Advertisement

Erratum to: Environmental assessment of sardine (Sardina pilchardus) purse seine fishery in Portugal with LCA methodology including biological impact categories

  • Cheila AlmeidaEmail author
  • Sofia Vaz
  • Henrique Cabral
  • Friederike Ziegler
Erratum
  • 792 Downloads

Erratum to: Int J Life Cycle Assess

DOI 10.1007/s11367-013-0646-5

Page 4 of online version (changes are in boldface)

Old:

The FUI per sardine landed was neither statistically different between years nor between vessel size categories (t test, p = 0.35). Average values for the different years assessed varied between 0.9 (SD = 0.02) and 0.14 (SD = 0.03)l/kg and the fuel consumption use was highest in 2008, coinciding with the year for the largest landings of large purse seiners (Fig. 2).

New:

The FUI per sardine landed was neither statistically different between years nor between vessel size categories (t test, p = 0.35). Average values for the different years assessed varied between 0.09 (SD = 0.02) and 0.14 (SD = 0.03)l/kg and the fuel consumption use was highest in 2008, coinciding with the year for the largest landings of large purse seiners (Fig. 2).

Old:

The average global warming potential (GWP) for the overall fleet was 0.36 kg CO2 eq. The GWP for the two size vessel categories were almost equal: 0.35 for larger and 0.36 kg.CO2 eq for smaller boats. The same trend happens with the other impact categories due to the dominance of fuel combustion and production. For the categories EP, AP, and ODP the results for the overall fleet were 0.0024 kg SO2 eq;0.0005 kg PO4 eq; and 0.48 kg CFC-11 eq, respectively.

New:

The average global warming potential (GWP) for the overall fleet was 0.36 kg CO2 eq. The GWP for the two size vessel categories were almost equal: 0.35 for larger and 0.36 kg.CO2 eq for smaller boats. The same trend happens with the other impact categories due to the dominance of fuel combustion and production. For the categories EP, AP, and ODP the results for the overall fleet were 0.0024 kg SO2 eq;0.0005 kg PO4 eq; and 4.77E-08 kg CFC-11 eq, respectively.

Page 8 on online version: Table 2 (changes are in boldface)

Table 2 Data from JRC for purse seine fishery in Portugal

Size

2008

2009

2010

Fuel per landings (l/kg)

 Small

0.09

0.13

0.15

 Large

0.11

0.12

0.13

 Overall

0.11

0.12

0.13

Labour per landings (crew/tonne)

 Small

0.13

0.11

0.09

 Large

0.02

0.02

0.02

 Overall

0.03

0.03

0.03

Value per landings (EUR/tonne)

 Small

1.20

1.07

0.92

 Large

0.63

0.70

0.14

 Overall

0.66

0.74

0.60

Online Resource (changes are in boldface)

Old: Table 1 Inventory for fish landed in Portugal by purse seiners. Values per FU (standard deviation) of fish landed for the overall fleet and for different vessel size categories in the 2006–2011 period. Data is referred to the selected FU in the study (1 kg of landed fish).

Inputs

Unit

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

Diesel

l

0.03 (0,09)

0.00 (0,11)

0.02 (0,14)

0.03 (0,12)

0.03 (0,09)

0.02 (0,10)

Ice

kg

0.02 (0,11)

0.02 (0,08)

0.04 (0,12)

0.05 (0,12)

0.05 (0,15)

0.05 (0,18)

Marine lubricant oil

l

0.00 (0,00)

0.00 (0,00)

0.01 (0,01)

0.02 (0,01)

0.01 (0,01)

0.01 (0,00)

Outputs

Sardine

kg

0.70 (0,91)

0.89 (0,89)

0.90 (0,91)

0.88 (0,94)

0.95 (0,89)

0.93 (0,85)

Other species

kg

0.30 (0,09)

0.11 (0,11)

0.10 (0,09)

0.12 (0,06)

0.05 (0,11)

0.07 (0,15)

CO2

kg

0.292

0.363

0.466

0.398

0.301

0.318

SO2

g

0.430

0.523

0.662

0.569

0.438

0.461

NOx

kg

0.003

0.004

0.005

0.004

0.003

0.003

Impact assessment

GWP

kg CO2 eq

0.292

0.363

0.466

0.398

0.301

0.318

EP

kg PO4 eq

0.000

0.001

0.001

0.001

0.000

0.000

AP

kg SO2 eq

0.002

0.002

0.003

0.003

0.002

0.002

ODP

kg CFC-11 eq

0.385

0.475

0.604

0.518

0.397

0.418

E

MJ

4.330

5.390

6.910

5.900

4.470

4.720

New: Table 1 Inventory for fish landed in Portugal by purse seiners. Values per FU (standard deviation) of fish landed for the overall fleet and for different vessel size categories in the 2006–2011 period. Data is referred to the selected FU in the study (1 kg of landed fish).

Inputs

Unit

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

Diesel

l

0.03 (0,09)

0.00 (0,11)

0.02 (0,14)

0.03 (0,12)

0.03 (0,09)

0.02 (0,10)

Ice

kg

0.02 (0,11)

0.02 (0,08)

0.04 (0,12)

0.05 (0,12)

0.05 (0,15)

0.05 (0,18)

Marine lubricant oil

l

0.00 (0,00)

0.00 (0,00)

0.01 (0,01)

0.02 (0,01)

0.01 (0,01)

0.01 (0,00)

Outputs

Sardine

kg

0.70 (0,91)

0.89 (0,89)

0.90 (0,91)

0.88 (0,94)

0.95 (0,89)

0.93 (0,85)

Other species

kg

0.30 (0,09)

0.11 (0,11)

0.10 (0,09)

0.12 (0,06)

0.05 (0,11)

0.07 (0,15)

CO2

kg

0.292

0.363

0.466

0.398

0.301

0.318

SO2

g

0.430

0.523

0.662

0.569

0.438

0.461

NOx

kg

0.003

0.004

0.005

0.004

0.003

0.003

Impact assessment

GWP

kg CO2 eq

0.292

0.363

0.466

0.397

0.301

0.318

EP

kg PO4 eq

0.000

0.001

0.001

0.001

0.000

0.000

AP

kg SO2 eq

0.002

0.002

0.003

0.003

0.002

0.002

ODP

kg CFC-11 eq

3.86E-08

4.75E-08

6.04E-08

5.18E-08

3.97E-08

4.18E-08

E

MJ

4.330

5.390

6.910

5.900

4.470

4.720

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cheila Almeida
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Sofia Vaz
    • 2
  • Henrique Cabral
    • 1
  • Friederike Ziegler
    • 3
  1. 1.Centro de Oceanografia, Faculdade de CiênciasUniversidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.Centre for Environmental and Sustainability Research, Faculdade de Ciências de TecnologiaUniversidade Nova de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.The Swedish Institute for Food and BiotechnologyGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations