Advertisement

Life cycle inventory processes of the integrated steel plant (ISP) in Krakow, Poland-continuous casting of steel (CCS): a case study

  • Boguslaw BiedaEmail author
  • Iwona Skalna
  • Bartłomiej Gaweł
  • Katarzyna Grzesik
  • Anna Henclik
  • Dariusz Sala
LCI METHODOLOGY AND DATABASES

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to perform the life cycle inventory (LCI) to continuous casting of steel (CCS) process in integrated steel plant (ISP) in Krakow, Poland. The present LCI is representative for year 2015 by application of PN-EN ISO 14040 (2009). The system boundary was labeled as gate to gate. The background input and output data from the CCS has been inventoried as follows: consumption of energy and fuels, materials inputs, and waste.

Methods

In this paper, LCI CCS process on integrated permit (secondary data), literature information, and expert consultations was developed. The functional unit (FU) is represented by 1 t of steel slabs produced by CCS. Operating parameters as well as air emissions associated with the CCS process were presented. The production data (slabs) was given. The emissions of dust, Fe, PM10 and PM2.5, and waste (iron dust, iron particles, the others) are outcomes of the CCS processes.

Results and discussion

Annually production of steel slabs in CCS plant amounted to 200,000 t. Coke oven gas, natural gas, steam, air, oxygen, casting powders for crystallizer and for intermediate tundish, refractory material, oil, lubricant, argon, and industrial water amounts were in the order of 2,750,000 Nm3/year, 770,000 Nm3/year, 2000 t/year, 90,000,000 Nm3/year, 970 t/year, 1300 t/year, 810 t/year, 30 t/year, 45 t/year, 330 t/year, and 13,175,300 m3/year, respectively. The average heat and electric energy consumptions were about 0.023 to 0.068 GJ/t and 12.0 to 17.2 kWh/t, respectively. Emissions in air of dust, Fe, PM10, and PM2.5 were in the order of 1.3, 0.1, 0.5, and 0.44 kg/h, respectively. The amounts of iron dust and the other waste were 200 t/year and 240 t, respectively. No information is available on CO2 emission.

Conclusions

The LCI study resulted in the development of a database with an inventory of secondary data regarding CCS process referring to the year 2015. The scope of this study considered input items needed in CCS production (entry gate) to the final delivery of steel slabs (exit gate). The raw materials, supplies, and equipment to the CCS plant and infrastructure are not taken into consideration in the analysis. The FU is 1 t of steel slabs.

Recommendations and outlook

The LCI offers environmental information consisting of the list of environmental loads. The impact assessment phase aims to present more understandable results from the inventory analysis, and life cycle impact assessment will be the direction for future research.

Keywords

Air emissions Continuous casting of steel Integrated steel plant Life cycle inventory (LCI) Poland System boundaries 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Research is not involving human participants and/or animals.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bahadir ME (2016) Analysis of the environmental effects of international outsourcing: study of the iron casting industry. Sci Res Essays 11(16):160–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baitz M, Bayliss C, Russell-Vaccari A (2016) Preface. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(11):1541–1542Google Scholar
  3. Bieda B (2011) Life cycle inventory of energy production in ArcelorMittal steel power plant Poland S.A. in Krakow, Poland. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(6):503–511Google Scholar
  4. Bieda B (2012a) Life cycle inventory processes of the ArcelorMittal Poland (AMP) S. A. in Kraków, Poland—basic oxygen furnace steel production: a case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(4):463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bieda B (2012b) Life cycle inventory processes of the Mittal Steel Poland (MSP) S. A. in Krakow—blast furnace pig iron production—a case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(6):787–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bieda B, Grzesik K, Sala D, Gaweł B (2015) Life cycle inventory processes of the integrated steel plant (ISP) in Krakow, Poland—coke production, a case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(8):1089–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Broadbent C (2016) Steel’s recyclability: demonstrating the benefits of recycling steel to achieve a circular economy. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1658–1665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burchart-Korol D (2013) Life cycle assessment of steel production in Poland: a case study. J Clean Prod 54:235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burchart-Korol D, Korol J, Czaplicka-Kolarz K (2016) Life cycle assessment of heat production from underground coal gasification. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1391–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CEIC (2014) Database expansion: world steel crude steel production and continuously cast steel output January 17, 2014 - CEIC Data NewsAlert: Sector Database Expansion. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/blog/ceic-database-expansion-world-steel-crude-steel-production-and-continuously-cast-steel-output. Accessed 5 December 2016
  11. Chao C-C (2001) Life cycle inventory for steel in Taiwan. Center for Environmental, Safety & Health Technology Development Industrial Technology Research Institute 42:1–11 http://enger.thu.edu.tw/files/archive/108_4d6fb596.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2017Google Scholar
  12. Chomkhamsri K, Mungcharoen T, Yuvaniyama C (2016) 10-year experience with the Thai national LCI database: case study of refinery products. Int J Life Cycle Assess. doi: 10.1007/s11367-016-1160-3
  13. Continuous Casting Schematic (2011) Industrial efficiency technology database. http://ietd.iipnetwork.org/content/continuous-casting. Accessed 5 December 2016
  14. Davidson AJ, Binks SP, Gediga J (2016) Lead industry life cycle studies: environmental impact and life cycle assessment of lead battery and architectural sheet production. Int J Life Cycle Ass 21:1624–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Di Maria F, Micale C, Contini S (2016) A novel approach for uncertainty propagation applied to two different bio-waste management options. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1529–1537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. EUR-lex (2012) http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec_impl/2012/135/oj. Accessed 18 December 2015
  17. Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Hellweg S, Koehler A, Pennington D, Suh S (2009) Recent development in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manag 91:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galdiz P, Palacios J, Arana JL, Thomas BG (2014) Round continuous casting with EMS-CFD coupled. ECCC 2014, (European Continuous Casting Conference, Graz, Austria, June 23–26, 2014) http://ccc.illinois.edu/PDF%20Files/Publications/2014%20Papers/14_GALDIZ-P%20Round%20CC%20with%20EMS%20CFD%20Coupled%20ECCC2014.pdf. Accessed 19 December 2016
  19. Gallagher WP (1978) The corrosion behavior of ship-steel plates rolled from continuous-cast slabs. The Journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 30:5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gielen D, Moriguchi Y (2002a) Modelling CO2 policies for the Japanese iron and steel industry. Environ Model Softw 17(5):481–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gielen D, Moriguchi Y (2002b) CO2 in the iron and steel industry: an analysis of Japanese emission reduction potentials. Energy Policy 30(10):849–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gómez P, Elduque D, Sarasa J, Pina C, Javierre C (2016) Influence of composition on the environmental impact of a cast aluminum alloy. Materials 9(6):412. doi: 10.3390/ma9060412 
  23. Herfurth K, Elmkvist H, Reif K (2005) Continuous cast iron for innovative parts manufacture. konstruieren + giessen 30 H. 3, pp 1020Google Scholar
  24. Hibbeler LC, Langeneckert MM, Iwasaki J, Hwang I, Brian G, Thomas BG, O’Malley RJ (2013) Calibration of thermal models of steel continuous casting molds. AISTech 2013—The Iron & Steel Technology Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA. AIST Transactions 10(5):199–211Google Scholar
  25. Huang Z, Ding X, Sun H, Liu S (2010) Identification of main influencing factors of life cycle CO2 emissions from the integrated steelworks using sensitivity analysis. J Clean Prod 18(10–11):1052–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hunkeler D, Rebitzer G (2005) Editorial: the future of life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(5):305–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Iosif A-M, Birat J-P, Mirgaux O, Ablitzer D (2009) Reduction of CO2 emissions in the steel industry based on LCA methodology. TMS - CO2 Reduction Metallurgy, San-Francisco. http://www.ulcos.org/en/docs/Ref33%20-%20TMS_CO2_correct_1.pdf
  28. Iosif A-M, Hanrot F, Birat J-P, Ablitzer D (2010) Physicochemical modelling of classical steelmaking route for life cycle inventory analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:304–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=37456. Accessed 16 December 2016
  30. Ison E, Miller A (2000) The use of LCA to introduce life-cycle thinking into decision-making for the purchase of medical devices in the NHS. J Env Ass Pol Manag 2(4):453–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Journal of Laws (2001) No 62, Item 627 of 27 Avril 2001. http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/DetailsServlet?id=WDU20010620627. Accessed 6 December 2016
  32. Journal of Laws (2002) No 122, Item 1055 of 26 July 2002. http://www.prawo.egospodarka.pl/akty/dziennik-ustaw/2002/122/1055. Accessed 18 December 2016
  33. Journal of Laws (2013) Item 1232 of 23 October 2013 http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/DetailsServlet?id=WDU20130001232. Accessed 11 December 2016
  34. Kim Y, Worrell E (2002) International comparison of CO2 emission trends in the iron and steel industry. Energy Policy 30(10):827–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. KOBiZE (2014) Wartości opałowe (WO) i wskaźniki emisji CO2 (WE) w roku 2014 do raportowania w ramach Wspólnotowego Systemu Handlu Uprawnieniami do Emisji za rok 2017. http://www.kobize.pl/pl/article/monitorowanie-raportowanie-weryfikacja-emisji/id/318/tabele-wo-i-we. Accessed 12 June 2017
  36. Kulczycka J, Henclik A (2009) Ocena wpływu cyklu życia procesów wytwórczych na Wydziałach Surowcowych i Wytwarzania Stali Huty ArcelorMittal Poland SA, Oddział w Krakowie, Polish Akademy of Sciences, Krakow (in Polish)Google Scholar
  37. Kulczycka J, Kurczewski P, Kasprzak J, Lewandowska A, Lewicki R, Witczak A, Witczak J (2011) The Polish Centre for Life Cycle Assssment—the centre for life cycle assessment in Poland. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(5):442–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lindfors LG, Christiansen K, Hoffman L, Virtanen Y, Juntilla V, Hanssen OJ, Rønning A, Ekvall T, Finnvenden G (1995) Nordic guidelines on life-cycle assessment, Nird 1995: 20. Nordic Council of Ministers, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  39. Millet D, Bistagnino L, Lanzavecchia C, Camous R, Poldma T (2007) Does the potential of the use of LCA match the design team needs? J Clean Prod 15(4):335–346Google Scholar
  40. Morales M, Quintero J, Aroca G (2017) Environmental assessment of the production and addition pf bioethanol produced from Eucalyptus globulus to gasoline in Chile. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:525–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ogłoszenie (2014) Ogłoszenie o udzieleniu przez Marszałka Województwa Małopolskiego pozwolenia zintegrowanego. http://bip.malopolska.pl/umwm/Article/get/id,972964.html. Accessed 31 March 2015
  42. PE International (2014) Harmonization of LCA methodologies for metals, version 1.01. http://www.euromines.org/files/publications/harmonization-lca-methodologies-metals.pdf. Accesed 29 October 2016
  43. Petrus B, Zheng K, Zhou X, Brian G, Thomas BG, Bentsman J (2011) Real-time, model-based spray-cooling control system for steel continuous casting. Metall Mater Trans B Process Metall Mater Process Sci 42B:87–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. PN-EN ISO 14040 (2009) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework (2009)Google Scholar
  45. Remus R. Monsonet MAA, Roudier S, Sancho D (2013) Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for Iron and Steel Production. JRC Reference Report. Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU (Integated Pollution Prevention and Control). http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference/BREF/IS_Adopted_03_2012.pdf. Accessed 15 December 2016
  46. Rönnlund I, Reuter M, Horn S, Aho J, Aho M, Päällysaho M, Ylimäki L, Pursula T (2016a) Eco-efficiency indicator framework implemented in the metallurgical industry: part 1-a comprehensive view and benchmark. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1473–1500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rönnlund I, Reuter M, Horn S, Aho J, Aho M, Päällysaho M, Ylimäki L, Pursula T (2016b) Eco-efficiency indicator framework implemented in the metallurgical industry: part 2-a case study from the copper industry. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1719–1748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Selech J, Joachimiak-Lechman K, Kłos Z, Kulczycka J, Kurczewski P (2014) Life cycle thinking in small and medium enterprises: the results of research on the implementation of life cycle tools in Polish SMEs-part 3: LCC related aspects. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(5):1119–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sengupta J, Trinh M-K, Currey D, Thomas BG (2009) Utilization of CON1D at ArcelorMittal Dofasco’s No. 2 Continuous Caster for Crater End Determination. Assoc. Iron Steel Tech., Warrendale, PA, Vol. 1. http://ccc.illinois.edu/PDF%20Files/Publications/09_SENGUPTA_J%20%20Utilization%20of%20CON1D%20at%20ArcelorMittal%20Dofasco%202%20CC%20for%20Crater%20End%20Determination_AISTech.pdf. Accessed 11 December 2016
  50. Seto KE, Panesar DK, Churchill CJ (2017) Criteria for the evaluation on life cycle assessment software packages and life cycle inventory data with application to concrete. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:694–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sonnemann G. Castells F, Schumacher M (2004) Integrated life-cycle and risk assessment for industrial processes. LEWIS PUBLISHERS. A CRC Press CompanyGoogle Scholar
  52. SOWA L, BOKOTA A (2011) Numerical model of thermal and flow phenomena the process growing of the cc slab. Archives and Metallurgy and Materials 56(2):359–366. doi: 10.2478/v10172-011-0038-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Suh S, Leighton M, Tomar S, Chen C (2016) Interoperability between ecoinvent ver. 3 US LCI database: a case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1290–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thomas BG (2001) Continuous casting of steel. Chapter 15 in Modeling for Casting and Solidification Processingx, O. Yu, editor, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, 2001, pp 499–540Google Scholar
  55. Thomas BG, Liu R, Rietow B (2014) Combining models and measurements to better understand steel continuous casting. European Continuous Casting Conference, ECCC2014, Graz, Austria, June 23–26, 2014, http://ccc.illinois.edu/PDF%20Files/Publications/2014%20Papers/16_THOMAS-BG%20Combining%20Models%20Measurements%20to%20Understand%20CC%20-ECCC2014.pdf. Accessed 11 December 2016
  56. de Udo Haes HA, Heijungs R, Suh S, Huppes G (2004) Three strategies to overcome the limitations of life-cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 8(3):19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Westfall LA, Davourie J, Ali M, McGough D (2016) Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of global manganese alloy production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(11):1573–1579Google Scholar
  58. Witczak J, Kasprzak J, Kłos Z, Kurczewski P, Lewandowska A, Lewicki R (2014) Life cycle thinking in small and medium enterprises: the results of research on the implementation of life cycle tools in Polish SMEs—part 2: LCA related aspects. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(4):891–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Xue B, Ma Z, Geng Y, Heck P, Ren W, Tobias M, Maas A, Jiang P, de Puppim Oliveira JA, Fujita T (2015) A life cycle co-benefits assessment of wind power in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 41:338–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yanmaz M, Kaya D (2012) ULTRA—low carbon dioxide (CO2) steelmaking. International Iron & Steel Symposium, 02–04 April 2012, Karabük, Türkiye. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.452.6950&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 11 December 2016
  61. Yasin S, Behary N, Rovero G, Kumar V (2016) Statistical analysis of use-phase energy consumption of textile products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1776–1788CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Management DepartmentAGH University of Science and TechnologyKrakówPoland
  2. 2.Faculty of Mining Surveying and Enviromental EngineeringAGH University of Science and TechnologyKrakówPoland
  3. 3.Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute of the Polish Academy of SciencesKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations