Material flow analysis and energy requirements of mobile phone material recovery processes

  • Juan Manuel Valero Navazo
  • Gara Villalba Méndez
  • Laura Talens Peiró



Proper recycling of mobile phones and other electronic products is important in order to reduce the generation of large amounts of hazardous waste, lessen environmental and social problems associated to the extraction of minerals and primary production of materials, and also minimize the depletion of scarce materials that are often difficult to substitute. Current material recovery processes are used to recycle electronic waste of various compositions.


Based on a review of the recycling processes and material flow analysis (MFA), we attribute the material and energy required to recover metals from 1 tonne of discarded mobile phones.

Results and discussion

We estimate that the recovery rates of gold, palladium, silver, copper, nickel, lead, antimony, and tin from the recycling processes described are 80 to 99 % (16.4 % of the phone in weight). The two main industrial processes used at present time (pyrometallurgical and combined pyro-hydrometallurgical) have similar energy consumptions (7,763 and 7,568 MJ/tonne of mobile phones, respectively). An average tonne of used mobile phones represents a potential of 128 kg of copper, 0.347 kg of gold, 0.15 kg of palladium, 3.63 kg of silver, 15 kg of nickel, 6 kg of lead, 1 kg of antimony, and 10 kg of tin as well as other metals that are not yet profitable to recover but might be in the future.


We find that the energy consumed to recover copper from mobile phones is half of that needed for copper primary extraction and similar or greater energy savings for precious metal refining. Nevertheless, only 2.5 % of mobile phones arrive to industrial recovery facilities. There is a great potential to increase the amount of metals being recovered, thereby reducing energy consumption and increasing resource efficiency.


Electronic waste Material flow analysis Mobile phone recycling 


  1. Alvarado S, Maldonado P, Barrios A, Jeques I (2002) Long term energy-related environmental issues of copper production. Energy 27:183–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrae A, Andersen O (2010) Life cycle assessments of consumer electronics—are they consistent? Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(8):827–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayres RU, Ayres LW, Råde I (2003) The life cycle of copper, its coproducts and byproducts. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Battelle (1973) Energy use patterns in metallurgical and nonmetallic mineral processing (phase 6-energy data and flowsheets, low priority commodities). Gold. Prepared for the U.S. Bureau of Mines. Battelle Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, pp 83–88Google Scholar
  5. Battelle, (1973) Energy use patterns in metallurgical and nonmetallic mineral processing (phase 6-energy data and flowsheets, low priority commodities). Silver. Prepared for the U.S. Bureau of Mines. Battelle Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, pp 174–180Google Scholar
  6. Bigum M, Brogaard L, Christensen TH (2011) Metal recovery from high-grade WEEE: a life cycle assessment. J Hazard Mater 207–208:8–14Google Scholar
  7. British Geological Survey (2011) Current supply risk index for chemical elements or element groups which are of economic value. British Geological Survey, NottinghamshireGoogle Scholar
  8. Brusselaers J, Hagelüken C, Mark F, Mayne N, Tange L (2005) An eco-efficient solution for plastics-metals-mixtures from electronic waste: the integrated metals smelter. In: Plastics Europe, Association of Plastics Manufacturers 5th IDENTIPLAST 2005, the Biennial Conference on the Recycling and Recovery of Plastics Identifying the Opportunities for Plastics Recovery, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  9. Buchert M, Schueler D, Bleher D (2009) Critical metals for future sustainable technologies and their recycling potential, sustainable innovation and technology transfer industrial sector studies. UNEP, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  10. Classen M, Althaus H, Blaser S, Scharnhorst W, Thuchschmid N, Emmenegger M (2009) Life cycle inventory of metals v 2.1. Ecoinvent Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories, DüberdorfGoogle Scholar
  11. Cobbing M (2008) Toxic tech: not in our backyard. Greenpeace Accessed 10 Nov 2012
  12. Cui J, Zhang L (2008) Metallurgical recovery of metals from electronic waste: a review. J Hazard Mater 158(2–3):228–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davenport W, King M, Schlesinger M, Biswas A (2002) Extractive metallurgy of copper, 4th edn. Elsevier, KidlingtonGoogle Scholar
  14. Dominguez A, Valero A (2012) Global gold mining: is technological learning overcoming the declining in ore grades? In: ECOS 2012 25th International conference on efficiency, cost, optimization and environmental impact of energy systems, Perugia, Italy. Accessed 10 Nov 2012
  15. EPA (2004) The life cycle of a cell phone. Accessed 2 Apr 2012
  16. European Commission (2010a) Annex V to the report of the ad-hoc working group on defining critical raw materials. European Commission, Brussels, p 220. Accessed 10 Oct 2012
  17. European Commission (2010b) Critical raw materials for the European Union. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  18. Hagelüken C (2006) Improving metal returns and eco-efficiency in electronics recycling metals smelting and refining. In: IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment, San Francisco, California, pp 218–223Google Scholar
  19. Hagelüken C (2007) Metals Recovery from e-scrap in a global environment. Technical capabilities, challenges and experience gained. In: 6th session of OEWG Basel Convention, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  20. Hagelüken C, Buchert M (2008) The mine above ground—opportunities and challenges to recover scarce and valuable metals from EOL electronic devices. In: International electronics recycling congress, Salzburg, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  21. Hischier R (2007) Disposal of electric and electronic equipment (e-Waste). Ecoinvent report #18, part V. Ecoinvent, DüberdorfGoogle Scholar
  22. Huisman J (2004) QWERTY and eco-efficiency analysis on cellular phone treatment in Sweden. TU Delft, Delft, pp 1–33Google Scholar
  23. ITC (2011) ICT facts and figures. The world in 2011. Accessed 24 Sep 2012
  24. Keller M (2006) Assessment of gold recovery processes in Bangalore, India. An evaluation of an alternative recycling path for printed wiring boards. A case study. Institute for Spatial and Landscape Planning, Regional Resource Management at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, p 115Google Scholar
  25. Kippenberger C (2001) Materials flow and energy required for the production of selected mineral commodities. Summary and Conclusions. In: Jahrbuch, G. (ed) Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe und den Staatlichen Geologishen Diensten in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, pp 1–55Google Scholar
  26. Kuper J, Hojsik M (2008) Poisoning the poor. Electronic waste in Ghana. Greenpeace. 2008. Accessed 5 Oct 2012
  27. Legarth J, Alting L, Baldo G (1995) Sustainability issues in circuit board recycling. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment, Orlando, Florida, pp 126–131Google Scholar
  28. Meskers C, Hagelüken C (2009) The impact of different pre-processing routes on the metal recovery from PCs. In: European metallurgical conference. 2009, R'09 Twin world congress and world resources forum “resource management and technology for material and energy efficiency”. EMPA Material Science and Technology, Davos, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  29. Meskers C, Hagelüken C, Van Damme G (2009) Green recycling of electrical and electronic equipment: special and precious metal recovery. In: Howard SM, Zhang L (ed) Extraction and processing division congress. The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  30. Mudd G (2010) Platinum group metals: a unique case study in the sustainability of mineral resources. In: 4th International platinum conference, platinum in transition ‘boom or bust’, Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (SAIMM), Sun City, South Africa, pp 113–120, Accessed 20 Sep 2012
  31. Norgate TE (2004) Metal recycling: an assessment using life cycle energy consumption as a sustainability indicator. CSIRO, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  32. OECD (2010) Material case study 1: critical metals and mobile devices—working document. In: Sustainable metals management. OECD, Mechelen. Accessed 3 Mar 2012
  33. Oguchi M (2011) A preliminary categorization of end-of-life electrical and electronic equipment as secondary metal resources. Waste Manage 31(9–10):2150–2160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Puckett J, Byster L, Westervelt S, Gutierrez R, Davis S, Smith T (2002) Exporting harm. The high-tech trashing of Asia. The Basel Action Network and Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition. Accessed 22 Jun 2012
  35. Puckett J, Westervelt S, Gutierrez R, Takamiya Y (2005) The digital dump. Exporting re-use and abuse to Africa. The Basel Action Network. A project of earth economics Accessed 2 Nov 2012
  36. Renner H, Schlamp G, Hollmann D (2005) Gold, gold alloys, and gold compounds vol. 7. In: Elvers B et al (eds) Ullmann's encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  37. Renner H (2008) Silver, silver compounds, and silver alloys. In: Elvers B et al (eds) Ullmann's encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley, Weinheim, Published Online January 15, 2008Google Scholar
  38. Reuter MA, Heiskanen K, Boin U, van Schaik A, Verhoef EW, Yang Y, Georgialli G (2005) The metrics of material and metal ecology: harmonizing the resource, technology and environmental cycles. Appendix B: description of metal production flowcharts. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  39. Rochat D, Hagelüken C, Keller M, Widmer R (2007) Optimal recycling for printed wiring boards (PWBs) in India. In: R'07 Recovery of materials and energy for resource efficiency, Davos, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  40. Saurat M (2006) Material flow analysis and environmental impact assessment related to current and future use of PGM in Europe. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, p 229, Department of Energy and Environment, Division of Physical Resource TheoryGoogle Scholar
  41. Singhal P (ed) (2006) Integrated product policy pilot on mobile phones stage III final report: evaluation of options to improve the life cycle environmental performance of mobile phones. Nokia, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  42. Takahashi KI, Tsuda M, Nakamura J, Otabe K, Tsuruoka M, Matsuno Y, Adachi Y (2009a) Elementary analysis of mobile phones for optimizing end-of-life scenarios. In: IEEE international symposium on sustainable systems and technology, pp 747–751Google Scholar
  43. Takahashi KI, Tsuda M, Nakamura J, Otabe K, Tsuruoka M, Matsuno Y, Adachi Y (2009b) Resource recovery from mobile phone and the economic and environmental impact. J Jpn I Met 73:747–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Talens Peiro L, Villalba G, Ayres RU (2012) Rare and critical metals as by-products and the implications for future supply. Environ Sci Technol 47(6):2939–2947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. U.S. Congress (1988) Copper: technology and competitiveness. Library of Congress catalog card number 87–6198893, Washington DC: US Government Printing Office. Accessed 14 Nov 2012
  46. UNEP (2006) Basel conference addresses electronic wastes challenge. Press release. Accessed 5 Oct 2012
  47. USBS (1987) An appraisal of minerals availability for 34 commodities. US Bureau of Mines, Washington, DC. UNT Digital Library
  48. Villalba G, Talens L, Ayres R, Van den Bergh J, Gabarrell X, Herwich E, Wood R (2012) Technology forecast of IT and electric uses of scarce metals and economy-wide assessment of selected scarce metals. Annex 2 IT Workshop. In: PROSUITE-Prospective Sustainability Assessment of Technologies, a.E.-f.p.
  49. Wu B (2008) Assessment of toxicity potential of metallic elements in discarded electronics: a case study of mobile phones in China. J Environ Sci 20:1403–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan Manuel Valero Navazo
    • 1
  • Gara Villalba Méndez
    • 1
    • 2
  • Laura Talens Peiró
    • 3
  1. 1.Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals (ICTA)Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBellaterraSpain
  2. 2.Department of Chemical Engineering, School of EngineeringUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBellaterraSpain
  3. 3.INSEAD Europe CampusFontainebleauFrance

Personalised recommendations