Analysis of the different techniques to include noise damage in life cycle assessment. A case study for car tires

  • Rodolphe Meyer
  • Enrico Benetto
  • Elorri Igos
  • Catherine Lavandier
LCIA OF IMPACTS ON HUMAN HEALTH AND ECOSYSTEMS
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 350 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Despite that different methods for the inclusion of transport noise in life cycle assessment (LCA) have been proposed, none of them has become consensual. Leveraging a case study on car tires, this paper aims at comparing two among these characterization approaches to identify strengths and weaknesses and to investigate the relative contribution of noise to human health (in disability-adjusted life years (DALYs)) as compared to other environmental stressors.

Methods

The case study analyzed two tires showing different acoustical properties. The two methods applied are the one developed by Müller-Wenk and further improved by other authors and the recent one proposed by Cucurachi. These two methods were adapted to the case study, and a full LCA study of the car tires was carried out. Both uncertainty and sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results and discussion

Both methods highlight the potential high contribution of noise damage to the DALYs generated by car tires, even considering parameters’ uncertainties. This study shows therefore the necessity to integrate noise impact in LCA in a broader way. Both methods present coherent results regarding the environmental performance differences between the two products. However, the absolute DALY scores differ by eight orders of magnitude, probably because Cucurachi’s methods overestimate the damages. The analysis of modeling choices and parameter uncertainties could not explain this difference.

Conclusions

Noise impact on human health has to be included in LCA, and additional efforts should focus on the characterization modeling since there is not yet a consensual method for a systematic integration. The case study shows that the improvement of tire design can efficiently reduce noise impact on human health. Both methods have advantages and inconveniences. We think that it is possible to elaborate a method combining the strengths of both approaches. An incremental approach used on accurate localized and temporalized data processed with noise propagation software could provide characterization factors for a set of archetypes. This should be a good compromise for a method allowing systematic integration of noise impact in LCA.

Keywords

DALY LCA Noise impact assessment Road traffic noise Tire 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Goodyear Innovation Center (GYIC) Luxembourg, in particular Dr. Georges Thielen, for having co-funded the study and provided data for the two tires and Vanessa Peardon from LIST for English proofreading. This research has been funded by the Luxembourg National Research Fund (FNR) under the project DyPLCA (INTER/ANR/13/10/DyPLCA).

References

  1. Althaus H-J, de Haan P, Scholz RW (2009) Traffic noise in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:560–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ChemRisk L (2009) Tyre generic exposure scenario; Service life guidanceGoogle Scholar
  3. Cucurachi S, Heijungs R (2014) Characterisation factors for life cycle impact assessment of sound emissions. Sci Total Environ 468–469:280–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cucurachi S, Heijungs R, Ohlau K (2012) Towards a general framework for including noise impacts in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:471–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Hollander AE, Melse JM, Lebret E, Kramers PG (1999) An aggregate public health indicator to represent the impact of multiple environmental exposures. Epidemiol 10:606–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Directive E (2002) Directive 2002/49/EC of the European parliament and the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise. Off. J. Eur. Communities 189Google Scholar
  7. Doka G (2003) Ergänzung der Gewichtungsmethode für Ökobilanzen Umweltbelastungspunkte’ 97 zu Mobilitäts-UBP’ 97. Doka Ökobilanzen ZurichGoogle Scholar
  8. Dutilleux G, Defrance J, Ecotière D, Gauvreau B, Bérengier M, Besnard F, Duc EL (2010) NMPB-routes-2008: the revision of the French method for road traffic noise prediction. Acta Acust United Acust 96:452–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. EASA (2009) Background noise level and noise level from en route aircraft final reportGoogle Scholar
  10. ETRMA (2010) Replacement of highly aromatic oils in tyres – FAQ and DEFINITIONS [WWW Document]. URL http://www.etrma.org/uploads/Modules/Documentsmanager/20100712-etrma-qanda---replacement-of-ha-oils-in-tyres.pdf
  11. Eurostat, European Commission [WWW Document], n.d. URL http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ (accessed 2.26.16)
  12. Evans L, MacIsaac Jr J, Harris J, Yates K, Dudek W, Holmes J, Popio J, Rice D, Salaani M (2009) NHTSA tire fuel efficiency consumer information program development: phase 2—effects of tire rolling resistance levels on traction, treadwear, and vehicle fuel economy. East Lib. OH Natl. Highw. Traffic Saf. AdmGoogle Scholar
  13. Franco V, Garraín D, Vidal R (2010) Methodological proposals for improved assessments of the impact of traffic noise upon human health. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:869–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. French Road Safety reports, Observatoire National Interministériel de la Sécurité Routière (ONISR) [WWW Document], n.d. URL http://www.securite-routiere.gouv.fr (accessed 2.26.16)
  15. Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H-J, Doka G, Dones R, Heck T, Hellweg S, Hischier R, Nemecek T, Rebitzer G (2005) The ecoinvent database: overview and methodological framework. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess 10:3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fritschi L, Brown L, Kim R, Schwela D, Kephalopolous S (2011) Conclusions [Burden of disease from environmental noise: Quantification of healthy years life lost in Europe]. World Health OrganisationGoogle Scholar
  17. Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, De Schryver A, Struijs J, van Zelm R (2009) ReCiPe 2008. Life Cycle Impact Assess. Method Which Comprises Harmon. Categ. Indic. Midpoint Endpoint Level 1Google Scholar
  18. Heutschi K (2004) des forêts et du paysage Suisse. Office fédéral de l’environnement, Eidgenössische Materialprüfungs-und Forschungsanstalt. Akustik, Geinoz D, Liengme J-D, 2004. SonRoad: modèle de calcul du trafic routier. OFEFPGoogle Scholar
  19. Hofstetter P, Müller-Wenk R (2005) Monetization of health damages from road noise with implications for monetizing health impacts in life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 13:1235–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huijbregts M, Hertwich EG, Reijnders L (2006) Including human health damages due to road traffic in life cycle assessment of dwellings. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE) [WWW Document], n.d. URL http://www.insee.fr/fr/ (accessed 2.26.16)
  22. ISO E (2006) 14044: 2006. Environ. Manag.-Life Cycle Assess.-Requir. Guidel. Eur. Comm. StandGoogle Scholar
  23. Krzyżanowski M, Kuna-Dibbert B, Schneider J (2005) Health effects of transport-related air pollution. WHO Regional Office EuropeGoogle Scholar
  24. Lacour S, Joumard R (2002) Parc, usage et émissions des véhicules routiers en France de 1970 à 2020Google Scholar
  25. Miedema HM, Oudshoorn CG (2001) Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. Environ Health Perspect 109:409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Müller-Wenk R (1999) Life-cycle impact assessment of road transport noise. Institut für Wirtschaft und Ökologie, Universität St. Gallen (IWÖ-HSG)Google Scholar
  27. Müller-Wenk R (2002) Attribution to road traffic of the impact of noise on health environmental series no. 339: noise. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7:376–376Google Scholar
  28. Müller-Wenk R (2004) A method to include in lca road traffic noise and its health effects. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9:76–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nielsen P, Laursen J (2005) Integration of external noise nuisance from road and rail transportation in lifecycle assessment. Dan. Environ. Prot. Agency CphGoogle Scholar
  30. Noise Observation and Information Service for Europe (NOISE) [WWW Document], n.d. URL http://noise.eionet.europa.eu/ (accessed 2.26.16)
  31. Ntziachristos L, Boulter P (2009) EMEP/EEA air pollutant emissions inventory guidebook 2009: road vehicle tyre and brake wear; road surface wear. Copenhagen. Eur. Environ. AgencyGoogle Scholar
  32. Null V (1999) Safe process oils for tires with low environmental impact. Kgk Kautsch Gummi Kunstst 52:6Google Scholar
  33. Observatoire de l’environnement sonore de la Métropole de Lyon [WWW Document], n.d.. acoucité. URL http://www.acoucite.org/ (accessed 2.26.16)
  34. PRé Consultants B (2001) Life cycle assessment of an average European car tyre. Comm. Eur. Car Tyre Manuf. BLIC Third Party Rep. 23Google Scholar
  35. Rauterberg-Wulff A (2003) Tire wear as source of PAH, Umweltbundesamt, Berlin CSTEE/2003/18/4Google Scholar
  36. Steven H (2005) Ermittlung der Geräuschemission von Kfz im Straßenverkehr. TÜV Nord WürselenGoogle Scholar
  37. Ten Broeke H, Hulskotte J, Van Der Gon H-D (2008) Emission estimates for diffuse sources Netherlands Emission Inventory—road traffic tire wear. TNO Built Environment and Geosciences. US department of energy (USDE) [WWW Document]. URL http://www.emissieregistratie.nl/ERPUBLIEK/documenten/Water/Factsheets/English/Road%20traffic%20tyre%20wear.pdf (accessed 2.26.16)
  38. USIRF ©., n.d. Union des Syndicats de l’Industrie Routière Française (USIRF)Google Scholar
  39. Weissman S, Sackman J, Gillen D, Monismith C (2003) Extending the lifespan of tires: final report. Symplectic Eng. Corp. Inst. Transp. Stud. Univ. Calif. Berkeley 23Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST)Esch-sur-AlzetteLuxembourg
  2. 2.Université de Cergy-Pontoise, Laboratoire MRTECergy-Pontoise CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations