Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

NativeLCA - a systematic approach for the selection of environmental datasets as generic data: application to construction products in a national context

  • 588 Accesses

  • 31 Citations



The aim of this paper is to propose guidelines for the selection of an accurate life cycle assessment (LCA) dataset of building products to be used as generic data for a national context.


The guidelines are structured within a methodology, called NativeLCA. First, a review of available datasets for construction products is presented such as generic LCA and Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) databases for both national (e.g. France, Germany, Spain etc.) and European context. Secondly, a method is proposed to choose appropriate generic datasets by means of a hybrid methodology. A meta-analysis is conducted in the first step on the sample of collected datasets from the literature. When relevant, product-specific data (EPD of the different producers) are averaged to represent an average data or existing generic data are adapted to be more suitable for the context. Then, a data quality assessment enables to rank the different datasets according to the goal and scope of the study.

Results and discussion

This study provides consistent guidelines that can be used by building LCA practitioners to select relevant datasets depending on their goal and scope. A full case study for stone wool boards illustrates and demonstrates the applicability and usefulness of the proposed methodology, namely in the selection of a coherent dataset as generic data for a national context. This work highlights the issues in terms of choice and adaptation of existing data for a national context. Industry data cannot be adapted due to confidentiality issues unlike unit process generic data. The use of data quality indicators then helps to select the relevant generic data for each context according to user needs.


While further efforts are needed to develop regional and sector-specific LCA databases adapted for each national context, the proposed guidelines showed that the current use or adaptation of existing data, if consistently done, can lead practitioners to increase the reliability of building LCA studies according to their goal and scope definition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9


  1. 1.

    A specific EPD consistent in terms of methodological rules may be far from representing the production volume of the product sold in the national market. This particularity needs to be documented in the data quality aspects before being assessed (see Sect. 3.3).

  2. 2.

    Neither existing nor on-going site-specific data from national LCA studies will be subjected to this checking because: they will not be used in the calculation of reference values; they will only be compared with the remaining datasets in the last step of this methodology.


  1. AFNOR (2004) Qualité environnementale des produits de construction. NF P01-010. AFNOR, France

  2. Baitz M, Albrecht S, Brauner E, Broadbent C, Castellan G, Conrath P, Fava J, Finkbeiner M, Fischer M, Fullana i Palmer P, Krinke S, Leroy C, Loebel O, McKeown P, Mersiowsky I, Möginger B, Pfaadt M, Rebitzer G, Rother E, Ruhland K, Schanssema A, Tikana L (2012) LCA’s theory and practice: like ebony and ivory living in perfect harmony? Editorial. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(6):1–9

  3. Barozzi B, Breedveld L, Dotta S, Meroni I, Moro A, Peuportier B, Principi P (2009) Development of an Italian LCA database of building materials: regionalising existing LCI data for the Italian situation. Paper presented at the Regionalisation in LCA—39th LCA forum, Zurich, Switzerland

  4. Biemann K, Recchioni M, Mathieux F (2013) Data quality assessment of LCI datasets—a systematic approach to integrate different user requirements. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Life Cycle Management, Gothenburg, 25–28 August 2013

  5. Bourgault G, Durme GV, Lesage P (2010) Quebec life cycle database project. Paper presented at the Life Cycle Assessment X Conference—Bridging Science, Policy and the Public, Portland, USA, November

  6. CEN (2010) Sustainability of construction works—environmental product declarations—methodology for selection and use of generic data. TR 15941. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels, Belgium

  7. CEN (2011) Sustainability of construction works—assessment of environmental performance of buildings—calculation method. FprEN 15978. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels, Belgium

  8. CEN (2012) Sustainability of construction works—environmental product declarations—core rules for the product category of construction products. EN 15804. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels, Belgium

  9. CIB (1999) Agenda 21 on sustainable construction. Conseil International du Bâtiment, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

  10. Colodel CM, Sedlbauer K, Eyerer P, Kranert M (2010) Systematic approach for the estimation of country-specific product eco-profile using the Portland cement as example (in German). Bauphysik 32(4):233–239

  11. de Eicker MO, Hischier R, Hurni H, Zah R (2010a) Using non-local databases for the environmental assessment of industrial activities: the case of Latin America. Environ Impact Asses 30(3):145–157

  12. de Eicker MO, Hischier R, Kulay LA, Lehmann M, Zah R, Hurni H (2010b) The applicability of non-local LCI data for LCA. Environ Impact Asses 30(3):192–199

  13. DGNB (2011) Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen (DGNB e.V.) certification system. Paper presented at the Presentation of the DGNB Certification System for Sustainable Buildings, Barcelona, Spain

  14. EarthShift (2012) Adaptation of Ecoinvent database for US conditions www.earthshift.com/software/simapro/USEI-database. Accessed 2012-11-26

  15. EC-JRC (2011) International Reference life cycle data system (ILCD) handbook. General guide for life cycle impact assessment—detailed guidance. 1st ed. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

  16. European Commission (2006) Environmental Impact of Products. (EIPRO). Analysis of the life cycle environmental impacts related to the final consumption of the EU-25. European Commission

  17. European Commission (2008) Commission staff working document—accompanying document to the proposal for a recast of the energy performance of buildings directive (2002/91/EC)—summary of the impact assessment. vol COM (2008) 780 final. European Commission

  18. European Commission (2012) Product environmental footprint guide—Joint Research Centre (JRC) Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES). Ispra, Italy, p 160

  19. Ecoinvent (2012) Ecoinvent LCA database. www.ecoinvent.ch. Accessed 2012-04-26

  20. EeBGuide (2012) European project EeBGuide—operational guidance for life cycle assessment studies of the energy efficient buildings initiative. www.eebguide.eu. Accessed 2012-11-26

  21. Gomès F, Brière R, Feraille A, Habert G, Lasvaux S, Tessier C (2013) Adaptation of environmental data to national and sectorial context: application for reinforcing steel sold on the French market. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(5):926–938

  22. Hodková J, Lasvaux S (2012) Towards a methodology to determine generic LCA data on building materials for a national context. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Symposium on Life Cycle Assessment and Construction, Nantes, France

  23. Hodková J, Lupíšek A, Mančík Š, Vochoc L, Žďára T (2012) National platform for LCA data on building elements in the context of the Czech Republic. Int J Sustain Build Technol Urban Dev 3(4):277–284

  24. ISO (2006a) Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework. ISO 14040:2006(E). International Organization for Standardization

  25. ISO (2006b) Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044:2006(E).International Organization for Standardization

  26. Lasvaux S, Ventura A, Habert G, De La Roche C, Hermel K, Féraille A, Tardivel Y, Tessier C (2014a) Linking research activities and their implementation in practice in the construction sector: the LCA Construction 2012 experience. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(2):463–470

  27. Lasvaux S, Gantner J, Wittstock B, Bazzana M, Schiopu N, Saunders T, Gazulla C, Mundy J-A, Sjöström C, Fullana-i-Palmer P, Barrow-Williams T, Braune A, Anderson J, Lenz K, Takacs Z, Hans J, Chevalier J (2014b) Achieving consistency in life cycle assessment practice within the European construction sector: the role of the EeBGuide InfoHub. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(11):1783–1793

  28. May J, Brennan D (2003) Application of data quality assessment methods to an LCA of electricity generation. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(4):215–225

  29. Nebel B, Alcorn A, Wittstock B (2011) Life cycle assessment: adopting and adapting overseas LCA data and methodologies for building materials in New Zealand. SCION for Ministry of Agriculture and. Forestry, New Zealand

  30. Ortiz O, Castells F, Sonnemann G (2009) Sustainability in the construction industry: a review of recent developments based on LCA. Constr Build Mater 23(1):28–39

  31. Padey P, Blanc I, Beloin Saint Pierre D, Girard R, Le Boulch (2012) Understanding LCA results variability: developing global sensitivity analysis with Sobol indices: A first application to photovoltaic systems, proceedings CSTB / IFSTTAR conference , Nantes, France

  32. Peuportier B, Herfray G, Malmqvist T, Zabalza I, Staller H, Tritthart W, Wetzel C, Szalay Z (2011) Life cycle assessment methodologies in the construction sector: the contribution of the European LORE-LCA project. Paper presented at the SB11 Helsinki: World Sustainable Building Conference, Helsinki, Finland

  33. Silvestre JD (2012) Life cycle assessment “from cradle to cradle” of building assemblies—application to external walls. PhD in Civil Engineering, Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal

  34. UNEP (2007) Buildings and climate change: status, challenges and opportunities. United Nations Environment Programme, New York, USA

  35. Weidema B, Wesnes M (1996) Data quality management for life cycle inventories—an example of using data quality indicators. J Clean Prod 4(3–4):167–174

  36. Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R, Mutel C, Nemecek T, Reinhard J, Vadenbo CO, Wernet G (2013) Overview and methodology. Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. Ecoinvent Report 1 (v3). St. Gallen: The ecoinvent Centre

  37. Wang E, Shen Z (2013) A hybrid data quality indicator and statistical method for improving uncertainty analysis in LCA of complex system—application to the whole-building embodied energy analysis. J Clean Prod 43:166–173

  38. Whitaker M, Heath G.A., O’Donoughue P, Vorum M. (2012) Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Coal - Fired Electricity Generation. Journal of Industrial Ecology 16, S53 – S72

  39. Zamagni A, Masoni P, Buttol P, Raggi A, Buonamici R (2012) Finding Life Cycle Assessment Research Direction with the Aid of Meta - Analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 16 , S39 – S52

  40. Zumsteg JM, Cooper JS, Noon MS (2012) Systematic Review Checklist. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16 , S12 – S21

Download references


The authors gratefully acknowledge the scholarship of Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia of Portugal (FCT) to support the PhD study of the first author and the financial support of the ICIST Research Institute, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal, the Scientific and Technical Centre for Buildings (CSTB), France, and of the European Union, OP RDI project No. CZ.1.05/3.1.00/13.0283—Intelligent Buildings. The authors also acknowledge the reviewers for their expert comments and suggestions, and Yann Leroy for fruitful feedbacks, which contributed to the improvement of this paper.

Author information

Correspondence to José Dinis Silvestre.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Göran Finnveden

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.


(DOCX 91 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silvestre, J.D., Lasvaux, S., Hodková, J. et al. NativeLCA - a systematic approach for the selection of environmental datasets as generic data: application to construction products in a national context. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20, 731–750 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0885-8

Download citation


  • Building products
  • Data quality
  • EPD
  • Generic data
  • LCA