The legitimacy of life cycle assessment in the waste management sector
- 572 Downloads
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is commonly presented as a tool for rational decision-making. It has been increasingly used to support decision-making in situations where multiple actors possess diverse, and sometimes conflicting, perspectives, values and motives. Yet, little effort has been placed on understanding LCA in a social framework of action. This paper aims to analyse the legitimacy of LCA in public sector decision-making situations, the criticisms presented against LCA, and suggest potential ways to alleviate these criticisms.
This study consists of a case study of the application of LCA in the waste management sector in England and France. To gain an understanding of the justification and criticism of LCA, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with national and local level waste management actors. The justifications and criticism of the application of LCA was analysed through an analytical framework, the economies of worth. This suggests that in situations of disagreement, actors’ justifications are required to show their attachment to plural forms of common good. This work analyses the orders of worth in which justifications and criticisms of the application of LCA were based.
Results and discussion
LCA is applied primarily as a test of environmental efficiency, illustrating a collaboration between the industrial and green orders of worth. Actors apply LCA with the aspiration of replicating the scientific method and producing robust evidence to support the most efficient waste treatment option. In this case, efficiency is coupled with the green order of worth, where gains in efficiency mean lower environmental impacts. Internal criticisms of LCA, based in the industrial order of worth, highlights the limitations of LCA to act as a test of environmental efficiency. Furthermore, criticism based in the civic order of worth highlights the friction which arises in decision-making situations when LCA has been seen to subjugate the civic nature of waste management decisions.
One potential way forward for LCA may be to introduce aspects relevant in the civic order of worth which aims at achieving a compromise between the industrial and civic orders of worth. Envisioning LCA as a process-oriented tool, as opposed to an outcome-oriented tool, can allow for aspects on public involvement in the LCA process, thereby increasing its civic legitimacy.
KeywordsEnvironmental efficiency Justification Legitimacy Life cycle assessment Orders of worth Waste management
I would like to thank Nicolas Buclet for his insightful comments, Maëlle Quandalle-Ranoux for her contribution in developing interview guides and conducting interviews in France, and Karoliina Pilli-Sihvola for her comments on the text.
- ADEME (2008) Bilan des connaissances ACV et économiques sur la consigne des emballages boissons et le recyclage des emballages plastiques. Étude réalisée pour le compte de l’ADEME par RDC-Environnement, AngersGoogle Scholar
- Baumann H (1998) Life cycle assessment and decision making—theories and practices. Chalmers University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
- Boltanski L, Chiapello E (1999) Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Gallimard, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Boltanski L, Thévenot L (2006) On justification: economies of worth. Universtiy, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Council Directive (2008) 2008/98/EC of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives.Google Scholar
- Dalhammer C (2007) An emerging product approach in environmental law incorporating the life cycle perspective. Lund UniversityGoogle Scholar
- DEFRA (2011a) Applying the Waste Hierarchy: evidence summary. Department for Environment, Food and Rural AffairsGoogle Scholar
- DEFRA (2011b) Guidance on applying the Waste Hierarchy. Department for Environment, Food and Rural AffairsGoogle Scholar
- Eco-Emballages (2002) Eco-efficacité du recyclage des emballages plastique: analyses environnementales et économiques du recyclage des déchets ménagers d’emballages plastique en FranceGoogle Scholar
- Eco-Emballages and ADEME (2009) Etude sur l’opportunité du tri et du recyclage des emballages ménagers plastiques autres que bouteilles et flacons. Eco-Embellages and ADEME, prepared by PricewaterhouseCoopers Advisory, Ecobilan and Cadet InternationalGoogle Scholar
- Eunomia Research and The Open University (2004) Municipal waste management strategies and the land use planning system for waste in England. Eunomia and The Open University, A report to DEFRA and ODPMGoogle Scholar
- Frankl P, Rubik F (1999) Life-cycle assessment (LCA) in business. An overview on drivers, applications, issues and future perspectives. Glob Nest Int J 1:185–194Google Scholar
- Godard O, Laurans Y (2004) Evaluating environmental issue-Valuation as co-ordination in a pluralistic world. Ecole Polytechnique, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Hawken P, Lovins A, Lovins LH (1999) Natural capitalism. York, NewGoogle Scholar
- Heiskanen E (1999) Every product casts a shadow: but can we see it, and can we act on it? Environ Sci Pol 2(1):61–74Google Scholar
- House of Commons (2001) Environment, transport and regional affairs. Fifth report, delivering sustainable waste management. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
- ISO (2006) Environmental Management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and Framework (ISO 14040:2006)Google Scholar
- JRC (2011) Supporting environmentally sound decisions for waste management—a technical guide to life cycle thinking (LCT) and life cycle assessment (LCA) for waste experts and LCA practitioners. Institute for Environment and Sustainability. Joint Research Centre, European Commission, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
- Lazarevic D (2012) Life cycle thinking and waste policy: between science and society. KTH - Royal Intitute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
- Merlin-Brogniart C (2010) The integration of sustainable development in for-profit public service networks in France. The case of the postal and energy fields (GDF, EDF). Journal of Innovation. Economics 5(1):105Google Scholar
- Moody M, Thévenot L (2000) Comparing models of strategy, interests, and the public good in French and American environmental disputes. In: Lamont M, Thévenot L (eds) Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 273–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rex E (2008) Marketing for life cycle thinking. Chalmers University of, TechnologyGoogle Scholar
- Tironi M (2014) (De)politicising and ecologising bicycles. Journal of Cultural Economy. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2013.838600
- Vagt H, Jacob K, Rubik F, et al. (2008) LCA options for sustainable governance assessed. Deliverable D8 of work package 4 of the CALCAS ProjectGoogle Scholar
- Vinck D (1999) Les objets intermédiaires dans les réseaux de coopération scientifique: Contribution à la prise en compte des objets dans les dynamiques sociales. Rev Fr Sociol 385–414Google Scholar