Life cycle assessment with primary data on heavy rare earth oxides from ion-adsorption clays
- 26 Downloads
Heavy and light rare earth elements (REEs) are critical to clean energy technologies, and thus the environmental impacts from their production are increasingly scrutinized. Most previous LCAs of REE production focus on sites producing light REEs. This research addresses this gap by collecting primary data from sites producing heavy rare earth oxides (HREOs) from ion-adsorption clays, conducting an LCA, and providing open-source life cycle inventory (LCI) datasets of HREO production for the LCA community.
This study conducts a LCA based on acquired primary data from four mining sites in Jiangxi Province, China. The functional unit is 1 kg of mixed HREOs of 90% purity from ion-adsorption clays using the technology of in situ leaching. Previous studies have used the Ecoinvent database, relying mostly on European or global life cycle inventories (LCIs). Here, the Chinese Life Cycle Database provided China-specific reference life cycle inventories (LCIs) for all inputs and processes with the exception of electricity generation LCIs used in a scenario analysis, which were provided by Ecoinvent 3. Twelve impact categories were examined using Impact 2002+, USEtox 2.01, and IPCC methods. Results are provided as a bounded range, reflecting low and high estimates based on collected primary data.
Results and discussion
Results show 1 kg of mixed HREOs emit 258–408 kg CO2e, and consume 270–443 MJ primary energy. These values fall within the range of previous LCAs that examined both bastnaesite/monazite deposits and ion-adsorption clays using literature values. Other impact categories considered are not similar across studies, however. Differences are due to variability in resource type and quality, technology, and modeling choices, such as reference LCI sources. Mining and extraction contribute most to impacts due to large quantities of chemicals for leaching and precipitation of REOs, and electricity consumption. Among chemicals, ammonium sulfate is the largest contributor to many impact categories. When China’s electricity grid mix change over time is included, environmental impacts for the whole production process can change up to 12%.
The primary contributions of this study are the collection and publication of primary data from mining companies in Jiangxi Province, China; the provision of open-source LCI datasets for mixed HREOs from ion-adsorption clays; and a comparison of results between this study and previously published studies. While the scope of this study concludes at the production of mixed HREO, which is a limitation, it provides a foundation for development of LCIs for refined heavy REEs.
KeywordsDysprosium Heavy rare earth elements HREE LCA Life cycle inventory Mining
We would like to extend particular thanks to the participating companies and their employees who provided data for this work, contingent on their anonymity.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CBET-1337095.
- Charles N, Tuduri J, Guyonnet D, Melleton J, Pourret O (2013) Rare earth elements in Europe and Greenland: a geological potential? An overview. 12th meeting of the Society of Geology Applied to Mineral Deposits (SGA):1698–1701. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3450.7206
- Cheng J, Che L (2010) Current mining situation and potential development of rare earth in China. Chin Rare Earths 31:65–69 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Chi R, Tian J, Luo X, Xu Z, He Z (2012) The basic research on the weathered crust elution-deposited rare earth ores. Nonferrous Metals Sci Eng 3:1–13 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- China Energy Portal (2016) 2016 China electricity industry statistics. China electricity council. http://chinaenergyportal.org/en/2016-detailed-electricity-statistics/. Accessed 26 August 2017
- Chu J (2015) RE100: China’s fast track to a renewable future. China Analysis 2015Google Scholar
- Ecoinvent Center (2016) Ecoinvent version 3 life cycle inventory database. Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories, St GallenGoogle Scholar
- Eriksson T, Olsson D (2011) The product chains of rare earth elements. Chalmers University of Technology, Report No 2011:8Google Scholar
- Gambogi J (2016) 2014 Minerals yearbook U.S. Geological Survey. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Hykawy J, Thomas A, Casasnovas G (2010) The rare earths: pick your spots carefully. Publication, Securities Division, Byron Capital Markets, UKGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, Zhang L, Zhou X (2010) Resource and environment protected exploitation model for ion-type rare earth deposit in southern of China. Chin Rare Earths 31:80–85 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Liao Z, He W, Liu H, Wang X, Ganzhou GT (2014) Quality assessment of geological environment of ion-absorbed rare-earth mine in Longnan County. Nonferrous Metals Sci Eng 5:885–889 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Liu X, Wang H, Chen J, He Q, Zhang H, Jiang R, Chen X (2010) Method and basic model for development of Chinese reference life cycle database. J Environ Sci 30:2136–2144Google Scholar
- MEP (2011) Emission standards of pollutants from rare earths industry. Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China. Volume GB 26451–2011Google Scholar
- Schüler D, Buchert M, Liu R, Dittrich S, Merz C (2011) Study on rare earths and their recycling. Öko-Institut eV Darmstadt, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- SCIO (2012) Situation and policies for China’s rare earth industry. Information Office of the State Council, China. Foreign Languages PressGoogle Scholar
- Su W (2009) Economic and policy analysis of China’s rare earth industry China. Financial and Economic Publishing House, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- Thinkstep (2017) GaBi ts 8.0. Leinfelden-EchterdingenGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Department of Energy (2010) Critical materials strategy. Washington, D.C. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/edg/news/documents/criticalmaterialsstrategy.pdf
- Van Gosen B, Verplanck P, Long K, Gambogi J, Robert R, Seal I (2014) The rare-earth elements: vital to modern technologies and lifestyles. US Geological Survey, series number 2014–3078. https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20143078
- Wang R (2013) Potential problems caused by in situ leaching of ion adsorption clays in South Jiangxi. Technol Inform 33:150–151 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Xu G, Shi C, Wang D, Zhao Z, Wang D, He Z (2005) Urgent call on the protection of Bayan Obo area from radioactive pollution. Bull Chin Acad Sci 20:448–450 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Yongfu Y (1992) Comprehensively recovering rare-earths from Bayan Obo low and medium grade oxide ores using a combined flowsheet of low intensity magnetic separation-high intensity magnetic separation-flotation separation. Min Metall Eng 12:58–61 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Zhao J, Tang X, Wu C (2001) Status quo of mining and recovering technologies for ion-absorbed rare earth deposits in China. Yunnan Metall 30:11–14 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Zou G (2012) A comparative study of the different mining and separating technologies of ion-absorbed rare earth from the perspective of production costs. Nonferrous Metals Sci Eng 3:53–56 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Zou G, Wu Y, Dai S (2014) The impacts of ion-adsorption rare earth’s production technologies on resource and environment. Nonferrous Metals Sci Eng 5:1 (in Chinese)Google Scholar