Advertisement

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

, Volume 20, Issue 10, pp 1429–1443 | Cite as

Life cycle assessment of a plastic air intake manifold

  • Massimo Delogu
  • Francesco Del Pero
  • Filippo Romoli
  • Marco Pierini
LCA FOR MACHINES

Abstract

Purpose

Nowadays, some engine components subjected to mechanical stress and high temperature are made of thermoplastic materials. The air intake manifold (AIM) is one of these parts. In the past, AIM was made of aluminium or magnesium alloy, while today, engine manufacturers prefer to use lighter materials such as nylon reinforced with glass fibre. The scope of this work is to assess from an environmental point of view the adoption of two alternative thermoplastic materials (polyamide reinforced with 30 % of glass fibre and polypropylene reinforced with 35 % of glass fibre) for the construction of a Magneti Marelli® AIM and the introduction in the production stage of new additional design solutions (scraps recycling and brass inserts elimination). The outcome of the paper would contribute both to establish a baseline for comparison with other composite AIMs and to improve the knowledge of materials and manufacturing technologies related to the product.

Methods

The study has been performed applying the LCA methods as described in the ISO standards 14040 and 14044. The life cycle inventory (LCI) captures the whole AIM life-cycle (LC) subdivided in four stages: materials supply, production, use and end-of-life (EoL). For the LCI data collection, primary data have been provided by the AIM manufacturer, while available databases have been used as source for secondary data. Unlike previous LCAs regarding AIM, the environmental profile is assessed through a broader range of life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) impact categories as provided by the CML 2001 framework in its November 2010 release.

Results and discussion

The results show that for both the polyamide composite and the polypropylene composite, the AIM the most influential LC stages are use and materials supply. Such outcome is due to the considerable quantity of fuel consumed during the whole LC and the energy/resources consumption involved by the raw materials extraction and production processes. The substitution of polyamide composite with polypropylene composite reduces the potential environmental impacts for all the categories and for each stage of the AIM LC. Contribution analysis by LC stage of potential environmental impact evidences that the change of material involves a remarkable increase of the use stage quota with no notable mutation of production and EoL contributions. The introduction of scraps recycling and brass inserts elimination entails no significant impact reduction for all the categories with the only exception of abiotic depletion potential (ADPe).

Conclusions

The substitution of polyamide composite with polypropylene composite involves considerable reduction of the AIM LC impact, while the introduction of scraps recycling and brass inserts elimination entails negligible effects.

Keywords

Air intake manifold Eco design Energy consumption Life cycle assessment Potential environmental impact Vehicle 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Magneti Marelli S.p.A. for the cooperation. In particular, the authors are very grateful to Mrs. Rubina Riccomagno and Mr. Marco Brizigotti for the fruitful contributions.

Supplementary material

11367_2015_946_MOESM1_ESM.docx (850 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 850 kb)

References

  1. Bates P, Mah J, Zou X, Wang C, Baylis B (2004) Vibration welding air intake manifolds from reinforced nylon 66, nylon 6 and polypropylene. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 35:1107–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Battistoni M, Pispola G, Grimaldi CN, Mattogno G, Bellato N (2006) Dependence of NVH Performance of Plastic Air Intake Manifolds on the Structural Design (SAE Technical Paper No. 2006-01-0705). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauhof MJ, Castle KJ (1993) Design of an EGR Interface for Thermoplastic Intake Manifolds (SAE Technical Paper No. 930086). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  4. Berzi L, Delogu M, Giorgetti A, Pierini M (2013) On-field investigation and process modelling of End-of-Life Vehicles treatment in the context of Italian craft-type Authorized Treatment Facilities. Waste Manag 33(4):892–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Capitani R, Pierini M, Massimo S (1998) Definition and validation of a methodology industrially usable to analyse the dynamic behaviour of a car engine component made in plastic, in: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, ISMA, pp 639–646Google Scholar
  6. Capitani R, Pierini M, Massimo S (2000) Method for conducting validation testing on polyamide engine components. Shock Vib Dig 32:23Google Scholar
  7. Capitani R, Delogu M, Orofino L (2003) Vehicle consumption evaluation using simulation models reproducing gear management strategies. ASME 116(1):25–32Google Scholar
  8. Cappelli F, Delogu M, Pierini M, Schiavone F (2007) Design for disassembly: a methodology for identifying the optimal disassembly sequence. J Eng Des 18(6):563–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlson E, Nelson K (2003) Nylon under the hood: a history of innovationGoogle Scholar
  10. Caskey J, Daly P (1998) Effects of Rapid Strain Rates in Plastic Intake Manifolds (SAE Technical Paper No. 980729). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  11. Cossu R, Fiore S, Lai T, Luciano A, Mancini G, Ruffino B, Viotti P, Zanetti MC (2014) Review of Italian experience on automotive shredder residue characterization and management. Waste Manag 34(10):1752–1762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Defosse M (2009) Plastics in automotive design: heavy emphasis on weight reduction. Mod Plast Worldw 86:92–93Google Scholar
  13. Del Pero F, Delogu M, Pierini M, Bonaffini D (2015) Life Cycle Assessment of a heavy metro train. J Clean Prod 87(1):787–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dimeo A, Alegre G, Modeo G, Bellato N, Moura T (2012) Plastic Intake Manifold Influence on the NVH Performance in PFI Engine (SAE Technical Paper No. 2012-36-0615). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  15. Directive 2000/53/EC (2005) on end-of-life vehicles European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  16. Edwards K, Daly P (1999) Plastic Intake Manifolds - Geometric Growth for 7 Years (SAE Technical Paper No. 1999-01-0315). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  17. Finkbeiner M, Hoffmann R (2006) Application of Life Cycle Assessment for the Environmental Certificate of the Mercedes-Benz S-Class. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:240–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hickman GF, Schumacher D (2005) Polyamide Intake Manifold Shell Bonding (SAE Technical Paper No. 2005-01-1518). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  19. Hiederer R (2011) European Commission., Joint Research Centre., Institute for Environment and Sustainability. International reference life cycle data system (ILCD) handbook: general guide for life cycle assessment: provisions and action steps. Publications Office, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  20. Hu K, Lee C, Homsi E, Moenssen D (2003) Acoustic Modeling and Radiated Noise Prediction for Plastic Air-Intake Manifolds (SAE Technical Paper No. 2003-01-1448). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kar K, Keoleian GA (1996) Application of Life Cycle Design to Aluminum Intake Manifolds (SAE Technical Paper No. 960410). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  22. Keoleian GA, Kar K (1999) Life Cycle Design of Air Intake Manifolds: Phase I, 2.0 L Ford Contour Air Intake Manifold. Environmental Protection Agency, National Risk Management Research LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  23. Keoleian GA, Kar K (2003) Elucidating complex design and management tradeoffs through life cycle design: air intake manifold demonstration project. J Clean Prod 11:61–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klein J, Wiese J (2011) High performance engineered polypropylene compounds for high temperature automotive under-the-hood applications. Presented at the Society of Plastics Engineers - 11th-Annual Automotive Composites Conference and Exhibition, ACCE 2011Google Scholar
  25. Koffler C (2013) Life cycle assessment of automotive lightweighting through polymers under US boundary conditions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:538–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koffler C, Rodhe-Branderburger K (2010) On the calculation of fuel savings through lightweight design in automotive life cycle assessments. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(1):128–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kondapalli PS, Sirani V (2000) General Guidelines for Improving Burst Pressure Strength of Welded Nylon Air Intake Manifolds (SAE Technical Paper No. 2000-01-0040). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  28. Kraft WW (2000) The Reduction of Air-Rush Noise in Plastic Engine Intake Manifolds (SAE Technical Paper No. 2000-01-0044). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kraft WW, Sattler E, Abboud I (1995) Noise Attenuation for Polyamide Intake Manifold (SAE Technical Paper No. 950232). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee K-H (1998) A Study on the Influence of Plastic Intake Manifold on the Performance and NVH of In-line 4 Cylinder Gasoline Engine (SAE Technical Paper No. 980728). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee CS, Kagan V, Knowlden N, Kim KW, Kim H-D (1998) Optimization of Vibration Weld Joint Strength for Plastic Air Intake Manifold (SAE Technical Paper No. 980730). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  32. Mallick PK, Daly P (2000) Investigation of Thermoforming as a Method of Manufacturing Plastic Air Intake Manifolds (SAE Technical Paper No. 2000-01-0045). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  33. Mathew BA, Wiebeck H (1999) Automotive Air Intake Manifold Application using Nylon 6,6 Composite Material (SAE Technical Paper No. 1999-01-3011). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  34. Mukawa T, Goto Y, Sekine N, Ikeda Y (1996) Development of a plastic intake manifold. JSAE Rev 17:51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nelson KW (1995) Vibration welding: a low cost assembly process for thermoplastic intake manifolds (SAE Technical Paper No. 950230). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  36. Novak C, Gaspar R, Fletcher S, Daly P (2001) Development of a Plastic Manifold Noise Syntheses Technique (SAE Technical Paper No. 2001-01-1144). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  37. Paffrath H, Alex M, Hummel K-E (1999) Technology for Future Air Intake Systems (SAE Technical Paper No. 1999-01-0266). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  38. Palmer RJ, Norrey C, Hayashi R, Tres D (1996) Meeting Present and Future Global Materials Requirements for Nylon Air Intake Manifolds (SAE Technical Paper No. 960144). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  39. PlasticsEurope (2010) Plastics - the Facts 2010 - An analysis of European plastics production. demand and recovery for 2009Google Scholar
  40. Pricken F (1999) Top Acoustic of Plastic Air Intake Manifolds (SAE Technical Paper No. 1999-01-0319). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  41. Querini F, Béziat J-C, Morel S, Boch V, Rousseaux P (2011) Life cycle assessment of automotive fuels: critical analysis and recommendations on the emissions inventory in the tank to wheels stage. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:454–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schramm JG (1992) Design Considerations for the Use of Composite Materials in Intake Manifolds and Fuel Rails (SAE Technical Paper No. 922149). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  43. Schuckert M, Dekorsy T, Pfleiderer I, Eyerer P (1993) Developing a Comprehensive Balance of an Automobile Air Intake Manifold. Kunststoffe Ger Plast 83:16–19Google Scholar
  44. Siavoshani S, Stickler M, Nehme H, Krajewski B (2001) Analytical and Experimental Techniques in Solving the Plastic Intake Manifold NVH (SAE Technical Paper No. 2001-01-1544). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  45. Sievewright GP (1998) Noise Optimisation of Plastic Air Intake Manifolds (SAE Technical Paper No. 980273). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  46. Sievewright G (2000) Air Flow Noise of Plastic Air Intake Manifolds (SAE Technical Paper No. 2000-01-0028). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  47. Spitzley DV, Keoleian GA (2001) Life cycle design of air intake manifolds, phase II: lower plenum of the 5.4 L F-250 air intake manifold, including recycling scenarios. United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-01/059Google Scholar
  48. Stasinopoulos P, Compston P, Newell B, Jones HM (2011) A system dynamics approach in LCA to account for temporal effects—a consequential energy LCI of car body-in-whites. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tanaka H, Kitagawa S (2007) Development of a Plastic Intake Manifold with CAE (SAE Technical Paper No. 2007-01-3549). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  50. Tchertchian N, Yvars P-A, Millet D (2013) Benefits and limits of a Constraint Satisfaction Problem/Life Cycle Assessment approach for the ecodesign of complex systems: a case applied to a hybrid passenger ferry. J Clean Prod 42:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thatcher R, Storr P, Green P (1992) Plastic intake manifold. Mater Des 13:353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Timmis AJ, Hodzic A, Koh L, Bonner M, Soutis C, Schäfer AW, Dray L (2014) Environmental impact assessment of aviation emission reduction through the implementation of composite materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Todd F, Pascoe G (1987) The production of hollow plastics components (SAE Technical Paper No. 870539). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  54. University of Leiden (2001) Centre for Environmental Studies (CML) [WWW Document]. URL http://www.cml.leiden.edu/ (accessed 1.28.14)
  55. Villalva S, Alegre G, Moura T, Windlin F, Savioli A, Motta P (2012) Air intake manifolds manufactured with chemically recycled material achieve a reduction of CO2 emissions and costs saving with similar mechanical resistance (SAE Technical Paper No. 2012-36-0368). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  56. Wehr D, Huurdeman B, Spennemann A (2002) EGR—a challenge for modern plastic intake manifolds (SAE Technical Paper No. 2002-01-0902). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  57. Yamaguchi S (2000) Development of plastic intake manifold by DRI process (SAE Technical Paper No. 2000-01-0041). SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  58. Zucchelli A, Curioni S, Lanzellotto T, Minak G (2009) Bursting Tests of a short fiber reinforced composite air intake manifold. Presented at the ICCM-17 17th International Conference on Composite Materials, Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Massimo Delogu
    • 1
  • Francesco Del Pero
    • 1
  • Filippo Romoli
    • 1
  • Marco Pierini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial Engineering (DIEF)University of FlorenceFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations