Advertisement

Review: life-cycle assessment, water footprinting, and carbon footprinting in Portugal

  • Nicholas W. Burman
  • Joel Croft
  • Shaun Engelbrecht
  • A. O. Ladenika
  • O. S. MacGregor
  • Mpho Maepa
  • Michael Oluwatosin Bodunrin
  • Kevin G. Harding
COMMENTARY AND DISCUSSION ARTICLE

Abstract

Purpose

A review of readily available quantitative environmental data was conducted in order to determine the state of sustainability reporting and identify possible future research areas in Portugal.

Methods

Internet searches of articles written in English and published between 2001 and 2015 were conducted using the keywords “life-cycle assessment,” “LCA,” “water footprint,” “carbon footprint,” and “Portugal.” Additionally, reports from the Global Reporting Initiative (2015 only) were included in the search.

Results and discussion

It was found that 79% of reports found were published in the period 2011–2015. Several reports were found for the forestry, paper and pulp, food and beverage, energy and electricity, waste management, and automotive industries, while no reports were found for the textile, footwear and clothing, and base metal and mineral industries. As such, these are industries on which future studies might focus. No reports found were published by governmental organizations, although it is thought that expanding the search to include Portuguese language results would yields more results. The majority (68%) of companies reporting to the GRI adhered to the relevant guidelines.

Conclusions

A total of 72 reports were found (41 LCAs, water- or carbon footprints, and 31 GRI reports). It is unclear if there are other reports that may be restricted to “hidden” datasets or company specific archives. The aim of this report was to highlight those that were available to a non-specialist or international audiences trying to gain a greater understanding of the LCA space in Portugal.

Keywords

Carbon footprinting Global Reporting Initiative Life-cycle assessment Portugal Water footprinting 

References

  1. Abrseu Advogados (2015) Relatório de Sustentabilidade 2013–2014Google Scholar
  2. Almeida C, Vaz S, Cabral H, Ziegler F (2014) Environmental assessment of sardine (Sardina pilchardus) purse seine fishery in Portugal with LCA methodology including biological impact categories. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida C, Vaz S, Friederike Z (2015) Environmental life cycle assessment of a canned sardine product from Portugal. J Ind Ecol 19:607–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arroja L, Dias AC (2012) Life cycle assessment of forest products, in: II workshop biogar. AveiroGoogle Scholar
  5. BA (2015) BA Sustainability ReportGoogle Scholar
  6. Badinio G, Blengini GA (2004) The role of LCA to assess environmental performances of mineral construction materials production in Portugal and in Italy. Geam Geoing Ambient. E Mineraria 112:55–65Google Scholar
  7. Baptista PC, Silva CM, Farias TL (2010) Impacts of alternative vehicle technologies and energy sources in the Portuguese road transportation sector, in: 12th World Conference on Transport Research. Lisbon. http://www.wctrs-society.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/abstracts/lisbon/selected/02706.pdf
  8. Baptista PC, Silva CM, Farias TL, Heywood JB (2012) Energy and environmental impacts of alternative pathways for the Portuguese road transportation sector. Energy Policy 51:802–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bodunrin MO, Burman NW, Croft J, Engelbrecht S, Goga T, Ladenika AO, MacGregor OS, Maepa M, Harding KG (2018) The availability of life-cycle assessment, water footprinting and carbon footprinting studies in Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1484-2
  10. Braganca L, Mateus R (2012) Life-cycle analysis of buildings environmental impact for building elements, 1st ed. iiSBE, Portugal. https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/20481/1/LCA%20Book%20-%20Web%20Version.pdf
  11. Brisa (2015) Relatório de sustentabilidade 2014Google Scholar
  12. Caixa Geral De Depositos (2015) Relatórios de Sustentabilidade 2014Google Scholar
  13. Carris (2015) Relatório de Sustentabilidade 2014Google Scholar
  14. Castanheira ÉG, Grisoli R, Coelho S, Anderi da Silva G, Freire F (2015) Life-cycle assessment of soybean-based biodiesel in Europe: comparing grain, oil and biodiesel import from Brazil. J Clean Prod 102:188–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chapagain AK, Hoekstra AY (2004) Water footprints of nations Volume 1: Main ReportGoogle Scholar
  16. Chapagain AK, Hoekstra AY (2011) The green, blue and grey water footprint of rice from both a production and consumption perspective. Ecol Econ 70:749–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Croezen H, Bijleveld M, Sevenster M (2013) Natural cork bottle stoppers: a stopper on CO2 emissions?Google Scholar
  18. CTT (2015) Relatório de Sustentabilidade 2014Google Scholar
  19. CUF - Companhia União Fabril (2015) CUF Sustainability Report 2014Google Scholar
  20. Dias AC, Arroja L (2012) Environmental impacts of eucalypt and maritime pine wood production in Portugal. J Clean Prod 37:368–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dias AC, Louro M, Arroja L, Capela I (2004) Evaluation of the environmental performance of printing and writing paper using life cycle assessment, in: 1st international conference on environmentally-compatible forest products. Oporto, Portugal, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  22. Dias AC, Arroja L, Capela I (2006) Life cycle assessment of printing and writing paper produced in Portugal. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:521–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dias AC, Arroja L, Capela I (2007a) Carbon dioxide emissions from forest operations in Portuguese eucalypt and maritime pine stands. Scand J For Res 22:422–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dias AC, Arroja L, Capela I (2007b) Life cycle assessment of printing and writing paper produced in Portugal. LCA Case Stud 12:521–528Google Scholar
  25. Dias AC, Demertzi M, Arroja L (2014) Production of electricity from forest residues in Portugal: environmental gains and losses using carbon footprint and LCA, in: 24th SETAC Europe Annual Meeting. BaselGoogle Scholar
  26. do Ó A, Antonelli F, Silca LN, Morgado A (2010) Water footprint in Portugal. WWF, RomaGoogle Scholar
  27. EDP (2015) 2014 Annual ReportGoogle Scholar
  28. Engelbrecht S, Ladenika AO, MacGregor OS, Maepa M, Bodunrin MO, Burman NW, Croft J, Goga T, Harding KG (2018) A discussion on the availability of life-cycle assessment studies in New Zealand. Int J Life Cycle Assess.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1485-1
  29. EPAL (2015) Relatório de Sustentabilidade 2014Google Scholar
  30. Faias S, Sousa J, Xavier L, Ferreira P (2014) Energy consumption and CO2 emissions evaluation for electric and internal combustion vehicles using a LCA approach, in: International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality. Cordoba. http://www.icrepq.com/icrepq'11/660-faias.pdf
  31. Feliciano M, Maia F, Gonçalves A (2014) An analysis of eco-efficiency and GHG emission of olive oil production in northeast of Portugal. Int J Biol Biomol Agric Food Biotechnol Eng 8:359–364Google Scholar
  32. Ferreira J, Esteves B, Nune L, Domingos I (2014a) Life cycle assessment of thermally treated and untreated maritime pine boards: a Portuguese case study, in: European Conference on Wood Modification 2014. LisbonGoogle Scholar
  33. Ferreira S, Cabral M, da Cruz NF, Simões P, Marques RC (2014b) Life cycle assessment of a packaging waste recycling system in Portugal. Waste Manag 34:1725–1735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ferreira JV, Viana H, Esteves B, Cruz Lopes LP, Domingos I (2014c) Life cycle assessment of residual forestry biomass chips at a power plant: a Portuguese case study. Int J Energy Environ Eng 5:86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Figueiredo F, Marques P, Castanheira ÉG, Kulay L, Freire F (2014) Greenhouse gas assessment of olive oil in Portugal addressing the valorization of olive mill waste, in: Symbiosis International Conference. AthensGoogle Scholar
  36. Figueiredot F, Castanheira EG, Felician M, Rodrigues MA, Peres A, Maia F, Ramos A, Carneiro J, Coroama VC, Freire F (2013) Carbon footprint of apple and pear: orchards, storage and distribution, in: engineering for sustainability. CoimbraGoogle Scholar
  37. FSLCI (2016) Forum for sustainability through life cycle innovation [WWW Document]. URL https://fslci.org/ (accessed 1.18.16)
  38. Galp Energia (2015) 2014 Sustainability ReportGoogle Scholar
  39. Garcia R, Marques P, Freire F (2014) Life-cycle assessment of electricity in Portugal. Appl Energy 134:563–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gerbens-Leenes W, Hoekstra AY (2011) The water footprint of biofuel-based transport. Energy Environ Sci 4:2658–2668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gestamp Aveiro (2015) Relatório de sustentabilidade´14Google Scholar
  42. Huf Portuguesa (2015) Communication on Progress 2014Google Scholar
  43. Itron (2015) 2014 Sustainability ReportGoogle Scholar
  44. Lipor (2015) Sustainability Report 2014Google Scholar
  45. Lopes E, Dias A, Arroja L, Capela I, Pereira F (2003) Application of life cycle assessment to the Portuguese pulp and paper industry. J Clean Prod 11:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lucas A, Alexandra Silva C, Costa Neto R (2012a) Life cycle analysis of energy supply infrastructure for conventional and electric vehicles. Energy Policy 41:537–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lucas A, Neto RC, Silva CA (2012b) Impact of energy supply infrastructure in life cycle analysis of hydrogen and electric systems applied to the Portuguese transportation sector. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:10973–10985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Maepa M, Bodunrin MO, Burman NW, Croft J, Engelbrecht S, Ladenika AO, MacGregor OS, Harding KG (2017) Review: life cycle assessments in Nigeria, Ghana, and Ivory Coast. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22(7):1159–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Margallo M, Aldacoa R, Balab A, Fullanab P, Irabien Á (2012) Best available techniques in municipal solid waste incineration: state of the art in Spain and Portugal. Chem Eng Trans 29:1345–1350Google Scholar
  50. Marques P, Freire F (2011) Comparative life-cycle assessment of electric and conventional vehicles in Portugal. 43rd LCA Discuss. Forum LCA Electromobility Answers Challenges. http://www.lcaforum.ch/portals/0/df43/DF43-11%20Fausto%20Freire.pdf
  51. Mekonnen, MM, Hoekstra AY (2011) National water footprint accounts: the green, blue and grey water footprint of production and consumption Volume 1: Main ReportGoogle Scholar
  52. Millennium Banco Comercial Português (2015) Sustainability Report 2014Google Scholar
  53. Monteiro H, Freire F (2012) Life-cycle assessment of a house with alternative exterior walls: comparison of three impact assessment methods. Energy Build 47:572–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nestlé Portugal (2015) Criação de Valor Partilhado 2014Google Scholar
  55. Neto B, Dias AC, Machado M (2012) Life cycle assessment of the supply chain of a Portuguese wine: from viticulture to distribution. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:590–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nogueira AM, Paco TA, Silvestre JC, Gonzalez LF, Santos FL, Pereira LS (2012) Water footprint of a super-intensive olive grove under Mediterranean climate using ground-based evapotranspiration Measurements and Remote Sens, in: EGU General Assembly. Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  57. NOS (2015) NOS Manual de SustentabilidadeGoogle Scholar
  58. Novo Banco (2015) Annu Rep 2014Google Scholar
  59. Pargana, NGSC (2012) Environmental impacts of the life cycle of thermal insulation materials of buildings. Tecnico LisboaGoogle Scholar
  60. Pina L, Dias AC, Neto B, Arroja L, Quinteiro P (2011) The water footprint of wine production in Portugal: a case-study on “vinho verde,” in: 6th International Conference on Industrial Ecology. Berkeley, USAGoogle Scholar
  61. Pires A, Chang N-B, Martinho G (2011) Reliability-based life cycle assessment for future solid waste management alternatives in Portugal. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:316–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Piresa A, Martinho G (2012) Carbon footprint analysis for the waste oil management system in Portugal. Br J Environ Clim Chang 2:278–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Porto de Sines (2015) Relatório de Sustentabiladade 2014Google Scholar
  64. Portugal Telecom (2015) Relatório de Sustentabiladade 2014Google Scholar
  65. Quinteiro P, Araújo A, Oliveira B, Dias AC, Arroja L (2012) The carbon footprint and energy consumption of a commercially produced earthenware ceramic piece. J Eur Ceram Soc 32:2087–2094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. REN (2015) Relatório & Contas 2014Google Scholar
  67. Residuos do Nordeste (2014) Sustainability Report Resíduos do Nordeste, EIM S.AGoogle Scholar
  68. SANEST (2015) Relatório de Sustentabiladade 2014Google Scholar
  69. Santander totta (2015) Relatório de Sustentabilidade 2014Google Scholar
  70. Saúde J de M (2015) Annual Report and Accounts 2014Google Scholar
  71. SOMAGUE Engenharia (2015) Somague SGPS Relatório Anual 2014Google Scholar
  72. SONAE (2015) Sustainability Report:2014Google Scholar
  73. Sonae Indústria (2015) 2014 Annu Rep and AccountsGoogle Scholar
  74. Sonae Sierra (2015) 2014 Economic, Environmental and social reportGoogle Scholar
  75. SUMOL+COMPAL (2015) Relatório único de gestão 2014Google Scholar
  76. TRATOLIXO (2015) Relatório e Contas & de Sustentabilidade de 2014Google Scholar
  77. UNEP/SETAC (2016) UNEP/SETAC—life cycle initative [WWW Document]. URL http://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/. Accessed 18 Jan 2016
  78. WFN (2016) Water footprint network [WWW Document]. URL http://waterfootprint.org/en/ (accessed 1.18.16)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas W. Burman
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Joel Croft
    • 1
    • 4
  • Shaun Engelbrecht
    • 1
    • 4
  • A. O. Ladenika
    • 1
  • O. S. MacGregor
    • 1
    • 5
  • Mpho Maepa
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Michael Oluwatosin Bodunrin
    • 1
    • 5
    • 6
  • Kevin G. Harding
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Chemical and Metallurgical EngineeringUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  2. 2.Industrial and Mining Water Research Unit (IMWaRU)University of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  3. 3.Centre in Water Research and Development (CiWaRD)University of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  4. 4.NRF/DST Chair: Sustainable Process Engineering UnitUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  5. 5.DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Strong Materials, African Materials Science and Engineering NetworkUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  6. 6.Department of Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringFederal University of Technology AkureAkureNigeria

Personalised recommendations