Life cycle assessment of two biologically produced phase change materials and their related products
- 432 Downloads
Phase change materials (PCMs) hold considerable promise for thermal energy storage and reduction of temperature swings in building space, and can reduce reliance on fossil fuel sources for both heating and cooling. Previous studies have evaluated the use of PCMs for energy storage and provided some limited information on the embodied energy of the PCM; however, an important factor that has not fully been addressed until now is the environmental impact of preparation of organic PCMs. This study presents life cycle assessments (LCAs) of two organic, biosourced PCMs for their applications, focusing on embodied energy and CO2 emissions.
Dodecanoic acid produced from palm kernel oil was considered as a PCM for use in a solar thermal water heating application, and ethyl hexadecanoate produced from algae was considered for thermal buffering. The functional units were defined as 1 t of dodecanoic acid PCM and 1 kg of encapsulated ethyl hexadecanoate PCM, respectively. The LCA encompasses all phases in the PCM production: growth and harvesting of the feedstocks, extraction of the oil, treatment of the oil, and separation of singular components. The two PCMs were evaluated in terms of the payback times for their embodied energies and embodied CO2 under a modeled use phase.
Results and discussion
The energy payback time for dodecanoic acid in a solar thermal application was found to be less than 2 years. Although production of dodecanoic acid is a net CO2 emitter, use of this PCM in a solar thermal system can recoup the CO2 of production in less than a year. Ethyl hexadecanoate produced from algae, considered for use in a thermal buffering wallboard product, would require at least 30 years of use before its energy savings would match its embodied energy, mostly due to the drying step in the production of the PCM. However, ethyl hexadecanoate is a strong sequester of CO2 at 7.6 t per ton of ethyl hexadecanoate.
Dodecanoic acid produced from palm kernel oil for use in a solar thermal hot water system appears to be a viable PCM. Its payback time, both for energy and carbon emissions, is under 3 years. On the other hand, the high embodied energy of ethyl hexadecanoate produced from algae gives a prohibitively long payback time for use in domestic thermal buffering applications.
KeywordsLife cycle analysis Life cycle assessment Phase change materials Thermal energy storage
- Allred PM (2014) Phase change materials for thermal energy storage. Masters Dissertation, Dalhousie UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Ashby MF (2012) Materials and the environment, 2nd edn. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Bowyer C, Baldock D, Kretschmer B, Polakova J (2012) The GHG emissions intensity of bioenergy. Institute for European Environmental Policy, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Childs K, Stovall T (2012) Potential energy savings due to phase change material in a building wall assembly: an examination of two climates. ORNL/TM-2012/6, Oak Ridge National LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
- Dall Acqua S, Fawer M, Fritschi R, Allenspach C (1999) Life cycle inventories for the production of detergent ingredients. Technical Report 244, German Federal Environmental Agency and Oeko-InstituteGoogle Scholar
- DuPont, DuPont Energain® Technical datasheet. http://energain.co.uk/Energain/en_GB/assets/downloads/documentation/download/Energain%C2%AE_Datasheet_UK.pdf. Accessed 15 September 2014
- Environmental Protection Agency (2014) Greenhouse gas equivalencies calculator. http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-resources/calculator.html. Accessed 15 September 2014
- Gervajio GC (2012) Fatty acids and derivatives from coconut oil. In: Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology, Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 445–482Google Scholar
- Lane GA (1983) Solar heat storage: latent heat materials. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- Lurgi, Fatty acid technology. Technical brochure no. 274e/08.10/10, Lurgi GmbH, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
- Mehling H, Cabeza LF (2008) Heat and cold storage with PCM. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Muhammad H, Hashim Z, Subramaniam V, Tan YA, Wei PC, Let CC, May CY (2010) Life cycle assessment of oil palm seedling production. J Oil Palm Res 22:876–886Google Scholar
- Muruganantham K, Phelan P, Horwath P, Ludlam D, McDonald T (2010) Experimental investigation of a bio-based phase change material to improve building energy performance. ASME 2010 4th International Conference on Energy Sustainability 1:979–984. doi:10.1115/ES2010-90035
- Myrans K (2009) Comparative energy and carbon assessment of three green technologies for a Toronto roof. Dissertation, University of TorontoGoogle Scholar
- Subramaniam V, May CY, Muhammad H, Hashim Z, Tan YA, Wei PC (2010a) Life cycle assessment of the production of crude palm oil. J Oil Palm Res 22:895–903Google Scholar
- Subramaniam V, May CY, Muhammad H, Hashim Z, Tan YA, Wei PC (2010b) Life cycle assessment of the production of crude palm kernel oil. J Oil Palm Res 22:904–912Google Scholar
- Wei PC, May CW, Ngan MA (2010) Life cycle assessment for the production and use of palm biodiesel. J Oil Palm Res 22:927–933Google Scholar
- Zulkifli H, Halimah M, Chan KW, Choo YM, Mohd Basri W (2010) Life cycle assessment for oil palm fresh fruit bunch production from continued land use for oil palm planted on mineral soil. J Oil Palm Res 22:887–894Google Scholar