Advertisement

Life cycle assessment of the Peruvian industrial anchoveta fleet: boundary setting in life cycle inventory analyses of complex and plural means of production

  • Pierre FréonEmail author
  • Angel Avadí
  • Rosa Amelia Vinatea Chavez
  • Federico Iriarte Ahón
LCA FOR ENERGY SYSTEMS AND FOOD PRODUCTS

Abstract

Purpose

This work has two major objectives: (1) to perform an attributional life cycle assessment (LCA) of a complex mean of production, the main Peruvian fishery targeting anchoveta (anchovy) and (2) to assess common assumptions regarding the exclusion of items from the life cycle inventory (LCI).

Methods

Data were compiled for 136 vessels of the 661 units in the fleet. The functional unit was 1 t of fresh fish delivered by a steel vessel. Our approach consisted of four steps: (1) a stratified sampling scheme based on a typology of the fleet, (2) a large and very detailed inventory on small representative samples with very limited exclusion based on conventional LCI approaches, (3) an impact assessment on this detailed LCI, followed by a boundary-refining process consisting of retention of items that contributed to the first 95 % of total impacts and (4) increasing the initial sample with a limited number of items, according to the results of (3). The life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) method mostly used was ReCiPe v1.07 associated to the ecoinvent database.

Results and discussion

Some items that are usually ignored in an LCI’s means of production have a significant impact. The use phase is the most important in terms of impacts (66 %), and within that phase, fuel consumption is the leading inventory item contributing to impacts (99 %). Provision of metals (with special attention to electric wiring which is often overlooked) during construction and maintenance, and of nylon for fishing nets, follows. The anchoveta fishery is shown to display the lowest fuel use intensity worldwide.

Conclusions

Boundary setting is crucial to avoid underestimation of environmental impacts of complex means of production. The construction, maintenance and EOL stages of the life cycle of fishing vessels have here a substantial environmental impact. Recommendations can be made to decrease the environmental impact of the fleet.

Keywords

Attributional LCA Complex production system Environmental impacts Fishing vessel Fuel use Life cycle inventory 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work, carried out by members of the anchoveta supply chain (ANCHOVETA-SC) project (http://anchoveta-sc.wikispaces.com; Accessed Oct 04, 2013) is a contribution to the International Join Laboratory “Dynamics of the Humboldt Current system” (LMI-DISCOH) coordinated by the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) and the Instituto del Mar del Peru (IMARPE), and gathering several other institutions. This work was carried out under the sponsorship of the Direction des Programmes de Recherche et de la formation au Sud (DPF) of the IRD. We acknowledge Philippe Roux (Cemagre, France) for suggesting a figure to formalise our ideas (Fig. 1). The first two authors are members of the ELSA research group (environmental life cycle and sustainability assessment, http://www.elsa-lca.org/. Accessed Oct 04, 213). The Sociedad Nacional de Pesquería (National Society for Fisheries, SNP) facilitated our contacts with some of the largest fishing companies.

Supplementary material

11367_2014_716_MOESM1_ESM.doc (436 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 436 kb)

References

  1. Avadi A, Fréon P (2013) Life cycle assessment of fisheries: a review for fisheries scientists and managers. Fish Res 143:21–38Google Scholar
  2. Bertrand A, Ballon M, Chaigneau A (2010) Acoustic observation of living organisms reveals the upper limit of the oxygen minimum zone. PLoS ONE 5(4):e10330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertrand A, Chaigneau A, Peraltilla S et al (2011) Oxygen: a fundamental property regulating pelagic ecosystem structure in the coastal southeastern tropical Pacific. PloS one 6:e29558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brochier T, Lett C, Fréon P (2011) Investigating the “northern Humboldt paradox” from model comparisons of small pelagic fish reproductive strategies in eastern boundary upwelling ecosystems. Fish and Fish 12:94–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BSI (2012) Publicly Available Specification (PAS) 2050–2:2012 Assessment of life cycle greenhouse emissions. Supplementary requirements for the application of PAS 2050:2011 to seafood and other aquatic food products. British Standards Institution, London.Google Scholar
  6. Chavez F, Bertrand A, Guevara-Carrasco R, Soler P, Csirke J (2008) Editorial: The Northern Humboldt current system: brief history, present status and a view towards the future. In: Werner F, Lough G, Bertrand A, Guevara-carrasco R, Soler P, Csirke J, & Chavez FP (eds) The Northern Humboldt current system: ocean dynamics, ecosystem processes, and fisheries. Progr Oceanogr 79:95–412Google Scholar
  7. Driscoll J, Tyedmers P (2010) Fuel use and greenhouse gas emission implications of fisheries management: the case of the New England Atlantic herring fishery. Mar Policy 34(3):353–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ecoinvent (2012) The ecoinvent centre portal, http://www.ecoinvent.ch/. Accessed 04 Oct 2013
  9. Ellingsen H, Aanondsen S (2006) Environmental impacts of wild caught cod and farmed salmon—a comparison with chicken. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):60–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) handbook: general guide for life cycle assessment—Provisions and action steps. First edition March 2010, EUR 24708 EN, Luxembourg. European Commission-Joint Research Centre-Institute for Environment and Sustainability. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  11. Fréon P, Bouchon M, Mullon C, Garcia C, Niquen M (2008) Interdecadal variability of anchoveta abundance and overcapacity of the fishery in Peru. Progr Oceanogr 79(2–4):401–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fréon P, Barange M, Arístegui J (2009) Eastern boundary upwelling ecosystems: integrative and comparative approaches, an introduction. Progr Oceanogr 83(1–4):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fréon P, Bouchon M, Domalain G, Estrella C, Iriarte F, Lazard J, Legendre M et al. (2010) Impacts of the Peruvian anchoveta supply chains: from wild fish in the water to protein on the plate. GLOBEC Int Newsl (April): 27–31.Google Scholar
  14. Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, Schryver AD, Struijs J, Zelm RV (2009) ReCiPe 2008. A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. Report I: characterisation, ministry of housing, spatial planning and environment (VROM). http://www.lcia-recipe.net/. Accessed 04 Oct 2013
  15. Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, Koning A de, Oers L van, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Suh S, Udo de Haes HA, Bruijn H de, Duin R van, Huijbregts MAJ (2001) Handbook on life cycle assessment. Operational guide to the ISO standards. I: LCA in perspective. IIa: guide. IIb: operational annex. III: scientific background. Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 1-4020-0228-9, Dordrecht, 2002, 692 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Hischier R, Weidema B, Althaus H-jörg, Bauer C, Doka G, Dones R, Frischknecht R et al. (2010) Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods. Ecoinvent report No. 3 Dübendorf.Google Scholar
  17. Hospido A, Tyedmers P (2005) Life cycle environmental impacts of Spanish tuna fisheries. Fish Res 76(2):174–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) (2006a) Environmental management-life cycle assessment—principles and framework. EN ISO 14040Google Scholar
  19. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) (2006b) Environmental management-life cycle assessment-requirements and guidelines. EN ISO 14044Google Scholar
  20. Oliveros-Ramos R, Guevara-Carrasco R, Simmonds J, Csirke J, Gerlotto F, Pena C, Tam J (2010) Modelo de evaluación integrada del stock norte-centro de la anchoveta peruana Engraulis ringens Jenyns. Bol Inst Mar Perú 25:49–55Google Scholar
  21. Paredes C (2010) Reformando el Sector de la Anchoveta Peruana Progreso Reciente y Desafíos Futuros (Reforming the Peruvian anchovy sector: recent progress and future challenges). Instituto del Perú - Cuadernos de Investigación (pp 1–23). http://www.institutodelperu.org.pe/descargas/Publicaciones/DelInstitutodelPeru/DOC/contenido_carlos_paredes_-_reforma_de_la_presqueria_anchoveta_peru.pdf. Accessed 04 Oct 2013
  22. Parker R (2012) Review of life cycle assessment research on products derived from fisheries and aquaculture: a report for seafish as part of the collective action to address greenhouse gas emissions in seafood. Final report. Sea fish industry authority, Edinburgh. http://www.seafish.org/media/583639/seafish_lca_review_report_final.pdf. Accessed 04 Oct 2013
  23. Parker R, Tyedmers P (2012) Life cycle environmental impacts of three products derived from wild-caught Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba). Envir Sci Tech 46:4958–4965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. PRé (2012) SimaPro by Pré Consultants. http://www.pre-sustainability.com/content/simapro-lca-software/. Accessed 04 Oct 2013
  25. PRODUCE (2012) Ministry of production of Peru, statistics section. http://www.produce.gob.pe/. Accessed 04 Oct 2013
  26. Ramos S, Vázquez-Rowe I, Artetxe I, Moreira MT, Feijoo G, Zufía J (2011) Environmental assessment of the Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) season in the Basque Country. Increasing the timeline delimitation in fishery LCA studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(7):599–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Raynolds M, Fraser R, Checkel D (2000a) The relative mass-energy-economic (RMEE) method for system boundary selection. Part 1: a means to systematically and quantitatively select LCA boundaries. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5(1):37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Raynolds M, Fraser R, Checkel D (2000b) The relative mass-energy-economic (RMEE) method for system boundary selection. Part 2: selecting the boundary cut-off parameter (ZRMEE) and its relationship to overall uncertainty. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5(2):96–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reenaas M (2005) Solide oxide fuel cell combined with gas turbine versus diesel engine as auxiliary power producing unit onboard a passenger ferry: a comparative life cycle assessment and life cycle cost assessment. Masters Dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  30. Saetersda G, Tsukayama Alegre B (1965) Fluctuations in the apparent abundance of the anchovy stock in the 1959–1962. Bol Inst Mar Peru 2:33–104Google Scholar
  31. Schau E, Ellingsen H, Endal A, Aanondsen S (2009) Energy consumption in the Norwegian fisheries. J Clean Prod 17(3):325–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Suh S, Lenzen M, Treloar G, Hondo H (2004) System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. Envir Sci Tech 38(3):657–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thrane M (2004) Environmental impacts from Danish fish products—hot spots and environmental policies. PhD Dissertation, Aalborg University, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  34. Tveteras S, Paredes CE, Peña-Torres J (2011) Individual fishing quotas in Peru: stopping the race for anchovies. Mar Res Econ 26:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tyedmers P, Watson R, Pauly D (2005) Fueling global fishing fleets. Ambio 34(8):635–638Google Scholar
  36. Vázquez-Rowe I, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2010) Life cycle assessment of horse mackerel fisheries in Galicia (NW Spain). Comparative analysis of two major fishing methods. Fish Res 106(3):517–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Winther U, Ziegler F, Hognes ES, Emanuelsson A, Sund V, Ellingsen H (2009). Carbon footprint and energy use of Norwegian seafood products. SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture (p 89). http://www.sintef.no/upload/Fiskeri_og_havbruk/Fiskeriteknologi/Filer%20fra%20Erik%20Skontorp%20Hognes/Carbon%20footprint%20and%20energy%20use%20of%20Norwegian%20seafood%20products%20-%20Final%20report%20-%2004_12_09.pdf. Accessed 04 Oct 2013
  38. Yebra DM, Kiil S, Dam-Johansen K (2004) Antifouling technology—past, present and future steps towards efficient and environmentally friendly antifouling coatings. Progr Organic Coatings 50:75–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ziegler F, Hornborg S (2013) Stock size matters more than vessel size: the fuel efficiency of Swedish demersal trawl fisheries 2002–2010. Mar Pol 44:72–81Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre Fréon
    • 1
    Email author
  • Angel Avadí
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rosa Amelia Vinatea Chavez
    • 3
  • Federico Iriarte Ahón
    • 4
  1. 1.UMR 212 EME, Centre de Recherche Halieutique Méditerranéenne et TropicaleInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) SETE cedexFrance
  2. 2.Université Montpellier 2Sciences et TechniquesMontpellier Cedex 5France
  3. 3.Facultad de Oceanografía, Pesquería, Ciencias Alimentarias y AcuiculturaUniversidad Federico VillarrealLimaPeru
  4. 4.Iriarte & Asociados (I&A), Miro Quesada 191, of. 510LimaPeru

Personalised recommendations