Environmental assessment of multi-functional building elements constructed with digital fabrication techniques
- 193 Downloads
Digital fabrication is revolutionizing architecture, enabling the construction of complex and multi-functional building elements. Multi-functionality is often achieved through material reduction strategies such as functional or material hybridization. However, these design strategies may increase environmental impacts over the life cycle. The integration of functions may hinder the maintenance and shorten the service life. Moreover, once a building element has reached the end of life, hybrid materials may influence negatively its recycling capacity. Consequently, the aim of this paper is to analyze the influence of multi-functionality in the environmental performance of two digitally fabricated architectural elements: The Sequential Roof and Concrete-Sandstone Composite Slab and to compare them with existing standard elements.
A method based on the life-cycle assessment (LCA) framework is applied for the evaluation of the environmental implications of multi-functionality in digital fabrication. The evaluation consists of the comparison of embodied impacts between a multi-functional building element constructed with digital fabrication techniques and a conventional one, both with the same building functions. Specifically, the method considers the lifetime uncertainty caused by multi-functionality by considering two alternative service life scenarios during the evaluation of the digitally fabricated building element. The study is extended with a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the additional environmental implications during end-of-life processing derived from the use of hybrid materials to achieve multi-functionality in architecture.
Results and discussion
The evaluation of two case studies of digitally fabricated architecture indicates that their environmental impacts are very sensitive to the duration of their service life. Considering production and life span phases, multi-functional building elements should have a minimum service life of 30 years to bring environmental benefits over conventional construction. Furthermore, the case study of Concrete-Sandstone Composite Slab shows that using hybrid materials to achieve multi-functionality carries important environmental consequences at the end of life, such as the emission of air pollutants during recycling.
The results from the case studies allow the identification of key environmental criteria to consider during the design of digitally fabricated building elements. Multi-functionality provides material efficiency during production, but design adaptability must be a priority to avoid a decrease in their environmental performance. Moreover, the high environmental impacts caused by end-of-life processing should be compensated during design.
KeywordsDigital fabrication End of life Hybrid materials LCA Multi-functionality Service life
This research was supported by the National Competence Centre for Research, NCCR Digital Fabrication, which was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (project number 51NF40_141853).
- Agustí-Juan I, Zingg S, Habert G (2017b) End-of-life consideration for hybrid material systems. Paper presented at the 14th International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components, Ghent, Belgium, 29–31 May 2017Google Scholar
- AMCOL Metalcasting (2013) LOVOX No-Bake Binder Systems. http://www.amcolmetalcasting.com/DesktopModules/Bring2mind/DMX/Download.aspx?EntryId=12588&Command=Core_Download&language=es-ES&PortalId=43&TabId=4464. Accessed 25.08.2016 2016
- Block P, Schlueter A, Veenendaal D, Bakker J, Begle M, Hischier I, Hofer J, Jayathissa P, Maxwell I, Echenagucia TM, Nagy Z, Pigram D, Svetozarevic B, Torsing R, Verbeek J, Willmann A, Lydon GP (2017) NEST HiLo: investigating lightweight construction and adaptive energy systems. J Build Eng 12:332–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brand S (1995) How buildings learn: what happens after they’re built. Penguin Publishing Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- CEN (European Committee for Standardization) (2011) Sustainability of construction works. Assessment of environmental performance of buildings. Calculation method. EN 15978:2011, Brussels Google Scholar
- CEN (European Committee for Standardization) (2012) Sustainability of construction works. Environmental product declarations. Core rules for the product category of construction products. EN 15804: 2012, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- De Schutter G, Lesage K, Mechterine V, Nerella VN, Habert G, Agustí-Juan I (2018) Vision of 3D printing with concrete—technical, economic and environmental potentials. Cem Concr Res 112: 25-36Google Scholar
- European Commission (2011) Supporting Environmentally Sound Decisions for Construction and Demolition (C&D) Waste Management. Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Joint Research Centre, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
- European Commission (2016) EU Construction and Demolition Waste Management Protocol. Ecorys, LondonGoogle Scholar
- European Parliament and Council (2012) Strategy for the sustainable competitiveness of the construction sector and its enterprises. COM/2012/433, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- Holliger Consult GmbH (2017) Bauteilkatalog, Bauteile SIA MB 2032. www.bauteilkatalog.ch. Accessed 02.09.2017
- IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (2011) Buildings and constructed assets—Service life planning—Part 1: General principles and Framework. ISO 15686–1:2000, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (2006) Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework. ISO 14040:2006, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Jipa A, Bernhard M, Dillenburger B, Meibodi M (2016) 3D-printed stay-in-place formwork for topologically optimized concrete slabs. Paper presented at the TxA emerging design + technology conference San Antonio, Texas, USA, 04 November 2016Google Scholar
- Lechner N (2015) Heating, cooling, lighting: sustainable design methods for architects. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- Meibodi MA, Bernhard M, Jipa A, Dillenburger B (2017) The smart takes from the strong. Paper presented at the Fabricate: rethinking design and construction, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
- Odaglia P, Voney V, Habert G, Dillenburger B (2018) Open hardware AM in binder jet 3D printing. Paper presented at the first international conference on 3D construction printing, Melbourne, Australia, 26–28 NovemberGoogle Scholar
- Oxman N, Rosenberg J (2007) Material computation. Int J Archit Comput 1(5):21–44Google Scholar
- SIA (2010) Norm 2032: Graue Energie von Gebäuden. ZürichGoogle Scholar
- Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R, Mutel C, Nemecek T, Reinhard J, Vadenbo CO, Wernet G (2013) Overview and methodology. Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, St. GallenGoogle Scholar
- Williams ED, Sasaki Y (2003) Energy analysis of end-of-life options for personal computers: resell, upgrade, recycle. In: IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Boston, USA. pp 187–192Google Scholar