A bibliometric overview of Brazilian LCA research
- 422 Downloads
We bibliometrically evaluated the scientific literature outlined around Brazilian life cycle assessment (LCA). Our aim is twofold: (1) Analyze the Brazilian scientific literature on LCA, forming a current view of how the LCA methodology is applied in the country; (2) within this view, trace the evolution of themes, characterize institution collaboration, and indicate major influences in Brazilian LCA community.
Data were outlined around academic production and publications, from 1993 to 2015, indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI- SCIE and SSCI) through a specific group of keywords. Initially, a temporal evolution and projection of papers, PhD and Master Theses, were performed. In sequence, indexed papers were analyzed through performance indicators (i.e., number of authors, impact factor, among others) and content evaluation (for instance, major addressed themes). Finally, a mapping of science was performed, with the aid of Cite Space software application, where coword (and evolution), cocollaboration (and evolution), and cocitation maps were created.
Results and discussion
The survey identified 429 documents divided among international and national papers, PhD and Master Theses. From those documents, 165 were indexed. In terms of production and performance, the results indicate an undeniable evolution of the Brazilian LCA research, as affirmed by relations solidified through time. The main research field is “LCA application” with 84 % of papers, whereas “LCA methodology” completes the framework. In LCA applications, 25 % of publications are related to Biofuels—divided into bioethanol and biodiesel—which makes it the current dominant LCA research area in Brazil. The collaboration network demonstrates three main institution groups, whereas evolution through the years indicates that this situation may further improve. Influential authors are linked to LCA of biofuels, general LCA guidelines, and methodological LCA developments.
Brazilian LCA research has been growing and more complex relations between themes and institutions denote that further developments can be expected. Cocollaboration indicates three main clusters, led by USP, Unicamp, and UFRJ. “Biofuels” is the main research area where sugarcane ethanol and biodiesel from different sources are the domain product systems. Cocitation analysis solidifies this statement, pointing to Isaias Macedo (and other biofuel researchers) as the main author in Brazilian LCA after ISO and Mark Goedkoop.
KeywordsBibliometrics Brazil LCA research Networks Trends
- Bauer PE, Filho RM (2004) Incorporation of environmental impact criteria in the design and operation of chemical processes. Braz J Chem Eng 21(3), São Paulo - July/Sept. 2004. doi:10.1590/S0104-66322004000300005
- Bezerra FL, Favacho CH, Souza RN, de Souza CRB (2014) Towards Supporting Systematic Mappings Studies: an automatic snowballing approach. In: Proceedings of the Simpósio Brasileiro de Banco de Dados (SBBD)Google Scholar
- Brasil (2009) Lei n° 12.187, de 29 de Dezembro de 2009Google Scholar
- Cederberg C, Meyer D, Flysjö A (2009) Life cycle inventory of greenhouse gas emissions and use of land and energy in Brazilian beef production. SIK Report No 792. 2009. Swedish Institute for Food and BiotechnologyGoogle Scholar
- Chen C (2014) The cite space manual. Available at http://cluster.ischool.drexel.edu/~cchen/citespace/CiteSpaceManual.pdf. Accessed in February 2015
- Cherubini E, Ribeiro PT (2015) Diálogos Setoriais Brasil e União Europeia: desafios e soluções para o fortalecimento da ACV no Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia - Ibict, Brasília, 187 ppGoogle Scholar
- Coulter N, Monarch I, Konda S (1998) Software Engineering as Seen through Its Research Literature: a study in co-word analysis. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 49(13):1206–1223Google Scholar
- Estrela S (2015) I publish, therefore I am. Or am I? A reply to A bibliometric investigation of life cycle assessment research in the web of science databases by Chen et al. (2014) and Mapping the scientific research on life cycle assessment: a bibliometric analysis by Hou et al. (2015). Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1601–1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Figueirêdo MCB, Rodrigues GS, Caldeira-Pires A, Rosa MF, Aragão FAS, Vieira VPPB, Mota FSB (2014) Environmental performance evaluation of agro-industrial innovations – part 1: Ambitec-Life Cycle, a methodological approach for considering life cycle thinking. J Clean Prod 18(14):1366–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus HJ, Doka G, Heck T, Hellweg S, Hischier R, Nemecek T, Rebitzer G, Spielmann M (2007a) Overview and Methodology. Final report ecoinvent data v2.0, No. 1, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, DübendorfGoogle Scholar
- Frischknecht R, Tuchschmid M, Faist Emmenegger M, Bauer C, Dones R (2007b) Strommix und Stromnetz. Ecoinvent report n 6, v2.0. Paul Scherrer Institut Villigen, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Duebendorf, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- Glänzel W (2003) Bibliometricsas a research field. A course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators. Course Handouts, 2003. 115 pp. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.97.5311&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed on February 2015
- Goedkoop MJ, Spriensma RS (1999) The Eco-indicator 99, a Damage oriented method for LCIA. Ministry VROM report 1999Google Scholar
- Goedkoop MJ, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, de Schryver A, Struijs J, van Zelm R (2009) ReCiPe 2008: a Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method Which Comprises Harmonized Category Indicators at the Midpoint and the Endpoint Level. Report 1: Characterization. Ministry of Housing Spatial Planning and the Environment. Netherlands [online]. Available at http://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/misc/ReCiPe_main_report_final_27-02-2009_web.pdf
- Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, de Koning A, van Oers L, Sleeswijk AW, Suh S, Udo de Haes HA, de Bruijn H, van Duin R, Huijbregts MAJ (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment. Operational guide to the ISO standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 692 ppGoogle Scholar
- ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), GeneveGoogle Scholar
- Jalali S, Wohlin C (2012) Systematic literature studies: database searches vs. backward snowballing. In: Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement, ESEM’12, pages 29–38, Lund, Sweden. ACM-IEEE. doi:10.1145/2372251.2372257
- Ming HW, Te CY, Yuh SH (2009) A bibliometric analysis of the performance of Water Research. Scientometrics 84:813–820Google Scholar
- SETAC (1993) Guidelines for life-cycle assessment: a code of practice. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), edn 1Google Scholar
- UNEP (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: social and socio-economic LCA guidelines complementing environmental LCA and life cycle costing, contributing to the full assessment of goods and services within the context of sustainable development. UNEP, ParisGoogle Scholar
- White HD, McCain KW (1989) Bibliometrics. In: Williams ME (ed) Annual review of information science and technology, vol 24. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. for the American Society for Information Science, Amsterdam, pp 119–186Google Scholar
- Zanghelini GM, Cherubini E, Galindro BM, Alvarenga RAF, Soares SR (2014a) A Aplicação da Avaliação do Ciclo de Vida no Brasil na Última Década. IV Congresso Brasileiro Sobre Gestão Pelo Ciclo de Vida. Novembro de 2014 - São Bernardo do Campo – SP – Brasil. doi:10.13140/2.1.4672.1601
- Zanghelini GM, Cherubini E, Orsi P, Soares SR (2014b) Waste management Life Cycle Assessment: the case of a reciprocating air compressor in Brazil. J Clean Prod 70:164–174Google Scholar