Life cycle assessment of an offshore grid interconnecting wind farms and customers across the North Sea
- 981 Downloads
This study aims to contribute to an improved understanding of the environmental implications of offshore power grid and wind power development pathways. To achieve this aim, we present two assessments. First, we investigate the impacts of a North Sea power grid enabling enhanced trade and integration of offshore wind power. Second, we assess the benefit of the North Sea grid and wind power through a comparison of scenarios for power generation in affected countries.
The grid scenario explored in the first assessment is the most ambitious scenario of the Windspeed project and is the result of cost minimization analysis using a transmission-expansion-planning model. We develop a hybrid life cycle inventory for array cables; high voltage, direct current (HVDC) links; and substations. The functional unit is 1 kWh of electricity transmitted. The second assessment compares two different energy scenarios of Windspeed for the North Sea and surrounding countries. Here, we utilize a life cycle inventory for offshore grid components together with an inventory for a catalog of power generation technologies from Ecoinvent and couple these inventories with grid configurations and electricity mixes determined by the optimization procedure in Windspeed.
Results and discussion
Developing, operating, and dismantling the grid cause emissions of 2.5 g CO2-Eq per kWh electricity transmission or 36 Mt CO2-Eq in total. HVDC cables are the major cause of environmental damage, causing, for example, half of total climate change effects. The next most important contributors are substations and array cabling used in offshore wind parks. Toxicity and eutrophication effects stem largely from leakages from disposed copper and iron mine tailings and overburden. Results from the comparison of two scenarios demonstrate a substantial environmental benefit from the North Sea grid extension and the associated wind power development compared with an alternative generation of electricity from fossil fuels. Offshore grid and wind power, however, entail an increased use of metals and, hence, a higher metal depletion indicator.
We present the first life cycle assessment of a large offshore power grid, using the results of an energy planning model as input. HVDC links are the major cause of environmental damage. There are differences across impact categories with respect to which components or types of activities that are responsible for damage. The North Sea grid and wind power are environmentally beneficial by an array of criteria if displacing fossil fuels, but cause substantial metal use.
KeywordsCarbon footprint Grid integration Hybrid LCA HVDC transmission Variable renewable energy Windspeed
The work was supported by the Research Council of Norway through the Centre for Sustainable Energy Studies (CenSES). Huertas-Hernando acknowledges financial support from FME NOWITECH. The analysis builds on the MSc thesis by Nes supervised by Hertwich and Arvesen, Arvesen’s wind power LCAs, and Huertas-Hernando’s work on Windspeed. We thank the anonymous reviewers for many helpful comments and suggestions.
- 4C Offshore (2013) 4C Global offshore wind farms database. http://www.4coffshore.com/offshorewind. Accessed 19 Apr 2013
- ABB (2008) Miljörapport för år: 2007 [in Swedish). ABB high voltage cables, SwedenGoogle Scholar
- ABB (2010) XLPE submarine cable systems. Attachment to XLPE land cable systems. User’s guide. www.abb.com. Accessed 26 Apr 2011
- ABB (2012a) Environmental product declaration. Power transformer TrafoStar 500 MVA. www.abb.com. Accessed 5 May 2012
- ABB (2012b) Environmental product declaration. GIS type ELK-3 for 420 kV. www.abb.com Accessed 15 Nov 2012
- ABB (2013) The NorNed HVDC connection, Norway–Netherlands. ABB High voltage cables. www.abb.com. Accessed 17 Apr 2013
- Arvesen A (2013) Understanding the environmental implications of energy transitions: a case study for wind power. Dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
- Azau S (2011) Focusing on 2050. In: EWEA wind directions: the European wind industry magazine. European Wind Energy Associations (EWEA). www.ewea.org/annual2011/fileadmin/ewec2011_files/documents/Wind_Directions_March_2011.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2013
- Bengtsson S, Andersson K, Fridell E (2011) A comparative life cycle assessment of marine fuels. J Eng Marit Environ 225(2):97–110Google Scholar
- Beurskens LWM, Hekkenberg M, Vethman P (2011) Renewable energy projections as published in the National Renewable Energy Action Plans of the European member states. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands and the European Environment Agency. www.ecn.nl/docs/library/report/2010/e10069.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2012
- Birkeland C (2011) Assessing the life cycle environmental impacts of offshore wind power generation and power transmission in the North Sea. Dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
- Callavik M, Blomberg A, Häfner J, Jacobsen B (2012) The hybrid HVDC breaker. An innovation breakthrough enabling reliable HVDC grids. ABB Grid Systems. http://www05.abb.com/global/scot/scot221.nsf/veritydisplay/c9d5ba256e7e9671c1257ab6004b1feb/$file/hybrid-hvdc-breaker---an-innovation-breakthrough-for-reliable-hvdc-gridsnov2012.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2013
- Cameron L, van Stralen J, Veum K (2011) Scenarios for offshore wind including spatial interaction and grid issues. Windspeed. www.windspeed.eu/media/publications/WINDSPEED_D6.1_final.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2013
- EC (2010a) Energy infrastructure priorities for 2020 and beyond—a blueprint for an integrated European energy network. COM (2010) 677 final. European Commission (EC), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- EC (2010b) State of play in the EU energy policy. Accompanying document to COM (2010) 639. European Commission (EC). SEC (2010) 1346 final, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- Ecoinvent. Life cycle inventory database v2.2 (2010). Swiss Centre for Life Cycle InventoriesGoogle Scholar
- EWEA (2009) Oceans of opportunity: harnessing Europe’s largest domestic energy resource. European Wind Energy Association (EWEA), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- Hegger S, Hischier R (2010) ReCiPe—Implementation. Assignment of characterisation factors to the Swiss LCI database ecoinvent (version v. 2.2). Midpoint method, hierarchist version. PRé Consultant and Swiss Centre for Life Cycle InventoriesGoogle Scholar
- Huertas-Hernando D, Korpås M, van Dyken S (2011) Grid implications: optimal design of a subsea power grid in the North Sea. Windspeed. www.windspeed.eu/media/publications/WINDSPEED_D6.3%5B1%5D.pdf. Accessed 27 Sept 2012
- ISO (2006) Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework (ISO 14040: 2006). International Organization for Standardization (ISO), GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Jacquemin J, Butterworth D, Garret C, Baldock N, Henderson A (2011) Inventory of location specific wind energy cost. Windspeed. www.windspeed.eu/media/publications/WINDSPEED_D2_2_revised_May_2011.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2013
- Nexans (2011) 60–500 kV High voltage underground cables. XLPE insulated cables. www.nexans.com. Accessed 26 Apr 2011
- Riahi K, Dentener F, Gielen D, Grubler A, Jewell J, Klimont Z, Krey V, McCollum D, Pachauri S, Rao S, van Ruijven B, van Vuuren DP, Wilson C (2012) Energy pathways for sustainable development. In: Global energy assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 1205–1306Google Scholar
- Rosenbaum RK, Bachmann TM, Gold LS, Huijbregts MAJ, Jolliet O, Juraske R, Koehler A, Larsen HF, MacLeod M, Margni M, McKone TE, Schuhmacher M, Van de Meent D, Hauschild MZ (2008) USEtox–the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(7):532–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Veum K, Cameron L, Hernando DH, Korpås M (2011) Roadmap to the deployment of offshore wind energy in the Central and Southern North Sea (2020–2030). Windspeed. www.windspeed.eu/media/publications/WINDSPEED_Roadmap_110719_final.pdf. Accessed 27 Sept 2012
- Windspeed (2014) Windspeed. Supporting decisions. Spatial deployment of offshore wind energy in Europe. http://www.windspeed.eu. Accessed 19 Mar 2013