Advertisement

Commentary on “Correction to: On the calculation of fuel savings through lightweight design in automotive life cycle assessments” by Koffler and Rohde-Brandeburger (2018)

  • Hyung Chul KimEmail author
  • Timothy J. Wallington
  • John L. Sullivan
  • Gregory A. Keoleian
COMMENTARY AND DISCUSSION ARTICLE
  • 12 Downloads

In their recent article “Correction to: On the calculation of fuel savings through lightweight design in automotive life cycle assessments” ( https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1474-4), Koffler and Rohde-Brandenburger (2018) present a method to determine the “percentage fuel savings” from lightweighting a vehicle component. The original work by Koffler and Rohde-Brandenburger (2010) introduced a novel method of estimating generic fuel reduction values (FRVs) to assess the benefits of vehicle lightweighting. Koffler and Rohde-Brandenburger (2010) also described how FRVs could be used to assess the absolute fuel savings from component lightweighting. However, Koffler and Rohde-Brandenburger (2010) noted that for the case of powertrain resizing (changing engine displacement or gear ratios to match vehicle performance), it was not possible to assess relativefuel savings from component lightweighting because this would involve division by zero in their method. To address this limitation,...

Notes

References

  1. Kim HC, Wallington TJ (2013) Life cycle assessment of vehicle lightweighting: a physics-based model of mass-induced fuel consumption. Environ Sci Technol 47:14358–14366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kim HC, Wallington TJ (2016) Life cycle assessment of vehicle lightweighting: a physics-based model to estimate use-phase fuel consumption of electrified vehicles. Environ Sci Technol 50:11226–11233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kim HC, Wallington TJ, Sullivan JL, Keoleian GA (2015) Life cycle assessment of vehicle lightweighting: novel mathematical methods to estimate use-phase fuel consumption. Environ Sci Technol 49:10209–10216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Koffler C, Rohde-Brandenburger K (2010) On the calculation of fuel savings through lightweight design in automotive life cycle assessments. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:128–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Koffler C, Rohde-Brandenburger K (2018) Correction to: On the calculation of fuel savings through lightweight design in automotive life cycle assessments. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:1525–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nam EK, Giannelli R (2005) Fuel consumption modeling of conventional and advanced technology vehicles in the physical emission rate estimator (PERE). U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
  7. Ross M (1997) Fuel efficiency and the physics of automobiles. Contemp Phys 38:381–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Willans PW (1888) Economy trials of a non-condensing steam-engine: simple, compound and triple. Minutes of the Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers 93:128–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ford Motor Co.DearbornUSA
  2. 2.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations