LCA mainstreaming conditions in Latin America—based on learnings from 2005 to 2014

  • Sonia Valdivia
  • Guido Sonnemann
  • Llorenç Milà i Canals
LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT: A TOOL FOR INNOVATION IN LATIN AMERICA

Abstract

Purpose

Based on the 2005–2014 developments in the Latin American and the Caribbean region (LAC), this paper aims to understand the conditions’ levels for mainstreaming life cycle assessment/life cycle management (LCA/LCM) and map key next actions.

Methods

Along the paper, four mainstreaming conditions are analyzed: expansion of LCM/LCA training activities, availability of LCA studies, national LCA database operating, and existence and activity of national life cycle network(s). Assuming that countries with better conditions are in a better position to develop national LCA based regulations, policies are also researched to complement this study.

Results and discussion

With nine life cycle (LC) networks in 2014, the LAC region has positively developed its networking capacities since 2005 but not the databases area (only one LCA database, Mexicaniuh, is fully operational). It was found that countries with no networks, lack all LCA trainings, studies, and databases.

Local capacities are limited which in best case, Chile, does not exceed 18 practitioners per 10 million inhabitants. Based on the total score on mainstreaming conditions, Mexico and Brazil are the most advanced countries, but their markets for LCA professionals are still small (Valdivia et al. 2015), which suggests that tailored made strategies are needed for stronger uptake of LCA by industrial sectors.

Argentina, Peru, Chile, and Colombia are in the second tier but still lack a critical mass of business cases and the political will to improve their mainstreaming conditions.

Conclusions

LCA development in the LAC region since 2005 is overall positive but still insufficient to serve the growth of prosperous LCA markets. Well-functioning LC networks are essential to leapfrog LCA. In 2014, about 27 % of LAC countries counted on a LC network. A common language in the region (except for Portuguese in Brazil) has been instrumental for expanding LCA through regional cooperation. LCA-based policies are boosted when local capacities and databases are available following the cases of Mexico, Chile, and Brazil. More data and research are needed to understand the women role in advancing LCA and the causalities and motivations of LAC companies to decide for LCA implementation. The application of the methodology was possible thanks to good quality data available and delivered key findings to develop national road maps for advancing LCA. No indicator used is specific for the LAC region and similar exercises are encouraged in other regions such as Africa and Asia.

Keywords

Databases Latin America LCA LCM Networks 

References

  1. Cadis (2015) Centro de Análisis de Ciclo de Vida y Diseño Sustentable. Inventario Mexicano: Mexicaniuh. www.centroacv.mx/servicios.html
  2. Cadena E (2015) Principles of LCA, requirements, problems and main aspects. In Proceedings of the 2nd LCA European Workshop, Nice, 2015Google Scholar
  3. Caldeiras A, De Souza-Paula M, Villas Boas R (2005) Avaliação do Ciclo de Vida: a ISO 14040 na América Latina. ABIPT publicationGoogle Scholar
  4. CdD (2016) Law to promote recycling and extended producer responsibility In Spanish: Ley de Fomento al Reciclaje y Responsabilidad Extendida del Productor. Issued by The Camara de Diputados, ChileGoogle Scholar
  5. IBICT (2016) Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia: Internal Communication, Tiago Braga, Brazil, 2016Google Scholar
  6. NMX (2013) Norma Mexicana NMX-AA-164-SCFI-2013: Edificacion Sustentable - Criterios y Requerimientos Ambientales Mínimos (Sustainable Building - Minimum Environmental Criteria and Requirements)Google Scholar
  7. MMA (2010) Politica Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos - Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Lei n° 12.305/2010, Decreto No. 7.404/2010Google Scholar
  8. Quispe I et al (2014) VI International conference on life cycle assessment in Latin America: CILCA 2015—Lima, Peru. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(3):718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sonnemann G, Ciroth A, Valdivia S, Mila i Canals L (2016) Opportunities for LC networks creation and expansion around the world—with a special focus on LCA database development and based on a global mapping and conformance analysis of LCA databases. UNEP/SETAC publication. In PressGoogle Scholar
  10. UNEP/SETAC (2015) UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative. www.lifecycleinitiative.org
  11. Valdivia S, Mila i Canals L (2014) A evolução do pensamento sobre Ciclos de Vida na América Latina. Published by Instituto Brasil PNUMA. brasilpnuma.blogspot.fr/2014/08/a-evolucao-do-pensamento-sobre-ciclos.htmlGoogle Scholar
  12. Valdivia S, Suh S, Aldaya M, Sandoval C, Tonda E (2014) The state of natural resource management in Latin America and the Caribbean. UNEP. http://www.unep.org/10yfp/Portals/50150/downloads/Report_SNRM_EN.pdf
  13. Valdivia S, Bajaj S, Sonnemann G, Quiros A, Ugaya C (2015) Mainstreaming life cycle sustainability management in rapidly growing and emerging economies through capacity-building. In: Sonnemann G (ed) LCM Compendium—the complete world of life cycle assessment. Springer Verlag, pp 263–277Google Scholar
  14. World Bank (2014) The little data book on private sector development 2014Google Scholar
  15. Worldometer (2014). Countries in the world. www.worldometers.info
  16. 10YFP (2015) 10-year framework of programmes on sustainable consumption and production. www.unep.org/10yfp/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sonia Valdivia
    • 1
  • Guido Sonnemann
    • 2
  • Llorenç Milà i Canals
    • 3
  1. 1.World Resources ForumSaint GallenSwitzerland
  2. 2.University of BordeauxTalenceFrance
  3. 3.UNEPParisFrance

Personalised recommendations