Advertisement

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

, Volume 21, Issue 9, pp 1255–1268 | Cite as

Life cycle inventories of electricity generation and power supply in version 3 of the ecoinvent database—part II: electricity markets

  • Karin Treyer
  • Christian Bauer
THE ECOINVENT DATABASE V3

Abstract

Purpose

Representative, consistent and up-to-date life cycle inventories (LCI) of electricity supply are key elements of ecoinvent as an LCI background database since these are often among the determining factors with regard to life cycle assessment (LCA) results. ecoinvent version 3 (ev3) offers new LCI data of power supply (electricity markets) in 71 geographies. This article gives an overview of these electricity markets and discusses new ecoinvent features in the context of power supply.

Methods

The annual geography- and technology-specific electricity production for the year 2008 specifies the technology shares on the high-, medium- and low-voltage level electricity markets. Data are based on IEA statistics. Different voltage levels are linked by transformation activities. Region-specific electricity losses due to power transmission and voltage transformation are considered in the market and transformation activities. The majority of the 71 power markets are defined by national boundaries. The attributional ecoinvent system model in ev3 with linking to average current suppliers results in electricity markets supplied by all geography-specific power generation technologies and electricity imports, while the consequential system model generates markets only linked to unconstrained suppliers.

Results and discussion

The availability of LCI data for 71 electricity markets in ev3 covering 50 countries reduces the “Rest-of-the-World” electricity supply not covered by country- or region-specific inventories to 17 % for the year 2008. Specific power supply activities for all countries contributing more than 1 % to global electricity production are available. The electricity markets show large variations concerning contributions from specific technologies and energy carriers. Imports can substantially change the national/regional power mix, especially in small markets. Large differences can also be observed between the electricity markets in the attributional and the consequential database calculation. Region-specific total power losses between production on the high voltage level and consumer on the low voltage level are on the order of 2.5–23 %.

Conclusions

Electricity supply mixes (electricity markets) in the ecoinvent database have been updated and substantially extended for v3. Inventories for electricity supply in all globally important economies are available with geography-specific technology and market datasets which will contribute to increasing quality and reducing uncertainties in LCA studies worldwide and to allow more accurate estimation of environmental burdens from global production chains. Future work should focus on improving the details of country-specific data, implementation of more countries into the database, splitting of large countries into smaller regions and on developing a more sophisticated approach specifying country-specific electricity mixes in consequential system models.

Keywords

Country specific ecoinvent v3 Electricity markets Electricity mix 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to René Itten, Rolf Frischknecht and Matthias Stucki from treeze for the preparation of the report on production volumes in all required countries; and to Pablo Tirado and Pascal Lesage from CIRAIG, Canada, for supply of high quality inventory data for the individual Canadian provinces/territories.

Supplementary material

11367_2013_694_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (258 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 258 kb)

References

  1. Bousquin J, Gambeta E, Esterman M, Rothenberg S (2012) Life cycle assessment in the print industry. J Ind Ecol 16:S195–S205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Frischknecht R, Faist Emmenegger M, Bauer C, Dones R (2007) Strommix und Stromnetz. In: Sachbilanzen von Energiesystemen: Grundlagen für den ökologischen Vergleich von Energiesystemen und den Einbezug von Energiesystemen in Ökobilanzen für die Schweiz (Ed. Dones R.). ecoinvent report No. 6, v2.0. Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen / Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Duebendorf, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  3. Hawkins T, Gausen O, Strømman A (2012) Environmental impacts of hybrid and electric vehicles—a review. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(8):997–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Heinonen J, Junnila S (2011) Case study on the carbon consumption of two metropolitan cities. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(6):569–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hischier R, Baudin I (2010) LCA study of a plasma television device. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(5):428–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. IEA, OECD (2010) Electricity Information 2010. International Energy Agency, Paris Cedex, FranceGoogle Scholar
  7. IEA, OECD (2011) Electricity and heat generation. International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris Cedex (FR), Electricity information statistics (database), retreived from: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/energy/
  8. IEA (2012) IEA Home - Statistics and Balances. International Energy Agency. http://www.iea.org/stats/defs/sources/coal.asp. Accessed 24.01.213
  9. ISO (2006a) ISO 14040. Environmental management—life cycle assessment—prinicples and framework. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO)Google Scholar
  10. ISO (2006b) ISO 14044. Environmental management - life cycle assessment - requirements and guidelines. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO)Google Scholar
  11. Itten R, Frischknecht R, Stucki M (2012) Life Cycle Inventories of Electricity Mixes and Grid. ESU-services Ltd., Uster, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  12. Kendall A, McPherson E (2012) A life cycle greenhouse gas inventory of a tree production system. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(4):444–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lund H, Mathiesen B, Christensen P, Schmidt J (2010) Energy system analysis of marginal electricity supply in consequential LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(3):260–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mathiesen BV, Muenster M, Fruergaard T (2009) Uncertainties related to the identification of the marginal energy technology in consequential life cycle assessments. J Clean Prod 17(15):1331–1338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ménard M, Dones R, Gantner U (1998) Strommix in Ökobilanzen: Auswirkungen der Strommodellwahl für Produkt- und Betriebs-Ökobilanzen. PSI-Bericht No. 98–17. Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  16. Mendoza J-M, Oliver-Solà J, Gabarrell X, Josa A, Rieradevall J (2012) Life cycle assessment of granite application in sidewalks. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(5):580–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Milà i Canals L, Sim S, García-Suárez T, Neuer G, Herstein K, Kerr C, Rigarlsford G, King H (2011) Estimating the greenhouse gas footprint of Knorr. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(1):50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mohr N, Meijer A, Huijbregts M, Reijnders L (2009) Environmental impact of thin-film GaInP/GaAs and multicrystalline silicon solar modules produced with solar electricity. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(3):225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. PAS (2011) PAS 2050:2011. Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. British Standards Institute. ICS code: 13.030.40, ISBN 978 0 580 71382 8Google Scholar
  20. Schmidt J, Thrane M, Merciai S, Dalgaard R (2011) Inventory of country specific electricity in LCA - Consequential and attributional scenarios. Methodology report v2. 2-0 LCA consultants, Aalborg http://lca-net.com/publications/show/inventory-country-specific-electricity-lca-india/
  21. Teehan P, Kandlikar M (2012) Sources of Variation in Life Cycle Assessments of Desktop Computers. J Ind Ecol 16:S182–S194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Torrellas M, Antón A, López J, Baeza E, Parra J, Muñoz P, Montero J (2012) LCA of a tomato crop in a multi-tunnel greenhouse in Almeria. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(7):863–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Treyer K, Bauer C (2013) Life cycle inventories of electricity generation and power supply in version 3 of the ecoinvent database—part I: electricity generation. Int J Life Cycle Assess. doi: 10.1007/s11367-013-0665-2 Google Scholar
  24. Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R, Mutel C, Nemecek T, Reinhard J, Vadenbo CO, Wernet G (2013) Overview and methodology. Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. St. Gallen: The ecoinvent CentreGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory for Energy Systems AnalysisPaul Scherrer Institut (PSI)VilligenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations