Evaluation of treatment options for well water contaminated with perfluorinated alkyl substances using life cycle assessment
- 3 Downloads
As knowledge grows of the potentially harmful effects of chemicals in widespread use, emerging contaminants have become a major source of concern and uncertainty for public health officials and water quality managers. Perfluorinated alkyl substances, often referred to as perfluorinated compounds, have come under recent scrutiny and are present in groundwater at many sites across the USA. We examine the life cycle impacts of treating drinking water at one such site.
We assembled life cycle models for groundwater treatment and bottled water delivery to residents of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, where wells were recently taken out of service due to concerns related to perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) contamination. Two treatment methods, granular activated carbon filtration and ion-exchange columns, were modeled under a range of contaminant concentrations covering three orders of magnitude: 0.7, 7.0, and 70 μg/L PFAS. On-site infrastructure, operations, and adsorbent cycling were included in models. Impacts of bottled water production and supply were assessed using two data sets reflecting a range of production and supply chain assumptions. Uncertainty in input data was captured using Monte Carlo simulations.
Results and discussion
Results show that for contaminant concentrations below 70 μg/L, the dominant contributor to life cycle impacts is electricity use at the treatment facility. Production, reactivation, and disposal of treatment media become major sources of impact only at very high PFAS concentrations. Though the life cycle impacts of bottled water are up to three orders of magnitude higher than remediated groundwater on a volumetric basis, supplementing a contaminated water supply with bottled drinking water may result in lower life cycle human health impacts when only a small proportion of the total population is vulnerable.
These results provide quantitative data and proposed scenarios for water quality managers and risk management officials in developing plans to address PFAS contamination and emerging contaminants in general. However, more information on the direct human health effects of these poorly understood pollutants is needed before the trade-offs in life cycle health impacts can be comprehensively assessed.
KeywordsBottled water Emerging contaminants Life cycle assessment PFAS Water treatment
The authors thank Treva Bashore and Michael Brady with the Air Force Civil Engineering Center for their helpful conversations in identifying case studies for this project. We are also grateful to Ryan Morrish with Bay West, LLC., Kendra Ryan with Calgon Carbon, Inc., William Scoville from CBI Federal Services, Inc., Steve Woodard with Emerging Contaminant Treatment Technologies, and Brandon Newman with Amec Foster Wheeler, Inc. for supplying data. This research was supported by Defense Environmental Restoration Account (DERA) funds, and by an appointment to the Postgraduate Research Participation Program at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the US Department of Energy and AFIT. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the US Air Force, the US Department of Defense, or the US government.
- Amec Foster Wheeler (2017) Perfluorinated compounds release response at multiple BRAC bases: site 8 pilot test results report. Former Pease Air Force Base, LacklandGoogle Scholar
- Barzen-Hanson KA, Roberts SC, Choyke SJ, Oetjen K, McAlees A, Riddell N, McCrindle R, Ferguson PL, Higgins CP, Field JA (2017) Discovery of 40 classes of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in historical aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs) and AFFF-impacted groundwater. Environ Sci Technol 41:2047–2057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- CDPH (Colorado department of public health) (2016) PFC Levels in Environmental Water Samples Collected from the Widefield Aquifer Region. https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/WQ_PFC_Environmental-data-table.pdf
- Ciroth A, Muller S, Weidema BP, Lesage P (2012) Refining the pedigree matrix approach in ecoinvent : Towards empirical uncertainty factors. LCA Discussion ForumGoogle Scholar
- Dickenson E, Higgins C (2016) Treatment mitigation strategies for poly- and perfluorinated chemicals (pp 1–123). Retrieved from http://www.waterrf.org/PublicReportLibrary/4322.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
- Filipovic M, Woldegiorgis A, Norström K, Bibi M, Lindberg M, Österås A-H (2015) Historical usage of aqueous film forming foam: a case study of the widespread distribution of perfluoroalkyl acids from a military airport to groundwater, lakes, soils and fish. Chemosphere 129:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hale SE, Arp HPH, Slinde GA, Wade EJ, Bjørseth K, Breedveld GD, Straith BF, Moe KG, Jartun M, Høisæter Å (2017) Sorbent amendment as a remediation strategy to reduce PFAS mobility and leaching in a contaminated sandy soil from a Norwegian firefighting training facility. Chemosphere 171:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huijbregts MAJ, Rombouts LJA, Ragas AMJ, van de Meent D (2005) Human-toxicological effect and damage factors of carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic Chemicals for Life Cycle Impact Assessment Human-Toxicological Effect and Damage Factors of carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic Chemicals for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Integr Environ Assess Manag 1:181–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hutchinson RA (1975) Thermal regeneration costs. Chem Eng Prog 71:86–88Google Scholar
- Isla-cabaraban MT, Marc G, Cabaraban S (2016) Generating electricity from spent activated carbon : life cycle environmental benefits. WSEAS Trans Environ Dev 12:1–8Google Scholar
- Lloyd-Smith M, Senjen R (2015) The persistence and toxicity of perfluorinated compounds in Australia, (November), 1–13. Retrieved from http://www.ntn.org.au/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/NTNPerfluoros-in-Australia-NOV-2016.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
- Martin RJ, Ng WJ (1991) The Thermal Regeneration of Exhausted Activated Carbon: The Balance Between Weight Loss and Regeneration Efficiency. In: Pawlowski L, Lacy WJ, Dlugosz JJ (eds) Chemistry for the Protection of the Environment. Environmental Science Research, vol 42. Springer, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Quantis (2010) Nestlé waters North America: environmental life cycle assessment of drinking water alternatives and consumer beverage consumption in North America. Quantis Sustainability counts, Salem, MA. https://www.nestlewatersna.com/asset-library/documents/nwna_lca_report_020410.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
- USCDC (2016) Deaths and Mortality [WWW Document]. FastStats. URL https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/deaths.htm. Accessed 3.10.17
- USEPA (2011) Planning for an emergency drinking water supply (June), 1–40. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-03/documents/planning_for_an_emergency_drinking_water_supply.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
- USEPA (2016a) Health effects support document for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), (822-R-16–003). https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-05/documents/pfoa_hesd_final-plain.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
- USEPA (2016b) Drinking water health advisory for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), (May), 1–103. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-05/documents/pfoa_health_advisory_final-plain.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
- USEPA (2016c) Drinking water health advisory for perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), (May), 1–103. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-05/documents/pfos_health_advisory_final-plain.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
- USEPA (2016d) Valuing mortality risk reductions for policy: a meta-analytic approach (pp. 1–77). https://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/0/0CA9E925C9A702F285257F380050C842/$File/VSL%20white%20paper_final_020516.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
- USEPA (2017) Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2015, chapter 4: Industrial Processes and Product Use, Washington, DC. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-02/documents/2017_complete_report.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018