Advertisement

The availability of life-cycle assessment, water footprinting, and carbon footprinting studies in Brazil

  • Michael O. Bodunrin
  • Nicholas W. Burman
  • Joel Croft
  • Shaun Engelbrecht
  • Taahira Goga
  • A. O. Ladenika
  • O. S. MacGregor
  • Mpho Maepa
  • Kevin G. Harding
COMMENTARY AND DISCUSSION ARTICLE

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to determine the availability of environmental life cycle assessment (LCA), water footprinting, and carbon footprinting data in Brazil. In particular, the study is targeted at showing what LCA-related studies are accessible to non-specialists residing in Brazil as well as LCA specialists interested in accessing Brazilian LCA-related studies.

Methods

Online searches for LCA documents were performed using publicly available search engines such as Google and Google Scholar, as well as academic databases containing peer-reviewed journal articles such as Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Springer. The searches were conducted utilizing the keywords “Life Cycle Assessment,” “carbon footprint,” “water footprint,” and “Brazil.”

Results and discussion

A total of 73 published documents on LCA studies conducted between 2000 and 2016 could be found. Of these, 59 were only available in restricted access journals requiring some form of paid subscriptions. Most of these documents originated from academic institutions. For the majority of the studies, the exact region in which the study was carried out was not specified. Only twelve carbon and water footprinting studies were found. However, it was known that several other studies were available but were not found in these searches unless more specific years, authors, and/or products were included in the search terms.

Conclusions

It was observed that LCA studies were more established in the energy and agricultural sectors, an expected result given that all LCA studies would rely on energy as a background process, as well as the increasing energy demand due to increasing population and industrial activities in Brazil. Furthermore, it was observed that most LCA studies in the energy sector concentrated on the conversion of biomass, mainly sugarcane and soybean, to biofuels; thereby, establishing a strong link between the energy and agricultural sectors. The results showed that LCA is an emerging quantitative assessment technique in Brazil, especially in the energy and agricultural sectors. While there were over 70 studies found, it is not clear how many of these could be transferable into an LCI database or be used in other studies, due to the exact inputs used.

Keywords

Brazil Carbon footprinting Life cycle assessment Water footprinting 

References

  1. Alves TM, Barrigossi JF, Quintela ED (2012) Life cycle of Glyphepomis spinosa Campos & Grazia (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae): a new pest of rice in Brazil. Neotrop Entomol 41:437–441.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-012-0067-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnson C, Sotero P (2010) Brazil as a regional power: views from the hemisphere. Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars. http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Brazil-as-a-Regional-Power3.pdf
  3. Bailis R, Rujanavech C, Dwivedi P, de Oliveira Vilela A, Chang H, de Miranda RC (2013) Innovation in charcoal production: a comparative life-cycle assessment of two kiln technologies in Brazil. Energy Sustain Dev 17:189–200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2012.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bansal A, Yogeshwari P, Gupta IC, and Rajendra J (2009) Transcending horizons through innovative global practice, Excel Books. New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauer PE, Maciel Filho R (2004) Incorporation of environmental impact criteria in the design and operation of chemical processes. Braz J Chem Eng 21(1):405–414 Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S010466322004000300005&lng=en&nrm=iso CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borsato M, Estorilio CCA, Cziulik C, Ugaya CML, Rozenfeld H (2010) An ontology building approach for knowledge sharing in product lifecycle management. Int J Bus Syst Res 4:278.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBSR.2010.032951 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brondani M, Hoffmann R, Mayer FD, Kleinert JS (2014) Environmental and energy analysis of biodiesel production in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Clean Techn Environ Policy 17:129–143.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0768-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burman NW, Croft J, Engelbrecht S, Ladenika AO, MacGregor OS, Maepa M, Bodunrin MO, Harding KG (2018) Review: life-cycle assessment, water foot printing and carbon foot printing in Portugal. Int J Life Cycle Assess.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1483-3
  9. Cardozo NP, Bordonal R de O, La Scala N Jr (2016) Greenhouse gas emission estimate in sugarcane irrigation in Brazil: is it possible to reduce it, and still increase crop yield? J Clean Prod 112(Part 5):3988–3997.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carvalho M, Delgado DB de M, Chacartegui R (2016a) Life cycle analysis as a decision criterion for the implementation of solar photovoltaic panels in as Northeast Brazil hospital. In: Grammelis P (ed) Energy, Transportation and Global Warming, Green Energy and Technology. Springer International Publishing, pp 295–310Google Scholar
  11. Carvalho M, da Silva ES, Andersen SLF, Abrahão R (2016b) Life cycle assessment of the transesterification double step process for biodiesel production from refined soybean oil in Brazil. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23:11025–11033.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6295-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Castanheira ÉG, Grisoli R, Coelho S, da Silva GA, Freire F (2015) Life-cycle assessment of soybean-based biodiesel in Europe: comparing grain, oil and biodiesel import from Brazil. J Clean Prod 102:188–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cavalett O, Junqueira TL, Dias MOS, Jesus CDF, Mantelatto PE, Cunha MP, Franco HCJ, Cardoso TF, Filho RM, Rossell CEV, Bonomi A (2011) Environmental and economic assessment of sugarcane first generation biorefineries in Brazil. Clean Techn Environ Policy 14:399–410.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-011-0424-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cavalett O, Chagas MF, Seabra JEA, Bonomi A (2012) Comparative LCA of ethanol versus gasoline in Brazil using different LCIA methods. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:647–658.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0465-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cederberg C, Meyer D, Flysjö A (2009) Life cycle inventory of greenhouse gas emissions and use of land and energy in Brazilian beef production. SIK - Institutet för livsmedel och bioteknik, GöteborgGoogle Scholar
  16. Cerri CC, Moreira CS, Alves PA, Raucci GS, de Almeida Castigioni B, Mello FFC, Cerri DGP, Cerri CEP (2016) Assessing the carbon footprint of beef cattle in Brazil: a case study with 22 farms in the State of Mato Grosso. J Clean Prod 112(Part 4):2593–2600.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cherubini E, Zanghelini GM, Alvarenga RAF, Franco D, Soares SR (2015) Life cycle assessment of swine production in Brazil: a comparison of four manure management systems. J Clean Prod 87:68–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coelho C (2009) Life cycle assessment parameters adaptation for Brazilian electricity productionGoogle Scholar
  19. Coelho S, Silva GA, Freire F, Grisoli R, Castanheira ÉG, Garcilasso VP, Nogueira AR (2013) A comparative life cycle assessment of biodiesel from soybean oil and beef tallow in BrazilGoogle Scholar
  20. Coltro L, Garcia EEC, Queiroz G de C (2003) Life cycle inventory for electric energy system in Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:290–296.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978921 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coltro L, Mourad A, Oliveira P, Baddini J, Kletecke R (2006) Environmental profile of Brazilian green coffee (6 pp). Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:16–21.  https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.01.230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coltro L, Mourad AL, Kletecke RM, Mendonça TA, Germer SPM (2009) Assessing the environmental profile of orange production in Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:656–664.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0097-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Condeixa K, Haddad A, Boer D (2014) Life cycle impact assessment of masonry system as inner walls: a case study in Brazil. Constr Build Mater 70:141–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Costa D, Galante E, Andrade I, Cunha J (2015) Environmental life-cycle assessment of a military explosive production unit—a preliminary approach. U Porto J Eng 1:2–10Google Scholar
  25. Dale A, Pereira de Lucena A, Marriott J, Borba B, Schaeffer R, Bilec M (2013) Modeling future life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impacts of electricity supplies in Brazil. Energies 6:3182–3208.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en6073182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. de Andrade MFC, Souza PMS, Cavalett O, Morales AR (2016) Life cycle assessment of poly(lactic acid) (PLA): comparison between chemical recycling, mechanical recycling and composting. J Polym Environ 24:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-016-0787-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. de Figueirêdo MCB, Potting J, Serrano LAL, Bezerra MA, da Silva Barros V, Gondim RS, Nemecek T (2014) Life cycle assessment of Brazilian cashew. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food SectorGoogle Scholar
  28. de Figueiredo EB, Jayasundara S, de Oliveira Bordonal R, Berchielli TT, Reis RA, Wagner-Riddle C, La Scala N Jr (2016) Greenhouse gas balance and carbon footprint of beef cattle in three contrasting pasture-management systems in Brazil. J Clean Prod 142(Part 1):420–431.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.132 Google Scholar
  29. de Gomes MBM, Sacomano JB, Papalardo F, da Silva AE (2015) In: Umeda S, Nakano M, Mizuyama H, Hibino N, Kiritsis D, von Cieminski G (eds) Life cycle assessment electricity generation from landfill in São Paulo City, Advances in Production Management Systems: Innovative Production Management Towards Sustainable Growth, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Springer International Publishing, pp 632–639Google Scholar
  30. de Léis CM, Cherubini E, Ruviaro CF, da Silva VP, Lampert V d N, Spies A, Soares SR (2014) Carbon footprint of milk production in Brazil: a comparative case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:46–60.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0813-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. de Oliveira BG, Nunes Carvalho JL, Pellegrino Cerri CE, Cerri CC, Feigl BJ (2015) Greenhouse gas emissions from sugarcane vinasse transportation by open channel: a case study in Brazil. J Clean Prod 94:102–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. de Souza CG, Barbastefano RG, Teixeira RC (2017) Life cycle assessment research in Brazil: characteristics, interdiciplinarity, and applications. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:266–276.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1150-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dick M, Abreu da Silva M, Dewes H (2015a) Mitigation of environmental impacts of beef cattle production in southern Brazil—evaluation using farm-based life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 87:58–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dick M, Abreu da Silva M, Dewes H (2015b) Life cycle assessment of beef cattle production in two typical grassland systems of southern Brazil. J Clean Prod 96:426–434.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Engelbrecht S, Ladenika AO, MacGregor OS, Maepa M, Bodunrin MO, Burman NW, Croft J, Goga T, Harding KG (2018) A discussion on the availability of life-cycle assessment studies in New Zealand. Int J Life Cycle Assess.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1485-1
  36. Esteves VPP, Esteves EMM, Bungenstab DJ, Loebmann DG dos SW, Victoria D de C, Vicente LE, Araújo O de QF, Morgado C do RV (2016) Land use change (LUC) analysis and life cycle assessment (LCA) of Brazilian soybean biodiesel. Clean Techn Environ Policy 18:1655–1673.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1161-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Figueirêdo MCB, Rosa MF, Ugaya CML, Souza Filho MSM, Braid ACCS, Melo LFL (2012) Life cycle assessment of cellulose nanowhiskers. J Clean Prod 35:130–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Foelster A-S, Andrew S, Kroeger L, Bohr P, Dettmer T, Boehme S, Herrmann C (2016) Electronics recycling as an energy efficiency measure—a life cycle assessment (LCA) study on refrigerator recycling in Brazil. J Clean Prod 129:30–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Francke ICM, Castro JFW (2013) Carbon and water footprint analysis of a soap bar produced in Brazil by Natura Cosmetics. Water Resour Ind, Water Footprint Assessment (WFA) for better water governance and sustainable development 1–2, 37–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri.2013.03.003
  40. Gadioli MCB, Castro NF, de Andrade Pazeto A, Wandermurem CER, de Almeida PF, Tavares DP (2012) Life-cycle inventory of dimension stones, Brazil. In: Centro De Tenologia Mineral, CETEM. Cachoeiro de ItapemirimGoogle Scholar
  41. Hernandes TAD, Bufon VB, Seabra JEA (2014) Water footprint of biofuels in Brazil: assessing regional differences. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 8:241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kami Delivand M, Gnansounou E (2013) Life cycle environmental impacts of a prospective palm-based biorefinery in Pará State-Brazil. Bioresour Technol 150:438–446.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Langer T (2006) Simplified life cycle assessment study of the substitution of 5% of Swiss gasoline by Brazilian bio-ethanol. Inst. Ekos Braz São Paulo 26Google Scholar
  44. Leal JJF, Esteves F d A (2000) Life cycle and production of Campsurus notatus (Ephemeroptera, Polymitarcyidae) in an Amazonian lake impacted by bauxite tailings (Pará, Brazil). Hydrobiologia 437:91–99.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026526101039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lenzen M, Wachsmann U (2004) Wind turbines in Brazil and Germany: an example of geographical variability in life-cycle assessment. Appl Energy 77:119–130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-2619(03)00105-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lenzen M, Schaeffer R, Karstensen J, Peters GP (2013) Drivers of change in Brazil’s carbon dioxide emissions. Clim Chang 121:815–824.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0930-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lopes Silva DA, Delai I, Delgado Montes ML, Roberto Ometto A (2014) Life cycle assessment of the sugarcane bagasse electricity generation in Brazil. Renew Sust Energ Rev 32:532–547.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Luo L, van der Voet E, Huppes G (2009) Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of bioethanol from sugarcane in Brazil. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13:1613–1619.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Luz HR, Faccini JLH, Pires MS, da Silva HR, Barros-Battesti DM (2012) Life cycle and behavior of Amblyomma rotundatum (Acari: Ixodidae) under laboratory conditions and remarks on parasitism of toads in Brazil. Exp Appl Acarol 60:55–62.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-012-9628-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maciel VG, Zortea RB, Menezes da Silva W, Cybis LF de A, Einloft S, Seferin M (2015) Life cycle inventory for the agricultural stages of soybean production in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. J Clean Prod 93:65–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maepa M, Bodunrin MO, Burman NW, Croft J, Engelbrecht S, Ladenika AO, MacGregor OS, Harding KG (2017) Review: life cycle assessments in Nigeria, Ghana, and Ivory Coast. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22(7):1159–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Maia de Souza D, Lafontaine M, Charron-Doucet F, Chappert B, Kicak K, Duarte F, Lima L (2016) Comparative life cycle assessment of ceramic brick, concrete brick and cast-in-place reinforced concrete exterior walls. J Clean Prod 137:70–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Maia de Souza D, Braga T, Brito de Figueirêdo MC, Matsuura MISF, Dias FRT, Ugaya CML (2017) Life cycle thinking in Brazil: challenges and advances towards a more comprehensive practice. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:462–465.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1234-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Maranduba HL, Robra S, Nascimento IA, Da Cruz RS, Rodrigues LB, Almeida Neto JA (2015) Reducing the life cycle GHG emissions of microalgal biodiesel through integration with ethanol production system. Bioresour Technol 194:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Matsuura MISF, Dias FRT, Picoli JF, Lucas KRG, de Castro C, Hirakuri MH (2017) Life-cycle assessment of the soybean-sunflower production system in the Brazilian Cerrado. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:492–501.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1089-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mattioda RA, Mazzi A, Canciglieri O Jr, Scipioni A (2015) Determining the principal references of the social life cycle assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1155–1165.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0873-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Moore CCS, Nogueira AR, Kulay L (2017) Environmental and energy assessment of the substitution of chemical fertilizers for industrial wastes of ethanol production in sugarcane cultivation in Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:628–643.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1074-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moraes D da G e SVM, Rocha TB, Ewald MR (2014) Life cycle assessment of cell phones in Brazil based on two reverse logistics scenarios. Produção 0–0.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65132014005000011
  59. Mourad AL, Coltro L, Oliveira PAPLV, Kletecke RM, Baddini JPOA (2006) A simple methodology for elaborating the life cycle inventory of agricultural products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:408–413.  https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.09.272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Muñoz I, Flury K, Jungbluth N, Rigarlsford G, Milà i, Canals LM, King H (2014) Life cycle assessment of bio-based ethanol produced from different agricultural feedstocks. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:109–119.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0613-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nigri EM, Barros AC, Rocha SDF, Filho ER (2014) Assessing environmental impacts using a comparative LCA of industrial and artisanal production processes: “minas cheese” case. Food Sci Technol (Campinas) 34(3):522–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Novak LH, Ugaya CML, Mbohwa C (2009) Consequential life cycle assessment: a tool to evaluate greenhouse gas emissions from soybean-derived biodiesel in Brazil. In: ECOS 2009 - 22nd international conference on efficiency, cost, optimization, simulation and environmental impact of energy systems. Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, pp 1071–1078Google Scholar
  63. Oebels KB, Pacca S (2013) Life cycle assessment of an onshore wind farm located at the northeastern coast of Brazil. Renew Energy 53:60–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.10.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ometto AR, Roma WNL, Ortega E (2004) Emergy life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol in Brazil. In: Proceedings of IV biennial international workshop “advances in energy studies”. Unicamp, Campinas, SP, Brazil. pp 389–399Google Scholar
  65. Ometto A, Batistella M, Filho AG, Chuzeld G, Viau A (2007) Geotraceability and life cycle assessment in environmental life cycle management: towards sustainability. In: Geilson L, Curranc R (eds) Complex systems concurrent engineering. Springer, London, pp 673–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ometto AR, Hauschild MZ, Roma WNL (2009) Lifecycle assessment of fuel ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:236–247.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0065-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Paes MX, Gianelli BF, Kulay LA, de Medeiros GA, Mancini SD (2014) Life cycle assessment applied to municipal solid waste management: a case study. Environ Nat Resour Res 4.  https://doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v4n4p169
  68. Palma-Rojas S, Caldeira-Pires A, Nogueira JM (2017) Environmental and economic hybrid life cycle assessment of bagasse-derived ethanol produced in Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:317–327.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0892-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Paulsen JS, Sposto RM (2013) A life cycle energy analysis of social housing in Brazil: case study for the program “MY HOUSE MY LIFE”. Energy Build 57:95–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.11.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pavan ALR, Ometto AR (2016) Regionalization of land use impact models for life cycle assessment: recommendations for their use on the global scale and their applicability to Brazil. Environ Impact Assess Rev 60:148–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pereira LG, Chagas MF, Dias MOS, Cavalett O, Bonomi A (2015) Life cycle assessment of butanol production in sugarcane biorefineries in Brazil. J Clean Prod 96:557–568.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Port D, Perez JAA, de Menezes JT (2016) Energy direct inputs and greenhouse gas emissions of the main industrial trawl fishery of Brazil. Mar Pollut Bull 107:251–260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.03.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rocha MH, Capaz RS, Lora EES, Nogueira LAH, Leme MMV, Renó MLG, del Olmo OA (2014) Life cycle assessment (LCA) for biofuels in Brazilian conditions: a meta-analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 37:435–459.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rocha MSR, Ortega LG, Kabe YHO, Popi M d GCB, Duarte F, Nerys ML (2015) Promoting life cycle thinking, life cycle assessment and life cycle management within business in Brazil. In: Sonnemann G, Margni M (eds) Life cycle management, LCA compendium—the complete world of life cycle assessment. Springer, Netherlands, pp 257–261Google Scholar
  75. Rossi E, Sales A (2014) Carbon footprint of coarse aggregate in Brazilian construction. Constr Build Mater 72:333–339.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ruviaro CF, Gianezini M, Brandão FS, Wink CA, Dewes H (2012) Life cycle assessment in Brazilian agriculture facing worldwide trends. J Clean Prod 28:9–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ruviaro CF, Léis CM, Lampert VN, Barcellos JOJ, Dewes H (2015) Carbon footprint in different beef production systems on a southern Brazilian farm: a case study. J Clean Prod 96(1):435–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Salinas B (2008) Life Cycle Assessment of Coffee ProductionGoogle Scholar
  79. Santos JO, Andrade JCS, Marinho MMO, Noyola A, Güereca LP (2015) Greenhouse gas inventory of a state water and wastewater utility in Northeast Brazil. J Clean Prod 104:168–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Scarpare FV, Hernandes TAD, Ruiz-Corrêa ST, Kolln OT, Gava GJ d C, dos Santos LNS, Victoria RL (2016) Sugarcane water footprint under different management practices in Brazil: Tietê/Jacaré watershed assessment. J Clean Prod 112(Part 5):4576–4584.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schmitz TG, Seale Jr JL, Buzzanell PJ (2002) Brazil’s domination of the world sugar market. Sugar and related sweetener markets: international perspectives, pp 123–139Google Scholar
  82. Seabra JEA (2011) Brazilian work on GHG LCA of bioenergy in BrazilGoogle Scholar
  83. Seabra JE, Macedo IC, Chum HL, Faroni CE, Sarto CA (2011) Life cycle assessment of Brazilian sugarcane products: GHG emissions and energy use. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 5:519–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Seo ESM, Kulay LA (2006) Life cycle assessment: management tool for decision-making. INTERFACEHS 1Google Scholar
  85. Silva GA, Kulay LA (2003) Application of life cycle assessment to the LCA case studies single superphosphate production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:209–214.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Silva DAL, Delai I, de MMM, Montes MLD, Ometto AR (2012) LCA application: the case of the sugar cane bagasse electricity generation in Brazil. In: Dornfeld DA, Linke BS (eds) Leveraging technology for a sustainable world. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 85–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Silva DAL, Lahr FAR, Garcia RP, Freire FMCS, Ometto AR (2013a) Life cycle assessment of medium density particleboard (MDP) produced in Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1404–1411.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0583-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Silva DAL, Mendes NC, Varanda LD, Ometto AR, Lahr FAR (2013b) Life cycle assessment of urea formaldehyde resin: comparison by CML (2001), EDIP (1997) and USEtox (2008) methods for toxicological impact categories. In: Nee AYC, Song B, Ong S-K (eds) Re-engineering manufacturing for sustainability. Springer, Singapore, pp 529–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Silva VP, Van Der Werf HMG, Soares SR, Corsen MS (2014) Environmental impacts of French and Brazilian broiler chicken production scenarios: an LCA approach. J Environ Manag 133:222–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Silva DAL, Raymundo Pavan AL, Augusto de Oliveira J, Ometto AR (2015) Life cycle assessment of offset paper production in Brazil: hotspots and cleaner production alternatives. J Clean Prod 93:222–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Souza SP, Gopal AR, Seabra JE (2015) Life cycle assessment of biofuels from an integrated Brazilian algae-sugarcane biorefinery. Energy 81:373–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Stafford FN, Raupp-Pereira F, Labrincha JA, Hotza D (2016) Life cycle assessment of the production of cement: a Brazilian case study. J Clean Prod 137:1293–1299.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tolmasquim MT, Machado G (2003) Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 8:139–155.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026013814547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tsiropoulos I, Faaij APC, Seabra JEA, Lundquist L, Schenker U, Briois J-F, Patel MK (2014) Life cycle assessment of sugarcane ethanol production in India in comparison to Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1049–1067.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0714-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ugaya CML (1998) Life cycle energy consumption in different lifetimes of the automobile. In: SAE Technical PapersGoogle Scholar
  96. Ugaya CML, Walter ACS (2004) Life cycle inventory analysis—a case study of steel used in Brazilian automobiles. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9:365–370.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. US CIA (2016) Central intelligence agency: the world Factbook. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/.Assessed 22 Jan 2016
  98. Willers CD, Rodrigues LB (2013) A critical evaluation of Brazilian life cycle assessment studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:144–152.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0608-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Willers CD, Rodrigues LB, Silva CA (2013) Avaliação do ciclo de vida no Brasil: uma investigação nas principais bases científicas nacionais. Prod. [online] 23(2):436–447. Available from: <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=
  100. Willers CD, Maranduba HL, Neto JA de A, Rodrigues LB (2017) Environmental impact assessment of a semi-intensive beef cattle production in Brazil’s Northeast. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:516–524.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1062-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Worldometers (2016) Population of Brazil –Worldometers. http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/brazil-population/. Assessed 22 Jan 2016
  102. Xavier L d S, Peixoto JAA, de Souza CG, Pontes AT, Futuro DO (2014) Life cycle thinking in graduate education: an experience from Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1433–1444.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0749-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Zanghelini GM, Cherubini E, Orsi P, Soares SR (2014) Waste management life cycle assessment: the case of a reciprocating air compressor in Brazil. J Clean Prod 70:164–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Zanghelini GM, Junior HRA d S, Kulay L, Cherubini E, Ribeiro PT, Soares SR (2016) A bibliometric overview of Brazilian LCA research. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1759–1775.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1132-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael O. Bodunrin
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Nicholas W. Burman
    • 1
    • 5
    • 6
  • Joel Croft
    • 1
    • 7
  • Shaun Engelbrecht
    • 1
    • 7
  • Taahira Goga
    • 1
    • 5
    • 6
  • A. O. Ladenika
    • 1
  • O. S. MacGregor
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Mpho Maepa
    • 1
    • 5
    • 6
  • Kevin G. Harding
    • 1
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.School of Chemical and Metallurgical EngineeringUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  2. 2.African Materials Science and Engineering Network (AMSEN)University of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  3. 3.DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Strong MaterialsUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  4. 4.Department of Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringFederal University of Technology AkureAkureNigeria
  5. 5.Industrial and Mining Water Research UnitUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  6. 6.Centre in Water Research and Development (CiWaRD)University of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  7. 7.NRF/DST Chair: Sustainable Process Engineering UnitUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations