Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Aggregating local, regional and global burden of disease impact assessment: detecting potential problem shifting in air quality policy making

Abstract

Purpose

Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) has been applied widely in environmental decision-making. Despite its advantage in taking locally specific details into consideration, problem shifting may occur due to its relatively narrow focus. To achieve a broader perspective, we propose that the combined use of QRA and life cycle assessment (LCA) may be beneficial. The feasibility and effectiveness of a hybrid approach of QRA and LCA were evaluated by considering alternative future air quality scenarios.

Methods

Future air pollution emission scenarios based on different state-based environmental agency policies in Victoria, Australia, were considered to explore ways to reduce problem shifting. QRA was used to estimate human burden of disease (BoD) for the local population due to particulates and tropospheric ozone under ‘Low Impact’ and ‘Most Likely’ scenarios. To detect potential problem shifting, LCA was performed for other associated impact categories such as climate change potential. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were used as a common metric to facilitate direct comparisons and aggregation between results of QRA and LCA.

Results and discussion

While the ‘Low Impact’ scenario was developed to project a scenario with reduced human health impacts (among other environmental impacts), the overall assessment revealed that BoD impacts may suffer a net increase under this scenario. The QRA suggested about 0.74 kilo DALYs (kDALYs) were saved annually; however, the LCA indicated that more impacts were expected, over 8 kDALYs per year. Hence, it was projected that reducing local impact by improving local air quality would shift more problems elsewhere. Therefore, using QRA alone that focuses on local impacts could result in an inappropriate scenario being preferred and improper policies being set.

Conclusions

The outcomes of this study revealed the importance of applying a broad perspective in environmental decision-making. QRA appeared to be a suitable tool to assess local BoD impacts caused by ambient air pollutants. However, by also including LCA, impacts could be more comprehensively assessed. Combined use of QRA and LCA enables the analyst to account for locally specific considerations while reducing potential problem shifting to more distant receptors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. ABS (2012a) Household Water and Energy Use, Victoria, October 2011. Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/0/85424ADCCF6E5AE9CA257A670013AF89?opendocument. Accessed September 5th 2016

  2. ABS (2012b) Year Book Australia, 2012- Transport. Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/1301.0~2012~Main%20Features~Transport%20activity~187. Accessed December 25th 2014

  3. ABS (2014) Australian Historical Population Statistics, 2014. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/3105.0.65.0012014?OpenDocument. Accessed September 18th 2016

  4. Alcoa (2013) Application for electricity generation license—Anglesea Power Station. Alcoa of Australia Limited, VIC, Australia

  5. Azevedo LB, Henderson AD, van Zelm R, Jolliet O, Huijbregts MAJ (2013) Assessing the importance of spatial variability versus model choices in life cycle impact assessment: the case of freshwater eutrophication in Europe. Environ Sci Technol 47:13565–13570

  6. Bannister M (2014) Personal communication, November 25, 2014. Environment Protection Authority Victoria (EPA VIC), Melbourne

  7. Bichai F, Smeets PWMH (2013) Using QMRA-based regulation as a water quality management tool in the water security challenge: experience from the Netherlands and Australia. Water Res 47:7315–7326

  8. Boin UMJ, Bertram M (2005) Melting standardized aluminum scrap: a mass balance model for Europe. JOM 57:26–33

  9. Chafe Z, Brauer M, Heroux ME, Klimont Z, Lanki T, Salonen RO, Smith KR (2015) Residential heating with wood and coal: health impacts and policy options in Europe and North America. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen

  10. Clark RM, Besterfield-Sacre ME (2009) A new approach to hazardous materials transportation risk analysis: decision modeling to identify critical variables. Risk Anal 29:344–354

  11. Cope M, Lee S (2009) Chemical transport model user manual. The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, Melbourne, Australia

  12. Cope M, Lee S, Noonan J, Lilley B, Hess D, Aszzi M (2009) Chemical transport model technical description. The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, Melbourne, Australia

  13. Cowell SJ, Fairman R, Lofstedt RE (2002) Use of risk assessment and life cycle assessment in decision making: a common policy research agenda. Risk Anal 22:879–894

  14. de Baan L, Mutel CL, Curran M, Hellweg S, Koellner T (2013) Land use in life cycle assessment: global characterization factors based on regional and global potential species extinction. Environ Sci Technol 47:9281–9290

  15. De Haes HAU, Sleeswijk AW, Heijungs R (2006) Similarities, differences and synergisms between HERA and LCA—an analysis at three levels. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 12:431–449

  16. Delucchi MA, Yang C, Burke AF, Ogden JM, Kurani K, Kessler J, Sperling D (2014) An assessment of electric vehicles: technology, infrastructure requirements, greenhouse-gas emissions, petroleum use, material use, lifetime cost, consumer acceptance and policy initiatives Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical. Phys Eng Sci 372

  17. East Penn Manufacturing (2013) Material safety data sheet—lead acid battery wet, filled with acid. Lyon Station, PA

  18. EPA VIC (2013) Future air quality in Victoria–final report. EPA Victoria, Calton, VIC, Australia

  19. EUR-Lex (2014) Reduction of pollutant emissions from light vehicles http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1430962134685&uri=URISERV:l28186. Accessed May 7th 2015

  20. Fann N, Roman HA, Fulcher CM, Gentile MA, Hubbell BJ, Wesson K, Levy JI (2011) Maximizing health benefits and minimizing inequality: incorporating local-scale data in the design and evaluation of air quality policies. Risk Anal 31:908–922

  21. Fantke P et al (2015) USEtox® 2.0 User Manual (Version 2). USEtox, Lyngby, Denmark

  22. Feng C, Gao X, Tang Y, Zhang Y (2014) Comparative life cycle environmental assessment of flue gas desulphurization technologies in China. J Clean Prod 68:81–92

  23. Gao T, Wang XC, Chen R, Ngo HH, Guo W (2015) Disability adjusted life year (DALY): a useful tool for quantitative assessment of environmental pollution. Sci Total Environ 511:268–287

  24. Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, De Schryver A, Struijs J, van zelm R (2013) ReCiPe 2008: a life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level—First edition (version 1.08). Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment (VROM), Netherlands

  25. Gronlund CJ, Humbert S, Shaked S, O’Neill MS, Jolliet O (2015) Characterizing the burden of disease of particulate matter for life cycle impact assessment. Air Qual Atmos Health 8:29–46

  26. Hall A (2012) Up-take of Renewable Energy in Bass Coast and South Gippsland Shires. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourn, Victoria, Australia

  27. Hänninen O et al (2014) Environmental burden of disease in Europe: assessing nine risk factors in six countries. Environ Health Persp 122:439–446

  28. Harder R, Schoen ME, Peters GM (2015) Including pathogen risk in life cycle assessment of wastewater management. Implications for selecting the functional unit. Environ Sci Technol 49:14–15

  29. Hauck M, Steinmann ZJN, Laurenzi IJ, Karuppiah R, Huijbregts MAJ (2014) How to quantify uncertainty and variability in life cycle assessment: the case of greenhouse gas emissions of gas power generation in the US. Environ Res Lett 9:074005

  30. Hawkins TR, Singh B, Majeau-Bettez G, Strømman AH (2013) Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles. J Ind Ecol 17:53–64

  31. Heimersson S, Harder R, Peters GM, Svanström M (2014) Including pathogen risk in life cycle assessment of wastewater management. 2. Quantitative comparison of pathogen risk to other impacts on human health. Environ Sci Technol 48:9446–9453

  32. Humbert S et al (2011) Intake fraction for particulate matter: recommendations for life cycle impact assessment. Environ Sci Technol 45:4808–4816

  33. IHME (2016) Global Health Data Exchange. University of Washington. http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool. Accessed September 8th 2016

  34. IPCC (2000) IPCC Special Report: Emissions scenarios—summary for policymakers. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva

  35. Kim YM, Kim JW, Lee HJ (2011) Burden of disease attributable to air pollutants from municipal solid waste incinerators in Seoul, Korea: a source-specific approach for environmental burden of disease. Sci Total Environ 409:2019–2028

  36. Knol AB, Staatsen BAM (2005) Trends in the environmental burden of disease in the Netherlands, 1980–2020. RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands

  37. Kobayashi Y, Peters GM, Ashbolt NJ, Heimersson S, Svanström M, Khan SJ (2015a) Global and local health burden trade-off through the hybridisation of quantitative microbial risk assessment and life cycle assessment to aid water management. Water Rese 79:26–38

  38. Kobayashi Y, Peters GM, Ashbolt NJ, Shiels S, Khan SJ (2015b) Assessing burden of disease as disability adjusted life years in life cycle assessment. Sci Total Environ 530–531:120–128

  39. Lan X, Liu Y (2010) Life cycle assessment of lawnmowers—two mowers’ case studies. Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden

  40. Leighton AP (1961) Photochemistry of air pollution. Academic Press, New York

  41. Lim SS et al (2012) A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380:2224–2260

  42. Logue JM, Price PN, Sherman MH, Singer BC (2012) A method to estimate the chronic health impact of air pollutants in U.S. residences. Environ Health Persp 120:216–222

  43. Majeau-Bettez G, Hawkins TR, StrØmman AH (2011) Life cycle environmental assessment of lithium-ion and nickel metal hydride batteries for plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles. Environ Sci Technol 45:4548–4554

  44. Mathers C (2008) Global Burden of Disease. In: Kris H (ed) International Encyclopedia of Public Health. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 59–72

  45. Moriguchi Y, Terazono A (2000) A simplified model for spatially differentiated impact assessment of air emissions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5:281–286

  46. Murray CJL, Acharya AK (1997) Understanding DALYs. J Health Econ 16:703–730

  47. Murray CJL, Lopez AD (1996) The global burden of disease—a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA

  48. Ostro B (2004) Outdoor air pollution—assessing the environmental burden of disease at national and local levels vol Environmental Burden of Disease Series, No. 5. WHO, Geneva

  49. Owens JW (1997) Life-cycle assessment in relation to risk assessment: an evolving perspective. Risk Anal 17:359–365

  50. Parsons D (2010) Home heating in temperate Australia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:785–793

  51. Peled E, Patolsky F, Golodnitsky D, Freedman K, Davidi G, Schneier D (2015) Tissue-like silicon nanowires-based three-dimensional anodes for high-capacity lithium ion batteries. Nano Lett. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00744

  52. Pfister S, Koehler A, Hellweg S (2009) Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ Sci Technol 43:4098–4104

  53. Philp JC, Bartsev A, Ritchie RJ, Baucher MA, Guy K (2013) Bioplastics science from a policy vantage point. New Biotechnol 30:635–646

  54. Pope IC, Burnett RT, Thun MJ et al (2002) Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. JAMA 287:1132–1141

  55. Premrudee K, Jantima U, Kittinan A, Naruetep L, Kittiwan K, Sudkla B (2013) Life cycle assessment of lead acid battery. Case study for Thailand. Environ Prot Eng 39:101–114

  56. Priest MW, Williams DJ, Bridgman HA (2000) Emissions from in-use lawn-mowers in Australia. Atmos Environ 34:657–664

  57. Saad R, Koellner T, Margni M (2013) Land use impacts on freshwater regulation, erosion regulation, and water purification: a spatial approach for a global scale level. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1253–1264

  58. Singh P, Gundimeda H, Stucki M (2014) Environmental footprint of cooking fuels: a life cycle assessment of ten fuel sources used in Indian households. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1036–1048

  59. Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2012) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Ind 15:281–299

  60. Skaar C, Jørgensen RB (2013) Integrating human health impact from indoor emissions into an LCA: a case study evaluating the significance of the use stage. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:636–646

  61. Sleeswijk AW, Heijungs R, Erler ST (2003) Risk assessment and life-cycle assessment: fundamentally different yet reconcilable Greener Management International, pp 77–87

  62. Solli C, Reenaas M, Strømman AH, Hertwich EG (2009) Life cycle assessment of wood-based heating in Norway. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:517–528

  63. Spadaro JV, Rabl A (1999) Estimates of real damage from air pollution: site dependence and simple impact indices for LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4:229–243

  64. Spruijt P, Knol AB, Petersen AC, Lebret E (2016) Differences in views of experts about their role in particulate matter policy advice: empirical evidence from an international expert consultation. Environ Sci Pol 59:44–52

  65. Strezov L, Herbertson J (2006) A life cycle perspective on steel building materials. Australian Steel Institute, Bently WA, Australia

  66. Sullivan JL, Gaines L (2012) Status of life cycle inventories for batteries. Energ Convers Manage 58:134–148

  67. Sustainability Victoria (2014) Fact sheet: market summary—recycled glass. Sustainability Victoria, Melbourne

  68. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories (2014) The ecoinvent Database. http://www.ecoinvent.org/database/.

  69. Tang L, Nagashima T, Hasegawa K, Ohara T, Sudo K, Itsubo N (2015) Development of human health damage factors for PM2.5 based on a global chemical transport model. Int J Life Cycle Assess. doi:10.1007/s11367-014-0837-8

  70. thinkstep (2013) GaBi 6 Software—system and databases for life cycle engineering. vol November, 2013. Stuttgart, Echterdingen

  71. Udo de Haes HA, Sleeswijk AW, Heijungs R (2006) Similarities, differences and synergisms between HERA and LCA—an analysis at three levels. Human Ecol Risk Assess 12:431–449

  72. UNFCCC (2016) The Paris Agreement. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Accessed October 3rd 2016

  73. van Zelm R et al (2008) European characterization factors for human health damage of PM10 and ozone in life cycle impact assessment. Atmos Environ 42:441–453

  74. van Zelm R, Preiss P, van Goethem T, Van Dingenen R, Huijbregts M (2016) Regionalized life cycle impact assessment of air pollution on the global scale: damage to human health and vegetation. Atmos Environ 134:129–137

  75. Verones F, Pfister S, Hellweg S (2013) Quantifying area changes of internationally important wetlands due to water consumption in LCA. Environ Sci Technol 47:9799–9807

  76. Walsh S, Bannister M, Cope M, Delaney W, Marshall A, Middleton M, Lee S (2013) Predictions of air quality impacts in Victoria under three future emission scenarios. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 21st International Clean Air and Environment Conference, Sydney, Australia, 7–11 September 2013

  77. WHO (2003) Health aspects of air pollution with particulate matter, ozone and nitrogen dioxide vol Report on a WHO Working Group. Bonn, Germany

  78. WHO (2004) Meta-analysis of time-series studies and panel studies of particulate matter (PM) and Ozone (O3) vol Report of a WHO Task Group. Copenhagen

  79. WHO (2005) Air Quality Guidelines Global Update 2005. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen

  80. WHO (2006) Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide—Global update 2005—summary of risk assessment. World Health Organization, Geneva

  81. WHO (2013) Health effects of particulate matter—policy implications for countries in eastern Europe, Caucasus and central Asia. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen

  82. Worldsteel (2012) Sustainable steel: at the core of a green economy. World Steel association, Brussels, Belgium

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage Projects Program (grant no. LP 110200594) and the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (FORMAS) under grant agreement no. 2012-1122. Industry contributions to this grant are provided by EPA Victoria.

Author information

Correspondence to Stuart J. Khan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Roland Hischier

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 75 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kobayashi, Y., Peters, G.M., Ashbolt, N.J. et al. Aggregating local, regional and global burden of disease impact assessment: detecting potential problem shifting in air quality policy making. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22, 1543–1557 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1276-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Quantitative risk assessment
  • Life cycle assessment
  • Burden of disease
  • Particulate matter
  • Tropospheric ozone
  • Climate change
  • Human toxicity
  • Electric vehicles