Rethinking system boundary in LCA—reply to “Lifting the fog on the characteristics and limitations of hybrid LCA” by Thomas Gibon and Thomas Schaubroeck (2017)
- 301 Downloads
The comments made by Gibon and Schaubroeck (2017) on my previous article (Yang 2017) are highly appreciated. The authors raised several interesting questions that warrant further discussion. As the limitations of the conventional linear framework are increasingly recognized (Searchinger et al. 2008b; Ferng 2009; Haberl et al. 2012; Plevin et al. 2014; McManus and Taylor 2015; Yang and Campbell 2017), it is time to reevaluate some of its long-held assumptions. One such assumption is a complete, economy-wide system boundary. It is my hope that our exchanges here will trigger further discussion and research that lead to more robust life-cycle assessment (LCA) methodologies for decision-making.
Rethinking a complete, economy-wide system boundary
Gibon and Schaubroeck (2017) rightly pointed out that whether promotion of one, or any, product would affect all other processes across the world “depends on the data and not only on the methodology.” But, it was not the data, but the...
KeywordsLarge Hadron Collider System Boundary Methodological Development Bamboo Shoot Corn Ethanol
- Gibon T, Schaubroeck T (2017) Lifting the fog on the characteristics and limitations of hybrid LCA—a reply to “Does hybrid LCA with a complete system boundary yield adequate results for product promotion?” by Yi Yang (Int J Life Cycle Assess 22(3):456–406, doi: 10.1007/s11367–016–1256-9. Int J Life Cycle Assess. doi: 10.1007/s11367–017–1291-1
- Searchinger TD, Heimlich R et al (2008b) Estimating greenhouse gas emissions from soy-based US biodiesel when factoring in emissions from land use change. Lifecycle Carbon Footpr Biofuels 35–45Google Scholar
- Yang Y, Heijungs R (2016) Consequential life cycle assessment: different models for the same question. Int J Life Cycle Assess (in review)Google Scholar