Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Implementation of life cycle management practices in a cluster of companies in Bogota, Colombia

Abstract

Purpose

The UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative has been promoting the development and dissemination of a life cycle management capability maturity model (LCM CMM) to fully operationalize and eventually mainstream LCA into all facets of business, including product development, marketing, and strategic decision-making business processes. The capability framework defines a logical sequence of skill building based on the experiences of sustainability leaders that can speed learning for companies with less mature programs. Business improvement projects are designed to incrementally expand the span of concern from company objectives, to value chain viability, and ultimately to societal needs, while broadening the base of information and engaging a wider set of stakeholder views.

Methods

The UNEP/SETAC sponsored pilot tests of the LCM CMM in Cameroon, Uganda, South Africa, India, Brazil, Colombia, and Peru. The results from the pilot conducted by Secretaria Distrital de Ambiente (SDA) and a network of 22 companies in Bogotá, Colombia, are presented to illustrate how the capability approach can be applied and highlight lessons learned to promote further dissemination of life cycle practices.

Results and discussion

The companies were able to apply the concepts to develop accurate, representative assessments of organizational maturity and to identify reasonable improvement projects that delivered some financial value in the short term, addressed a management system gap identified in the maturity assessment, and could be completed within the schedule deadline of the contract (∼6 to 9 months). The projects included an LCA of cleaning products, collaboration among three companies to find a better solution for managing a waste stream of coffee “silver skins,” a streamlined assessment of acrylic products, an LCA of disposable polypropylene (PP) and polystyrene (PS) cups, and a qualitative screening of operations of a transit company. The paper discusses how the results of the studies were used to identify specific improvement projects tailored to the specific needs and priorities of each company.

Conclusions

The pilot projects showed that the capability maturity approach had intuitive appeal and the companies were able to apply the concepts to their organizations with limited technical support and identify an appropriate improvement project with LC relevance. This suggests there should be less emphasis on LCA as a tool to identify projects and more as a method to gain insights for effective implementation of business-relevant projects. One key question is how to sustain the energy and ongoing improvements fostered by this pilot program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    A copy of the questionnaire and accompanying workbook can be downloaded from: http://blog.pucp.edu.pe/media/2360/20130211-4__cmm_workbook_ilcm2012_s__valdivia.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2015

References

  1. Beer M (2001) How to develop an organization capable of sustained high performance: embrace the drive for results-capability development paradox. Organ Dyn 29(4):233–247

  2. Benson- Armer R et al. (2015) Building capabilities for performance. Insights & publications. Retrieved 19 January, 2015, from http://www.mckinsey.com/Insights/Organization/Building_capabilities_for_performance?cid = other-eml-alt-mip-mck-oth-1501

  3. Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Hppes G, Zamagni A, Masoni P, Buonamici R, Ekvall T, Rydbert T (2011) Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. Environ Sci Technol 48(1):90–96

  4. Hellweg S, Milá i Canals L (2014) Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science 344(6188):1109–1113

  5. O’Rourke D (2014) The science of sustainable supply chains. Science 344(6188):1124–1127

  6. Stiglitz JE, Greenwald BC (2014) Creating a learning society: a new approach to growth, development, and social progress. Columbia University Press, New York

  7. Swarr T, Fava J, Jensen AA, Valdivia S, Vigon B (2011) Life cycle management capability: an alternative approach to sustainability assessment. In: Finkbeiner M (ed) Towards life cycle sustainability management. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 35–42

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the support of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative and the European Commission for the pilot studies.

Ethical statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Correspondence to Thomas E. Swarr.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Mary Ann Curran

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moreno, O.A.V., Swarr, T.E., Asselin, A. et al. Implementation of life cycle management practices in a cluster of companies in Bogota, Colombia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20, 723–730 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0875-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Business strategy
  • Capability maturity model
  • Life cycle assessment
  • Life cycle management
  • Organizational development