycle assessments” by Koffler and Rohde-Brandenburger (2018). Int J Life Cycle AssessGoogle Scholar
- Rohde-Brandenburger K (1996) Verfahren zur einfachen und sicheren Abschätzung von Kraftstoffverbrauchspotentialen, Einfluss von Ganzfahrzeug-Parametern auf Fahrverhalten, Fahrleistung, und Kraftstoffverbrauch. Haus der Technik, EssenGoogle Scholar