A cascaded life cycle: reuse of electric vehicle lithium-ion battery packs in energy storage systems
- 2.7k Downloads
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery packs recovered from end-of-life electric vehicles (EV) present potential technological, economic and environmental opportunities for improving energy systems and material efficiency. Battery packs can be reused in stationary applications as part of a “smart grid”, for example to provide energy storage systems (ESS) for load leveling, residential or commercial power. Previous work on EV battery reuse has demonstrated technical viability and shown energy efficiency benefits in energy storage systems modeled under commercial scenarios. The current analysis performs a life cycle assessment (LCA) study on a Li-ion battery pack used in an EV and then reused in a stationary ESS.
A complex functional unit is used to combine energy delivered by the battery pack from the mobility function and the stationary ESS. Various scenarios of cascaded “EV mobility plus reuse in stationary clean electric power scenarios” are contrasted with “conventional system mobility with internal combustion engine vehicles plus natural gas peaking power.” Eight years are assumed for first use; with 10 years for reuse in the stationary application. Operational scenarios and environmental data are based on real time-of-day and time-of-year power use. Additional data from LCA databases are utilized. Ontario, Canada, is used as the geographic baseline; analysis includes sensitivity to the electricity mix and battery degradation. Seven environmental categories are assessed using ReCiPe.
Results and discussion
Results indicate that the manufacturing phase of the Li-ion battery will still dominate environmental impacts across the extended life cycle of the pack (first use in vehicle plus reuse in stationary application). For most impact categories, the cascaded use system appears significantly beneficial compared to the conventional system. By consuming clean energy sources for both use and reuse, global and local environmental stress reductions can be supported. Greenhouse gas advantages of vehicle electrification can be doubled by extending the life of the EV batteries, and enabling better use of off-peak low-cost clean electricity or intermittent renewable capacity. However, questions remain concerning implications of long-duration use of raw material resources employed before potential recycling.
Li-ion battery packs present opportunities for powering both mobility and stationary applications in the necessary transition to cleaner energy. Battery state-of-health is a considerable determinant in the life cycle performance of a Li-ion battery pack. The use of a complex functional unit was demonstrated in studying a component system with multiple uses in a cascaded application.
KeywordsElectric vehicle Energy storage systems (ESS) Life cycle assessment (LCA) Li-ion battery Resource efficiency Reuse Second use
The authors acknowledge support in this research from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Mitsui & Co. (Canada) Ltd., and Nuvation Engineering.
- Bennion K, Thornton M (2009) Fuel savings from hybrid electric vehicles fuel savings from hybrid electric vehicles. In: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, USGoogle Scholar
- Cicconi P, Landi D, Morbidoni A, Germani M (2012) Feasibility analysis of second life applications for Li-ion cells used in electric powertrain using environmental indicators. In: Energy Conference and Exhibition (ENERGYCON), 2012 I.E. International, pp 985–990Google Scholar
- Cready E, Lippert J, Pihl J, Weinstock I, Symons P, Jungst RG (2003) Final Report Technical and Economic Feasibility of Applying Used EV Batteries in Stationary Applications A Study for the DOE Energy Storage Systems ProgramGoogle Scholar
- Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H, Doka G, Dones R, Heck T, Spielmann M (2007) Overview and methodology. DubendorfGoogle Scholar
- Gaffney B, Walker SB, Fowler M, Young SB et al. (2014) FMEA and fault tree analysis for second use EV battery in a residence. 64th Canadian Society of Chemical Engineers Conference (CSCHe2014), pp 19–22 October, 2014, Niagara Falls, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Gaines L, Sullivan J, Burnham A, Belharouak I (2011) Life-cycle analysis for lithium-ion battery production and recycling. Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, pp 23–27Google Scholar
- Herrmann C, Raatz A, Mennenga M, Schmitt J, Andrew S (2012) assessment of automation potentials for the disassembly of automotive lithium ion battery systems. In: Leveraging Technology for a Sustainable World, pp 149–154Google Scholar
- Hischier R, Classen M, Lehmann M (2007) Life cycle inventories of electric and electronic equipment: production, use and disposal. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, St. Gallen/DubendorfGoogle Scholar
- IESO (2012a) Monthly Market Report December 2012. Mississauga, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- IESO (2012b, January 6) Composition of Ontario’s electricity mix continues to change: consumer response supports reliability. Independent electricity system operator. http://doi.org/613 -738-2646
- IESO (2013) Monthly Market Report June 2013 (Vol. 73). Toronto, Ontario, CA. Retrieved from http://www.ieso.ca/imoweb/pubs/marketReports/monthly/2013jun.pdf
- JRC (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD handbook). Retrieved from http://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/2014/01/ILCD-Handbook-LCIA-Background-analysis-online-12March2010.pdf
- Long RT, Kahn M, Mikolajczak C (2012). Lithium-ion battery hazards. Fire protection engineering. Retrieved from http://magazine.sfpe.org/content/lithium-ion-battery-hazards
- LTEP (2010) Building our clean energy future; Ontario’s long-term energy plan. Toronto, Ontario, CA. Retrieved from http://www.energy.gov.on.ca/docs/en/MEI_LTEP_en.pdf
- MacLean HL, Lave LB (2003) Life cycle assessment of automobile/fuel options. Env Sci & Tech, 37(23), 5445–52. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14700331
- Mikolajczak C, Kahn M, White K, Long RT (2011) Lithium-ion batteries hazard and use assessment. Springer. http://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-1-4614-3486-3
- Saha B, Goebel K (2009) Modeling Li-ion battery capacity depletion in a particle filtering framework. In: Annual Conference of the PHM Society, San Diego, CA, pp 1–10Google Scholar
- Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Miller HL (2007) Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
- Van Lanen D, Cocking J, Walker SB, Fowler M, Fraser R, Young SB, Yip A (2015) Economic and environmental analysis of a green energy hub with energy storage under fixed and variable pricing structures. Int J Process Systems EnginGoogle Scholar
- Wang X, Gaustad G, Babbitt C, Bailey C, Ganter M, Landi B (2014) Economic and environmental characterization of an evolving Li-ion battery waste stream. Environ Manag 135:126–134Google Scholar
- Wolfs P (2010) An economic assessment of “ second use ” lithium-ion batteries for grid support. In: AUPECGoogle Scholar