Second life of electric vehicle batteries: relation between materials degradation and environmental impact

  • Lluc Canals Casals
  • Beatriz Amante García
  • Frédéric Aguesse
  • Amaia Iturrondobeitia
ASSESSING AND MANAGING LIFE CYCLES OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES

Abstract

Purpose

Nowadays, the electric vehicle is one of the most promising alternatives for sustainable transportation. However, the battery, which is one of the most important components, is the main contributor to environmental impact and faces recycling issues. In order to reduce the carbon footprint and to minimize the overall recycling processes, this paper introduces the concept of re-use of electric vehicle batteries, analyzing some possible second-life applications.

Methods

First, the boundaries of the life cycle assessment of an electric vehicle are defined, considering the use of the battery in a second-life application. To perform the study, we present eight different scenarios for the second-life application. For each case, the energy, the efficiency, and the lifetime of the battery are calculated. Additionally, and based on the global warming potential, the environmental impact of the electric vehicle and its battery on a second-life application is determined for each scenario. Finally, an environmentally focused discussion on battery electrodes and research trends is presented.

Results and discussion

For the selected scenarios, the second life of the battery varies from 8 to 20 years depending on the application and the requirements. It has been observed that the batteries connected to the electricity grid for energy arbitrage storage have the highest impact per provided kilowatt hour. On the contrary, the environmental benefit comes from applications working with renewable energy sources and presenting a longer lifetime. We pointed out that a correlation between cycling conditions and degradation mechanisms of the electrode materials is compulsory for proper use of the electric vehicle battery in a second-life application.

Conclusions

To limit the environmental impact, batteries should be associated with renewable energy sources in stationary applications. However, it is more profitable to re-use Li-ion batteries than to use new lead-acid batteries. Although many batteries applied for electric vehicles use graphite-based anodes, the latter may not be the most suitable for the second-life application. A better understanding of Li-ion battery degradation during the second-life application is required for the different existing chemistries.

Keywords

Degradation mechanisms Electric vehicle Environmental cost Li-ion battery Second life 

Notes

Acknowledgments

A.I. and F.A. are supported by the European Community’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 608931 through the MAT4BAT project (http://mat4bat.eu/). We would like to thank the UPC for the opportunity to do research in these fields.

References

  1. 4r-energy (2013) http://www.4r-energy.com/en/company/. Accessed 13 Feb 2014
  2. Agubra V, Fergus J (2013) Lithium ion battery anode aging mechanisms. Mater (Basel) 6:1310–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrew B (2009) Performance, charging and second use considerations for lithium batteries for plug-in electric vehicles. Electr Storage Assoc Meet Sess Transp GridGoogle Scholar
  4. Armand M, Tarascon J-M (2008) Building better batteries. Nature 451:652–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloom I, Jones SA, Battaglia VS et al (2003) Effect of cathode composition on capacity fade, impedance rise and power fade in high-power, lithium-ion cells. J Power Sources 124:538–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley TH, Frank AA (2009) Design, demonstrations and sustainability impact assessments for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13:115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campanari S, Manzolini G, Garcia de la Iglesia F (2009) Energy analysis of electric vehicles using batteries or fuel cells through well-to-wheel driving cycle simulations. J Power Sources 186:464–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Casals LC, García BA (2014) A review of the complexities of applying second life electric car batteries on energy businesses. Energy Syst. Conf.Google Scholar
  9. Casals LC, Benítez MG, Amante García B (2014) A cost analysis of electric vehicle battery second life businesses. XVIII Int Congr Proj Manag Eng Alcañiz, 0946–0958Google Scholar
  10. Chen CH, Liu J, Stoll ME et al (2004) Aluminum-doped lithium nickel cobalt oxide electrodes for high-power lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 128:278–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ciccioni P, Landi D, Alessandro Morbidoni, Germani M (2012) Feasibility analysis of second life applications for li-ion cells used in electric powertrain using environmental indicators. 2nd IEEE ENERGYCON Conf. Exhib Sustain Transp Syst Symp Florence, 985–990Google Scholar
  12. Cready E, Lippert J, Pihl J et al. (2003) Technical and economic feasibility of applying used EV batteries in stationary applications a study for the doe energy storage systems programGoogle Scholar
  13. David WIF, Bruce PG, Goodenough JB (1983) Lithium insertion into manganese spinels. Mater Res Bull 18:461–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delaille A, Grolleau S, Duclaud F (2013) SIMCAL Project: calendar aging results obtained on a panel of 6 commercial Li-ion cells. Electrochem Energy Summit l’Electrochem SocGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunn B, Kamath H, Tarascon J-M (2011) Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices. Science 334:928–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ecker M, Gerschler JB, Vogel J et al (2012) Development of a lifetime prediction model for lithium-ion batteries based on extended accelerated aging test data. J Power Sources 215:248–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eiber U, Grassmann F (2012) Annual activity report. doi:10.1021/ie900953z.http
  18. Genikomakis KN, Ioakimidis CS, Murillo A et al. (2013) A life cycle assessment of a Li-ion urban electric vehicle battery. Parameters settings for EVS27 International battery, hybrid and fuel cell electric vehicle symposium. Barcelona, 1–11Google Scholar
  19. Goodenough JB, Kim Y (2010) Challenges for rechargeable Li batteries. Chem Mater 22:587–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guo F, Li H, Yao C et al. (2014) Residential usage profile optimization and experimental implementation of the retired HEV battery with a hybrid microgrid testbed. Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2014 IEEE, 428–435Google Scholar
  21. Han X, Ouyang M, Lu L, Li J (2014) Cycle life of commercial lithium-ion batteries with lithium titanium oxide anodes in electric vehicles. Energies 7:4895–4909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hawkins TR, Gausen OM, Strømman AH (2012) Environmental impacts of hybrid and electric vehicles—a review. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:997–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Held M, Baumann M (2011) Assessment of the environmental impacts of electric vehicle concepts. Towar Life Cycle Sustain Manag, 535–546Google Scholar
  24. Helms H, Pehnt M, Lambrecht U, Liebich A (2010) Electric vehicle and plug-in hybrid energy efficiency and life cycle emissions. Transp Air Pollut 18th Int Symp, 113–124Google Scholar
  25. Heymans C, Walker SB, Young SB, Fowler M (2014) Economic analysis of second use electric vehicle batteries for residential energy storage and load-levelling. Energy Policy 71:22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hu M, Pang X, Zhou Z (2013) Recent progress in high-voltage lithium ion batteries. J Power Sources 237:229–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leijen P (2014) Real world battery diagnostics model based and prius case study. IEEE 23rd Int Symp Industrial Electron, 2457–2462Google Scholar
  28. Lu L, Han X, Li J et al (2013) A review on the key issues for lithium-ion battery management in electric vehicles. J Power Sources 226:272–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maini C, Gopal K, Prakash R (2013) Making of an “all reason” electric vehicle. 2013 World Electr Veh Symp Exhib 1–4. doi:10.1109/EVS.2013.6915015
  30. Mateyshina YG, Uvarov NF (2011) Electrochemical behavior of Li3−xM′xV2−yM″y(PO4)3 (M′=K, M″=Sc, Mg+Ti)/C composite cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 196:1494–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matheys J, Van Autenboer W, Timmermans J et al (2007) Influence of functional unit on the life cycle assessment of traction batteries. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:191–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ohzuku T, Makimura Y (2001) Layered lithium insertion material of LiCo1/3Ni1/3Mn1/3O2 for lithium-ion batteries. Chem Lett 30:642–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ohzuku T, Ueda A, Yamamota N (1995) Zero-strain insertion material of Li[Li[sub 1∕3]Ti[sub 5∕3]]O[sub 4] for rechargeable lithium cells. J Electrochem Soc 142:1431–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Padhi AK, Nanjundaswamy KS, Goodenough JB (1997) Phospho-olivines as positive-electrode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. J Electrochem SocGoogle Scholar
  35. Patterson J, Alexander M, Gurr A, Greenwood D (2011) Preparing for a life cycle CO2 measureGoogle Scholar
  36. Rastler D (2010) Electricity energy storage technology optionsGoogle Scholar
  37. Sarasketa-Zabala E, Aguesse F, Villarreal I et al (2015) Understanding lithium inventory loss and sudden performance fade in cylindrical cells during cycling with deep discharge steps. J Phys Chem C 119:896–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schmalstieg J, Käbitz S, Ecker M, Sauer DU (2014) A holistic aging model for Li(NiMnCo)O2 based 18650 lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 257:325–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scrosati B, Garche J (2010) Lithium batteries: status, prospects and future. J Power Sources 195:2419–2430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shizuka K, Kobayashi T, Okahara K et al (2005) Characterization of Li1+yNixCo1−2xMnxO2 positive active materials for lithium ion batteries. J Power Sources 146:589–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Teodorescu R, Sauer DU, Rodriguez P et al (2013) Industrial / PhD course storage systems based on electrochemical batteries for grid support applications. Aalborg University, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  42. Thackeray MM (1995) Lithiated oxides for lithium ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc 142:2558–2563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thackeray MM, Johnson CS, Vaughey JT et al (2005) Advances in manganese-oxide “composite” electrodes for lithium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem 15:2257–2267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van den Bossche P, Vergels F, Van Mierlo J et al (2006) SUBAT: an assessment of sustainable battery technology. J Power Sources 162:913–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vroey L De, Jahn R, Baghdadi M El, Mierlo J Van (2013) Plug-to-wheel energy balance—results of a two years experience behind the wheel of electric vehicles. Electr Veh Symp EVS 27. Barcelona, 1–5Google Scholar
  46. Wang X, Adelmann P, Reindl T (2012) Use of LiFePO4 batteries in stand-alone solar system. Energy Procedia 25:135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Whittingham MS (2004) Lithium batteries and cathode materials. Chem Rev 104:4271–4301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Whittingham MS, Savinell RF, Zawodzinski T (2004) Batteries and fuel cells. Am Chem Soc 104:297–309Google Scholar
  49. Wood E, Alexander M, Bradley TH (2011) Investigation of battery end-of-life conditions for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. J Power Sources 196:5147–5154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Xia Y (1996) An investigation of lithium ion insertion into spinel structure Li-Mn-O compounds. J Electrochem Soc 143:825–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Xia Y (1997) Capacity fading on cycling of 4 V Li∕LiMn[sub 2]O[sub 4] cells. J Electrochem Soc 144:2593–2600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yan J, Yuan W, Xie H et al (2012) Novel self-catalyzed sol–gel synthesis of high-rate cathode Li3V2(PO4)3/C for lithium ion batteries. Mater Lett 71:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yan J, Liu X, Li B (2014) Recent progress in Li-rich layered oxides as cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. RSC Adv 4:63268–63284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zaghib K, Simoneau M, Armand M, Gauthier M (1999) Electrochemical study of Li4Ti5O12 as negative electrode for Li-ion polymer rechargeable batteries. J Power Sources 81–82:300–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lluc Canals Casals
    • 1
  • Beatriz Amante García
    • 1
  • Frédéric Aguesse
    • 2
  • Amaia Iturrondobeitia
    • 2
  1. 1.ETSEIATUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)TerrassaSpain
  2. 2.CIC-energigune (CIC)MiñanoSpain

Personalised recommendations