YUPI®, a regional footprint calculator

  • Alejandro Pablo Arena
  • Roxana PiastrelliniEmail author
  • Gabriela Nuri Barón
  • Bárbara María Civit



Many tools to quantify the environmental impact of human decisions have been developed, but all of them seem to have a limited application at the regional or local level. A free-of-charge, Argentina-based personal footprint calculator software (YUPI®) has been developed in order to raise awareness among local citizens about the environmental impacts generated by their daily habits. The extensive use of the tool will generate information suitable for future scientific studies based on local data.


The software calculates the ecological, carbon, and water footprints of individuals, implementing specific regional data from Argentina developed by the CLIOPE group, complemented with data from the Water Footprint Network and the Global Footprint Network. The calculator was developed focusing on interface attractiveness, ease of use, language simplicity, and a good trade-off between completion time and fullness.

Results and discussion

The YUPI® software allows its users to understand at a glance their contribution to the environmental impacts of modern society and to quantify the reduction opportunities they have at hand. The program’s language and variables reflect local lifestyle choices, making the filling process accessible for children. The calculator was placed online as an educational tool for teachers and students from all educational levels, and it was also used by visitors in local science and educational fairs. Valuable data was collected for future initiatives on impact mitigation.


Amplified by the mass media, the new tool has helped raise awareness and discussion about the individual environmental footprint, both in the educational and in the domestic terrain. The strategy of creating a simple, easily administered, and widely available quiz helped bridge the gap between the academy and the people, making available to them the continuously updated information generated by the research groups. This is facilitating citizen not only to understand the complexity of the environmental problems but also to take informed actions leading to their mitigation.


Argentina Carbon footprint Community outreach Ecological footprint Online calculator Water footprint 

Supplementary material

11367_2016_1049_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 16.5 kb)


  1. Borucke M, Moore D, Cranston G, Gracey K, Iha K, Larson J, Lazarus E, Morales JC, Wackernagel M, Galli A (2012) Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: The National Footprint Accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecol Indic 24:518–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carbon Trust (2012) Energy and carbon conversions. Accesed 05 March 2014
  3. Čuček L, Klemeš JJ, Kravanja Z (2012) A review of footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability. J Clean Prod 34:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. El Sol (2014) Profesores de la UTN organizan un sitio web para encontrar la huella ecológica. Accessed 19 March 2014
  5. Flysjö AJ (2011) Potential for improving the carbon footprint of butter and blend products. Dairy Sci 94(12):5833–5841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Foster C, Green K, Bleda M, Dewick P, Evans B, Flynn A, Mylan J (2006) Environmental impacts of foods production and consumption: a report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Manchester Business School, Defra, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Frank F, Montero G, Ricard F, Viglizzo E (2014) La huella de carbono en la agroindustria. Viglizzo E. (eds). 1st ed. Anguil, La Pampa, Argentina, INTA EditionsGoogle Scholar
  8. Franz J, Papyrakis E (2011) Online calculators of ecological footprint: do they promote or dissuade sustainable behaviour? Sustain Dev 19:391–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus HJ, Doka G, Dones R, Heck T, Hellweg S, Hischier R, Nemecek T, Rebitzer G, Spielmann M (2005) The ecoinvent database: overview and methodological framework. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galli A, Wiedmann T, Ercin E, Knoblauch D, Ewing B, Giljum S (2012) Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a “footprint family” of indicators: definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecol Ind 16:100–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gerbens-Leenes PW, Hoekstra AY, Van der Meer T (2009) The water footprint of energy from biomass: a quantitative assessment and consequences of an increasing share of bio-energy in energy supply. Ecol Econ 68(4):1052–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerbens-Leenes PW, Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2013) The water footprint of poultry, pork and beef: a comparative study in different countries and production systems. Water Resour Ind 1–2:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoekstra A, Chapagain A, Aldaya M, Mekonnen M (2011) The water footprint assessment manual. Setting the Global Standard. Earthscan, London,Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. ICAO (2015) ICAO carbon emissions calculator methodology. Version 8. Accessed 19 November 2015
  15. IPCC (2006) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, prepared by the national greenhouse gas inventories programme. IGES, Hayama, JapanGoogle Scholar
  16. Kanyama AC, Lindén AL (1999) Travel patterns and environmental effects now and in the future: implications of differences in energy consumption among socio-economic groups. Ecol Econ 30:405–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Killian B, Rivera L, Soto M, Navichoc D (2013) Carbon footprint across the coffee supply chain: the case of Costa Rican coffee. J Agric Sci Technol B 3:151–170Google Scholar
  18. Leiva Mas J, Rodríguez Rico I, Martínez Nodal P (2012) Cálculo de la huella ecológica en universidades cubanas. Caso de estudio: Universidad Central “Marta Abreu” de Las Villas. Afinidad LXVIII, 557, January-March 2012Google Scholar
  19. Lopez Alvarez N (2009) Metodología para el cálculo de la huella ecológica en universidades. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. Oficina de Desarrollo Sostenible. Accessed 05 September 2015Google Scholar
  20. Los Andes (2014) Un test permite calcular la huella hídrica de cada persona. Accessed 14 August 2014
  21. Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2010) The green, blue and grey water footprint of farm animals and animal products, Value of Water Research Report Series No. 48, UNESCO-IHE, Delft, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  22. Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2011) The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15(5):1577-1600Google Scholar
  23. Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2012) A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products. Ecosystems 15(3):401–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Niccolucci V, Rugani B, Botto S, Gaggi C (2010) An integrated footprint based aproach for environmental labelling of products: the case of drinking bottled water. Int J Des Nat Ecodyn 5(1):68–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Raj S, Goel S, Sharma M, Singh A (2012) Ecological footprint score in university students of an Indian city. J Environ Occup Sci 1(1):23–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rees WE (1992) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ Urban 4(2):121–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Solar VA (2011) Gender and natural resource consumption. Int J Environ Sci Dev 2:399–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo (2014) Profesores de la UTN organizan un sitio web para encontrar la huella ecológica. Accessed: 19 March 2014
  29. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional (2014) Calcular tu huella ecológica. Accessed 13 September 2014
  30. Vox populi (2014) Crean una página para calcular cuánto contamina cada persona. Accessed 06 March 2014
  31. Wackernagel M, Rees W (1998) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth (No. 9). New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, British Columbia, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  32. Wiedmann T, Minx J (2008) A Definition of ‘Carbon Footprint’. In: C. C. Pertsova, Ecological Economics Research Trends: Chapter 1, pp. 1--11, Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge NY, USA.
  33. World Tourism Organization (2013) UNWTO. Annual Report 2013. Accessed 10 February 2013Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alejandro Pablo Arena
    • 1
    • 2
  • Roxana Piastrellini
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Gabriela Nuri Barón
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bárbara María Civit
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Grupo CLIOPE-Universidad Tecnológica Nacional-Regional MendozaMendozaArgentina
  2. 2.Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas CONICET-CCT MendozaSan MartínArgentina

Personalised recommendations