Social impacts and life cycle assessment: proposals for methodological development for SMEs in the European food and drink sector
Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) account for 99 % of companies operating in the European food and drink industry and, often, are part of highly fragmented and complex food chains. The article focuses on the development of a social impact assessment methodology for SMEs in selected food and drink products as part of the EU-FP7 SENSE research project. The proposed methodology employs a top-down and bottom-up approach and focuses on labour rights/working conditions along the product supply chain as the key social impact indicator, limiting key stakeholder classification to workers/employees and local communities impacted by the production process. Problems related to this emerging field are discussed, and questions for further research are expounded.
The article reviews both academic and ‘grey’ literature on life cycle assessment (LCA) and its relationship to social LCA (S-LCA) and SMEs at the beginning of 2013 and includes case study evidence from the food sector. A pilot questionnaire survey sent to European food and drink sector SMEs and trade associations (as partners in the research project) about their knowledge, experience and engagement with social impacts is presented. Proposals are elaborated for a social impact assessment methodology that identifies the key data for SMEs to collect.
Results and discussion
The literature reveals the complexity of the S-LCA approach as it aims to unite disparate and often conflicting interests. Findings from the pilot questionnaire are discussed. Using a top-down and bottom-up approach, the proposed methodology assesses data from SMEs along the supply chain in order to gauge social improvements in the management of labour-related issues for different product sectors. Issues relating to the ‘attributional’ choice of a social impact indicator and key stakeholder categories are discussed. How ‘scoring’ is interpreted and reported and what the intended effect of its use will be are also elaborated upon.
Whilst recognising the difficulty of devising a robust social impact assessment for SMEs in the food and drink sector, it is argued that the proposed methodology makes a useful contribution in this fast-emerging field.
KeywordsEurope Food and drink sector Life cycle assessment Methodologies S-LCA SMEs Social impacts
- Aquaculture Stewardship Council (2012) ASC farm certification and accreditation requirements. Version 1.0. UtrechtGoogle Scholar
- Barrientos S, Gereffi G, Rossi A (2008) What are the challenges and opportunities for economic and social upgrading? Concept note ‘Capturing the gains’ workshop. University of ManchesterGoogle Scholar
- Benoît C, Mazijn B (eds) (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, ParisGoogle Scholar
- De Camillis C, Blighy JC, Pennington D, Palyi B (2012) Outcomes of the second workshop of the Food Sustainable Consumption and Production Round Table Working Group 1: deriving scientifically sound rules for a sector-specific environmental assessment methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:511–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fox T, Vorley B (2004) Corporate accountability in the UK supermarket sector. Final report of the race to the top project. International Institute for Environment and Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Freidberg S (2009) Hotspots in a cold chain: a life-cycle assessment of Loki fish. Environmental studies paper, Dartmouth College http://www.lokifish.com/freidbergpaper.pdf. Accessed 5 Sep 2013
- Griesshammer R, Benoît C, Dreyer LC et al. (2006) Feasibility study: integration of social aspects into LCA. https://biblio.ugent.be/input/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=512499&fileOId=633083. Accessed 28 Oct 2013
- Henriques A (2012) Standards for change? ISO 26000 and sustainable development. IIED, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Jørgensen A (2010) Developing the social life cycle assessment: addressing issues of validity and usability. Dissertation, DTU Management EngineeringGoogle Scholar
- Kissinger G (2012) Corporate social responsibility and supply agreements in the agricultural sector: Decreasing land and climate pressures. CCAFS working paper no. 14. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
- OECD (2009) Overview of selected initiatives and instruments relevant to corporate social responsibility. Annual report on the OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises 2008. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Steering Committee of the Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue (2012) Final standards for responsible salmon aquaculture, June 2012. http://assets.worldwildlife.org/publications/433/files/original/SAD_Standard_Final_Draft.pdf?1346188051. Accessed 7 Nov 2013
- Valdivia S, Ugaya C, Sonnemann G, Hildenbrand J (2011) Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment. Making informed choices on products. UNEP/SETAC, ParisGoogle Scholar