Skip to main content
Log in

Mapping of main research lines concerning life cycle studies on packaging systems in Brazil and in the world

  • LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This article aims to conduct a systematic literature review on the life cycle assessment of packaging in the world and in Brazil. Packaging plays an important role in the preservation and protection of products, and it is an issue of concern all over the world. Many environmental concerns lie on packaging, and life cycle assessment (LCA) is said to be the most comprehensive and complete tool for assessing environmental profiles.

Methods

The Methodi Ordinatio was used to assist identifying high impact research. The EndNote software was used for reference management and the VOSviewer for clustering terms and authors. The main research themes, institutions, authors, software tools used for impact assessment, and journals were identified in order to draw on the main aspects of the referred body of literature and present an insight on its trends.

Results and discussion

The line of study has not shown many solid patterns concerning either global or Brazilian research on LCA of packaging, so far. Nevertheless, most research has been dedicated to the food and beverage industries and European countries are leading this theme’s development. Research history shows that recycling has comprised one of the first concerns, whereas the search for alternative materials and end-of-life routes play an important role in the present and future of LCA of packaging. Brazil is the most prominent developing country in this field, featuring among the main contributors to the theme globally.

Conclusions

There is evidence that the referred body of literature has been increasingly receiving contributions both globally and in Brazil. However, it is not sufficient to state that there are solidly established either drifts or trends, as many research features change over time. The joint interest of public and private sectors can boost this study’s theme’s development and unveil novel alternatives for reducing environmental impacts of packaging systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Accorsi R, Cascini A, Cholette S, Manzini R, Mora C (2014) Economic and environmental assessment of reusable plastic containers: a food catering supply chain case study. Int J Prod Econ 152:88–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht S, Brandstetter P, Beck T, Fullana-i-Palmer P, Gronman K, Baitz M, Deimling S, Sandilands J, Fischer M (2013) An extended life cycle analysis of packaging systems for fruit and vegetable transport in Europe. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(8):1549–1567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amienyo D, Azapagic A (2014) Environmental impacts of consumption of Australian red wine in the UK. J Clean Prod 72:110–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amienyo D, Azapagic A (2016) Life cycle environmental impacts and costs of beer production and consumption in the UK. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(4):492–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amienyo D, Camilleri C, Azapagic A (2014) Environmental impacts of consumption of Australian red wine in the UK. J Clean Prod 72:110–119

  • Amienyo D, Gujba H, Stichnothe H, Azapagic A (2013) Life cycle environmental impacts of carbonated soft drinks. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):77–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson K, Ohlsson T, Olsson P (1998) Screening life cycle assessment (LCA) of tomato ketchup: a case study. J Clean Prod 6(3–4):277–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(98)00027-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrae ASG, Andersen O (2011) Life cycle assessment of integrated circuit packaging technologies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(3):258–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arena U, Mastellone ML, Perugini F (2003) Life cycle assessment of a plastic packaging recycling system. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(2):92–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalon O, Avnimelech Y, Shechter M (2000) Application of a comparative multidimensional life cycle analysis in solid waste management policy: the case of soft drink containers. Environ Sci Pol 3(2–3):135–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertoluci G, Leroy Y, Olsson A (2014) Exploring the environmental impacts of olive packaging solutions for the European food market. J Clean Prod 64:234–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocken NMP, Allwood JM, Willey AR, King JMH (2012) Development of a tool for rapidly assessing the implementation difficulty and emissions benefits of innovations. Technovation 32(1):19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonamente E, Scrucca F, Rinaldi S, Merico MC, Asdrubali F, Lamastra L (2016) Environmental impact of an Italian wine bottle: carbon and water footprint assessment. Sci Total Environ 560-561:274–283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borghi AD, Gallo M, Strazza C, Borghi MD (2014) An evaluation of environmental sustainability in the food industry through life cycle assessment: the case study of tomato products supply chain. J Clean Prod 78:121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büsser S, Jungbluth N (2009) The role of flexible packaging in the life cycle of coffee and butter. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(Suppl. 1):80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2011) Science mapping software tools: review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J Am Soc Inf Sci 62(7):1382–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordella M, Tugnoli A, Spadoni G, Santarelli F, Zangrando T (2008) LCA of an Italian lager beer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dam YKV (1996) Environmental assessment of packaging: the consumer point of view. Environ Manag 20(5):607–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eide MH (2002) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of industrial milk production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(2):115–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenstein EV, Wellenreuther F, Detzel A (2010) LCA studies comparing beverage cartons and alternative packaging: can overall conclusions be drawn? Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(9):938–945

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2014) Appropriate food packaging solutions for developing countries. Rome. Accessed 14 March 2018. Available on: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3684e.pdf

  • Gasol CM, Farreny R, Gabarrell X, Rieradevall J (2008) Life cycle assessment comparison among different reuse intensities for industrial wooden containers. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(5):421–431

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gatti JB, Queiroz GC, Garcia EEC (2008) Recycling of aluminum can in terms of life cycle inventory (LCI). Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(3):219–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glanzel W, Schoepflin U (1999) A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences. Inf Process Manag 35(1):31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-García S, Silva FJ, Moreira MT, Pascual RC, Lozano RG, Gabarrell X, Pons JRI, Feijoo G (2011) Combined application of LCA and eco-design for the sustainable production of wood boxes for wine bottles storage. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(3):224–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez MM, Meleddu M, Piga A (2017) Food losses, shelf life extension and environmental impact of a packaged cheesecake: a life cycle assessment. Food Res Int 91:124–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hischier R, Althaus HJ, Werner F (2005) Developments in wood and packaging materials life cycle inventories in ecoinvent. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(1):50–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Humbert S, Rossi V, Margni M, Jolliet O, Loerincik Y (2009) Life cycle assessment of two baby food packaging alternatives: glass jars vs. plastic pots. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(2):95–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ingrao C, Lo Giudice A, Bacenetti J, Khaneghah AM, Sant'Ana AS, Rana R, Siracusa V (2015) Foamy polystyrene trays for fresh-meat packaging: life-cycle inventory data collection and environmental impact assessment. Food Res Int 76:418–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ingrao C, Gigli M, Siracusa V (2017) An attributional life cycle assessment application experience to highlight environmental hotspots in the production of foamy polylactic acid trays for fresh-food packaging usage. J Clean Prod 150:93–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ISO Norm 14040:2006 (2006) Life cycle assessment: principles and framework. Environmental management (ISO) 2006a

  • ISO Norm 14044:2006 (2006) Life cycle assessment: Requirement and guidelines. Environmental management (ISO) 2006b

  • Kuta CC, Koch DG, Hildebrandt CC, Janzen DC (1995) Improvement of products and packaging through the use of life cycle analysis. Resour Conserv Recycl 14(3–4):185–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laso J, Margallo M, Fullana P, Bala A, Gazulla C, Irabien Á, Aldaco R (2017) When product diversification influences life cycle impact assessment: a case study of canned anchovy. Sci Total Environ 581-582:629–639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leis CM, Nogueira AR, Kulay L, Tadini CC (2017) Environmental and energy analysis of biopolymer film based on cassava starch in Brazil. J Clean Prod 143:76–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Licciardello F (2017) Packaging, blessing in disguise. Review on its diverse contribution to food sustainability. Trends Food Sci Technol 65:32–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorite GS, Rocha JM, Miilumaki N, Saavalainen P, Selkala T, Morales-Cid G, Goncalves MP, Pongracz E, Rocha CMR, Toth G (2017) Evaluation of physicochemical/microbial properties and life cycle assessment (LCA) of PLA-based nanocomposite active packaging. Lwt-Food Sci Technol 75:305–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luz LM, de Francisco AC, Piekarski CM (2015) Proposed model for assessing the contribution of the indicators obtained from the analysis of life-cycle inventory to the generation of industry innovation. J Clean Prod 96:339–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madival S, Auras R, Singh SP, Narayan R (2009) Assessment of the environmental profile of PLA, PET and PS clamshell containers using LCA methodology. J Clean Prod 17(13):1183–1194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manfredi M, Vignali G (2015) Comparative life cycle assessment of hot filling and aseptic packaging systems used for beverages. J Food Eng 147:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meneses M, Pasqualino J, Castells F (2012) Environmental assessment of the milk life cycle: the effect of packaging selection and the variability of milk production data. J Environ Manag 107:76–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monte M, Padoano E, Pozzetto D (2005) Alternative coffee packaging: an analysis from a life cycle point of view. J Food Eng 66(4):405–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mourad AL, Garcia EEC, Vilela GB, Von Zuben F (2008a) Environmental effects from a recycling rate increase of cardboard of aseptic packaging system for milk using life cycle approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):140–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mourad AL, Garcia EEC, Vilela GB, Von Zuben F (2008b) Influence of recycling rate increase of aseptic carton for long-life milk on GWP reduction. Resour Conserv Recycl 52(4):678–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mourad AL, Silva HLG, Nogueira JCB (2012) Carton for beverage-a decade of process efficiency improvements enhancing its environmental profile. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(2):176–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mourad AL, Silva HLG, Nogueira JCB (2014) Life cycle assessment of cellulose packaging materials production: folding box board and kraftliner paper. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(4):968–976

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira MC, Magrini A (2017) Life cycle assessment of lubricant oil plastic containers in Brazil. Sustainability 9(4):576–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagani RN, Kovaleski JL, Resende LM (2015) Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication. Scientometrics 105:2109–2135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1744-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasqualino J, Meneses M, Castells F (2011) The carbon footprint and energy consumption of beverage packaging selection and disposal. J Food Eng 103(4):357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard A (1969) Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. J Doc 25(4):348–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Hernández O, Hernandez SR, Munoz D, Detta-Silveira E, Palacios-Brun A, Laguna A (2009) Environmental implications and market analysis of soft drink packaging systems in Mexico. A waste management approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(2):107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross S, Evans D (2003) The environmental effect of reusing and recycling a plastic-based packaging system. J Clean Prod 11(5):561–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi V, Cleeve-Edwards N, Lundquist L, Schenker U, Dubois C, Humbert S, Jolliet O (2015) Life cycle assessment of end-of-life options for two biodegradable packaging materials: sound application of the European waste hierarchy. J Clean Prod 86:132–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saibuatrong W, Cheroennet N, Suwanmanee U (2017) Life cycle assessment focusing on the waste management of conventional and bio-based garbage bags. J Clean Prod 158:319–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saraiva AB, Pacheco EBAV, Gomes GM, Visconte LLY, Bernardo CA, Simoes CL, Soares AG (2016) Comparative lifecycle assessment of mango packaging made from a polyethylene/natural fiber-composite and from cardboard material. J Clean Prod 139:1168–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siracusa V, Ingrao C, Giudice AL, Mbohwa C, Rosa MD (2014) Environmental assessment of a multilayer polymer bag for food packaging and preservation: an LCA approach. Food Res Int 62:151–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Talve S (2001) Life cycle assessment of a basic lager beer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6(5):293–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toniolo S, Mazzi A, Niero M, Zuliani F, Scipioni A (2013) Comparative LCA to evaluate how much recycling is environmentally favourable for food packaging. Resour Conserv Recycl 77:61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verghese KL, Horne R, Carre A (2010) PIQET: the design and development of an online 'streamlined' LCA tool for sustainable packaging design decision support. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(6):608–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikstrom F, Williams H, Verghese K, Clune S (2014) The influence of packaging attributes on consumer behaviour in food-packaging life cycle assessment studies - a neglected topic. J Clean Prod 73:100–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams H, Wikström F (2011) Environmental impact of packaging and food losses in a life cycle perspective: a comparative analysis of five food items. J Clean Prod 19(1):43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams H, Wikstrom F, Lofgren M (2008) A life cycle perspective on environmental effects of customer focused packaging development. J Clean Prod 16(7):853–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie M, Li L, Qiao Q, Sun Q, Sun T (2011) A comparative study on milk packaging using life cycle assessment: from PA-PE-Al laminate and polyethylene in China. J Clean Prod 19(17–18):2100–2106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zabaniotou A, Kassidi E (2003) Life cycle assessment applied to egg packaging made from polystyrene and recycled paper. J Clean Prod 11(5):549–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Editor of the International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment and the reviewers for efficient handling and valuable comments improving this research on earlier versions of the paper.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murillo Vetroni Barros.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Hans-Jürgen Garvens

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Graph 1

(XLSX 13 kb)

Graph 2

(XLSX 13 kb)

Graph 3

(XLSX 13 kb)

Graph 4

(XLSX 13 kb)

Graph 5

(XLSX 12 kb)

Graph 6

(XLSX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barros, M.V., Salvador, R., Piekarski, C.M. et al. Mapping of main research lines concerning life cycle studies on packaging systems in Brazil and in the world. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24, 1429–1443 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1573-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1573-2

Keywords

Navigation